Computed Tomography Versus Standard 2D Mammography Versus 3D Tomosynthesis

NCT01852032 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 23

Last updated 2018-04-17

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the imaging performance of an investigational breast computed tomography (CT) scanner, built at UC Davis, with that of an FDA-Approved breast tomosynthesis scanner (capable of producing standard 2-D mammography and 3-D tomosynthesis images), built by Hologic, Incorporated, in a group of patients with suspected breast cancer.

Conditions

Interventions

RADIATION

Tomosynthesis Breast Scanning

The breast is positioned and compressed the same way it is in a conventional mammogram using a compression paddle device. The subject will be instructed to hold their breath and not move during the 7- second 3-D tomosynthesis acquisition. The affected breast is positioned with MLO compression. The radiation dose levels for each scan are equivalent to mammography

RADIATION

Breast CT Scanning

CT scanning will be performed before and after I.V. iodine contrast injection. The subject will lie prone on a large table (which is covered by a foam pad), and she will place the breast to be scanned in a small hole in that tabletop. The hole is surrounded by a soft neoprene "hammock," which will allow the subject's entire upper torso to slump into the scan plane of the device. After positioning of the affected breast by a female mammography technologist, the subject will be instructed to hold their breath for 16 seconds and the pre-contrast scan will commence. There will be no breast compression. Other than the sound of the relatively noisy x-ray system in the room, the subject will not feel or sense any aspect of this scan.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Hologic, Inc.

    collaborator INDUSTRY
  • University of California, Davis

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • John M Boone, PhD · University of California, Davis

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
35 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2010-11-30
Primary Completion
2016-03-04
Completion
2016-03-04
FDA Device
Yes

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01852032 on ClinicalTrials.gov