MedTrace Logo

Comparison of an Antibiotic Impregnated PICC Catheter Versus a Regular PICC Catheter in a Tertiary Care Setting

NCT01765738 · Status: WITHDRAWN · Phase: PHASE2 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Last updated 2018-06-18

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

To determine whether antibiotic impregnated PICC catheters have a lower infection rate than a conventional PICC catheter in a tertiary care patient population. Secondary goals will be to determine if there is a difference between the two catheters with early and late infections, to determine the cost comparison including extra cost of treatment for a line related infection, to determine if there are any non-infectious related complication differences between the two catheters.

Conditions

  • Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters

Interventions

DEVICE

PICC (Cook, Bard)

Comparison of antibiotic coated PICC vs. non-coated PICC

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Medical University of South Carolina

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • J. Bayne Selby, MD · Medical University of South Carolina

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
90 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2013-02-28
Primary Completion
2016-09-30
Completion
2016-09-30

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01765738 on ClinicalTrials.gov