Comparison of Different Intermittent Pneumatic Compression Devices for Deep Vein Thrombosis

NCT01779648 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 54

Last updated 2013-05-01

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Various kinds of intermittent pneumatic compression devices (IPC) with particular ways of compression have been developed and used for prevention of deep vein thrombosis.

There are still some controversies about the physiologic properties and clinical impact of numerous issues including the variety of the cuff length, inflation rate, compression sequence, compression-relaxation cycle rate, and pressure generation characteristics.

This study is designed to compare clinical efficacies as well as venous hemodynamic improvements between Simultaneous bilateral compression with fixed venous refill time versus alternate compression with adjusted refill time

Conditions

  • Venous Thrombosis
  • Deep Vein Thrombosis

Interventions

DEVICE

DVT-3000

DEVICE

SCD Express

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • DS MAREF Co., Ltd.

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Small and Medium Business Administration, KOREA

    collaborator UNKNOWN
  • Seoul National University Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Jae-Sung Choi, Ph.D. · SMG-SNU Boramae Medical Center

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
SINGLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-03-31
Primary Completion
2013-01-31
Completion
2013-01-31

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01779648 on ClinicalTrials.gov