Trial Outcomes & Findings for 12-Month OL Intranasal Fluticasone Propionate BID Using OptiNose Device (NCT NCT01623310)

NCT ID: NCT01623310

Last Updated: 2018-01-24

Results Overview

Patients with at least one Adverse Events

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

223 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

12 Months

Results posted on

2018-01-24

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Overall Study
STARTED
223
Overall Study
COMPLETED
144
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
79

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Overall Study
Adverse Event
21
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
18
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
6
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
6
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
25
Overall Study
Became potentially child-bearing
1
Overall Study
Diagnoses of bilateral cateracts
1
Overall Study
Investigators Discretion-Noncompliant
1

Baseline Characteristics

The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Age, Continuous
45.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.62 • n=223 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
96 Participants
n=223 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
127 Participants
n=223 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
175 Participants
n=223 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black/African American
45 Participants
n=223 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
2 Participants
n=223 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
1 Participants
n=223 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
223 Participants
n=223 Participants
Use of ICS treatment for polyps in past 10 years
214 Participants
n=223 Participants
Previous polyp removal surgery via polypectomy only
11 Participants
n=223 Participants
Previous sinus surgery for polyp removal or sinus surgery
80 Participants
n=223 Participants
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Pts With Polyps
41.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 23.27 • n=34 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Pts Without Polyps
39.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 21.72 • n=189 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Lund-Mackay total score
Pts With Polyps
1.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.51 • n=34 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Lund-Mackay total score
Pts Without Polyps
1.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.20 • n=189 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Summed Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grading Scale Score
2.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.17 • n=223 Participants
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Pts With Polyps
16 Participants
n=34 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Pts Without Polyps
11 Participants
n=189 Participants • The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: 12 Months

Patients with at least one Adverse Events

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Adverse Events
169 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Change from baseline to Month 3 \& Month 12 in SNOT-22 Total Score SNOT-22 is validated in large populations with chronic sinusitis with and without nasal polyps. The 22 questions are used to calculate a total score (the sum of all items) and 4 subscale scores. The 22 questions are divided among 4 subscales: Rhinologic, Ear and Facial Symptoms, Sleep Function, and Psychological Issues subscales. The total score can range from 0-110, 0 being the best and 110 being the worst. 0: No problem 1. Very mild problem 2. Mild or slight problem 3. Moderate problem 4. Severe problem 5. Problem as bad as it can be

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Change from BL to Month 3, Pts With Polyps
-16.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.39
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Change from BL to Month 3, Pts Without Polyps
-18.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.06
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Change from BL to Month 12, Pts With Polyps
-21.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.81
Sinonasal Outcome Test 22 (SNOT-22) Total Score
Change from BL to Month 12, Pts Without Polyps
-21.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Change from baseline to Month 3, Month 12, in Lund-Mackay Total Score Lund-Mackay Assessment of nasal cavity appearance, via nasoendoscopy, used to evaluate signs of edema, discharge, crusting, scarring/adhesions, and nasal polyps, with each sign rated on a 0 to 2 scale 0: None 2: Worse outcome

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Lund-Mackay Total Score
Change from BL to Month 12, Pts With Polyps
-0.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.63
Lund-Mackay Total Score
Change from BL to Month 12, Pts Without Polyps
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.18
Lund-Mackay Total Score
Change from BL to Month 3, Pts With Polyps
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.35
Lund-Mackay Total Score
Change from BL to Month 3, Pts Without Polyps
-0.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

The PGIC took less than 1 minute to complete. Subjects answered question, "Since starting the study drug, how would you rate the change in your symptoms?" Patients may answer very much improved, much improved, minimally improved, no change, minimally worse, much worse, or very much worse. Data listed below reports the total number of patients who answered very much improved, much improved, or minimally improved at the specified time.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Month 3, Pts With Polyps
27 Participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Month 3, Patients Without Polyps
151 Participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Month 12, Pts With Polyps
22 Participants
Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)
Month 12, Pts Without Polyps
110 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Population: Includes Chronic Sinusitis with Nasal Polyp Patients

In subjects with nasal polyps, polyp grading of each nasal cavity was determined by a nasal polyp grading scale score measured by nasoendoscopy. 0: No polyps 1. Mild polyposis: polyps not reaching below the inferior of the middle turbinate 2. Moderate polyposis: polyps reaching below the inferior border of the middle concha, but not the inferior border of the inferior turbinate 3. Severe polyposis: large polyps reaching below the lower inferior border of the inferior turbinate

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=34 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Summed Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grading Scale Score
Month 3
2.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.81
Summed Bilateral Nasal Polyp Grading Scale Score
Month 12
1.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.19

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Month 3, Month 12

Population: The Safety Analysis Set included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
OPN-375 400 μg
n=223 Participants
OPN-375 400 μg BID for 12 months
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Month 3, Pts With Polyps
5 Participants
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Month 3, Patients Without Polyps
2 Participants
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Month 12, Pts With Polyps
1 Participants
Nasal Polyp Surgery Eligibility
Month 12, Pts Without Polyps
3 Participants

Adverse Events

Fluticasone

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 169 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Fluticasone
n=223 participants at risk
400 μg of Fluticasone Propionate Twice a Day (BID) Using a Novel Bi-Directional Device Fluticasone Proprionate using OptiNose Device
Infections and infestations
Acute Sinusitis
13.9%
31/223
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
7.6%
17/223
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
2.7%
6/223
Infections and infestations
Influenza
2.7%
6/223
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
2.2%
5/223
Investigations
Intraocular Pressure Increase
2.2%
5/223
Nervous system disorders
Headache
9.4%
21/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Spontaneously Reported Epistaxis
11.2%
25/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal mucosal disorder
17.5%
39/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Septum Disorder
14.3%
32/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Septum Ulceration
11.2%
25/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal Pain
3.6%
8/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
3.1%
7/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal Congestion
2.7%
6/223
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis Identified via Nasal Endoscopy
16.6%
37/223

Additional Information

Vice President Global Clinical Operations & Outsourcing

OptiNose

Phone: 267-364-3508

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Disclosure agreement is described in the CTA between sponsor and PI
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER