Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of CP-690,550 In Asian Subjects With Moderate To Severe Plaque Psoriasis (NCT NCT01815424)

NCT ID: NCT01815424

Last Updated: 2019-04-16

Results Overview

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

266 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 16

Results posted on

2019-04-16

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 10 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Week 0 to 16
STARTED
90
88
88
0
0
Week 0 to 16
COMPLETED
83
84
77
0
0
Week 0 to 16
NOT COMPLETED
7
4
11
0
0
Week 16 to 52
STARTED
83
84
0
38
39
Week 16 to 52
COMPLETED
81
79
0
35
36
Week 16 to 52
NOT COMPLETED
2
5
0
3
3

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 10 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Week 0 to 16
Adverse Event
1
3
3
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Does Not Meet Entrance Criteria
2
0
0
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Lost to Follow-up
0
1
0
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Withdrawal by Subject
0
0
1
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Other
1
0
3
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Protocol Violation
1
0
0
0
0
Week 0 to 16
Insufficient Clinical Response
2
0
4
0
0
Week 16 to 52
Other
0
1
0
0
0
Week 16 to 52
Adverse Event
0
0
0
0
1
Week 16 to 52
Insufficient Clinical Response
1
0
0
1
1
Week 16 to 52
Lost to Follow-up
0
2
0
2
1
Week 16 to 52
Withdrawal by Subject
1
2
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study Evaluating The Efficacy And Safety Of CP-690,550 In Asian Subjects With Moderate To Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Total
n=266 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
41.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.0 • n=99 Participants
40.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=107 Participants
41.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7 • n=206 Participants
41.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.3 • n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
23 Participants
n=107 Participants
26 Participants
n=206 Participants
72 Participants
n=7 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
67 Participants
n=99 Participants
65 Participants
n=107 Participants
62 Participants
n=206 Participants
194 Participants
n=7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Score of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 16
75.56 percentage of participants
52.27 percentage of participants
19.32 percentage of participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and the "percent of body surface area (BSA)" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 75% Reduction in PASI (PASI75) at Week 16
81.11 percentage of participants
54.55 percentage of participants
12.50 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. Number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria.

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percent Change From Baseline in Total Body Surface Area (BSA) With Psoriasis at Week 16
-73.81 percent change
Standard Error 5.903
-54.39 percent change
Standard Error 5.838
-2.27 percent change
Standard Error 6.061

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI90 response was defined as at least a 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI (PASI90) at Week 16
60.00 percentage of participants
5.903
35.23 percentage of participants
5.838
3.41 percentage of participants
6.061

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. Number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria.

The DLQI is a 10 item general dermatology questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=84 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=77 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in DLQI Total Score at Week 16
-9.10 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.635
-7.03 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.627
-1.57 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.655

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With PGA Score of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 4
37.78 percentage of participants
0.497
19.32 percentage of participants
0.493
1.14 percentage of participants
0.504

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and the "percent of body surface area (BSA)" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response at Week 4
24.44 percentage of participants
4.55 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 4

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. Number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria.

The DLQI is a 10 item general dermatology questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=86 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=83 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in DLQI Total Score at Week 4
-6.03 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.497
-5.14 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.493
-0.94 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.504

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. Number of participants analyzed signifies those participants who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and had at least one measurement during follow up) for this measure..

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represent more severe psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=29 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percent Change From Baseline in Nail Psorasis Severity Index (NAPSI) at Week 16 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
-33.32 percent change
Standard Error 10.518
-14.98 percent change
Standard Error 10.566
7.91 percent change
Standard Error 12.025

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16 to Week 52

Population: Patients in the full analysis population and those who had PGA response at Week 16 and non-missing post Week 16 data were included. Patients initially treated with placebo were not included as they were advanced to tofacitinib and this maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Maintenance of PGA response at Week 52 among patients achieving PGA response at Week 16 is reported. This is a key secondary endpoint. Percentage of participants maintaining the response and the 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Event is loss of response. Percentage of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=68 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=46 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PGA Score of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" at Week 52 Among Participants Achieving PGA Response at Week 16
75.00 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.497 • Interval 62.91 to 83.65
73.63 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.493 • Interval 58.24 to 84.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16 to Week 52

Population: Patients in the full analysis population and those who had PASI75 response at Week 16 and non-missing post Week 16 data were included. Patients initially treated with placebo were not included as they were advanced to tofacitinib and this maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant.

The PASI quantifies severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk including axillae and groin, and lower limbs including buttocks), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response=at least 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Maintenance of PASI75 response at Week 52 among patients achieving PASI75 response at Week 16 is reported. This is a key secondary endpoint. Probability and the 95% CI were estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Event is loss of response. Percentage of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=73 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=48 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PASI75 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Achieving PASI75 Response at Week 16
84.93 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.497 • Interval 74.44 to 91.36
76.82 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.493 • Interval 62.04 to 86.44

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 16 to Week 52

Population: Patients in the full analysis population and those who had PASI90 response at Week 16 and non-missing post Week 16 data were included. Patients initially treated with placebo were not included as they were advanced to tofacitinib and this maintaining response at Week 52 was not relevant.

The PASI quantifies severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk including axillae and groin, and lower limbs including buttocks), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI90 response=at least 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Maintenance of PASI90 response at Week 52 among patients achieving PASI90 response at Week 16 is reported. This is a key secondary endpoint. Probability and the 95% CI were estimated based on the Kaplan-Meier method. Event is loss of response. Percentage of maintaining response is (1-probability of loss of response).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=54 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=31 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PASI90 Response at Week 52 Among Participants Achieving PASI90 at Week 16
74.07 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.497 • Interval 60.19 to 83.75
70.45 percentage of participants
95% Confidence Interval 0.493 • Interval 50.85 to 83.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: Participants with non-missing post-baseline response data in the full analysis population (all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of study drug) were included.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear). Median time to achieve a PGA response up to week 16 is reported. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 1). Median time to event is not estimable if less than 50% of participants had PGA response by Week 16.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=86 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Time to PGA Response up to Week 16
8.0 weeks
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
14.0 weeks
Interval 12.0 to
Upper limit of the CI is not estimable. The time frame from Baseline to Week 16 is insufficient to observe the required number of responders for the upper limit.
NA weeks
Not estimable. Less than half of the participants are responders by Week 16 (ie. censoring percent is \>50%).

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16

Population: Participants with non-missing post-baseline responses data in the full analysis population (all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo) were included.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response was defined as at least 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 2). Median time to event is not estimable if less than 50% of participants had PASI50 response by Week 16.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=86 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Time to PASI75 Response up to Week 16
8.0 weeks
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
16.0 weeks
Interval 12.0 to
Upper limit of the CI is not estimable. The time frame from Baseline to Week 16 is insufficient to observe the required number of responders for the upper limit.
NA weeks
Not estimable. Less than half of the participants are responders by Week 16 (ie. censoring percent is \>50%).

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16

Population: Participants with non-missing post-baseline responses data in the full analysis population (all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo) were included.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 50 response was defined as at least 50% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. The median time to event was estimated based on the probability of event-rate based on life table estimates (not the observed rate as in outcome measure 26). Median time to event is not estimable if the estimated probability of response by Week 16 is less than 50%.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=86 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Time to PASI50 Response up to Week 16
4.0 weeks
Interval 4.0 to 8.0
8.0 weeks
Interval 8.0 to 12.0
NA weeks
Not estimable. Less than half of the participants are responders by Week 16 (ie. censoring percent is \>50%).

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2
3.33 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.04
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.39
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4
37.78 percentage of participants
Interval 27.76 to 47.79
19.32 percentage of participants
Interval 11.07 to 27.57
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
57.78 percentage of participants
Interval 47.57 to 67.98
38.64 percentage of participants
Interval 28.46 to 48.81
11.36 percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12
74.44 percentage of participants
Interval 65.43 to 83.46
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 39.55 to 60.45
25.00 percentage of participants
Interval 12.21 to 37.79
6.82 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
75.56 percentage of participants
Interval 66.68 to 84.43
52.27 percentage of participants
Interval 41.84 to 62.71
29.55 percentage of participants
Interval 16.06 to 43.03
9.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
75.56 percentage of participants
Interval 66.68 to 84.43
54.55 percentage of participants
Interval 44.14 to 64.95
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 44.56 to 73.62
47.73 percentage of participants
Interval 32.97 to 62.49
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
73.33 percentage of participants
Interval 64.2 to 82.47
53.41 percentage of participants
Interval 42.99 to 63.83
68.18 percentage of participants
Interval 54.42 to 81.94
52.27 percentage of participants
Interval 37.51 to 67.03
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
72.22 percentage of participants
Interval 62.97 to 81.48
55.68 percentage of participants
Interval 45.3 to 66.06
65.91 percentage of participants
Interval 51.9 to 79.92
54.55 percentage of participants
Interval 39.83 to 69.26
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of 'Clear' or 'Almost Clear' Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
67.78 percentage of participants
Interval 58.12 to 77.43
54.55 percentage of participants
Interval 44.14 to 64.95
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 44.56 to 73.62
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 35.23 to 64.77

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0 \[no symptom\] to 4 \[severe symptom\]). The total score was calculated as average of the 3 severity scores and rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA score and category (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). Percentage of participants with each PGA score is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Almost Clear (n=84,84,38,39)
38.1 percentage of participants
38.1 percentage of participants
28.9 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Clear (n=90,88,44,44)
0 percentage of participants
Interval 95.67 to 100.0
0 percentage of participants
Interval 83.16 to 99.45
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Almost Clear (n=90,88,44,44)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Mild (n=90,88,44,44)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Moderate (n=90,88,44,44)
85.6 percentage of participants
87.5 percentage of participants
81.8 percentage of participants
70.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Severe (n=90,88,44,44)
14.4 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
18.2 percentage of participants
29.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Clear (n=88,86,44,42)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Almost Clear (n=88,86,44,42)
3.4 percentage of participants
2.3 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Mild (n=88,86,44,42)
47.7 percentage of participants
36.0 percentage of participants
11.4 percentage of participants
4.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Moderate (n=88,86,44,42)
40.9 percentage of participants
55.8 percentage of participants
75.0 percentage of participants
71.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Severe (n=88,86,44,42)
8.0 percentage of participants
5.8 percentage of participants
13.6 percentage of participants
23.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Clear (n=87,88,43,42)
2.3 percentage of participants
1.1 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Almost Clear (n=87,88,43,42)
36.8 percentage of participants
18.2 percentage of participants
2.3 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Mild (n=87,88,43,42)
29.9 percentage of participants
39.8 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Severe (n=87,88,43,42)
3.4 percentage of participants
4.5 percentage of participants
20.9 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Clear (n=85,88,40,39)
23.5 percentage of participants
3.4 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Almost Clear (n=85,88,40,39)
37.6 percentage of participants
35.2 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Mild (n=85,88,40,39)
20.0 percentage of participants
28.4 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
25.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Moderate (n=85,88,40,39)
17.6 percentage of participants
30.7 percentage of participants
42.5 percentage of participants
61.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Severe (n=85,88,40,39)
1.2 percentage of participants
2.3 percentage of participants
15.0 percentage of participants
12.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Clear (n=84,88,40,39)
34.5 percentage of participants
12.5 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Mild (n=84,84,38,39)
9.5 percentage of participants
21.4 percentage of participants
26.3 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Almost Clear (n=84,88,40,39)
45.2 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
27.5 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Mild (n=84,88,40,39)
11.9 percentage of participants
27.3 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Moderate (n=84,88,40,39)
6.0 percentage of participants
22.7 percentage of participants
37.5 percentage of participants
51.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Severe (n=84,88,40,39)
2.4 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
5.0 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Clear (n=84,84,38,39)
42.9 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Moderate (n=84,84,38,39)
9.5 percentage of participants
23.8 percentage of participants
34.2 percentage of participants
51.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Severe (n=84,84,38,39)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Clear (n=84,84,38,39)
50.0 percentage of participants
25.0 percentage of participants
15.8 percentage of participants
2.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Almost Clear (n=84,84,38,39)
31.0 percentage of participants
32.1 percentage of participants
52.6 percentage of participants
51.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Mild (n=84,84,38,39)
11.9 percentage of participants
29.8 percentage of participants
18.4 percentage of participants
38.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Moderate (n=84,84,38,39)
7.1 percentage of participants
13.1 percentage of participants
13.2 percentage of participants
7.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Clear (n=83,83,38,37)
51.8 percentage of participants
31.3 percentage of participants
44.7 percentage of participants
29.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Almost Clear (n=83,83,38,37)
27.7 percentage of participants
25.3 percentage of participants
34.2 percentage of participants
32.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Mild (n=83,83,38,37)
13.3 percentage of participants
26.5 percentage of participants
18.4 percentage of participants
32.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Severe (n=83,83,38,37)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Clear (n=81,81,37,36)
53.1 percentage of participants
29.6 percentage of participants
48.6 percentage of participants
36.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Moderate (n=81,81,37,36)
6.2 percentage of participants
13.6 percentage of participants
8.1 percentage of participants
13.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Mild (n=80,78,36,36)
16.3 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
30.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Moderate (n=87,88,43,42)
27.6 percentage of participants
36.4 percentage of participants
53.5 percentage of participants
69.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Severe (n=84,84,38,39)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Moderate (n=83,83,38,37)
7.2 percentage of participants
16.9 percentage of participants
2.6 percentage of participants
5.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Almost Clear (n=81,81,37,36)
27.2 percentage of participants
30.9 percentage of participants
29.7 percentage of participants
30.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Mild (n=81,81,37,36)
13.6 percentage of participants
25.9 percentage of participants
13.5 percentage of participants
19.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Severe (n=81,81,37,36)
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Clear (n=80,78,36,36)
45.0 percentage of participants
25.6 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
30.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Almost Clear (n=80,78,36,36)
31.3 percentage of participants
35.9 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
30.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Moderate (n=80,78,36,36)
7.5 percentage of participants
17.9 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
8.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PGA Category Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Severe (n=80,78,36,36)
0 percentage of participants
1.3 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants
0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 75 response was defined as at least 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI 75 response is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4
24.44 percentage of participants
Interval 15.57 to 33.32
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.19 to 8.9
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
51.11 percentage of participants
Interval 40.78 to 61.44
31.82 percentage of participants
Interval 22.09 to 41.55
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12
72.22 percentage of participants
Interval 62.97 to 81.48
47.73 percentage of participants
Interval 37.29 to 58.16
11.36 percentage of participants
Interval 1.99 to 20.74
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
81.11 percentage of participants
Interval 73.02 to 89.2
54.55 percentage of participants
Interval 44.14 to 64.95
20.45 percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 32.37
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 71.74 to 88.26
56.82 percentage of participants
Interval 46.47 to 67.17
68.18 percentage of participants
Interval 54.42 to 81.94
65.91 percentage of participants
Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2
1.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.28
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
83.33 percentage of participants
Interval 75.63 to 91.03
54.55 percentage of participants
Interval 44.14 to 64.95
52.27 percentage of participants
Interval 37.51 to 67.03
27.27 percentage of participants
Interval 14.11 to 40.43
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
81.11 percentage of participants
Interval 73.02 to 89.2
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 48.82 to 69.36
75.00 percentage of participants
Interval 62.21 to 87.79
65.91 percentage of participants
Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Percentage of Participants Achieving PASI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
76.67 percentage of participants
Interval 67.93 to 85.4
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 48.82 to 69.36
63.64 percentage of participants
Interval 49.42 to 77.85
59.09 percentage of participants
Interval 44.56 to 73.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
3.48 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 6.722 • Interval 75.63 to 91.03
8.42 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.800 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
15.27 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 11.441 • Interval 37.51 to 67.03
20.64 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.738 • Interval 14.11 to 40.43
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=90,88,44,44)
25.34 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.106 • Interval 0.0 to 3.28
25.32 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.185
25.62 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.429
26.51 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 8.525
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
19.03 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.392 • Interval 15.57 to 33.32
21.23 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.979 • Interval 0.19 to 8.9
25.72 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.582
26.34 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.456
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
13.81 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.826 • Interval 40.78 to 61.44
17.41 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.565 • Interval 22.09 to 41.55
24.81 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 12.081 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
24.65 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.433 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
8.18 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.075 • Interval 62.97 to 81.48
12.56 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.623 • Interval 37.29 to 58.16
21.38 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 11.689 • Interval 1.99 to 20.74
22.46 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 8.966 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
4.56 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 6.979 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
10.10 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.858 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
17.83 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 10.503 • Interval 8.54 to 32.37
21.35 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 9.477 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (84,84,38,39)
2.75 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 5.610 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
7.13 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 8.280 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
6.52 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 6.512 • Interval 62.21 to 87.79
10.43 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 7.612 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
2.15 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 3.810 • Interval 71.74 to 88.26
6.23 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 7.817 • Interval 46.47 to 67.17
3.09 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 5.434 • Interval 54.42 to 81.94
4.82 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 5.517 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
2.04 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 3.553 • Interval 67.93 to 85.4
5.74 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 6.415 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
2.79 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 4.458 • Interval 49.42 to 77.85
3.74 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 4.540 • Interval 44.56 to 73.62
Actual PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
2.82 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 4.674
6.00 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 7.313
3.11 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 5.027
4.69 percentage of participants
Standard Deviation 4.607

