Incentives for Participation Versus Outcomes

NCT01826331 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2025-04-17

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

One of the most important debates in the field of disease prevention is whether financial incentives should be contingent on participation in evidence-based programs for smoking cessation or on actual outcomes, like prolonged abstinence. This study can fill a major knowledge gap in this debate, which is the lack of any population trial that compared the impacts of outcomes- and participation-based incentives in a population of smokers. This research can help policy makers and health service providers choose the incentives approach that provides the most effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and cost-savings for entire populations of smokers.

Conditions

  • Smoking

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Incentives for Participation

Participants will receive three smoking cessation programs

BEHAVIORAL

Incentives for Cessation

Participants will have access to a smoking cessation program

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of Rhode Island

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • James O Prochaska, Ph.D. · University of Rhode Island

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
SINGLE
Model
FACTORIAL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2014-03-31
Primary Completion
2019-05-31
Completion
2019-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01826331 on ClinicalTrials.gov