Trial Outcomes & Findings for Personalized and Scalable Cognitive Remediation Approaches (NCT NCT01945333)
NCT ID: NCT01945333
Last Updated: 2026-07-17
Results Overview
Feasibility is measured by enrollment, acceptability of randomization defined as number initiated allocated treatment, retention of subjects defined as number completed allocated treatment
COMPLETED
NA
115 participants
Two years
2026-07-17
Participant Flow
Enrollment numbers are shown separately for phase 2 and phase 3 and summarized for the overall sample combined. Completion is shown for the combined sample. Participants from both phases are represented throughout the Participant Flow, Baseline Characteristics, Feasibility and Adverse Event modules. Other outcome measures include participants from phase 3 only.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matcher
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
32
|
23
|
29
|
31
|
|
Overall Study
Started Phase 2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Started Phase 3
|
28
|
21
|
25
|
29
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
22
|
17
|
20
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
10
|
6
|
9
|
11
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Personalized and Scalable Cognitive Remediation Approaches
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=32 Participants
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=23 Participants
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matcher
n=29 Participants
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=31 Participants
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
|
Total
n=115 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
43.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.04 • n=20 Participants
|
41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.06 • n=20 Participants
|
49.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 • n=40 Participants
|
37.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.48 • n=5 Participants
|
42.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
6 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
26 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
83 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
39 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
22 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
22 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
62 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
50 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
32 participants
n=20 Participants
|
23 participants
n=20 Participants
|
29 participants
n=40 Participants
|
31 participants
n=5 Participants
|
115 participants
n=9 Participants
|
|
Neurocognitive Composite T-Score
|
14.64 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.90 • n=20 Participants
|
26.29 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88 • n=20 Participants
|
17.08 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57 • n=40 Participants
|
23.93 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=5 Participants
|
20.22 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.74 • n=9 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Two yearsFeasibility is measured by enrollment, acceptability of randomization defined as number initiated allocated treatment, retention of subjects defined as number completed allocated treatment
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=32 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=29 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=23 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=31 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of Enrollment, Randomization and Retention
Initiated allocated treatment
|
32 number of participants
|
29 number of participants
|
23 number of participants
|
31 number of participants
|
|
Feasibility of Enrollment, Randomization and Retention
Completed allocated treatment
|
22 number of participants
|
20 number of participants
|
17 number of participants
|
20 number of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.
Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to Treatment End-point
|
6.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
|
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
|
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 monthsPopulation: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed at 3-month follow-up.
Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
|
7.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
|
4.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.
Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference between scores measured at baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to Treatment End-point
|
3.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
1.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
|
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
|
.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksPopulation: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.
The UPSA - Brief is a proxy measure of daily functioning skills. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. The scale score can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to Treatment End-point
|
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.3
|
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
|
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
|
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksThe SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed. Higher scores mean higher symptom severity. Change is calculated as the difference between the two scores. Greater change scores mean greater symptom improvement.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksIntrinsic Motivation Inventory for Schizophrenia Research (IMI-SR), a 21 item 7-point Likert type scale designed to assess a participant's subjective experience of an activity, specifically in an experimental setting (e.g. "I enjoyed doing this activity very much"). The IMI-SR will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 10 weeksThe PCS consists of 4 items on a 7-point Likert-type scale that assess feelings of competency when performing computer-based learning activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived competency. The PCS will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 monthsPopulation: The population analyzed includes participants who completed the 3-month follow-up phase of the randomized controlled trial.
Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference in scores assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Greater change scores mean greater improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to 3-month Follow up
|
3.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.85
|
3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.38
|
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.99
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 monthsPopulation: The population analyzed includes participants who completed the 3-month follow-up phase of the randomized controlled trial.
The UPSA-Brief is a proxy measure for daily functioning skills. The scale score ranges from 0-100. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up (5.5-6 months) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
|
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
|
17.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
|
9.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
|
15.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
|
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 monthsThe SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Brain Basics
Brain Training
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Alice Medalia
Columbia University Irving Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place