Prospective Randomized Feasibility Study Comparing Manual vs. Automatic Position-Adaptive Spinal Cord Stimulation With Surgical Leads

NCT01874899 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 18

Last updated 2019-08-07

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The main purpose of this study is to establish the extent that chronic pain patients implanted with surgical, laminectomy-type, leads experience position-related variation in spinal cord stimulation therapy and to investigate the effects of manual versus automatic position-adaptive spinal cord stimulation on clinical outcome.

Conditions

  • Chronic Refractory Low Back and Leg Pain

Interventions

DEVICE

RestoreSensor Neurostimulation

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Justin Parker Neurological Institute

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kara Beasley, DO · Boulder Neurosurgical Associates

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-06-30
Primary Completion
2017-12-31
Completion
2017-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01874899 on ClinicalTrials.gov