Proximal Row Carpectomy Versus Four Corner Fusion

NCT01906996 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 114

Last updated 2014-02-27

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There are two types of interventions to treat a post-traumatic wrist osteoarthritis: the proximal row carpectomy and the four corner fusion. They are used to reduce pain and to maintain the mobility. In previous studies are shown that the proximal row carpectomy shows a better mobility of the wrist postoperatively, whereas the four corner fusion has lower progression of radiocarpale osteoarthritis.

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical, radiological and subjective outcomes after the treatment with a proximal row carpectomy or a four corner fusion.

Conditions

  • Wrist Osteoarthritis

Interventions

PROCEDURE

proximal row carpectomy

excision of the scaphoid, lunate and triquetrum

PROCEDURE

four corner fusion

excision of the scaphoid and stiffening of the lunate, capitate and triquetrum by a plate

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Schulthess Klinik

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Daniel B Herren, Dr. med. · Schulthess Klinik

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-07-31
Primary Completion
2014-01-31
Completion
2014-01-31

Countries

  • Switzerland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01906996 on ClinicalTrials.gov