MedTrace Logo

Comparative Study Between Bilateral and Unilateral Spinal Anaesthesia

NCT01877356 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 25

Last updated 2018-11-14

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare unilateral spinal anesthesia using hyperbaric Prilocaine with "classical bilateral spinal anesthesia" using plain Prilocaine according to block characteristics and quality of micturition, standardized to the subjects own functional bladder capacity. Our hypothesis is that unilateral spinal anesthesia will provide faster time to micturtition and discharge, lesser hypotension and lesser micturition problems.

Conditions

  • Anesthesia; Adverse Effect, Spinal and Epidural

Interventions

PROCEDURE

bilateral spinal anesthesia

prilocaine plain 2% 50 mg

PROCEDURE

unilateral spinal anesthesia

prilocaine 2% hyperbaric 30 mg

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University Hospital, Antwerp

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • margaretha breebaart, md · senior member of staff department anaesthesiology

  • Marcel Vercauteren, professor · University Hospital, Antwerp

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
60 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-12-31
Primary Completion
2014-08-31
Completion
2014-08-31

Countries

  • Belgium

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01877356 on ClinicalTrials.gov