Trial Outcomes & Findings for Transcorneal Electrostimulation for Therapy of Retinitis Pigmentosa (NCT NCT01837901)
NCT ID: NCT01837901
Last Updated: 2021-03-18
Results Overview
Change in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement
COMPLETED
NA
88 participants
one year
2021-03-18
Participant Flow
Patients were recruited from the hospital's hereditary retinal degeneration clinic (Centre for Ophthalmology, University of Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany). Of 88 enrolled participants, 63 met the inclusion criteria and were randomized to treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Sham
OkuStim was used to determine the phosphene threshold, device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
|
150%
OkuStim was used to determine the phosphene threshold, and then to administer transcorneal electrostimulation with a stimulation strength corresponding to 150% of the patient's phosphene threshold.
|
200%
OkuStim was used to determine the phosphene threshold, and then to administer transcorneal electrostimulation with a stimulation strength corresponding to 200% of the patient's phosphene threshold.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
22
|
21
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
20
|
15
|
17
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
6
|
3
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Transcorneal Electrostimulation for Therapy of Retinitis Pigmentosa
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Sham
n=20 Participants
Device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
|
150%
n=15 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 150% of phosphene threshold.
|
200%
n=17 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 200% of phosphene threshold.
|
Total
n=52 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=99 Participants
|
42 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13 • n=107 Participants
|
49 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16 • n=206 Participants
|
46 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 15 • n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Germany
|
20 participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 participants
n=107 Participants
|
17 participants
n=206 Participants
|
52 participants
n=7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearChange in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham
n=20 Participants
Device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
|
150%
n=14 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 150% of phosphene threshold.
|
200%
n=17 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 200% of phosphene threshold.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Visual Field, III4e
Baseline
|
4835.29 deg2
Interval 2723.26 to 6947.32
|
4988.43 deg2
Interval 2799.14 to 7177.73
|
6234.59 deg2
Interval 4226.84 to 8242.34
|
|
Visual Field, III4e
1 year
|
4488.39 deg2
Interval 2473.83 to 6502.95
|
4962.76 deg2
Interval 2765.44 to 7160.08
|
5878.75 deg2
Interval 3926.21 to 7831.28
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearChange in the area measured by kinetic visual field measurement
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Sham
n=20 Participants
Device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
|
150%
n=14 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 150% of phosphene threshold.
|
200%
n=17 Participants
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 200% of phosphene threshold.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Visual Field, V4e
Baseline
|
7135.77 deg2
Interval 4771.87 to 9499.66
|
7599.65 deg2
Interval 5004.8 to 10194.5
|
8303.59 deg2
Interval 6217.92 to 10389.27
|
|
Visual Field, V4e
1 year
|
6730.20 deg2
Interval 4459.71 to 9000.69
|
7641.55 deg2
Interval 4945.26 to 10337.84
|
8112.18 deg2
Interval 6028.01 to 10196.34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearOutcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearBest corrected visual acuity
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearVisual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: one yearAdaptation time, changes in pupil diameter, threshold to fullfield blue and red light is measured with a fullfield stimulus threshold test (FST) on the ESPION ERG machine (Diagnosys).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Sham
150%
200%
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Sham
n=22 participants at risk
Device was turned on but no stimulation was performed.
|
150%
n=21 participants at risk
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 150% of phosphene threshold.
|
200%
n=20 participants at risk
Transcorneal electrostimulation with 200% of phosphene threshold.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Non-Ocular Adverse Events Total
|
45.5%
10/22 • Number of events 16 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
52.4%
11/21 • Number of events 20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
55.0%
11/20 • Number of events 17 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Macular edema
|
4.5%
1/22 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/21 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye Symptom
|
9.1%
2/22 • Number of events 2 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
66.7%
14/21 • Number of events 24 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
70.0%
14/20 • Number of events 22 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular discomfort
|
9.1%
2/22 • Number of events 2 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 2 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 4 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular pain
|
9.1%
2/22 • Number of events 3 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
9.5%
2/21 • Number of events 3 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Subjective visual decrease
|
4.5%
1/22 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/21 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Skin irritation due to electrode
|
0.00%
0/22 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Ocular infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
4.8%
1/21 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/20 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
Corneal erosion
|
0.00%
0/22 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/21 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
|
Eye disorders
General and ocular infection
|
0.00%
0/22 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
0.00%
0/21 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
5.0%
1/20 • Number of events 1 • 52 weeks treatment, follow-up visit after 72 weeks. AEs were recorded until the follow-up visit at 72 weeks.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60