Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients Treated Over the Long-term in Real-world Clinical Practice, Using Data Collected by the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Registry (NCT NCT01646385)
NCT ID: NCT01646385
Last Updated: 2014-08-05
Results Overview
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by mean follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of malignancy events divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000.
COMPLETED
6393 participants
Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 years
2014-08-05
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Etanercept
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
3529
|
2864
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
2691
|
1993
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
838
|
871
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Etanercept
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
202
|
222
|
|
Overall Study
Switched to alternate biologic
|
636
|
649
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of Etanercept in Patients Treated Over the Long-term in Real-world Clinical Practice, Using Data Collected by the British Society of Rheumatology Biologics Registry
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
Total
n=6393 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
55.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.1 • n=99 Participants
|
59.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=107 Participants
|
57.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.4 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2727 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
2135 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
4862 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
802 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
729 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1531 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by mean follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of malignancy events divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Incidence Rate of Malignancy
|
14.7 events per 1000 participant-years
|
23.9 events per 1000 participant-years
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by mean follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of LMs divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Lymphoproliferative: medical condition characterized by the dysfunction of the immune system often resulting in excessive production of lymphocytes. LMs included lymphoma, myeloma, and leukemia. Adverse outcome was defined as 'lymphoproliferative malignancy' in the field \[lymphopro\] labeled by BSRBR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Incidence Rate of Lymphoproliferative Malignancy (LM)
|
1.1 events per 1000 participant-years
|
2.6 events per 1000 participant-years
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of serious infections divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Serious infections included those infections which required intravenous antibiotics, hospitalization, or resulted in death. Adverse outcome was defined as 'serious infection' in the field \[serinf\] labeled by BSRBR.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Incidence Rate of Serious Infections
|
35.1 events per 1000 participant-years
|
36.2 events per 1000 participant-years
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of other serious adverse events divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Other serious adverse events were based on classifications assigned by the BSRBR and included cardiac serious adverse events (SAEs), central nervous system SAEs, and nonmalignant hematological SAEs.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Incidence Rate of Other Serious Adverse Events
|
20.3 events per 1000 participant-years
|
29.6 events per 1000 participant-years
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Safety analysis population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
Participant-Year estimated by calculating all of the years that participants in a study were followed (number of evaluable participants multiplied by total follow-up in years). Crude (unadjusted) incidence rate calculated as number of deaths divided by Participant-Year, multiplied by 1000. Death was recorded in the adverse outcomes table and in the consultant follow-up table. Where multiple events described death for the same participant, date of death was taken as per the earliest record.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Crude Incidence Rate of All-Cause Mortality
|
12.0 events per 1000 participant-years
|
20.1 events per 1000 participant-years
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: Full Analysis set (FAS) population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration. Only participants treated with ETN were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Participants who switched from etanercept to either DMARDs or alternative biologic drug are reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Other Therapy Following Etanercept Discontinuation
Switched to DMARDs
|
35.3 percentage of participants
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants Who Switched to Other Therapy Following Etanercept Discontinuation
Switched to alternative biologic
|
18.0 percentage of participants
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: FAS population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration. Only participants treated with ETN were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
Time on etanercept therapy was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time on Etanercept Therapy
|
4.959 years
Interval 4.539 to 5.379
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and tender joints (TJC) using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (erythrocyte sedimentation rate \[ESR, millimeter per hour\] or C-reactive protein \[CRP, milligram per liter\]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a Visual Analog Scale \[VAS\] of 0 millimeter \[mm\]-100 mm). DAS28 \<=1.6 = remission, DAS28 \<=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1 = severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Baseline
|
6.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
5.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Population: FAS included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of 1 consultant follow-up after baseline registration. N (number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure, n: participants evaluable for specified time-points for each treatment arm, respectively.
DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR \[millimeter per hour\] or CRP \[milligram per liter\]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 \<=1.6 = remission, DAS28 \<=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1 = severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3118 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1356 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Change at Year 1 (n= 3118, 1356)
|
-2.16 units on a scale
Interval -2.21 to -2.11
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Interval -1.51 to -1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Change at Year 2 (n= 2536, 1066)
|
-2.40 units on a scale
Interval -2.46 to -2.34
|
-1.79 units on a scale
Interval -1.89 to -1.69
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Change at Year 3 (n= 2141, 783)
|
-2.55 units on a scale
Interval -2.62 to -2.49
|
-1.95 units on a scale
Interval -2.07 to -1.83
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Change at Year 4 (n= 1623, 534)
|
-2.16 units on a scale
Interval -2.21 to -2.11
|
-1.42 units on a scale
Interval -1.51 to -1.33
|
|
Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28) at Year 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5
Change at Year 5 (n= 1351, 415)
|
-2.71 units on a scale
Interval -2.79 to -2.63
|
-2.47 units on a scale
Interval -2.62 to -2.31
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Population: FAS included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of 1 consultant follow-up after baseline registration. N (number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure, n: participants evaluable for specified time-points for each treatment arm, respectively.
DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR \[millimeter per hour\] or CRP \[milligram per liter\]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 \<=1.6 = remission, DAS28 \<=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1 = severe disease activity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3118 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1356 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Remission: Year 1 (n= 3118, 1356)
|
13.0 percentage of participants
|
12.6 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Remission: Year 2 (n= 2536, 1066)
|
17.0 percentage of participants
|
16.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Remission: Year 3 (n= 2141, 783)
|
20.1 percentage of participants
|
21.3 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Remission: Year 4 (n= 1623, 534)
|
23.7 percentage of participants
|
20.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Remission: Year 5 (n= 1351, 415)
|
23.4 percentage of participants
|
25.1 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Low disease activity: Year 1 (n= 3118, 1356)
|
24.1 percentage of participants
|
22.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Low disease activity: Year 2 (n= 2536, 1066)
|
30.5 percentage of participants
|
28.8 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Low disease activity: Year 3 (n= 2141, 783)
|
34.1 percentage of participants
|
33.2 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Low disease activity: Year 4 (n= 1623, 534)
|
37.6 percentage of participants
|
35.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission and Low Disease Activity as Assessed by Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joints Count (DAS28)
Low disease activity: Year 5 (n= 1351, 415)
|
37.3 percentage of participants
|
43.4 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to last follow-up, assessed every 6 month for first 3 years and thereafter annually up to 10 yearsPopulation: FAS population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
DAS28 calculated from SJC and TJC using the 28 joints count, the serological markers of inflammation (ESR \[millimeter per hour\] or CRP \[milligram per liter\]) and patient's general health assessment (recorded on a VAS scale of 0 mm-100 mm). DAS28 \<=1.6 = remission, DAS28 \<=2.4 = low disease activity, DAS28 \>=3.2 to 5.1 = moderate disease activity, DAS28 \>5.1 = severe disease activity. Time to achieve remission was calculated by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Remission
|
NA years
Median time to remission could not be calculated as fewer than 50% of participants had achieved remission during the follow up period.
|
NA years
Median time to remission could not be calculated as fewer than 50% of participants had achieved remission during the follow up period.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: BaselinePopulation: FAS population included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of one consultant follow-up after baseline registration.
HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Baseline
|
2.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.5
|
1.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 1, 2, 3Population: FAS included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of 1 consultant follow-up after baseline registration. N (number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure, n: participants evaluable for specified time-points for each treatment arm, respectively.
HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=2291 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1545 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Year 1, 2, and 3
Change at Year 1 (n= 2291, 1545)
|
-0.317 units on a scale
Interval -0.339 to -0.296
|
-0.057 units on a scale
Interval -0.084 to -0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Year 1, 2, and 3
Change at Year 2 (n= 2071, 1203)
|
-0.309 units on a scale
Interval -0.333 to -0.286
|
-0.062 units on a scale
Interval -0.095 to -0.03
|
|
Change From Baseline in Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score at Year 1, 2, and 3
Change at Year 3 (n= 1947, 995)
|
-0.301 units on a scale
Interval -0.326 to -0.277
|
-0.064 units on a scale
Interval -0.1 to -0.027
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Year 1, 2, 3Population: FAS included all participants treated with ETN or nbDMARDs who had a physician diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis and a minimum of 1 consultant follow-up after baseline registration. N (number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure, n: participants evaluable for specified time-points for each treatment arm, respectively.
HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3. Participants who had HAQ total score \<=0.5 were considered in remission state.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=2291 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=1545 Participants
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Year 1 (n = 2291, 1545)
|
24.9 percentage of participants
|
8.4 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Year 2 (n = 2071, 1203)
|
23.6 percentage of participants
|
8.0 percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Participants With Remission Based on Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score
Year 3 (n = 1947, 995)
|
23.9 percentage of participants
|
7.2 percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 6 months prior to and 6 months post switching etanerceptPopulation: FAS population. Here "N" (number of participants analyzed): participants evaluable for this measure, "n": participants evaluable for specified time-points. Only participants treated with ETN were to be analyzed for this outcome measure.
HAQ: self-reported, valid assessment of functional disability in rheumatoid arthritis. Assessed based on ability of participants to perform daily activities in 8 categories: dressing, arising, eating, walking, reaching, gripping, hygiene, and carrying out daily activities. HAQ score range: 0-3: without any difficulty=0, with some difficulty=1, with much difficulty=2, unable to do=3. HAQ total scores expressed as overall mean score with range 0-3: 0-0.25=normal functioning; 0.25-0.5=mild functional limitation; 0.5-1=moderate functional limitation; more than 1=significant functional limitation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=1227 Participants
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score 6 Months Prior to And 6 Months Post-Switching Etanercept
6-Months Prior to Switching (n = 1227)
|
2.006 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.625
|
—
|
|
Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) Score 6 Months Prior to And 6 Months Post-Switching Etanercept
6-Months Post-Switching (n = 754)
|
2.017 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.641
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Etanercept
nbDMARDs
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Etanercept
n=3529 participants at risk
Participants with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who received etanercept (ETN, as their first biological drug) in doses as per approved product label or summary of product characteristics (SmPC) were observed using the data in British Society for Rheumatology Biologics Register (BSRBR) for a maximum of 10 years. Doses of ETN and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity. Participants were eligible to receive any other therapy instead of ETN, as per investigator's discretion and the doses of these were not controlled in the follow-up.
|
nbDMARDs
n=2864 participants at risk
Biological naive participants with active RA who received non-biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (nbDMARDs) in doses as per approved product label or SmPC were observed using the data in BSRBR for a maximum of 8.75 years. Doses of nbDMARDs and any concomitant medication could be adjusted according to medical and therapeutic necessity.
|
|---|---|---|
|
General disorders
Death
|
5.8%
203/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
7.8%
223/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoproliferative
|
0.51%
18/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
1.0%
29/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.8%
205/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
7.9%
225/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septicaemia
|
0.96%
34/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.98%
28/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bone/Joint infection
|
2.4%
83/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
1.1%
31/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Other serious infection
|
8.9%
314/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
6.0%
171/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lymphoma
|
0.31%
11/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.63%
18/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Myeloma
|
0.03%
1/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.14%
4/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Leukaemia
|
0.17%
6/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.24%
7/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Non-melanoma skin cancer
|
2.2%
79/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
2.8%
79/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Solid tumours
|
4.3%
153/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
5.5%
158/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Congestive heart failure
|
0.79%
28/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
1.3%
36/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
1.8%
65/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
2.4%
69/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Other Cardiac events
|
2.4%
85/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
3.6%
102/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Central demyelination
|
0.03%
1/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.03%
1/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Optic neuritis
|
0.06%
2/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.00%
0/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral Neuropathy
|
0.28%
10/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.42%
12/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Other CNS event
|
3.3%
117/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
3.0%
85/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Aplastic anaemia
|
0.03%
1/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.00%
0/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pancytopaenia
|
0.11%
4/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.28%
8/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Agranulocytosis
|
0.06%
2/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.00%
0/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Other dyscrasia
|
1.4%
51/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
1.9%
53/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopaenia
|
0.20%
7/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.07%
2/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Pulmonary fibrosis
|
0.40%
14/3529
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
0.45%
13/2864
Due to retrospective nature of the study, it was difficult to capture non serious adverse events (Non-SAEs) and only serious adverse events (SAEs) were captured.
|
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER