Trial Outcomes & Findings for Alogliptin Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea (NCT NCT01964950)

NCT ID: NCT01964950

Last Updated: 2017-04-13

Results Overview

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Target enrollment

1101 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline up to 12 months

Results posted on

2017-04-13

Participant Flow

Participants took part in the study at 221 investigative sites in Japan from 1-Jul-11 to 31-Dec-14.

Participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus started treatment with alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed. As per protocol, participants we enrolled in 1 observational group at the start and were divided into 2 groups based on Sulfonylurea (SU) use for analysis of safety endpoints. Participant data was collected for overall arm.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
All Population (Alogliptin)
All participants who received alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months along with an SU or without an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Overall Study
STARTED
1101
Overall Study
COMPLETED
1076
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
25

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
All Population (Alogliptin)
All participants who received alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months along with an SU or without an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
25

Baseline Characteristics

Alogliptin Tablets Special Drug Use Surveillance Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Combination Therapy With Sulfonylurea

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=916 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
n=160 Participants
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Total
n=1076 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
Less Than (<) 65 Years
380 participants
11.67 • n=99 Participants
69 participants
12.19 • n=107 Participants
449 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 65 Years
536 participants
n=99 Participants
91 participants
n=107 Participants
627 participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
378 Participants
n=99 Participants
52 Participants
n=107 Participants
430 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
538 Participants
n=99 Participants
108 Participants
n=107 Participants
646 Participants
n=206 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Japan
916 participants
n=99 Participants
160 participants
n=107 Participants
1076 participants
n=206 Participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Less than (<)2 years
102 participants
n=99 Participants
21 participants
n=107 Participants
123 participants
n=206 Participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Greater than or equal to (>=)2 to <5 years
138 participants
n=99 Participants
22 participants
n=107 Participants
160 participants
n=206 Participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
>=5 to <10 years
216 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
241 participants
n=206 Participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
>=10 years
232 participants
n=99 Participants
55 participants
n=107 Participants
287 participants
n=206 Participants
Time From Diagnosis of Type 2 Diabetes
Unknown
228 participants
n=99 Participants
37 participants
n=107 Participants
265 participants
n=206 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
<25 kilogram per square meter (kg/m^2)
326 participants
n=99 Participants
63 participants
n=107 Participants
389 participants
n=206 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
>=25 kg/m^2
318 participants
n=99 Participants
60 participants
n=107 Participants
378 participants
n=206 Participants
Body Mass Index (BMI)
Unknown
272 participants
n=99 Participants
37 participants
n=107 Participants
309 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
<85 centimeter (cm) (Male)
52 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
59 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
>=85 cm (Male)
102 participants
n=99 Participants
22 participants
n=107 Participants
124 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
Unknown (Male)
384 participants
n=99 Participants
79 participants
n=107 Participants
463 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
<90 cm (Female)
52 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
59 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
>=90 cm (Female)
39 participants
n=99 Participants
4 participants
n=107 Participants
43 participants
n=206 Participants
Waist circumference
Unknown (Female)
287 participants
n=99 Participants
41 participants
n=107 Participants
328 participants
n=206 Participants
Pregnancy Status
Not pregnant
378 participants
n=99 Participants
52 participants
n=107 Participants
430 participants
n=206 Participants
Pregnancy Status
Pregnant
0 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
0 participants
n=206 Participants
Healthcare Category
Outpatient
891 participants
n=99 Participants
156 participants
n=107 Participants
1047 participants
n=206 Participants
Healthcare Category
Inpatient
3 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
4 participants
n=206 Participants
Healthcare Category
Outpatient and Inpatient
22 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
25 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Normal
151 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
176 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Mild
351 participants
n=99 Participants
61 participants
n=107 Participants
412 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Moderate
146 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
171 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Severe
12 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
12 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Renal Dysfunction
Unknown
256 participants
n=99 Participants
49 participants
n=107 Participants
305 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Allergy
Did not have allergy
742 participants
n=99 Participants
131 participants
n=107 Participants
873 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Allergy
Had allergy
78 participants
n=99 Participants
8 participants
n=107 Participants
86 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Allergy
Unknown
96 participants
n=99 Participants
21 participants
n=107 Participants
117 participants
n=206 Participants
Health-related Complications
Had complications
837 participants
n=99 Participants
145 participants
n=107 Participants
982 participants
n=206 Participants
Health-related Complications
Had no complications
79 participants
n=99 Participants
15 participants
n=107 Participants
94 participants
n=206 Participants
Diabetic Complications
Had complications
187 participants
n=99 Participants
43 participants
n=107 Participants
230 participants
n=206 Participants
Diabetic Complications
Had no complications
729 participants
n=99 Participants
117 participants
n=107 Participants
846 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic nephropathy
114 participants
n=99 Participants
23 participants
n=107 Participants
137 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic retinopathy
76 participants
n=99 Participants
21 participants
n=107 Participants
97 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Diabetic Complications
Diabetic neuropathy
61 participants
n=99 Participants
20 participants
n=107 Participants
81 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Hypertension
Had complications
593 participants
n=99 Participants
97 participants
n=107 Participants
690 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Hypertension
Had no complications
323 participants
n=99 Participants
63 participants
n=107 Participants
386 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Dyslipidemia
Had complications
582 participants
n=99 Participants
99 participants
n=107 Participants
681 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Dyslipidemia
Had no complications
334 participants
n=99 Participants
61 participants
n=107 Participants
395 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Hyperuricemia
Had complications
74 participants
n=99 Participants
8 participants
n=107 Participants
82 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Hyperuricemia
Had no complications
842 participants
n=99 Participants
152 participants
n=107 Participants
994 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Liver Damage
Had complications
181 participants
n=99 Participants
35 participants
n=107 Participants
216 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Liver Damage
Had no complications
735 participants
n=99 Participants
125 participants
n=107 Participants
860 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatic steatosis
122 participants
n=99 Participants
24 participants
n=107 Participants
146 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatitis alcoholic
30 participants
n=99 Participants
9 participants
n=107 Participants
39 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Chronic hepatitis
31 participants
n=99 Participants
5 participants
n=107 Participants
36 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Hepatic cirrhosis
2 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
3 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Liver Damage
Other
4 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
4 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Normal
599 participants
n=99 Participants
111 participants
n=107 Participants
710 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 1
75 participants
n=99 Participants
11 participants
n=107 Participants
86 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Grade 2
10 participants
n=99 Participants
2 participants
n=107 Participants
12 participants
n=206 Participants
Degree of Hepatic Dysfunction
Unknown
232 participants
n=99 Participants
36 participants
n=107 Participants
268 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Renal Damage
Had complications
126 participants
n=99 Participants
27 participants
n=107 Participants
153 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Renal Damage
Had no complications
790 participants
n=99 Participants
133 participants
n=107 Participants
923 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Nephrotic syndrome
3 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
4 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Glomerulonephritis
2 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
3 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Renal failure chronic
9 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
9 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Renal Damage
Other
113 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
138 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Heart Disease
Had complications
129 participants
n=99 Participants
18 participants
n=107 Participants
147 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Heart Disease
Had no complications
787 participants
n=99 Participants
142 participants
n=107 Participants
929 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Cardiac failure
25 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
28 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Myocardial infarction
26 participants
n=99 Participants
4 participants
n=107 Participants
30 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Angina pectoris
70 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
77 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Heart Disease
Other
26 participants
n=99 Participants
4 participants
n=107 Participants
30 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Heart Failure
Had complications
25 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
28 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Heart Failure
Had no complications
891 participants
n=99 Participants
157 participants
n=107 Participants
1048 participants
n=206 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class I
16 participants
n=99 Participants
2 participants
n=107 Participants
18 participants
n=206 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class II
5 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
5 participants
n=206 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class III
1 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
1 participants
n=206 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
NYHA Class IV
1 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
1 participants
n=206 Participants
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Heart Failure Classification
Unknown
2 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
3 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Had complications
65 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
72 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Had no complications
851 participants
n=99 Participants
153 participants
n=107 Participants
1004 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Cerebral infarction
64 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
71 participants
n=206 Participants
Breakdown of Complications of Stroke-related Disease
Cerebral haemorrhage
1 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
1 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Allergic Disease
Had complications
51 participants
n=99 Participants
7 participants
n=107 Participants
58 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Allergic Disease
Had no complications
865 participants
n=99 Participants
153 participants
n=107 Participants
1018 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Malignant Tumor
Had complications
19 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
22 participants
n=206 Participants
Complications of Malignant Tumor
Had no complications
897 participants
n=99 Participants
157 participants
n=107 Participants
1054 participants
n=206 Participants
Presence of Medical History
Had medical history
165 participants
n=99 Participants
31 participants
n=107 Participants
196 participants
n=206 Participants
Presence of Medical History
Did not have medical history
652 participants
n=99 Participants
113 participants
n=107 Participants
765 participants
n=206 Participants
Presence of Medical History
Unknown
99 participants
n=99 Participants
16 participants
n=107 Participants
115 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
Yes
228 participants
n=99 Participants
44 participants
n=107 Participants
272 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
No
527 participants
n=99 Participants
84 participants
n=107 Participants
611 participants
n=206 Participants
History of Alcohol Consumption
Unknown
161 participants
n=99 Participants
32 participants
n=107 Participants
193 participants
n=206 Participants
Smoking Classification
Never smoked
372 participants
n=99 Participants
51 participants
n=107 Participants
423 participants
n=206 Participants
Smoking Classification
Current smoker
145 participants
n=99 Participants
30 participants
n=107 Participants
175 participants
n=206 Participants
Smoking Classification
Ex-smoker
189 participants
n=99 Participants
39 participants
n=107 Participants
228 participants
n=206 Participants
Smoking Classification
Unknown
210 participants
n=99 Participants
40 participants
n=107 Participants
250 participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c <6.0 percent (%)
14 participants
n=99 Participants
4 participants
n=107 Participants
18 participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=6.0% to <7.0%
149 participants
n=99 Participants
25 participants
n=107 Participants
174 participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=7.0% to <8.0%
312 participants
n=99 Participants
61 participants
n=107 Participants
373 participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
HbA1c >=8.0%
374 participants
n=99 Participants
61 participants
n=107 Participants
435 participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Level
Unknown
67 participants
n=99 Participants
9 participants
n=107 Participants
76 participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Population: The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the study and had safety data available.

Adverse drug reactions are defined as adverse events (AEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. AEs are defined as any unfavorable and unintended signs, symptoms or diseases temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product reported from the first dose of study drug to the last dose of study drug. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=916 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
n=160 Participants
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Adverse Drug Reactions
19 participants
1 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 12 months

Population: The safety analysis set was defined as all participants who completed the study and had safety data available.

Serious adverse drug reactions are defined as serious adverse events (SAEs) which are in the investigator's opinion of causal relationship to the study treatment. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. The safety analysis was planned to be assessed in alogliptin + SU and alogliptin + other arm separately.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=916 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
n=160 Participants
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Number of Participants Reporting One or More Serious Adverse Drug Reaction
5 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

The change in the value of glycosylated hemoglobin (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=830 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Baseline (n=830)
8.03 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.348
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change at Month 1 (n = 655)
-0.40 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 0.708
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change at Month 3 (n = 710)
-0.66 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.117
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change at Month 6 (n = 725)
-0.72 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.117
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change at Month 12 (n = 670)
-0.64 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.106
Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)
Change at Final Assessment (n = 830)
-0.65 percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin
Standard Deviation 1.145

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had efficacy data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

The rate of achieving objective glycemic control in HbA1c level was calculated at baseline and final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12). Glycemic control was measured as \<8.0%, \<7.0%, and \<6.0% of glycosylated hemoglobin. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=830 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<8.0 percent: Baseline
56.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<8.0%: Final Assessment
75.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<7.0%: Baseline
19.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<7.0%: Final Assessment
43.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<6.0%: Baseline
1.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving Objective Glycemic Control
<6.0%: Final Assessment
4.6 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had fasting blood glucose data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

The change between the fasting blood glucose value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of the SU treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=250 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Baseline (n = 250)
151.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 43.07
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Change at Month 1 (n = 159)
-14.6 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 42.91
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Change at Month 3 (n = 175)
-13.8 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 40.08
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Change at Month 6 (n = 185)
-13.1 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 47.37
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Change at Month 12 (n = 168)
-16.4 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 43.97
Change From Baseline in Fasting Blood Glucose
Change at Final Assessment (n = 250)
-13.7 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL)
Standard Deviation 49.10

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Months 1, 3, 6, 12, and final assessment (up to Month 12)

Population: The efficacy assessment population was defined as participants who completed the study and had fasting insulin data at baseline and post-baseline time points available.

The change between the fasting insulin value collected at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months or final visit (last visit for a participant in the study, up to Month 12) relative to baseline. The efficacy analysis was planned to be assessed in the total alogliptin arm irrespective of SU treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=33 Participants
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Baseline (n = 33)
7.88 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 5.674
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Change at Month 1 (n = 15)
1.27 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 12.138
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Change at Month 3 (n = 17)
0.21 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 3.474
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Change at Month 6 (n = 20)
0.69 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 5.629
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Change at Month 12 (n = 22)
1.17 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 3.521
Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin Level
Change at Final Assessment (n = 33)
1.86 micro units per milliliter (mcU/mL)
Standard Deviation 5.455

Adverse Events

Alogliptin + SU

Serious events: 5 serious events
Other events: 19 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Alogliptin + Other

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=916 participants at risk
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
n=160 participants at risk
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Road traffic accident
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia pneumococcal
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Oesophageal carcinoma
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Alogliptin + SU
n=916 participants at risk
Alogliptin (Nesina) 25 milligram (mg), tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who received an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin and during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Alogliptin + Other
n=160 participants at risk
Alogliptin 25 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 12 months in participants who did not receive an SU within 3 months from the start of administration of alogliptin or during the treatment period of alogliptin as per routine clinical practice were observed in this study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.22%
2/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dry throat
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Aphthous stomatitis
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema multiforme
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
General disorders
Feeling abnormal
0.22%
2/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
General disorders
Malaise
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.62%
1/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
Investigations
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased
0.11%
1/916 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.
0.00%
0/160 • Baseline up to 12 months
At each visit the investigator had to document any occurrence of adverse events and abnormal laboratory findings. Any event spontaneously reported by the participant or observed by the investigator was recorded, irrespective of the relation to study treatment. Only adverse drug reactions were collected in the safety population.

Additional Information

Medical Director

Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited

Phone: +1-877-825-3327

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The first study related publication will be a multi-center publication submitted within 24 months after conclusion or termination of a study at all sites. After such multi site publication, all proposed site publications and presentations will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Site will remove Sponsor confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can delay a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER