Trial Outcomes & Findings for Personalized and Scalable Cognitive Remediation Approaches (NCT NCT01945333)

NCT ID: NCT01945333

Last Updated: 2026-07-17

Results Overview

Feasibility is measured by enrollment, acceptability of randomization defined as number initiated allocated treatment, retention of subjects defined as number completed allocated treatment

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

115 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Two years

Results posted on

2026-07-17

Participant Flow

Enrollment numbers are shown separately for phase 2 and phase 3 and summarized for the overall sample combined. Completion is shown for the combined sample. Participants from both phases are represented throughout the Participant Flow, Baseline Characteristics, Feasibility and Adverse Event modules. Other outcome measures include participants from phase 3 only.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matcher
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Overall Study
STARTED
32
23
29
31
Overall Study
Started Phase 2
4
2
4
2
Overall Study
Started Phase 3
28
21
25
29
Overall Study
COMPLETED
22
17
20
20
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
10
6
9
11

Reasons for withdrawal

Withdrawal data not reported

Baseline Characteristics

Personalized and Scalable Cognitive Remediation Approaches

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=32 Participants
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=23 Participants
Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matcher
n=29 Participants
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=31 Participants
Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training Cognitive remediation: Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion.
Total
n=115 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
Age, Continuous
43.39 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.04 • n=20 Participants
41.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.06 • n=20 Participants
49.08 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.08 • n=40 Participants
37.52 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.48 • n=5 Participants
42.82 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
6 Participants
n=20 Participants
5 Participants
n=20 Participants
13 Participants
n=40 Participants
8 Participants
n=5 Participants
32 Participants
n=9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
26 Participants
n=20 Participants
18 Participants
n=20 Participants
16 Participants
n=40 Participants
23 Participants
n=5 Participants
83 Participants
n=9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
7 Participants
n=20 Participants
9 Participants
n=40 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
39 Participants
n=9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
22 Participants
n=20 Participants
16 Participants
n=20 Participants
20 Participants
n=40 Participants
18 Participants
n=5 Participants
76 Participants
n=9 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
1 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
22 Participants
n=20 Participants
9 Participants
n=20 Participants
18 Participants
n=40 Participants
13 Participants
n=5 Participants
62 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
10 Participants
n=20 Participants
13 Participants
n=20 Participants
10 Participants
n=40 Participants
17 Participants
n=5 Participants
50 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
1 Participants
n=20 Participants
1 Participants
n=40 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=9 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=20 Participants
0 Participants
n=40 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=9 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
32 participants
n=20 Participants
23 participants
n=20 Participants
29 participants
n=40 Participants
31 participants
n=5 Participants
115 participants
n=9 Participants
Neurocognitive Composite T-Score
14.64 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.90 • n=20 Participants
26.29 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.88 • n=20 Participants
17.08 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.57 • n=40 Participants
23.93 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61 • n=5 Participants
20.22 T score
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.74 • n=9 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Two years

Feasibility is measured by enrollment, acceptability of randomization defined as number initiated allocated treatment, retention of subjects defined as number completed allocated treatment

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=32 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=29 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=23 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=31 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Feasibility of Enrollment, Randomization and Retention
Initiated allocated treatment
32 number of participants
29 number of participants
23 number of participants
31 number of participants
Feasibility of Enrollment, Randomization and Retention
Completed allocated treatment
22 number of participants
20 number of participants
17 number of participants
20 number of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.

Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to Treatment End-point
6.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.8
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.5
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.9
3.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 months

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed at 3-month follow-up.

Change in neurocognition is calculated as the difference in the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite Score between baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months). The MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery Neurocognitive Composite T-Score is a scaled score calculated from the following component subscales: a) working memory; b) attention/vigilance; c) verbal learning; d) visual learning; e) processing speed; f) reasoning and problem solving. The mean T-score is 50 with a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores on the scale mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in Neurocognition From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
7.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.9
4.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.8
4.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.7

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.

Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference between scores measured at baseline and treatment end-point (10 weeks), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to Treatment End-point
3.82 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
1.67 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.3
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
.20 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

Population: The analysis population includes participants who completed the randomized controlled trial and were assessed post-treatment.

The UPSA - Brief is a proxy measure of daily functioning skills. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. The scale score can range from 0 to 100. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=19 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=14 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to Treatment End-point
12.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.3
9.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.4

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

The SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to treatment end-point (10 weeks) will be assessed. Higher scores mean higher symptom severity. Change is calculated as the difference between the two scores. Greater change scores mean greater symptom improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

Intrinsic Motivation Inventory for Schizophrenia Research (IMI-SR), a 21 item 7-point Likert type scale designed to assess a participant's subjective experience of an activity, specifically in an experimental setting (e.g. "I enjoyed doing this activity very much"). The IMI-SR will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 10 weeks

The PCS consists of 4 items on a 7-point Likert-type scale that assess feelings of competency when performing computer-based learning activities, with higher scores indicating greater perceived competency. The PCS will be administered at the first and last treatment sessions.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 months

Population: The population analyzed includes participants who completed the 3-month follow-up phase of the randomized controlled trial.

Change in Tone Matching (percent correct) will be calculated as the difference in scores assessed at baseline and 3-month follow-up (5.5 to 6 months), using pairs of 100-ms tones in series, with 500-ms inter-tone interval. The values on this scale range from 0% to 100% where higher scores mean better outcomes. Greater change scores mean greater improvement.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in Tone Matching Ability From Baseline to 3-month Follow up
3.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
1.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.85
3.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.38
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.99

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 months

Population: The population analyzed includes participants who completed the 3-month follow-up phase of the randomized controlled trial.

The UPSA-Brief is a proxy measure for daily functioning skills. The scale score ranges from 0-100. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up (5.5-6 months) will be assessed as the difference between the two scores. Higher scores mean better outcomes. Higher change scores mean better outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Brain Basics for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Impaired Tone Matchers
n=12 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Brain Basics for Intact Tone Matchers
n=15 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation includes sensory processing training
Brain Training for Intact Tone Matchers
n=17 Participants
Cognitive remediation sessions include working on computer based cognitive exercises and participating in a verbal discussion. Cognitive remediation does not include sensory processing training
Change in UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)-Brief From Baseline to 3-month Follow-up
17.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
9.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.7
15.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.5

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: 5.5 to 6 months

The SCI-PANSS is a semi-structured interview containing 30 items that assess symptoms of psychotic disorders including positive, negative and general psychopathology. Change from baseline to 3-month follow-up will be assessed.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Brain Basics

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Brain Training

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Additional Information

Dr. Alice Medalia

Columbia University Irving Medical Center

Phone: 646-774-8464

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place