Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Tolerability of Antiplaque Chewing Gum in a Gingivitis Population (NCT NCT01877421)

NCT ID: NCT01877421

Last Updated: 2020-02-13

Results Overview

Occurrence of local oral mucosal reactions, systemic reactions such as fever, nausea, headache, and changes in blood pressure, clinical laboratory measures of safety, and serious total body reactions will be assessed (AEs and SAEs)

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE1/PHASE2

Target enrollment

135 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Up to 28 days

Results posted on

2020-02-13

Participant Flow

There were a total of 137 planned subjects (71 in Phase 1 and 66 in Phase 2) to participate in this study at the Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry. There were a total of 135 enrolled (71 in Phase 1 and 64 in Phase 2). Phase 1 and 2 are individual periods ran in parallel.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
2mg KSL-W
2mg KSL-W
2mg Placebo
2mg Placebo
4mg KSL-W
4mg KSL-W
4mg Placebo
4mg Placebo
6mg KSL-W
6mg KSL-W
6mg Placebo
6mg Placebo
10mg KSL-W
10mg KSL-W
10mg Placebo
10mg Placebo
20mg KSL-W
20mg KSL-W
20mg Placebo
20mg Placebo
30mg KSL-W
30mg KSL-W
30mg Placebo
30mg Placebo
50mg KSL-W
50mg KSL-W
50mg Placebo
50mg Placebo
75mg KSL-W
75mg KSL-W
75mg Placebo
75mg Placebo
100mg KSL-W
100mg KSL-W
100mg Placebo
100mg Placebo
Phase 1
STARTED
2
1
4
2
4
2
4
2
7
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
Phase 1
COMPLETED
2
1
4
2
4
2
4
2
7
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
Phase 1
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase 2
STARTED
0
0
4
2
7
3
7
2
6
3
7
3
7
3
7
3
0
0
Phase 2
COMPLETED
0
0
4
2
7
3
6
2
5
3
5
3
6
3
7
2
0
0
Phase 2
NOT COMPLETED
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
2mg KSL-W
2mg KSL-W
2mg Placebo
2mg Placebo
4mg KSL-W
4mg KSL-W
4mg Placebo
4mg Placebo
6mg KSL-W
6mg KSL-W
6mg Placebo
6mg Placebo
10mg KSL-W
10mg KSL-W
10mg Placebo
10mg Placebo
20mg KSL-W
20mg KSL-W
20mg Placebo
20mg Placebo
30mg KSL-W
30mg KSL-W
30mg Placebo
30mg Placebo
50mg KSL-W
50mg KSL-W
50mg Placebo
50mg Placebo
75mg KSL-W
75mg KSL-W
75mg Placebo
75mg Placebo
100mg KSL-W
100mg KSL-W
100mg Placebo
100mg Placebo
Phase 2
Lost to Follow-up
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Phase 2
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
Phase 2
Protocol Violation
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

Safety and Tolerability of Antiplaque Chewing Gum in a Gingivitis Population

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Total
n=135 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
45.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=99 Participants
49.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION NA • n=107 Participants
31.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.5 • n=206 Participants
41.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 2.1 • n=7 Participants
29.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1 • n=31 Participants
40.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.7 • n=30 Participants
44.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=3 Participants
44.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=6 Participants
38.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=114 Participants
49.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.5
36.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.9 • n=19 Participants
36.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.6 • n=4 Participants
27.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.5 • n=7 Participants
35.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.1 • n=7 Participants
29.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=3 Participants
44.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=4 Participants
26.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=2 Participants
33.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.6 • n=102 Participants
31.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=5 Participants
36.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.3 • n=5 Participants
38.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=15 Participants
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=138 Participants
25.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.8 • n=4 Participants
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15.6 • n=4 Participants
30.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=4 Participants
34.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.6 • n=4 Participants
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8 • n=4 Participants
24.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=4 Participants
37.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=94 Participants
26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.4 • n=3 Participants
26.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.0 • n=3 Participants
21.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6 • n=3 Participants
21.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0 • n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
4 Participants
n=114 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
n=19 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
6 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
5 Participants
n=3 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=2 Participants
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
5 Participants
n=15 Participants
1 Participants
n=138 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=94 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
76 Participants
n=4 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
3 Participants
n=114 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=15 Participants
2 Participants
n=138 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=94 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
59 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
4 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=2 Participants
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
13 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
4 Participants
n=206 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=31 Participants
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
4 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=6 Participants
3 Participants
n=114 Participants
3 Participants
6 Participants
n=19 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
7 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
7 Participants
n=15 Participants
3 Participants
n=138 Participants
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
7 Participants
n=94 Participants
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
6 Participants
n=3 Participants
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
122 Participants
n=4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
1 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
2 Participants
n=102 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
14 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
3 Participants
n=15 Participants
2 Participants
n=138 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
22 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
2 Participants
n=7 Participants
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
2 Participants
n=30 Participants
3 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=6 Participants
7 Participants
n=114 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
n=19 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
5 Participants
n=7 Participants
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
6 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=2 Participants
1 Participants
n=102 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
2 Participants
n=5 Participants
4 Participants
n=15 Participants
1 Participants
n=138 Participants
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
6 Participants
n=4 Participants
3 Participants
n=4 Participants
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
6 Participants
n=94 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
2 Participants
n=3 Participants
95 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
1 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
1 Participants
n=3 Participants
4 Participants
n=4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
0 Participants
n=30 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=6 Participants
0 Participants
n=114 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
n=19 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=2 Participants
0 Participants
n=102 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=15 Participants
0 Participants
n=138 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
0 Participants
n=94 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=3 Participants
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
2 participants
n=99 Participants
1 participants
n=107 Participants
4 participants
n=206 Participants
2 participants
n=7 Participants
4 participants
n=31 Participants
2 participants
n=30 Participants
4 participants
n=3 Participants
2 participants
n=6 Participants
7 participants
n=114 Participants
3 participants
7 participants
n=19 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
7 participants
n=7 Participants
3 participants
n=7 Participants
7 participants
n=3 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
7 participants
n=2 Participants
3 participants
n=102 Participants
4 participants
n=5 Participants
2 participants
n=5 Participants
7 participants
n=15 Participants
3 participants
n=138 Participants
7 participants
n=4 Participants
2 participants
n=4 Participants
6 participants
n=4 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
7 participants
n=4 Participants
3 participants
n=4 Participants
7 participants
n=94 Participants
3 participants
n=3 Participants
7 participants
n=3 Participants
3 participants
n=3 Participants
135 participants
n=4 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 28 days

Occurrence of local oral mucosal reactions, systemic reactions such as fever, nausea, headache, and changes in blood pressure, clinical laboratory measures of safety, and serious total body reactions will be assessed (AEs and SAEs)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Safety and Tolerability of KSL-W as Measured by Soft Tissue Erythema, Ulceration and Sloughing (AEs and SAEs)
Subject Experiencing AEs = NO
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
1 Participants
6 Participants
1 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
7 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
3 Participants
5 Participants
3 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
4 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
2 Participants
3 Participants
Safety and Tolerability of KSL-W as Measured by Soft Tissue Erythema, Ulceration and Sloughing (AEs and SAEs)
Subjects Experiencing AEs = YES
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
0 Participants
2 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
1 Participants
3 Participants
0 Participants
1 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
2 Participants
5 Participants
1 Participants
5 Participants
0 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: days 14, 28, 34

Data summarizes plaque index scores changes from baseline. Supragingival plaque will be assessed after the MGI and BOP assessments and following use of a disclosing solution on the facial (buccal) and lingual surfaces of a minimum of 16 scorable teeth according to the criteria of the Turesky modification of the Quigley-Hein Plaque Index. Quigley-Hein Plaque Index Scores with Turesky Modifications: 0 No plaque 1. Separate flecks of plaque at the cervical margin of the tooth 2. A thin continuous band of plaque (up to one mm) at the cervical margin of the tooth 3. A band of plaque wider than one mm but covering less than one-third of the crown of the tooth 4. Plaque covering at least one-third but less than two thirds of the crown of the tooth 5. Plaque covering two-thirds or more of the crown of the tooth

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=5 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
0.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.51
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.49 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.38 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.56 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.56
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.50
0.68 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
0.014 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.058
-0.50 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
-0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.46 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
-0.62 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.53
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.174
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
0.26 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.23 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.38
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.66 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
0.39 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.69 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
0.27 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-1.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.61 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.58 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
0.41 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.46
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.67 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.61
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
0.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
0.30 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.47
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.45 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.37
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.60 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.55
0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.24 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
-0.70 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
0.29 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
-0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
0.57 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.35
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.43 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.32 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.64 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.41
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
-0.47 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.48 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
-0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.28
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.33 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.34
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.29
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.30
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.39
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.31 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.52 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
0.28 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
0.37 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.42
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.40 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.36
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.42 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.20
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.54
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
0.22 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.23
-0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
0.25 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.33
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
-0.20 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
0.49 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.32
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Plaque in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
0.21 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.44
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.40
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.21
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.24
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.35 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.31
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.53 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.27
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.59 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
0.36 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: days 14, 28, 34

Data summarizes gingival index scores changes from baseline in phase 2a. Gingivitis will be assessed using both the MGI (Modified Gingival Index) and the Gingival Bleeding Index (BOP) The Modified Gingival Index assesses the buccal and lingual gingivae and interdental papillae. Modified Gingival Index Scores: 0 Absence of inflammation 1. Mild inflammation; slight change in color, little change in texture of any portion of but not the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit 2. Mild inflammation; criteria as above but involving the entire marginal or papillary gingival unit 3. Moderate inflammation; glazing, redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit 4. Severe inflammation; marked redness, edema and/or hypertrophy of the marginal or papillary gingival unit, spontaneous bleeding, congestion, or ulceration.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=5 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.18
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.047
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
-0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.22
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.16 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.17
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.11 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.047
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.02
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.03
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
-0.09 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
-0.04 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.19 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
-0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.05
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
0.18 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
-0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.03 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.13
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.19
0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.25
-0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.10
-0.12 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.13 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.11
0.15 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.12
Proof of Concept of KSL-W in Reducing Gingivitis in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
0.00 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.09
0.02 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.16
-0.05 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.10 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.15
0.08 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.06
0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.04
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.17 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.08
-0.01 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.07
-0.06 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.14
0.14 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.01

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: days 0, 14, 28, 34

Proof of concept of KSL-W in reducing plaque as measured by percent of bleeding sites upon probing (BOP) in phase 2a. Gingivitis will be assessed using both the MGI (Modified Gingival Index) and the Gingival Bleeding Index (BOP). The Modified Gingival Index assesses the buccal and lingual gingivae and interdental papillae. The Gingival Bleeding Index assesses the percentage of sites that bleed on gentle probing. A periodontal probe (HU-Friedy UNC 15) will be gently inserted into the gingival sulcus until resistance is felt at mid-facial (buccal), mid-lingual, mesial, and distal interproximal sites of all scorable teeth, with the exception of the most posterior distal sites. Presence or absence of bleeding will be recorded for each site and the percentage of bleeding sites per subject will serve as the unit of analysis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=4 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=7 Participants
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=6 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 Participants
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Eligibility
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 0
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 31
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 14
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 28
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Whole Mouth: Day 34
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
46 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Eligibility
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
8 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 0
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 28
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
231 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Maxillary: Day 34
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Eligibility
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 30
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 0
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
43 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 14
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 28
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Mandibular: Day 34
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
52 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
9 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Eligibility
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 0
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
40 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 28
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 0
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 14
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Posterior: Day 34
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Eligibility
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
44 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 0
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 33
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 28
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
32 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Interproximal: Day 34
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
54 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 30
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 25
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Eligibility
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 36
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 0
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 39
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 14
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
37 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 37
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 28
12 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
5 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
6 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 0
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Facial: Day 34
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
46 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
15 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
10 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
8 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Eligibility
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
18 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 12
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
24 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 27
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
38 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 32
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
17 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 0
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 19
34 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
29 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 5
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
41 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 29
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
30 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 1
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 14
16 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 18
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
14 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 14
31 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 31
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 6
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 28
19 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 24
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 17
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 9
42 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 26
33 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 13
26 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
25 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 7
22 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 23
35 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
258 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 2
Gingival Bleeding on Probing (BOP) - Percent of Bleeding Sites Upon Probing in Phase 2a
Lingual: Day 34
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 21
45 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 4
20 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 15
28 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 16
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 20
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 34
39 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 22
36 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 28
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
13 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
11 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 8
27 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 11
23 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 10
21 Percent of bleeding sites
Standard Deviation 3

Adverse Events

Phase 1, 1a (2mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 1a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 2a (4mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 2a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 3a (6mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 3a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 4a (10mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 4a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 5a (20mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 5a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 6a (30mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 6a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 7a (50mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 7a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 8a (75mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 8a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 9a (100mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 1, 9a Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 1b (4mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 1b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 2b (6mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 2b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 3b (10mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 3 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 3b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 4b (20mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 4b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 5b (30mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 5b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 2 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 6b (50mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 6b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 7b (75mg)

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 5 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Phase 2, 7b Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 0 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Phase 1, 1a (2mg)
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 1a (2mg) group
Phase 1, 1a Placebo
n=1 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 1a placebo group
Phase 1, 2a (4mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 2a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 2a (4mg) group
Phase 1, 3a (6mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subject from phase 1, 3a (6mg) group
Phase 1, 3a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 3a placebo gorup
Phase 1, 4a (10mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 4a (10mg) group
Phase 1, 4a Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 4a placebo group
Phase 1, 5a (20mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 5a (20mg) group
Phase 1, 5a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase1, 5a placebo group
Phase 1, 6a (30mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 6a (30mg) group
Phase 1, 6a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 6a placebo group
Phase 1, 7a (50mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 7a (50mg) group
Phase 1, 7a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 7a placebo group
Phase 1, 8a (75mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 8a (75mg) group
Phase 1, 8a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 8a placebo group
Phase 1, 9a (100mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 9a (100mg) group
Phase 1, 9a Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 1, 9a placebo group
Phase 2, 1b (4mg)
n=4 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 1b (4mg) group
Phase 2, 1b Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 1b placebo
Phase 2, 2b (6mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 2b (6mg) group
Phase 2, 2b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 2b placebo group
Phase 2, 3b (10mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 3b (10mg) group
Phase 2, 3b Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 3b placebo group
Phase 2, 4b (20mg)
n=6 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 4b (20mg) group
Phase 2, 4b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 4b placebo group
Phase 2, 5b (30mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 5b (30mg) group
Phase 2, 5b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 5b placebo group
Phase 2, 6b (50mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 6b (50mg) group
Phase 2, 6b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 6b placebo group
Phase 2, 7b (75mg)
n=7 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 7b (75mg) group
Phase 2, 7b Placebo
n=3 participants at risk
Subjects from phase 2, 7b placebo group
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Burning sensation in throat
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Renal and urinary disorders
Glucose urine present
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Coating in mouth
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Device connection issue
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Nervous system disorders
Ageusia
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Erythema, hard palate, right side, molar area
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdomin discomfort, upper stomach
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival ulceration
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth haemorrhage
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Mouth injury
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Mouth ulceration
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
50.0%
1/2 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral mucosal erythema
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pain
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Puffy and wrinkling sensation, bilateral buccal mucosa
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Stiffness of neck and shoulder
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Teeth staining
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Thermal burn
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
25.0%
1/4 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat tightness
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue coated
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
42.9%
3/7 • Number of events 3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue pigmentation
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothh discoloration
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
14.3%
1/7 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
28.6%
2/7 • Number of events 2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/4 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/2 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/6 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
33.3%
1/3 • Number of events 1 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/7 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.
0.00%
0/3 • up to 28 days
Formal statistical analysis of the safety data was not performed due to the small sample size.

Additional Information

Domenick T. Zero, DDS, MS

Oral Health Research Institute, Indiana University School of Dentistry

Phone: 240-457-0668

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
  • Publication restrictions are in place