Effects of RR and MT on Patient With Stroke
NCT01655446 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 100
Last updated 2012-08-01
Summary
The purpose of this proposal is 1) to compare the relative effects of the robotic rehabilitation (RR), mirror therapy (MT), and conventional intervention (CI), 2) to compare the effects of the combined therapy of the RR-Functional Electrical Stimulation (FES) and the RR-Placebo Intervention (PI), and 3) to identify the clinical predictors that will potentially influence the functional outcomes after interventions.
Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Mirror Therapy
This protocol includes 1 hour mirror therapy and 0.5 hour functional training in a session. The treatment intensity is 1.5 hours/day, 5 days/week, for 4 weeks. MT focuses on symmetrical bimanual movements and simultaneously observing the mirror visual feedback reflected by the unaffected upper extremity.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Conventional Rehabilitation
Participants in this group receive a structured protocol based on occupational therapy such as neuro-developmental techniques and task-oriented approach. The treatment dose is matched to RR and MT groups.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Robotic Rehabilitation
This protocol includes 5 to 10 min of warm-up, 1 hr of RR, and 15 to 20 min of functional activities training. The treatment intensity is 1.5 hours/day, 5days/week for 4 consecutive weeks. The RR session uses the robot-assisted arm trainer, Bi-Manu-Track (Reha-Stim Co., Berlin, Germany).
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Robotic rehabilitation with FES
This combined RR-FES treatment involves the same protocol as the RR regimen except that patients receive FES concurrently with RR.
- BEHAVIORAL
-
Robotic Rehabilitation with PI
The RR-PI protocol is the same as the RR-FES protocol described above except that the surface electrodes are attached to the same target muscles on the affected UL but there is no output of electrical stimulation.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
National Taiwan University Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Keh-chung Lin, ScD · School of Occupational Therapy, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Model
- FACTORIAL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 40 Years
- Max Age
- 75 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2011-08-31
- Primary Completion
- 2014-07-31
- Completion
- 2014-07-31
Countries
- Taiwan
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Effects of Robot-Assisted Combined Therapy in Upper Limb Rehabilitation in Stroke Patients
NCT02319785 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic-assisted Therapy With Bilateral Practice Improves Task and Motor Performance of the Upper Extremity for Chronic Stroke Patients
NCT03847103 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Combined Robot-assisted Therapy With Mirror Priming in Stroke Patients
NCT03917511 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Therapeutic Effect of the Hand Robot on Stroke Patients Upper-lime Rehabilitation of Stroke Patients
NCT03841695 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of Intelligent Rehabilitation Robot Training System Combined With Repetitive Facilitative Exercise on Upper Limb Motor Function After Stroke: a Randomized Control Trial.
NCT06435624 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effect of Mirror Therapy Versus Bilateral Arm Training for Rehabilitation After Chronic Stroke
NCT02548234 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Intensive Robot-assisted Therapy in Patients With Subacute Stroke
NCT01767480 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mirror Feedback, Augmented Task-Specific, Impairment-Oriented Therapy, Home Practice, Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT04978311 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Robotic Rehabilitation in Post-Stroke Patients
NCT04494685 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Efficacy of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Approach to Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation in Patients With Subacute Stroke
NCT01939041 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Effectiveness of a Robot Assisted Tenodeis-grip Neurorehabilitation
NCT03713476 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Augmented-reality Based Mirror Therapy in Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT05580744 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Unilateral vs. Bilateral Approaches to Hybrid Stroke Rehabilitation
NCT02451280 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
The Effects of Unilateral and Bilateral Mirror Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Early Subacute Stroke.
NCT06103045 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Mechanism and Efficacy of Rehabilitation Approaches
NCT00564005 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Comparative Efficacy Research of Uni- vs Bi-lateral Arm Training Poststroke
NCT01525979 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
A Feasible Smart Upper Limb Rehabilitation Model for Patients With Stroke and Spinal Cord Injuries
NCT06215625 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Evaluation of the Arm Rehabilitation Device for Patients With Stroke
NCT02698605 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Assisted Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Stroke Patients
NCT00372411 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Robotic Versus Conventional Therapy For Post-Stroke Hand Motoric Recovery
NCT06155058 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Mirror Therapy Combined With Task- vs. Impairment-oriented Rehabilitation Program
NCT06489938 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Differential Effectiveness of Robotic Assisted Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Patients With Chronic Stroke
NCT04260061 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
The General Use of Robots in Stroke Recovery
NCT01726660 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Robotic Upper-Limb Neurorehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patient
NCT00037934 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Is Robot-Assisted Therapy Effective for the Upper Extremity Following a Stroke
NCT05559385 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA