Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Tolerability of Antiplaque Chewing Gum in a Gingivitis Population (NCT NCT01877421)
NCT ID: NCT01877421
Last Updated: 2020-02-13
Results Overview
Occurrence of local oral mucosal reactions, systemic reactions such as fever, nausea, headache, and changes in blood pressure, clinical laboratory measures of safety, and serious total body reactions will be assessed (AEs and SAEs)
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
135 participants
Up to 28 days
2020-02-13
Participant Flow
There were a total of 137 planned subjects (71 in Phase 1 and 66 in Phase 2) to participate in this study at the Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry. There were a total of 135 enrolled (71 in Phase 1 and 64 in Phase 2). Phase 1 and 2 are individual periods ran in parallel.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
2mg KSL-W
2mg KSL-W
|
2mg Placebo
2mg Placebo
|
4mg KSL-W
4mg KSL-W
|
4mg Placebo
4mg Placebo
|
6mg KSL-W
6mg KSL-W
|
6mg Placebo
6mg Placebo
|
10mg KSL-W
10mg KSL-W
|
10mg Placebo
10mg Placebo
|
20mg KSL-W
20mg KSL-W
|
20mg Placebo
20mg Placebo
|
30mg KSL-W
30mg KSL-W
|
30mg Placebo
30mg Placebo
|
50mg KSL-W
50mg KSL-W
|
50mg Placebo
50mg Placebo
|
75mg KSL-W
75mg KSL-W
|
75mg Placebo
75mg Placebo
|
100mg KSL-W
100mg KSL-W
|
100mg Placebo
100mg Placebo
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1
STARTED
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
|
Phase 1
COMPLETED
|
2
|
1
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
|
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
STARTED
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
2
|
6
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
7
|
3
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
4
|
2
|
7
|
3
|
6
|
2
|
5
|
3
|
5
|
3
|
6
|
3
|
7
|
2
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
2
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
2mg KSL-W
2mg KSL-W
|
2mg Placebo
2mg Placebo
|
4mg KSL-W
4mg KSL-W
|
4mg Placebo
4mg Placebo
|
6mg KSL-W
6mg KSL-W
|
6mg Placebo
6mg Placebo
|
10mg KSL-W
10mg KSL-W
|
10mg Placebo
10mg Placebo
|
20mg KSL-W
20mg KSL-W
|
20mg Placebo
20mg Placebo
|
30mg KSL-W
30mg KSL-W
|
30mg Placebo
30mg Placebo
|
50mg KSL-W
50mg KSL-W
|
50mg Placebo
50mg Placebo
|
75mg KSL-W
75mg KSL-W
|
75mg Placebo
75mg Placebo
|
100mg KSL-W
100mg KSL-W
|
100mg Placebo
100mg Placebo
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
|
Phase 2
Protocol Violation
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Tolerability of Antiplaque Chewing Gum in a Gingivitis Population
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
Total
n=135 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=99 Participants
|
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=107 Participants
|
31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=206 Participants
|
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=7 Participants
|
29.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=31 Participants
|
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=30 Participants
|
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=3 Participants
|
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=6 Participants
|
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=114 Participants
|
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
|
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=19 Participants
|
36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=4 Participants
|
27.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=7 Participants
|
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 • n=7 Participants
|
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=3 Participants
|
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=4 Participants
|
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=2 Participants
|
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6 • n=102 Participants
|
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=5 Participants
|
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=5 Participants
|
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=15 Participants
|
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=138 Participants
|
25.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=4 Participants
|
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=4 Participants
|
30.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=4 Participants
|
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=4 Participants
|
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=4 Participants
|
24.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=4 Participants
|
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=94 Participants
|
26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=3 Participants
|
26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=3 Participants
|
21.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=3 Participants
|
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 • n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
76 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
122 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
95 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
2 participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 participants
n=206 Participants
|
2 participants
n=7 Participants
|
4 participants
n=31 Participants
|
2 participants
n=30 Participants
|
4 participants
n=3 Participants
|
2 participants
n=6 Participants
|
7 participants
n=114 Participants
|
3 participants
|
7 participants
n=19 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=7 Participants
|
3 participants
n=7 Participants
|
7 participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=2 Participants
|
3 participants
n=102 Participants
|
4 participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 participants
n=5 Participants
|
7 participants
n=15 Participants
|
3 participants
n=138 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
2 participants
n=4 Participants
|
6 participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 participants
n=94 Participants
|
3 participants
n=3 Participants
|
7 participants
n=3 Participants
|
3 participants
n=3 Participants
|
135 participants
n=4 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to 28 daysOccurrence of local oral mucosal reactions, systemic reactions such as fever, nausea, headache, and changes in blood pressure, clinical laboratory measures of safety, and serious total body reactions will be assessed (AEs and SAEs)
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Safety and Tolerability of KSL-W as Measured by Soft Tissue Erythema, Ulceration and Sloughing (AEs and SAEs)
Subject Experiencing AEs = NO
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
7 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Safety and Tolerability of KSL-W as Measured by Soft Tissue Erythema, Ulceration and Sloughing (AEs and SAEs)
Subjects Experiencing AEs = YES
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: days 14, 28, 34Data summarizes plaque index scores changes from baseline. Supragingival plaque will be assessed after the MGI and BOP assessments and following use of a disclosing solution on the facial (buccal) and lingual surfaces of a minimum of 16 scorable teeth according to the criteria of the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index. Quigley-Hein Plaque Index Scores with Turesky Modifications: 0 No plaque 1. Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth 2. A thin continuous band of plaque (up to one mm) at the cervical margin of the tooth 3. A band of plaque wider than one mm but covering less than one-third of the crown of the tooth 4. Plaque covering at least one-third but less than two thirds of the crown of the tooth 5. Plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown of the tooth
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=5 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
|
0.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.49 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
|
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
|
0.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
0.014 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.058
|
-0.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
|
0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.174
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
|
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
|
0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
|
0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-1.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
|
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
|
0.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
|
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
|
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
|
0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
|
0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
-0.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
0.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
|
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
|
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
|
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
|
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
|
0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
|
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
|
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
|
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
0.49 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
|
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: days 14, 28, 34Data summarizes gingival index scores changes from baseline in phase 2a. Gingivitis will be assessed using both the MGI (Modified Gingival Index) and the Gingival Bleeding Index (BOP) The Modified Gingival Index assesses the buccal and lingual gingivae and interdental papillae. Modified Gingival Index Scores: 0 Absence of inflammation 1. Mild inflammation; slight change in color, little change in texture of any portion of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit 2. Mild inflammation; criteria as above but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit 3. Moderate inflammation; glazing, redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit 4. Severe inflammation; marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=5 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
|
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
|
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.047
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
|
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
|
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
|
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.047
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
|
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
|
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
|
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
|
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
|
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
|
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
|
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
|
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
|
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
|
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
|
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
|
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: days 0, 14, 28, 34Proof of concept of KSL-W in reducing plaque as measured by percent of bleeding sites upon probing (BOP) in phase 2a. Gingivitis will be assessed using both the MGI (Modified Gingival Index) and the Gingival Bleeding Index (BOP). The Modified Gingival Index assesses the buccal and lingual gingivae and interdental papillae. The Gingival Bleeding Index assesses the percentage of sites that bleed on gentle probing. A periodontal probe (HU-Friedy UNC 15) will be gently inserted into the gingival sulcus until resistance is felt at mid-facial (buccal), mid-lingual, mesial, and distal interproximal sites of all scorable teeth, with the exception of the most posterior distal sites. Presence or absence of bleeding will be recorded for each site and the percentage of bleeding sites per subject will serve as the unit of analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Eligibility
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 0
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 31
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
46 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Eligibility
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
8 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 0
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
231 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Eligibility
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 30
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 0
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
43 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
52 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
9 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Eligibility
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 0
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
40 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Eligibility
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
44 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 0
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 33
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
54 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 30
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Eligibility
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 36
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 0
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 39
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 37
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
|
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
5 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
6 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
46 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
8 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Eligibility
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 0
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
|
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
41 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
|
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
|
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 31
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
|
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
|
42 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
|
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
|
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
|
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
|
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
258 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
|
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
|
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
|
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
|
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
|
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
|
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
|
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
|
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
|
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
|
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
|
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
|
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
|
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
|
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
|
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
|
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
|
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
|
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
|
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
|
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
|
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
|
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
|
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
|
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
|
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
|
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
|
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
|
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Burning sensation in throat
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Glucose urine present
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Coating in mouth
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Device connection issue
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ageusia
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Erythema, hard palate, right side, molar area
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdomin discomfort, upper stomach
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival ulceration
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Mouth injury
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral mucosal erythema
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Puffy and wrinkling sensation, bilateral buccal mucosa
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Stiffness of neck and shoulder
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Teeth staining
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat tightness
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue coated
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue pigmentation
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothh discoloration
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
|
Additional Information
Domenick T. Zero, DDS, MS
Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place