The Pain in Intensive Care Unit: Different Rating System Comparing

NCT01669486 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 100

Last updated 2013-04-23

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this research is to find the best system for assessing the pain of critically ill patient in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

At first the investigators assess the sedation of the patient with the scale sedation-agitation scale (SAS) or the delirium with the confusion assessment method, if the patient is too sedated or delirious the investigators consider him unable to use the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS).

The investigators compare two different scales Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) which include no verbal items. Each items has been evaluated in three different moments: before, during and after the nurses' care.

The investigators compare the scales between them. Then, every time the investigators value the score of these scales with the self-report of patients with the VAS scale (when it is possible) and finally with the physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate).

In the end, the investigators compare two different classes of patient: the surgical and medical one. The investigators search for some differences in the perception of the pain between these two classes.

Conditions

  • Critical Illness

Interventions

OTHER

CPOT, BPS

Scoring pain of the patients during nurses activity in ICU, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Paolo MD Severgnini, Prof. · Universita' degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-06-30
Primary Completion
2013-03-31
Completion
2013-04-30

Countries

  • Italy

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01669486 on ClinicalTrials.gov