Trial Outcomes & Findings for Treatment of Hyperphagia Behavioral Symptoms in Children and Adults Diagnosed With Prader-Willi Syndrome (NCT NCT01968187)
NCT ID: NCT01968187
Last Updated: 2025-03-27
Results Overview
The HPWSQ-R is an 11-item questionnaire examining the psychological, developmental, and neurobiological correlates of hyperphagia in PWS. The items are classified into 3 domains; behavior, drive, and severity with each item rated on a five-point scale (1: not at all/none of the time/extremely easy to 5: extremely/all of the time/extremely hard). The questionnaire was completed by the parent/caregiver using a 1-week recall period. Total score was the sum of all the items in the three domains and ranged from 11 (no hyperphagia behaviors) to 55 (most severe hyperphagia behaviors). Change from baseline in HPWSQ-R Total Score at Day 15 is presented for this outcome measure.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
38 participants
From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 15
2025-03-27
Participant Flow
The trial was performed in the United States, and a total of 3 sites randomized subjects to the trial between Jan 2014 to Jul 2014.
In total, 38 subjects were screened and randomized. One subject in the Carbetocin (FE 992097) arm was randomized in error and did not receive the investigational medicinal product (IMP), and was listed as a screening failure. Of the randomized subjects, 37 subjects were exposed to IMP: 17 to Carbetocin (FE 992097) and 20 to placebo.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
18
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Treated
|
17
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
17
|
19
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Randomized but not treated
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Treatment of Hyperphagia Behavioral Symptoms in Children and Adults Diagnosed With Prader-Willi Syndrome
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=17 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Total
n=37 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
13.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.45 • n=39 Participants
|
13.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.52 • n=41 Participants
|
13.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.46 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
6 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
17 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
17 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
36 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI)
|
25.72 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.947 • n=39 Participants
|
25.66 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.537 • n=41 Participants
|
25.69 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.760 • n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 15Population: The analysis population included the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all subjects in the safety population who had the primary efficacy endpoint measured (at baseline and phone call \[Day 8\] ±1 or Day 15). Analyses for the FAS were conducted according to the randomized treatment.
The HPWSQ-R is an 11-item questionnaire examining the psychological, developmental, and neurobiological correlates of hyperphagia in PWS. The items are classified into 3 domains; behavior, drive, and severity with each item rated on a five-point scale (1: not at all/none of the time/extremely easy to 5: extremely/all of the time/extremely hard). The questionnaire was completed by the parent/caregiver using a 1-week recall period. Total score was the sum of all the items in the three domains and ranged from 11 (no hyperphagia behaviors) to 55 (most severe hyperphagia behaviors). Change from baseline in HPWSQ-R Total Score at Day 15 is presented for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=17 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Hyperphagia in Prader-Willi Syndrome (PWS) Questionnaires- Responsiveness (HPWSQ-R) Total Score at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
|
-15.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.06
|
-8.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.61
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Day 15Population: The analysis population included the full analysis set (FAS) which consisted of all subjects in the safety population who had the primary efficacy endpoint measured (at baseline and phone call \[Day 8\] ±1 or Day 15). Analyses for the FAS were conducted according to the randomized treatment. Number of subjects analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
The Clinical Global Impression (CGI) scale consists of a 7-point clinician rating of illness severity (1 = normal, not at all ill, 7 = among the most extremely ill patients), at the beginning of the trial (baseline) - Clinical Global Impression-Severity Rating (CGI-S) and a 7-point clinician rating of improvement of patient condition (1=very much improved since baseline/initiation of treatment, 7=very much worse from baseline), during and at the end of the trial (Day 15) - CGI-I. The CGI-I score at Day 15 is presented for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=16 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Global Impression- Improvement After Treatment (CGI-I) Score at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
|
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.49
|
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.43
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 15Population: The analysis population included the FAS which consisted of all subjects in the safety population who had the primary efficacy endpoint measured (at baseline and phone call \[Day 8\] ±1 or Day 15). Analyses for the FAS were conducted according to the randomized treatment.
The HPWSQ-R is an 11-item questionnaire examining the psychological, developmental, and neurobiological correlates of hyperphagia in PWS. The items were classified into 3 domains; behavior, drive, and severity with each item rated on a five-point score range from 1 (not at all/none of the time/extremely easy) to 5 (extremely/all of the time/extremely hard). The questionnaire was completed by the parent/caregiver using a 1-week recall period. Changes in the HPWSQ-R Total Score and in the Domain Scores (behavior, drive, and severity) at Day 15 is presented for this outcome measure. HPWSQ-R Behavior, Drive and Severity scores range from 5-25, 4-20, and 2-10, respectively, with higher scores indicating a worse outcome. Change from baseline is presented = (Day 15 score minus Baseline score).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=17 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=20 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in HPWSQ-R Domain Scores (Behavior, Drive and Severity) at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
Behavior
|
-5.9 score on a scale
Interval -16.0 to 3.0
|
-3.9 score on a scale
Interval -14.0 to 3.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in HPWSQ-R Domain Scores (Behavior, Drive and Severity) at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
Drive
|
-4.5 score on a scale
Interval -13.0 to 3.0
|
-2.9 score on a scale
Interval -16.0 to 3.0
|
|
Change From Baseline in HPWSQ-R Domain Scores (Behavior, Drive and Severity) at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
Severity
|
-3.3 score on a scale
Interval -7.0 to 2.0
|
-1.8 score on a scale
Interval -7.0 to 3.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 15Population: The analysis population included the FAS which consisted of all subjects in the safety population who had the primary efficacy endpoint measured (at baseline and phone call \[Day 8\] ±1 or Day 15). Analyses for the FAS were conducted according to the randomized treatment. Number of subjects analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint
The CY-BOCS is a clinician rated, semi-structured inventory of specific symptoms and symptom severity in pediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Total scores on the CY-BOCS are calculated using a symptom checklist and severity scale. The 10 severity items are summed to produce an Obsessions Severity Score (5 items), Compulsions Severity Score (5 items), and Total score (sum of all 10 severity items). The total score is calculated by summing the 10 individual scores and ranges from 0 (no obsessions or compulsions) to 40 (most severe OC).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=16 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Children's Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale Score (CY-BOCS) at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
|
-8.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.29
|
-2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.82
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Day 1 (baseline) to Day 15Population: The analysis population included the FAS which consisted of all subjects in the safety population who had the primary efficacy endpoint measured (at baseline and phone call \[Day 8\] ±1 or Day 15). Analyses for the FAS were conducted according to the randomized treatment. Number of subjects analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for this endpoint.
The Food Domain Score of the Reiss Profile consisted of 7 questions that pertain to food seeking behavior. The questions were rated on a five point scale ranging from -2 (strongly disagree; this phrase is not at all characteristic of the person) to 2 (strongly agree; this phrase is definitely characteristic of the person). Total score was defined as the sum of all individual item scores. The total score ranged from -14 to 14 with higher scores indicating higher severity. Change from baseline in Food Domain of the Reiss Profile at Day 15 is presented for this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=16 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=19 Participants
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in the Food Domain Score of the Reiss Profile at End-of-treatment (Day 15)
|
-6.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.94
|
-2.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.55
|
Adverse Events
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Carbetocin (FE 992097)
n=17 participants at risk
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of solution containing 1.6 mg carbetocin (FE 992097); each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril delivering a total of 9.6 mg carbetocin.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
Placebo
n=20 participants at risk
Each spray pump actuation delivered a 50 μL volume of sterile sodium chloride solution 0.9%; each dose consisted of 3 spray pump actuations in each nostril.
Parents were instructed to administer 3 intranasal spray actuations in each nostril 3 times daily before meals for 14 days.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis infective
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Medication error
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
10.0%
2/20 • Number of events 2 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Investigations
Urine analysis abnormal
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperphagia
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
29.4%
5/17 • Number of events 8 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
30.0%
6/20 • Number of events 18 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 9 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Aggression
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/17 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 2 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Flushing
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep Disorder
|
5.9%
1/17 • Number of events 1 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
0.00%
0/20 • The adverse events (AEs) were recorded from signing of the informed consent until the Day 19 follow-up phone call.
Adverse events that began during the Treatment Period (period during which a subject received IMP) or worsening of a pre-existing medical condition (treatment-emergent AEs) are presented for the SAS.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review the draft manuscript prior to publication and can request delay of publication where any contents are deemed patentable by the sponsor or confidential to the sponsor. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the draft manuscript. Additional time may be required to allow Ferring to seek patent protection of the invention.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER