Surgical Spinal Decompression of Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression, Minimal Access Versus Open Surgery

NCT01865942 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2017-04-04

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The investigators wish to evaluate the effect of minimal access spinal surgery compared to traditional open surgery spinal surgery in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Minimal access surgery has been shown to bee less damaging for the tissue compared to traditional open surgery and also cause fewer wound complications, the investigators expect the above could have impact in a vulnerable patient group like patients with metastatic spinal cord compression.

Conditions

  • Spinal Metastases

Interventions

PROCEDURE

open surgery

The to surgical procedures are individually well know, but the outcome of the procedures in respect to perioperative bleeding and change in quality of life has to our knowledge not been compared.

PROCEDURE

Minimal access surgery

The to surgical procedures are individually well know, but the outcome of the procedures in respect to perioperative bleeding and change in quality of life has to our knowledge not been compared.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Rigshospitalet, Denmark

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Søren Schmidt Morgen, MD · Spine Section, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
99 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-08-28
Primary Completion
2017-01-02
Completion
2017-03-30

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01865942 on ClinicalTrials.gov