Trial Outcomes & Findings for Focal MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions (NCT NCT01657942)

NCT ID: NCT01657942

Last Updated: 2024-11-13

Results Overview

The cumulative sum of adverse events was followed through Month 12 of the study.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

NA

Target enrollment

101 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 months Post Treatment

Results posted on

2024-11-13

Participant Flow

The study was multi-center, prospective, single arm, observational trial conducted in the United States where subjects were treated and followed for 12 months. Males over 50 years of age (median age of 63 years) with a single, MRI-visible, hemilateral lesion of biopsy proven Gleason Grade Group 2 (3+4) or 3 (4+3) adenocarcinoma and with a PSA less than or equal to 20 ng/mL were treated with the Exablate 2100 Prostate System.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound Treatment of Locally Confined Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions
Single Arm Study: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance (MR) to guide focused ultrasound energy.
Overall Study
STARTED
101
Overall Study
Post Treatment Assignment Group 1) Involvement of Neurovascular Bundles and/or Urethra
57
Overall Study
Post Treatment Assignment Group 2) no Involvement of Neurovascular Bundles and/or Urethra
44
Overall Study
COMPLETED
93
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
8

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound Treatment of Locally Confined Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions
Single Arm Study: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance (MR) to guide focused ultrasound energy.
Overall Study
Alternative Treatment
7
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1

Baseline Characteristics

Focal MR-Guided Focused Ultrasound Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for the local treatment of intermediate prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy.
Age, Continuous
Age
62.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.7 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
101 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
90 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
101 participants
n=99 Participants
Biopsy proven adenocarcinoma of the prostate
101 Participants
n=99 Participants
BMI [kg/m^2]
28.5 kg/m^2
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.5 • n=99 Participants
Weight [kg]
91.3 kg
STANDARD_DEVIATION 17.3 • n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 months Post Treatment

Population: Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events are reported in the Adverse Events Section.

The cumulative sum of adverse events was followed through Month 12 of the study.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Number of Device and Procedure Related Adverse Events
24 Number of Adverse Events

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months Post Treatment

The first primary effectiveness endpoint is within area of treatment (Region of Treatment, ROT) prostate biopsy occurring at 6-months post-treatment. Positive biopsy was defined as any Gleason Grade Group (GGG) tissue identified within the area of planned Exablate ROT. Negative biopsy was defined No Gleason Grade Group (GGG) tissue within the area of planned ROT.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Percentage of Subjects With NO Gleason Grade Group (GGG) Tissue in the Planned Region of Treatment (ROT) at 6 Months.
91.1 Percentage of Subjects
Interval 83.8 to 95.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6-months Post Treatment

The second primary effectiveness endpoint is the percentage of subjects experiencing a reduction in PSA value (Prostate Specific Antigen) from baseline to 6-months post-treatment. PSA values that increased or remained the same were considered an increase. Increased Prostate Specific Antigen levels in the blood is a common indication of prostate cancer. PSA results at 6 months - Value of ≤ 10ng/mL (Yes/No)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Percentage of Subjects Showing a Reduction in PSA Value (Prostate Specific Antigen) From Baseline to 6-Months
91.1 Percentage of Subjects
Interval 83.8 to 95.8

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 6 Months Post Treatment

The final primary effectiveness endpoint is percentage of subjects with NPV complete coverage of targeted Gleason tissue at treatment. NPV (non-perfused volume) is the volume of tissue ablated/treated, a measure of the completeness/effectiveness of the ablation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Percentage of Subjects With Non-Perfused Volume (NPV) Entirely Covered Target Gleason Grade Group (GGG) Tissue at Treatment.
87.1 Percentage of Subjects
Interval 79.0 to 93.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 6 Months, 12 Months

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) concentration in the blood is commonly measured to screen for prostate cancer. Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) was reported as a primary endpoint. Here it is presented to show levels at 6 Months and 12 Months post-treatment compared to Baseline (pre-treatment). Elevated PSA suggests potential cancer.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
Baseline
6.4 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 3.1
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
6 Months
3.3 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.9
Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA)
12 Months
3.2 ng/mL
Standard Deviation 2.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations across visits resulted from missed visits and missed assessments.

The total FACT-G score ranges from 0 to 108 and is the summation of 4 subscale scores. The subscale scores are added to obtain the total score, which is calculated using a five-point scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). A higher FACT-G score indicates better overall well-being and quality of life. The FACT-G is an alternative scoring method to the Trial Outcome Index (TOI) which is also reported in this study.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G) Total Score
Baseline
94.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
94.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.8
94.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G) Total Score
3 Months
95.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.5
90.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.7
93.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G) Total Score
6 Months
64.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
92.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.0
93.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.9
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G) Total Score
9 Months
97.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.7
92.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7
95.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.4
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (Fact-G) Total Score
12 Months
95.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.8
93.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
94.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months

Population: Deviations from in the number of participants result from missed visits, assessments and early exits.

The Fact-P Total Score (Score range: 0-156) is a comprehensive multidimensional quality of life measure designed specifically for patients with prostate cancer. It is a 39-item assessment in a 5-point (0-4) Likert-type Scale. Higher scores represent better symptomology, functioning and quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact P) Total Score
Baseline
134.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.7
134.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.6
134.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.0
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact P) Total Score
3 Months
134.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.2
127.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.3
131.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact P) Total Score
6 Months
132.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.8
130.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.9
131.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.6
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact P) Total Score
9 Months
136.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.5
129.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.5
137.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.4
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact P) Total Score
12 Months
134.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.9
130.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.0
132.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations in sample size across visits are due to subjects missing visits, missing assessments, or exiting the study.

Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - P (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI, Score range: 1-104). An alternative scoring method to the Fact-G Total is the Trial Outcome Index (TOI), which is the sum of the Physical, Functional, and Lung Cancer Subscales. The TOI is reported to be an efficient and precise summary index of physical and functional outcomes. Higher scores indicate less symptomology and better physical and functional outcomes.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI)
Baseline
89.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.5
90.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.6
90.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.3
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI)
3 Months
89.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
86.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.2
87.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.3
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI)
6 Months
88.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.4
86.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.1
88.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.4
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI)
9 Months
90.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.8
86.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.5
88.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.9
Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Prostate (Fact-P) Trial Outcomes Index (TOI)
12 Months
89.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.7
87.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.0
88.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations from the overall number of participants are a result of missed visits, missed incomplete assessments, and early study exits

Urinary incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score (Score range: 0-21) is a simple questionnaire for evaluating the frequency, severity, and impact of urinary incontinence. High scores indicate greater impairment. Lower scores indicate better outcomes. This questionnaire assesses urinary incontinence and its impact on quality of life (QoL). So, a lower score implies less frequent and less severe incontinence, which is generally considered favorable.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score
Baseline
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.2
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score
3 Months
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.0
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score
9 Months
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score
6 Months
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.1
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.9
International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire (ICIQ-SF). Urinary Incontinence (ICIQ) Total Score
12 Months
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed resulted from missed visits, missed assessments or early study exits.

High scores indicate worse symptomology. The total I-PSS score can range from 0 (asymptomatic) to 35 (very symptomatic). Additionally, there's a question about quality of life due to urinary symptoms, where patients rate their feelings from "delighted" to "terrible" regarding their current condition. This assessment helps clinicians understand the severity of BPH symptoms and guide treatment decisions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Total Score)
Baseline
8.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
8.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
8.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Total Score)
3 Months
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.2
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Total Score)
6 Months
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.5
8.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
7.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.2
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Total Score)
9 Months
7.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.6
8.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
8.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.0
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS Total Score)
12 Months
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.8
8.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.4
8.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations from the overall number of participants result from missed visits, missed assessments, and early study exits.

IPSS Urinary Symptoms (IPSS-QoL Score range: 0-5). Question 7 of the IPSS, the Quality-of-Life question, is "7. Nocturia: How many times do you typically get up at night to urinate? (Select from 0 to 5)." Zero (0) suggests no interference with sleep and 5 suggests greater interference with sleep. Thus, high scores indicate worse quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Quality of Life Score
Baseline
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.5
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Quality of Life Score
3 Months
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.2
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Quality of Life Score
6 Months
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Quality of Life Score
9 Months
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.1
International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) - Quality of Life Score
12 Months
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, 3 Months, 6 Months, 9 Months, 12 Months.

Population: Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants Analyzed results from missed visits, missed or incomplete assessments, or early study exits.

IIEF-15 Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction (IIEF-15 Overall Satisfaction range: 0-10). Low scores are worse.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=57 Participants
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Neurovascular Bundles and Urethra Not Included in Treatment
n=44 Participants
For patient self-completed assessents subjects were separated into two subgroups after the treatment (not randomly: 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44). There was no hypothesis test comparison between groups. Comparisons are only observational. Deviations from the Overall Number of Participants is a result of missed visits, assessments and early exits.
Total Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound
n=101 Participants
Combined Groups: Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound - Local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy. Combined groups (n=101): 1) Neurovascular bundles and/or urethra included in treatment (n=57) or 2) Neurovascular bundles and urethra NOT included in treatment (n=44).
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction
Baseline
7.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
7.4 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction
3 Months
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction
6 Months
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.8
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.7
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction
9 Months
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-15) Erectile Dysfunction Overall Satisfaction
12 Months
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
7.3 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
7.1 score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5

Adverse Events

Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 24 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Exablate MR Guided Focus Ultrasound Treatment of Localized Intermediate Risk Prostate Lesions
n=101 participants at risk
Exablate MR Guided Focused Ultrasound for the local treatment of prostate lesions using Magnetic Resonance guided focused ultrasound energy
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
23.8%
24/101 • Number of events 25 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Incontinence
18.8%
19/101 • Number of events 21 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Erectile Dysfunction
18.8%
19/101 • Number of events 19 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Retention
14.9%
15/101 • Number of events 17 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Penile / Testicular Pain
13.9%
14/101 • Number of events 15 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Hematospermia
12.9%
13/101 • Number of events 13 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
General disorders
Fatigue
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 10 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ejaculation Disorder
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 9 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Frequency
8.9%
9/101 • Number of events 9 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Tract Pain
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Hesitancy
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary Urgency
5.9%
6/101 • Number of events 6 • Safety of Exablate prostate treatment will be collected for one year after Exablate

Additional Information

Nadir Alikacem

Insightec

Phone: 214-630-9900

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee PI needs to consult Sponsor for accuracy of trial results and approval before being published
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER