Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Comparing Fit of the iTotal Versus Standard Total Knee Implants (NCT NCT01861028)
NCT ID: NCT01861028
Last Updated: 2023-10-25
Results Overview
Fit will be measured in 4 quadrants on the tibia using a ruler to measure the distance between the customized implant and the edge of the tibia.
TERMINATED
44 participants
Intraoperatively, up to 120 minutes
2023-10-25
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
iTotal CR TKR
A series of 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients will be compared to assess the fit of the tibial tray intra-operatively. These patients will have a series of tibial templates from Standard TKR implant sets trialed on the operative knee. Each template will be optimally sized and positioned based on the surgeon's judgment. Implant fit data (overhang and underhang) on the tibia for all templates will be taken from intra-operative measurements
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
44
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Study Comparing Fit of the iTotal Versus Standard Total Knee Implants
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
iTotal CR TKR
n=44 Participants
A series of 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients will be compared to assess the fit of the tibial tray intra-operatively. These patients will have a series of tibial templates from Standard TKR implant sets trialed on the operative knee. Each template will be optimally sized and positioned based on the surgeon's judgment. Implant fit data (overhang and underhang) on the tibia for all templates will be taken from intra-operative measurements
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
32 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
70.48 Years
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex/Gender, Customized
Women
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Intraoperatively, up to 120 minutesPopulation: 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients - number of patients with overhang of 3mm or more
Fit will be measured in 4 quadrants on the tibia using a ruler to measure the distance between the customized implant and the edge of the tibia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=44 Participants
A series of 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients will be compared to assess the fit of the tibial tray intra-operatively. These patients will have a series of tibial templates from Standard TKR implant sets trialed on the operative knee. Each template will be optimally sized and positioned based on the surgeon's judgment. Implant fit data (overhang and underhang) on the tibia for all templates will be taken from intra-operative measurements
|
|---|---|
|
Phase I: Number of Participants With a Customized Tibia Implant Displaying an Overhang of 3 mm or Greater
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Intraoperatively, up to 120 minutesPopulation: 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients - number of patients with overhang of 3mm or more
Fit will be measured in 3 quadrants on the tibia using a ruler to measure the distance between the off-the-shelf design and the edge of the tibia.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Phase I
n=44 Participants
A series of 44 consecutive primary iTotal patients will be compared to assess the fit of the tibial tray intra-operatively. These patients will have a series of tibial templates from Standard TKR implant sets trialed on the operative knee. Each template will be optimally sized and positioned based on the surgeon's judgment. Implant fit data (overhang and underhang) on the tibia for all templates will be taken from intra-operative measurements
|
|---|---|
|
Phase II: Number of Participants With an Off-the-Shelf Implant Displaying an Overhang of 3 mm or Greater
|
8 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Enrolled Subjects
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place