MedTrace Logo

Endoscopic Evaluation of Late Rectal Injury Following CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Prostate Cancer

NCT01618838 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 4

Last updated 2018-08-22

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

Radiation therapy is a well-established treatment modality for clinically localized prostate cancer. Men who choose to undergo radiation treatments for prostate cancer will have to live with the side effects for many years. Attempts have been made to protect surrounding tissues while delivering high dosage of radiation to cancer. With the rectum being so close to the prostate, many patients still suffer from side effects caused by radiation injury to the rectum, especially those who received conventional external beam radiotherapy.

CyberKnife is an FDA approved radiosurgical devise. Its flexible robotic arm allows radiation beams to be delivered in different directions, providing a highly conformal, uniform dose with steep dose gradients. Therefore, treatment with the CyberKnife radiosurgical system should minimize the toxicity to the surrounding structures. CyberKnife System also incorporates a dynamic tracking system to allow the robot to correct the targeting of therapeutic beams during treatment. These improvements allow for dose escalation within the prostate with less normal tissue toxicity.

The purpose of this study is to estimate the proportion of patients with endoscopically detectable telangiectasia as the indication of radiation injury to the rectum, after CyberKnife Treatment for prostate cancer.

Conditions

  • Stage II Prostate Carcinoma

Interventions

RADIATION

CyberKnife radiosurgery

Treatment Planning: Inverse planning using the CyberKnife planning system will be employed. The treatment plan used for each treatment will be based on an analysis of the volumetric dose including dose-volume histogram (DVH) analyses of the Planning Treatment Volume (PTV) and critical normal structures. The homogeneous CT model shall be used. Number of paths and beams used for each patient will vary and will be determined by the selected individual treatment plan. To reduce overall treatment time and total monitor units, 150-200 non-zero beams are recommended. No more than 250 beams shall be employed. Tuning structures shall be employed to minimize conformality index (CI) and new conformality index (nCI), preferably yielding values less than 1.20 and 1.25, respectively.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Georgetown University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Sean P Collins, MD,PhD · Georgetown University Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
NA
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
MALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-02-28
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2012-12-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01618838 on ClinicalTrials.gov