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
-17.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.244 • Interval 62.97 to 81.48
-12.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.033 • Interval 37.29 to 58.16
-4.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.996 • Interval 1.99 to 20.74
-4.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.130 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=84,84,38,39)
-22.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.675 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
-18.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.955 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
-18.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.428 • Interval 62.21 to 87.79
-16.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.732 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
-22.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.655
-20.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.819
-22.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.368
-22.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.429
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
-6.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.724 • Interval 15.57 to 33.32
-4.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.231 • Interval 0.19 to 8.9
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.715
-0.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.676
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
-11.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.528 • Interval 40.78 to 61.44
-7.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.053 • Interval 22.09 to 41.55
-0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.423 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.799 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
-20.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.612 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
-15.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.214 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
-7.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.717 • Interval 8.54 to 32.37
-5.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.169 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
-22.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.127 • Interval 75.63 to 91.03
-17.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.711 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
-10.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.976 • Interval 37.51 to 67.03
-6.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.973 • Interval 14.11 to 40.43
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
-23.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.369 • Interval 71.74 to 88.26
-19.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.312 • Interval 46.47 to 67.17
-22.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.550 • Interval 54.42 to 81.94
-21.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.283 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Change From Baseline in PASI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
-23.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.702 • Interval 67.93 to 85.4
-20.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.292 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
-22.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.268 • Interval 49.42 to 77.85
-22.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.512 • Interval 44.56 to 73.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and the "percent of BSA" affected. Basic characteristics of psoriatic lesions: erythema, induration, and scaling (PASI components) are scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) according to a 5-point scale: 0 (no involvement); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (marked); 4 (very marked). PASI component score range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate greater severity of psoriatic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.871
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.888
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.735
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.871
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.847
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.008
1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.900
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.972
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.755
0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.814
0.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.702
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.794
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42
1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903 • Interval 40.78 to 61.44
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.037 • Interval 22.09 to 41.55
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.033 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.052 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.141 • Interval 8.54 to 32.37
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.075 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.867 • Interval 75.63 to 91.03
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.065 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.171 • Interval 37.51 to 67.03
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.038 • Interval 14.11 to 40.43
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.885 • Interval 67.93 to 85.4
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.989 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.860 • Interval 49.42 to 77.85
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.041 • Interval 44.56 to 73.62
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.937
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.982
2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.075
2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.823
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.830
2.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.776
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.568
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.697
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.929
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.173
1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.234
2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.811
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.005
1.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.080
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.800
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.924
0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.099
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.073
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.937
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.870
2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.830
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.776
3.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.576
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.870
1.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.043
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.945
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.842
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.860
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.197
0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.909
1.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.100
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.884
2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.919
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.876
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.798
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.761
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.108
1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.083
2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.870
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.818
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.013
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.924
1.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.823
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.798
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.064
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.919
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.917
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.910
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.037
0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.861
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.091
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.783
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.062
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.815
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.870
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.020
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.868
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.751
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.760
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.118
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.797
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.013
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.976
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.041
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.731
0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.056
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.921
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.042
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.069
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.120
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.886
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.988
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.874
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.951
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=90,88,44,44
2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.830 • Interval 15.57 to 33.32
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.977 • Interval 0.19 to 8.9
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.868
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42
1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.978 • Interval 62.97 to 81.48
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015 • Interval 37.29 to 58.16
1.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.065 • Interval 1.99 to 20.74
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.726 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.839 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.032 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.156 • Interval 62.21 to 87.79
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.073 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.784 • Interval 71.74 to 88.26
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.971 • Interval 46.47 to 67.17
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.883 • Interval 54.42 to 81.94
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.839 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.882
0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.946
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.728
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.899
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.925
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.966
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.774
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.929
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.694
2.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.686
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.805
2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.624
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.793
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.792
2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.829
2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.692
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.826
1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.920
2.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.960
2.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.673
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.778
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.074
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.067
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.873
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.784
0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.024
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.137
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.927
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.793
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.967
0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.788
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.877
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.697
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.087
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.760
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.791
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.034
0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.927
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.866
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.939
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.031
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.980
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.063
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Erythema (Trunk) n=90,88,44,44
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.696
2.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.658
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.510
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.625
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.922
2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.883
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.734
2.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.056
1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.006
2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.987
2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.778
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.024
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.133
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.137
2.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.790
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.952
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.137
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.893
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.968
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.823
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.078
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.835
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.862
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.678
2.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
3.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.746
3.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.608
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.946
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.854
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.856
3.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.677
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
1.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.051
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.077
2.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.939
2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.739
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.865
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.082
2.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.756
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.883
1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.155
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.166
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.810
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.963
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.159
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.968
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.889
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.024
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.281
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.198
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.068
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Induration (Head/Neck) n=90,88,44,44
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.937
1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.998
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.065
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.930
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42
1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.998
1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.011
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.100
2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.943
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42
1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.022
1.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.073
1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.071
2.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.932
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.010
1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.074
1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.959
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.010
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.736
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.974
1.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.984
1.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.995
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.642
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.910
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.683
0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.718
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.742
0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.801
0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.633
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.810
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
2.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.738
2.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.783
2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.925
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.677
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.054
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.021
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.795
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.029
1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.078
2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.050
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.813
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.081
1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.000
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.842
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.867
0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.041
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.768
0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.841
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Induration (Trunk) n=90,88,44,44
2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.619
2.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.703
2.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.772
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.695
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.913
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.804
2.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.689
2.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.759
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.109
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.970
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.919
2.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.742
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.142
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.061
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.080
2.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.969
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
0.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.034
1.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.115
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.109
2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.898
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.961
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.156
1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.298
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.942
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.976
1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.070
0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.972
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.833
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.846
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.087
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.980
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.939
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.899
0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.941
0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.028
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
3.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.678
2.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.708
3.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.821
3.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.680
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.915
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.888
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.846
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.826
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.102
2.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.978
2.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.932
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.808
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.138
1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.044
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.035
2.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.927
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.878
1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.063
2.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.975
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.970
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.798
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.115
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.138
2.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.969
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.827
1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.027
1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.785
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.826
1.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.088
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.976
0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.013
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.791
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.011
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.029
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.898
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.907
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.069
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.069
1.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.134
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=90,88,44,44
2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.946
2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.011
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.184
2.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.987
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42
1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.003
1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.185
2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.939
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.131
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.068
1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.214
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.906
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.986
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.039
1.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.109
2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.013
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.030
1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.914
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.811
0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.025
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.999
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.664
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.841
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.758
0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.812
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.739
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.809
0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.654
0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.878
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.839
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.894
0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.716
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.956
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.897
0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.884
0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.723
0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.914
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.779
2.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.796
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.848
2.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.724
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.922
2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.952
2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.900
2.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.764
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.047
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.031
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.804
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.939
1.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.118
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.841
1.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.033
2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.810
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.793
0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.070
1.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.033
1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.807
0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.907
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834
1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.833
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.708
0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.010
0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.642
0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.967
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.801
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.006
0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.686
0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.910
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.763
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.979
0.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.871
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.052
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Scaling (Trunk) n=90,88,44,44
2.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.765
2.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.784
2.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.677
2.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.789
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.928
2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.938
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.745
2.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.759
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.109
1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.883
2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.770
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.057
1.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.039
2.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.008
2.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.815
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.006
1.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132
1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.037
2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.857
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
0.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.938
1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.097
1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
2.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.882
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,84,38,37
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.871
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.987
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.955
1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.894
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.754
0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.953
0.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.823
0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.852
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.882
0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.938
0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.861
0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.989
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.855
0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.818
0.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.971
0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.887
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=90,88,44,44
2.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.709
2.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.776
2.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.834
3.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.765
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.017
2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.911
2.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.888
2.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.841
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.117
2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.960
2.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.906
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
1.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.129
1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.093
2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
2.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.884
PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.896
1.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.120
2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.920
2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.885

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and the "percent of body surface area (BSA)" affected. Basic characteristics of psoriatic lesions: erythema, induration, and scaling (PASI components) are scored separately for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]) according to a 5-point scale: 0 (no involvement); 1 (slight); 2 (moderate); 3 (marked); 4 (very marked). PASI component score range from 0 to 4, where higher scores indicate greater severity of psoriatic lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.860
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.820
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.625
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.593
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.945 • Interval 71.74 to 88.26
-1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.185 • Interval 46.47 to 67.17
-1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.172 • Interval 54.42 to 81.94
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.158 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.030 • Interval 67.93 to 85.4
-1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.203 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.254 • Interval 49.42 to 77.85
-1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.257 • Interval 44.56 to 73.62
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.084
-1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.195
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.132
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.191
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
-1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.079
-1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.181
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.225
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.265
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.698
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.609
0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.403
0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.417
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.858
-0.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.839
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.697
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.582
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.908
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.159
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.877
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.818
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.957
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.257
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.148
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.994
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.888
-0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.844
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.774
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.550
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.041
-1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.969
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.949
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.560
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
-2.04 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.176
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.167
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.711
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.054
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.203
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.262
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.793
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.134
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.200
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.025
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.091
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.034
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.276
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.016
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.028
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.212
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.929
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.072
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
-2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.082
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.256
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.174
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.158
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.010
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.123
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.764
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.637
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.000
-1.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.274
-1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.991
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.993
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.028
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.372
-2.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.025
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.129
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.077
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.400
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.251
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42
-1.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.974
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.892
-0.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.708
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.670
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
-1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.080
-0.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.937
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.086
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.927
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.024
-1.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
-0.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.011
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.751
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.296
-2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.150
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.093
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.067
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.266
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.100
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.108
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.107
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.282
-2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.183
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.204
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.728
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
-0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.457
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.439
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
-1.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.044
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.850
-0.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.812
-0.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.576
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
-2.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.035
-1.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.129
-0.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.194
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.637
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.984
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.071
-1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.138
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.031
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
-2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.938
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.122
-2.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.222
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.158
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
-2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.058
-1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.145
-2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.068
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.360
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.814
-1.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.159
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.148
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.766
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42
-1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.077
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.766
-0.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.955
-0.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.633
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.137
-1.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.103
-0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.338
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.993
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.160
-1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.151
-0.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.404
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.977
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.98 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.075
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.110
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.366
-1.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.021
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.078
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.950
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.030
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.940
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.894
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.114
-0.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.023
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.016
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.998
-1.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.040
-1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.115
-0.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.105
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.127
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.153
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.064
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.195
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.810
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.682
-0.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.655
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.490
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Trunk) n=87,88,43,42
-1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.104
-0.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.842
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.934
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.692
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.124
-1.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.018
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.790
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,88,40,39
-2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.045
-1.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.174
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.154
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.932
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.088
-1.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.090
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.219
-1.79 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.174
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Trunk) n=83,83,38,37
-2.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.992
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.049
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.054
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.250
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Trunk) n=81,81,37,36
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.173
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.160
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.042
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.410
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
-2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.188
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.049
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
-2.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.352
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.846
-0.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.778
-0.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.657
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.565
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.016
-0.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.933
-0.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.668
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.044
-1.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.078
-0.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.125
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.863
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.915
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.160
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.080
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.916
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.912
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.173
-0.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.293
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.014
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.964
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.128
-2.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.160
-2.16 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.236
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.190
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.118
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.331
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.111
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.151
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.360
-2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.326
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42)
-0.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.676 • Interval 40.78 to 61.44
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.757 • Interval 22.09 to 41.55
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.594 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.532 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=87,88,43,42)
-0.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.854 • Interval 62.97 to 81.48
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.890 • Interval 37.29 to 58.16
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.727 • Interval 1.99 to 20.74
-0.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.621 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.962 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.038 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
-0.20 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.114 • Interval 8.54 to 32.37
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.935 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
-1.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.957 • Interval 75.63 to 91.03
-1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.135 • Interval 44.14 to 64.95
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.295 • Interval 37.51 to 67.03
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.942 • Interval 14.11 to 40.43
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.015 • Interval 73.02 to 89.2
-1.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.175 • Interval 48.82 to 69.36
-0.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.361 • Interval 62.21 to 87.79
-0.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.907 • Interval 51.9 to 79.92
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.984
-1.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.977
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.784
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.677
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.004
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.092
-0.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.941
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.852
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.057
-1.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.117
-1.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.966
-1.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.042
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.111
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.185
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.286
-1.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.183
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Trunk) n=88,86,44,42
-0.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.724
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.639
-0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.457
0.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.370
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.587
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.722
0.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.374
0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.379
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.965
-1.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.183
-0.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.958
-0.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.778
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.014
-1.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.255
-0.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.085
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.818
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.803
-0.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.660
-0.09 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.421
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.417
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.062
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.243
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.082
-2.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.121
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42
-0.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.705
-0.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.602
-0.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.398
-0.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.468
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,88,40,39
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.032
-1.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.031
-0.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.075
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.913
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
-1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.060
-0.76 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.240
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.863
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Head/Neck) n=84,84,38,39
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.058
-1.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.084
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.133
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.903
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.121
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.094
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.155
-1.65 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.160
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.124
-1.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.066
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.056
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.198
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.178
-1.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.139
-1.58 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.228
-1.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.215
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.766
-0.42 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.727
-0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.526
-0.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.407
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.048
-0.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.867
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.833
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.707
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.862
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.231
-0.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.091
-0.54 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.822
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.32 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.867
-1.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.217
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.293
-0.69 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.977
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.012
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.186
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.250
-1.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.093
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Trunk) n=85,88,40,39
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.084
-1.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.003
-0.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.071
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.673
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Induration (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.965
-1.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.154
-1.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.398
-0.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.785
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Trunk) n=80,78,36,36
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.070
-1.90 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.180
-2.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.207
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.339
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.993
-0.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.809
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.773
-0.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.415
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=85,88,40,39
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.002
-1.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.977
-0.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.955
-0.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.683
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,88,40,39
-2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.845
-1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.093
-0.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.975
-0.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.772
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.61 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.865
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.039
-1.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.026
-1.74 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.818
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.957
-1.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.106
-2.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.083
-2.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.058
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.974
-1.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.022
-2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.033
-2.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.064
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Induration (Lower Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.041
-1.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.140
-2.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.178
-2.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.194
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=88,86,44,42
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.802
-0.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.587
-0.14 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.594
0.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.379
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=85,88,40,39
-1.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.157
-0.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.000
-0.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.296
-0.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.963
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=83,83,38,37
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.073
-1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.162
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.290
-1.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.266
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=81,81,37,36
-1.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.198
-1.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.138
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.250
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.267
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Head/Neck) n=80,78,36,36
-1.81 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.192
-1.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.202
-1.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.456
-1.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.233
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=88,86,44,42
-0.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.843
-0.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.602
-0.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.579
-0.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.634
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=87,88,43,42
-1.31 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.154
-0.83 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.847
-0.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.848
-0.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.742
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.35 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.047
-1.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.005
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.093
-1.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.112
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=83,83,38,37
-2.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.009
-1.67 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.025
-2.08 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.997
-2.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.258
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52: Scaling (Upper Limbs) n=80,78,36,36
-2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.175
-1.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.201
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.282
-1.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.381
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16: Scaling (Trunk) n=84,84,38,39
-2.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.090
-1.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.136
-1.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.255
-0.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.970
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20: Scaling (Lower Limbs) n=84,84,38,39
-2.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.963
-1.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.138
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.136
-1.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.023
Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40: Erythema (Upper Limbs) n=81,81,37,36
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.081
-1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.151
-2.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.153
-1.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.094

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
-46.24 percent change
Standard Error 3.135
-32.47 percent change
Standard Error 3.127
-1.98 percent change
Standard Error 4.444
-7.31 percent change
Standard Error 4.527
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
-66.96 percent change
Standard Error 3.769
-51.24 percent change
Standard Error 3.739
-13.17 percent change
Standard Error 5.384
-16.18 percent change
Standard Error 5.488
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
-80.64 percent change
Standard Error 3.631
-59.73 percent change
Standard Error 3.585
-25.13 percent change
Standard Error 5.205
-20.40 percent change
Standard Error 5.304
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
-84.35 percent change
Standard Error 3.912
-66.69 percent change
Standard Error 3.874
-32.79 percent change
Standard Error 5.651
-21.63 percent change
Standard Error 5.721
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
-90.18 percent change
Standard Error 2.264
-77.29 percent change
Standard Error 2.258
-87.73 percent change
Standard Error 3.332
-83.64 percent change
Standard Error 3.368
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
-86.05 percent change
Standard Error 2.763
-75.55 percent change
Standard Error 2.764
-84.65 percent change
Standard Error 4.066
-79.27 percent change
Standard Error 4.101
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
-24.93 percent change
Standard Error 2.399 • Interval 15.57 to 33.32
-16.28 percent change
Standard Error 2.409 • Interval 0.19 to 8.9
1.37 percent change
Standard Error 3.392
-0.35 percent change
Standard Error 3.473
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=84,84,38,39)
-87.89 percent change
Standard Error 3.024
-71.93 percent change
Standard Error 3.002
-69.85 percent change
Standard Error 4.399
-60.85 percent change
Standard Error 4.423
Percent Change From Baseline in PASI Scores Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
-90.47 percent change
Standard Error 2.444
-76.06 percent change
Standard Error 2.437
-86.63 percent change
Standard Error 3.584
-81.43 percent change
Standard Error 3.622

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
7.57 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 13.395
16.52 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.899
28.57 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 21.645
34.54 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.293
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=84,84,38,39)
5.05 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 10.041
13.69 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.976
15.50 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.522
24.83 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.044
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
3.22 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 5.894
11.47 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.304
6.95 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 10.262
9.03 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 11.781
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
2.56 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 5.412
10.32 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 13.077
5.88 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 8.351
6.35 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 9.462
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
3.83 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 7.908
10.94 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 15.255
5.00 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 7.686
7.87 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 9.584
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=90,88,44,44)
36.36 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.035 • Interval 15.57 to 33.32
37.41 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.614 • Interval 0.19 to 8.9
35.29 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.294
36.25 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.018
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,44)
33.95 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 17.537
36.56 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.363
36.84 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.808
36.38 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.592
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
27.82 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.599
32.75 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.314
38.32 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.355
36.30 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.916
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
17.62 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 18.411
24.38 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.583
36.75 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 19.817
34.99 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 16.182
Actual BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
10.59 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 15.486
20.45 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 20.462
33.15 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 20.483
34.06 percent BSA
Standard Deviation 17.142

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. Body regions are assigned specific number of handprints with percentage \[Head and neck = 10% (10 handprints), upper extremities = 20% (20 handprints), Trunk (including axillae and groin) = 30% (30 handprints), lower extremities (including buttocks) = 40% (40 handprints)\]. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis. The total BSA affected was the summation of individual regions affected.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
-84.16 percent change
Standard Error 3.867
-72.28 percent change
Standard Error 3.868
-81.70 percent change
Standard Error 5.681
-74.02 percent change
Standard Error 5.737
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,44)
-5.58 percent change
Standard Error 2.083
-2.53 percent change
Standard Error 2.093
4.79 percent change
Standard Error 2.947
2.14 percent change
Standard Error 3.016
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
-21.90 percent change
Standard Error 3.202
-10.98 percent change
Standard Error 3.193
10.29 percent change
Standard Error 4.541
2.28 percent change
Standard Error 4.622
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
-46.98 percent change
Standard Error 4.909
-33.22 percent change
Standard Error 4.870
8.73 percent change
Standard Error 7.017
-0.42 percent change
Standard Error 7.155
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
-65.97 percent change
Standard Error 5.536
-44.44 percent change
Standard Error 5.471
0.41 percent change
Standard Error 7.928
0.48 percent change
Standard Error 8.086
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
-73.80 percent change
Standard Error 5.903
-54.41 percent change
Standard Error 5.839
-8.85 percent change
Standard Error 8.511
4.13 percent change
Standard Error 8.632
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=84,84,38,39)
-82.65 percent change
Standard Error 4.459
-62.35 percent change
Standard Error 4.419
-49.35 percent change
Standard Error 6.495
-28.86 percent change
Standard Error 6.530
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
-87.55 percent change
Standard Error 3.531
-70.55 percent change
Standard Error 3.521
-74.83 percent change
Standard Error 5.186
-73.95 percent change
Standard Error 5.235
Percent Change From Baseline in BSA Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
-90.00 percent change
Standard Error 3.213
-73.00 percent change
Standard Error 3.207
-79.48 percent change
Standard Error 4.743
-79.91 percent change
Standard Error 4.786

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 50 response was defined as at least 50% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI50 response is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2
21.11 percentage of participants
Interval 12.68 to 29.54
5.68 percentage of participants
Interval 0.85 to 10.52
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4
48.89 percentage of participants
Interval 38.56 to 59.22
27.27 percentage of participants
Interval 17.97 to 36.58
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
74.44 percentage of participants
Interval 65.43 to 83.46
55.68 percentage of participants
Interval 45.3 to 66.06
13.64 percentage of participants
Interval 3.5 to 23.78
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12
81.11 percentage of participants
Interval 73.02 to 89.2
64.77 percentage of participants
Interval 54.79 to 74.75
27.27 percentage of participants
Interval 14.11 to 40.43
9.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
86.67 percentage of participants
Interval 79.64 to 93.69
71.59 percentage of participants
Interval 62.17 to 81.01
40.91 percentage of participants
Interval 26.38 to 55.44
18.18 percentage of participants
Interval 6.79 to 29.58
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
85.56 percentage of participants
Interval 78.29 to 92.82
72.73 percentage of participants
Interval 63.42 to 82.03
68.18 percentage of participants
Interval 54.42 to 81.94
63.64 percentage of participants
Interval 49.42 to 77.85
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
88.89 percentage of participants
Interval 82.4 to 95.38
78.41 percentage of participants
Interval 69.81 to 87.01
79.55 percentage of participants
Interval 67.63 to 91.46
75.00 percentage of participants
Interval 62.21 to 87.79
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
87.78 percentage of participants
Interval 81.01 to 94.54
80.68 percentage of participants
Interval 72.43 to 88.93
79.55 percentage of participants
Interval 67.63 to 91.46
72.73 percentage of participants
Interval 59.57 to 85.89
Percentage of Participants With PASI50 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
83.33 percentage of participants
Interval 75.63 to 91.03
73.86 percentage of participants
Interval 64.68 to 83.04
77.27 percentage of participants
Interval 64.89 to 89.66
75.00 percentage of participants
Interval 62.21 to 87.79

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both, "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI 90 response was defined as at least 90% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with PASI90 response up to Week 52 is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
27.78 percentage of participants
Interval 18.52 to 37.03
13.64 percentage of participants
Interval 6.47 to 20.81
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4
7.78 percentage of participants
Interval 2.24 to 13.31
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.39
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12
51.11 percentage of participants
Interval 40.78 to 61.44
29.55 percentage of participants
Interval 20.01 to 39.08
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 49.88 to 70.12
35.23 percentage of participants
Interval 25.25 to 45.21
6.82 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 14.27
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
71.11 percentage of participants
Interval 61.75 to 80.48
35.23 percentage of participants
Interval 25.25 to 45.21
25.00 percentage of participants
Interval 12.21 to 37.79
9.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
65.56 percentage of participants
Interval 55.74 to 75.37
42.05 percentage of participants
Interval 31.73 to 52.36
56.82 percentage of participants
Interval 42.18 to 71.45
40.91 percentage of participants
Interval 26.38 to 55.44
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 56.93 to 76.41
35.23 percentage of participants
Interval 25.25 to 45.21
56.82 percentage of participants
Interval 42.18 to 71.45
45.45 percentage of participants
Interval 30.74 to 60.17
Percentage of Participants With PASI90 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
56.67 percentage of participants
Interval 46.43 to 66.9
38.64 percentage of participants
Interval 28.46 to 48.81
56.82 percentage of participants
Interval 42.18 to 71.45
36.36 percentage of participants
Interval 22.15 to 50.58

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both "lesion severity" and "percent of BSA" affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks\]), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Percentage of participants with PASI score of at least 125% of baseline PASI score are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
1.25 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.68
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.39
1.16 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.43
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
4.76 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.2
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
2.30 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.45
1.14 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.35
13.95 percentage of participants
Interval 3.6 to 24.31
2.38 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.99
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
2.35 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.58
1.14 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.35
17.50 percentage of participants
Interval 5.72 to 29.28
2.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
1.19 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.51
1.14 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.35
7.50 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 15.66
5.13 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.05
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
1.19 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.51
2.38 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 5.64
10.53 percentage of participants
Interval 0.77 to 20.28
7.69 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.06
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=84,84,38,39)
1.19 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 3.51
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
2.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,83,38,37)
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With PASI125 Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represents more severe psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Baseline (n=40,38,18,18)
25.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.58 • Interval 0.0 to 5.58
26.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.97 • Interval 0.0 to 3.35
28.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.90 • Interval 5.72 to 29.28
25.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.37 • Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 8 (n=39,38,15,15)
23.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.45 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
23.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.29 • Interval 0.0 to 5.64
28.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.66 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
30.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.48 • Interval 0.0 to 16.06
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 16 (n=38,38,14,15)
17.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.14 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
19.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.30
30.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.86
28.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.54 • Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 20 (n=37,38,14,15)
13.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.70
17.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.94
28.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.02
30.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.08
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 32 (n=37,37,14,14)
12.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.59
15.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.69
16.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.48
17.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.69
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 40 (n=36,36,13,13)
9.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.65 • Interval 0.0 to 3.68
14.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.01
15.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.82
14.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.93
Actual Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) Score Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 52 (n=31,34,12,13)
10.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.22
13.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.96
13.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.54
10.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.67

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail was divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represents more severe psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 8 (n=39,38,15,15)
-3.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.416 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
-2.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.434 • Interval 0.0 to 5.64
2.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.282 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
2.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.283 • Interval 0.0 to 16.06
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 16 (n=38,38,14,15)
-9.38 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.927 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
-6.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.936
2.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.151
0.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.082 • Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 20 (n=37,38,14,15)
-12.68 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.886
-9.18 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.884
0.48 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.079
2.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.999
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 32 (n=37,37,14,14)
-14.02 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.350
-11.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.350
-11.81 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.834
-12.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.788
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 40 (n=36,36,13,13)
-16.31 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.365 • Interval 0.0 to 3.68
-11.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.359
-13.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.876
-14.19 units on a scale
Standard Error 3.842
Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52 in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline
Week 52 (n=31,34,12,13)
-17.13 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.689
-13.55 units on a scale
Standard Error 2.651
-15.08 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.387
-17.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 4.315

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

Nail psoriasis is evaluated by the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Total number psoriasis affected nails (presence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix/nail bed) were assessed and reported. The total number of affected FINGER nails was reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=40,38,18,18)
7.6 nails
Standard Deviation 3.06 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
7.3 nails
Standard Deviation 3.21 • Interval 0.0 to 5.64
8.1 nails
Standard Deviation 2.97 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
7.4 nails
Standard Deviation 3.45 • Interval 0.0 to 16.06
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=39,38,15,15)
7.2 nails
Standard Deviation 3.07 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
7.2 nails
Standard Deviation 3.61
7.3 nails
Standard Deviation 3.58
7.9 nails
Standard Deviation 3.20 • Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=38,38,14,15)
6.1 nails
Standard Deviation 3.53
6.6 nails
Standard Deviation 3.57
7.9 nails
Standard Deviation 3.82
7.6 nails
Standard Deviation 3.56
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=37,38,14,15)
5.1 nails
Standard Deviation 3.84
6.0 nails
Standard Deviation 3.84
7.4 nails
Standard Deviation 3.93
7.9 nails
Standard Deviation 3.08
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=37,37,14,14)
3.8 nails
Standard Deviation 3.92 • Interval 0.0 to 3.68
5.5 nails
Standard Deviation 3.85
6.1 nails
Standard Deviation 3.95
7.6 nails
Standard Deviation 3.72
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=36,36,13,13)
3.0 nails
Standard Deviation 3.60
5.4 nails
Standard Deviation 4.08
6.3 nails
Standard Deviation 4.39
5.8 nails
Standard Deviation 4.28
Number of Affected Nails in Participants With Nail Psoriasis at Baseline Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=31,34,12,13)
3.0 nails
Standard Deviation 3.67
4.4 nails
Standard Deviation 4.23
4.6 nails
Standard Deviation 4.12
4.4 nails
Standard Deviation 3.75

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represents more severe psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=39,38,15,15)
-9.59 percent change
Standard Error 8.473 • Interval 0.0 to 3.51
-8.81 percent change
Standard Error 8.585
5.28 percent change
Standard Error 13.661
25.40 percent change
Standard Error 13.662 • Interval 0.0 to 7.52
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=38,38,14,15)
-33.31 percent change
Standard Error 10.552
-14.91 percent change
Standard Error 10.600
-3.26 percent change
Standard Error 17.257
18.43 percent change
Standard Error 16.869
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=37,38,14,15)
-51.97 percent change
Standard Error 8.748
-25.10 percent change
Standard Error 8.715
-8.87 percent change
Standard Error 14.276
13.72 percent change
Standard Error 13.869
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=37,37,14,14)
-58.44 percent change
Standard Error 10.256 • Interval 0.0 to 3.68
-25.27 percent change
Standard Error 10.247
-50.20 percent change
Standard Error 16.734
-45.83 percent change
Standard Error 16.481
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=36,36,13,13)
-68.68 percent change
Standard Error 9.243
-37.40 percent change
Standard Error 9.208
-47.17 percent change
Standard Error 15.143
-58.60 percent change
Standard Error 14.988
Percent Change From Baseline in NAPSI Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=31,34,12,13)
-71.40 percent change
Standard Error 10.891
-51.71 percent change
Standard Error 10.636
-56.08 percent change
Standard Error 17.621
-45.67 percent change
Standard Error 17.192

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represents more severe psoriasis. NAPSI 75 response was defined as at least a 75% reduction in NAPSI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with NAPSI 75 response is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
10.53 percentage of participants
Interval 0.77 to 20.28
5.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.14
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 7.6 to 32.4
15.79 percentage of participants
Interval 4.2 to 27.38
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
5.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
30.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 44.2
13.16 percentage of participants
Interval 2.41 to 23.91
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
52.50 percentage of participants
Interval 37.02 to 67.98
28.95 percentage of participants
Interval 14.53 to 43.37
27.78 percentage of participants
Interval 7.09 to 48.47
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
65.00 percentage of participants
Interval 50.22 to 79.78
34.21 percentage of participants
Interval 19.13 to 49.29
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 11.56 to 55.11
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 11.56 to 55.11
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI75 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
52.50 percentage of participants
Interval 37.02 to 67.98
47.37 percentage of participants
Interval 31.49 to 63.24
38.89 percentage of participants
Interval 16.37 to 61.41
38.89 percentage of participants
Interval 16.37 to 61.41

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 8, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: Number of participants analyzed signifies the FAS participants (randomized and received at least 1 dose of investigational drug) who were evaluable (had nail psoriasis at Baseline and at least 1 measurement during follow up) for this measure. n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The NAPSI quantifies severity of nail psoriasis by evaluating the presence or absence of psoriatic manifestations on the nail matrix (pitting, leukonychia, red spots on lulunea, crumbling) and nail bed (onycholysis, splinter hemorrhages, subungual hyperkeratosis, oil drop \[salmon patch dyschromia\]). Each finger nail divided with imaginary lines into quadrants and scored for both nail matrix and nail bed psoriasis (range from 0 \[absence of psoriasis\] to 4 \[presence of psoriasis in all 4 quadrants\]). The total NAPSI score equals the sum of scores for all of the finger nails evaluated and ranges from 0 to 80. Higher scores represents more severe psoriasis. NAPSI 100 response was defined as at least a 100% reduction in NAPSI relative to Baseline. Percentage of participants with NAPSI 100 response is reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=40 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=38 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=18 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
17.50 percentage of participants
Interval 5.72 to 29.28
10.53 percentage of participants
Interval 0.77 to 20.28
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
5.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 11.75
5.26 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
5.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
27.50 percentage of participants
Interval 13.66 to 41.34
13.16 percentage of participants
Interval 2.41 to 23.91
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
5.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
30.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 44.2
15.79 percentage of participants
Interval 4.2 to 27.38
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
30.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.8 to 44.2
31.58 percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 46.36
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.88
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Percentage of Participants With NAPSI100 Response Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
5.26 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 12.36
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends for post baseline time points. Baseline ISI is average of scores on 7 days prior to start of study treatment.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=88,88,44,44)
5.66 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.586
5.10 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.679 • Interval 0.0 to 12.36
5.22 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.501
5.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.679
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=87,86,44,42)
2.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.043 • Interval 0.0 to 11.75
3.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.669 • Interval 0.0 to 12.36
5.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.791 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
4.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.731 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=88,88,43,42)
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.061 • Interval 5.72 to 29.28
2.68 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.322 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
5.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.715 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
5.12 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.491
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
1.47 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.900 • Interval 13.66 to 41.34
2.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.283 • Interval 2.41 to 23.91
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.677 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
4.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.978 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,40,39)
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.565 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
2.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.323 • Interval 4.2 to 27.38
4.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.621 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
5.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.938 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
1.17 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.782 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.367 • Interval 16.8 to 46.36
3.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.391 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
5.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.811 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=83,84,38,38)
1.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.564
2.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.326
1.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.253
2.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.227
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=838238,37
0.88 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.273
2.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.382
1.24 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.747
1.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.388
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
0.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.145
2.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.283
1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.181
1.53 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.158
Actual Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,36,36)
1.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.074
2.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.516
1.89 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.482
2.36 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.380

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

ISI assessed severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis. ISI is a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=79,78,36,36)
-3.91 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.272
-2.71 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.272
-3.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.401
-3.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.403
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=86,86,44,42)
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.219 • Interval 0.0 to 11.75
-1.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.218 • Interval 0.0 to 12.36
0.12 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.306 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-0.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.314 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=87,88,43,42)
-3.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.226 • Interval 5.72 to 29.28
-2.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.224 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
-0.03 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.319 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-0.47 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.325
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=84,88,40,39)
-3.93 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.232 • Interval 13.66 to 41.34
-2.88 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.228 • Interval 2.41 to 23.91
-0.50 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.331 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-0.46 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.337 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=83,88,40,39)
-4.10 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.237 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
-3.16 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.233 • Interval 4.2 to 27.38
-1.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.338 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-0.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.344 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=83,84,38,39)
-4.21 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.232 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
-3.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.229 • Interval 16.8 to 46.36
-1.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.335 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
-0.33 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.337 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=82,84,38,38)
-4.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.219
-3.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.216
-3.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.318
-3.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.320
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=82,82,38,37)
-4.51 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.220
-3.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.219
-4.01 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.322
-4.04 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.325
Change From Baseline in ISI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=80,81,37,36)
-4.39 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.224
-2.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.222
-3.81 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.328
-3.89 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.331

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The DLQI is a 10 item general dermatology questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=90,88,44,44)
14.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.17 • Interval 0.0 to 11.75
13.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.29 • Interval 0.0 to 12.36
12.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.82 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
12.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.92 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
9.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.31 • Interval 5.72 to 29.28
10.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.20 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
12.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.34 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
10.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.97
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=86,88,42,41)
7.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.00 • Interval 13.66 to 41.34
8.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.46 • Interval 2.41 to 23.91
12.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.99 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
10.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.39 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
5.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.49 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
7.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.89 • Interval 4.2 to 27.38
11.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.25 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
9.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.66 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,39,39)
4.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.47 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
6.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.16 • Interval 16.8 to 46.36
11.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.11 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
10.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.86 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
4.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.70
6.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.62
10.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.20
10.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.77
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=82,84,38,39)
3.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.46
5.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.50
6.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.80
6.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.17
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
3.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.39
5.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.31
4.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.42
5.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
3.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.37
5.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.44
4.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.07
4.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.03
Actual Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
4.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.83
6.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.25
4.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.85
6.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.68

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

The DLQI is a 10 item general dermatology questionnaire that assesses health-related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI item response options are rated by the participant from 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8 (n=85,88,40,39)
-7.52 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.594 • Interval 13.66 to 41.34
-5.83 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.587 • Interval 2.41 to 23.91
-1.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.852 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-2.70 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.868 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
-10.05 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.565
-8.07 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.562
-7.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.828
-7.94 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.837
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2 (n=88,86,44,42)
-3.98 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.455 • Interval 0.0 to 11.75
-3.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.458 • Interval 0.0 to 12.36
-0.20 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.644 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-2.27 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.659 • Interval 0.0 to 16.14
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4 (n=86,88,44,42)
-5.96 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.492 • Interval 5.72 to 29.28
-5.11 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.488 • Interval 0.77 to 20.28
0.17 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.700 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-2.26 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.712
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12 (n=84,88,39,39)
-8.59 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.618 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
-6.64 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.609 • Interval 4.2 to 27.38
-0.76 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.891 • Interval 0.0 to 25.63
-2.44 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.904 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,84,38,39)
-9.03 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.618 • Interval 15.8 to 44.2
-7.00 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.611 • Interval 16.8 to 46.36
-1.15 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.899 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
-2.22 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.905 • Interval 0.0 to 33.88
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20 (n=82,84,38,39)
-9.36 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.562
-7.78 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.555
-5.84 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.819
-6.30 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.821
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
-9.56 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.563
-7.32 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.559
-7.61 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.826
-8.28 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.836
Change From Baseline in DLQI Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
-8.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.679
-6.63 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.681
-7.42 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.012
-6.37 units on a scale
Standard Error 1.010

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo. NRI method (participants with missing values considered as non-responders) was used to impute missing values.

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5-point scale (0=clear \[no psoriasis\]; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; 4=severe). the percentage of participants with scores of 0 (clear) and 1 (almost clear) are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 2
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 4
7.78 percentage of participants
Interval 2.24 to 13.31
5.68 percentage of participants
Interval 0.85 to 10.52
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 8
32.22 percentage of participants
Interval 22.57 to 41.88
19.32 percentage of participants
Interval 11.07 to 27.57
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 12
45.56 percentage of participants
Interval 35.27 to 55.84
27.27 percentage of participants
Interval 17.97 to 36.58
2.27 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.00 percentage of participants
It is because the calculation method is based on normal approximation which assumes a big sample size, but n=0 at these weeks. Hence, it's not appropriate to use normal approximation to estimate the CI's.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 45.29 to 65.82
34.09 percentage of participants
Interval 24.19 to 43.99
9.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.6 to 17.59
4.55 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.7
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 20
52.22 percentage of participants
Interval 41.9 to 62.54
31.82 percentage of participants
Interval 22.09 to 41.55
18.18 percentage of participants
Interval 6.79 to 29.58
13.64 percentage of participants
Interval 3.5 to 23.78
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32
56.67 percentage of participants
Interval 46.43 to 66.9
34.09 percentage of participants
Interval 24.19 to 43.99
45.45 percentage of participants
Interval 30.74 to 60.17
31.82 percentage of participants
Interval 18.06 to 45.58
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40
52.22 percentage of participants
Interval 41.9 to 62.54
34.09 percentage of participants
Interval 24.19 to 43.99
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 35.23 to 64.77
40.91 percentage of participants
Interval 26.38 to 55.44
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) Response of "Clear" or "Almost Clear" Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52
51.11 percentage of participants
Interval 40.78 to 61.44
26.14 percentage of participants
Interval 16.96 to 35.32
47.73 percentage of participants
Interval 32.97 to 62.49
29.55 percentage of participants
Interval 16.06 to 43.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Weeks 16, 32, 40, 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a worse health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=90,88,44,44)
0.784 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2088
0.797 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1991
0.779 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1803
0.741 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2183
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,83,38,39)
0.957 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0778 • Interval 2.24 to 13.31
0.930 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1226 • Interval 0.85 to 10.52
0.905 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1191 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.817 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2108
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
0.955 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0796 • Interval 22.57 to 41.88
0.904 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1368 • Interval 11.07 to 27.57
0.960 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0739 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.917 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1477
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
0.950 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0940 • Interval 35.27 to 55.84
0.918 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1177 • Interval 17.97 to 36.58
0.954 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.0776 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.938 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1125
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
0.938 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1303 • Interval 45.29 to 65.82
0.893 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1719 • Interval 24.19 to 43.99
0.941 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1118 • Interval 0.6 to 17.59
0.887 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1626 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 16, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a worse health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,83,38,39)
0.172 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2164 • Interval 2.24 to 13.31
0.128 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2108 • Interval 0.85 to 10.52
0.105 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1824 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.074 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2391
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
0.170 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2092 • Interval 22.57 to 41.88
0.109 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2347 • Interval 11.07 to 27.57
0.160 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1904 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.173 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2202
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
0.168 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2159 • Interval 35.27 to 55.84
0.120 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2322 • Interval 17.97 to 36.58
0.159 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.1937 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
0.192 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2103
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Utility Score Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
0.156 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2071 • Interval 45.29 to 65.82
0.101 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2477 • Interval 24.19 to 43.99
0.147 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2136 • Interval 0.6 to 17.59
0.142 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.2328 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 16, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Baseline (n=90,88,44,44)
65.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.90
69.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.84
66.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.09
67.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.92
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,83,38,39)
83.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.30 • Interval 2.24 to 13.31
78.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.41 • Interval 0.85 to 10.52
72.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.04 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
68.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.20
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
84.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.17 • Interval 22.57 to 41.88
82.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.00 • Interval 11.07 to 27.57
85.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.36 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
81.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.25
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
85.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.45 • Interval 35.27 to 55.84
83.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.35 • Interval 17.97 to 36.58
83.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.86 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
81.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.03
Euro Quality of Life 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
82.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.13 • Interval 45.29 to 65.82
80.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.40 • Interval 24.19 to 43.99
85.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.58 • Interval 0.6 to 17.59
80.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.20 • Interval 0.0 to 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 16, 32, 40, and 52

Population: The full analysis population included all participants who were randomized to the study and received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; number of participants analyzed was the evaluable participants for the specific criteria; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single index value. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 millimeter (mm) (worst imaginable health state) to 100 mm (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 16 (n=84,83,38,39)
17.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.23 • Interval 2.24 to 13.31
8.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.15 • Interval 0.85 to 10.52
2.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.17 • Interval 0.0 to 6.68
-0.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.16
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 32 (n=83,82,38,37)
18.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.92
13.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.36
15.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.50
12.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.99
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 40 (n=81,81,37,36)
19.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 27.07
13.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.31
14.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.19
11.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.46
Change From Baseline in EQ-5D - Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Over Time Through Week 52
Week 52 (n=80,78,35,36)
16.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.08
9.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.54
15.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.96
10.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.16

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent AEs are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-16
Number of Participants with AEs(All Causalities)
61 participants
57 participants
43 participants
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-16
Number of Participants with SAEs(All Causalities)
0 participants
2 participants
0 participants
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-16
Number of Participants Discontinued due to AEs
1 participants
3 participants
3 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. AEs included both SAEs and non-SAEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-52
Number of Participants with AEs (All Causalities)
76 participants
74 participants
35 participants
33 participants
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-52
Number of Participants with SAEs(All Causalities)
2 participants
4 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Treatment-Emergent All Causalities Adverse Events (AEs) During Week 0-52
Number of Participants Discontinued due to AEs
1 participants
3 participants
3 participants
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

Study drugs were to be discontinued and the participant withdrawn for: 2 sequential absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) \<1.0 X 10\^9/L (1000/mm\^3); 2 sequential absolute lymphocyte counts \<0.5 X 10\^9/L; 2 sequential hemoglobin values \<9.0 g/dL and/or decreases of \>30% from baseline value; 2 sequential platelet counts \<75 X 10\^9/L; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations ≥3X ULN with at least 1 total bilirubin value ≥2X ULN (reason #1); 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations ≥5X ULN regardless of total bilirubin or accompanying signs or symptoms (reason #2); 2 sequential increases in serum creatinine \>50% and an increase in serum creatinine \>0.5 mg/dL over the average of screening and baseline values; 2 sequential CK elevations \>10X ULN.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential absolute neutrophil count
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential absolute lymphocyte count
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential hemoglobin
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential platelet count
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential AST or ALT reason #1
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential AST or ALT reason #2
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 Sequential serum creatinine
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-16
2 sequential creatine kinase
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

Study drugs were to be discontinued and the participant withdrawn for: 2 sequential absolute neutrophil counts (ANC) \<1.0 X 10\^9/L (1000/mm\^3); 2 sequential absolute lymphocyte counts \<0.5 X 10\^9/L; 2 sequential hemoglobin values \<9.0 g/dL and/or decreases of \>30% from baseline value; 2 sequential platelet counts \<75 X 10\^9/L; 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations ≥3X ULN with at least 1 total bilirubin value ≥2X ULN (reason #1); 2 sequential AST or ALT elevations ≥5X ULN regardless of total bilirubin or accompanying signs or symptoms (reason #2); 2 sequential increases in serum creatinine \>50% and an increase in serum creatinine \>0.5 mg/dL over the average of screening and baseline values; 2 sequential CK elevations \>10X ULN.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential absolute neutrophil count
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential absolute lymphocyte count
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential hemoglobin
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential platelet count
2 participants
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential AST or ALT reason #1
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential AST or ALT reason #2
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 Sequential serum creatinine
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Values Meeting Protocol Criteria for Discontinuation During Week 0-52
2 sequential creatine kinase
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; n=number of participants evaluated against criteria.

Vital signs assessment included pulse rate and blood pressure. Criteria for vital sign values meeting potential clinical concern included: pulse rate less than (\<)40 or greater than (\>)120 beats per minute (bpm), heart rate less than (\<)40 or greater than (\>)120 bpm; sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) of greater than or equal to (\>=)30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline or sitting SBP \<90 mmHg, sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>=20 mmHg change from baseline or sitting DBP \<50 mmHg.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting SBP <90 mmHg (n=87,88,86)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting DBP <50 mmHg (n=87,88,86)
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Heart Rate <40 or >120 bpm (n=73,74,68)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Pulse Rate <40 or >120 bpm (n=84,85,82)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting SBP max Increase >=30 Hg(n=87,88,86)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting DBP max Increase >=20 mmHg(n=87,88,86)
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting SBP max Decrease >=30 mmHg(n=87,88,86)
3 participants
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-16
Sitting DBP max Decrease >=20 mmHg(n=87,88,86)
2 participants
5 participants
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo; n=number of evaluable participants at the specified time point.

Vital signs assessment included pulse rate and blood pressure. Criteria for vital sign values meeting potential clinical concern included: pulse rate less than (\<)40 or greater than (\>)120 beats per minute (bpm), heart rate less than (\<)40 or greater than (\>)120 bpm; sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) of greater than or equal to (\>=)30 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) change from baseline or sitting SBP \<90 mmHg, sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) \>=20 mmHg change from baseline or sitting DBP \<50 mmHg.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting SBP <90 mmHg (n=87,88,44,42)
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting DBP <50 mmHg (n=87,88,44,42)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Heart Rate <40 or >120 bpm (n=74,75,35,34)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Pulse Rate <40 or >120 bpm (n=86,85,42,40)
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting SBP max Increase >=30 Hg(n=87,88,44,42)
5 participants
1 participants
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting DBP max Increase >=20 mmHg(n=87,88,44,42)
5 participants
4 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting SBP max Decrease >=30 mmHg(n=87,88,44,42)
4 participants
3 participants
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Values Meeting the Criteria for Potential Clinical Concern During Week 0-52
Sitting DBP max Decrease >=20 mmHg(n=87,88,44,42)
3 participants
8 participants
1 participants
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

CV event categories included: cerebrovascular accident (CVA), coronary revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\], percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\], coronary bypass grafting \[CABG\], heart failure, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), new ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease (first diagnosis). MACE included any MI, CVA (stroke or transient ischemic attack), or CV death.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Cerebrovascular Accident
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Coronary Revascularization Procedure
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Heart Failure
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
MACE
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Myocardial Infarction
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
New Ischemic Heart Disease
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Peripheral Vascular Disease
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-16
Non-CV Death
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 52

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

CV event categories included: cerebrovascular accident (CVA), coronary revascularization procedure (percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty \[PTCA\], percutaneous coronary intervention \[PCI\], coronary bypass grafting \[CABG\], heart failure, major adverse cardiac events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), new ischemic heart disease, peripheral vascular disease (first diagnosis). MACE included any MI, CVA (stroke or transient ischemic attack), or CV death.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Cerebrovascular Accident
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Coronary Revascularization Procedure
0 participants
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Heart Failure
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
MACE
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Myocardial Infarction
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
New Ischemic Heart Disease
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Peripheral Vascular Disease
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
0 participants
Incidence of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular (CV) Endpoints Reported During Week 0-52
Non-CV Death
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 16

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

As part of AE monitoring, potential malignancy events were adjudicated and centrally reviewed by a safety committee.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Malignancy Events Reported During Week 0-16
0 participants
1 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of tofacitinib or placebo.

As part of AE monitoring, potential malignancy events were adjudicated and centrally reviewed by a safety committee.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 Participants
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 Participants
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Malignancy Events Reported During Week 0-52
1 participants
1 participants
0 participants
0 participants

Adverse Events

Tofacitinib 10 mg

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 59 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Tofacitinib 5 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 60 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo to Tofacitinib 10 mg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 25 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 31 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 23 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 participants at risk
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 participants at risk
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=44 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
0.00%
0/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung adenocarcinoma metastatic
0.00%
0/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchopneumonia
1.1%
1/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Small cell lung cancer metastatic
1.1%
1/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Arteriosclerosis coronary artery
0.00%
0/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.00%
0/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=90 participants at risk
Participants received tofacitinib 10 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=88 participants at risk
Participants received tofacitinib 5 mg tablet orally twice daily (approximately 12 hours apart) up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 10 mg
n=44 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo to Tofacitinib 5 mg
n=44 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablet orally twice daily until Week 16, followed by tofacitinib 5 mg twice daily up to Week 52.
Placebo
n=88 participants at risk
Participants received placebo tablets orally twice daily up to Week 16. At Week 16, participants in this group were automatically advanced to their second treatment of tofacitinib 5 mg or 10 mg tablet orally twice daily, which was pre-determined at randomization (44 participants assigned to Placebo to 5 mg, 44 participants assigned to Placebo to 10 mg).
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
7.8%
7/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
6/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
12.2%
11/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
13.6%
12/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
13.6%
6/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
20.5%
9/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
3.4%
3/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
12.2%
11/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
20.5%
18/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
11.4%
5/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
15.9%
7/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
3.4%
3/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
16.7%
15/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
10.2%
9/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
2/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
8.9%
8/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
12.5%
11/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
9.1%
4/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
2/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
16.7%
15/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
14.8%
13/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
18.2%
8/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
15.9%
7/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
10.2%
9/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Hypomenorrhoea
0.00%
0/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
8.7%
2/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/14 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/12 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/26 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
6.7%
6/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
4/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
11.4%
5/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
11.4%
5/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
5.7%
5/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
5.7%
5/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
3.4%
3/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
2.2%
2/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
2/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Maternal exposure during pregnancy
0.00%
0/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.3%
1/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
7.1%
1/14 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/12 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/26 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
10.0%
9/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
4/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
3.4%
3/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
7.8%
7/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
5.7%
5/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
4/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
6.7%
6/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
2/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
2.3%
1/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
8.9%
8/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
6/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Investigations
Protein urine present
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
4/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
4.5%
2/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
5.6%
5/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
3.4%
3/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruation irregular
4.3%
1/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
8.7%
2/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/14 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
8.3%
1/12 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/26 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Vulvovaginal candidiasis
0.00%
0/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/23 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/14 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
8.3%
1/12 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/26 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
0.00%
0/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
2.2%
2/90 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
1.1%
1/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
6.8%
3/44 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.
0.00%
0/88 • Baseline up to Week 52
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and a non-serious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER