MedTrace Logo

Comparative Accuracy of Three Versions of Non-Invasive Hemoglobin Monitoring

NCT01604668 · Status: COMPLETED · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 10

Last updated 2013-08-21

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

There is no study hypothesis. The purpose of this study is to compare the accuracy of the: 1) SpHb (Radical 7 Pulse Co-Oximetry with SpHb™) RevF sensor (currently marketed), 2) the SpHb RevG sensor (a new, limited release version), and 3) the Pronto-7 sensor (currently marketed version) in patients undergoing spine surgery.

Conditions

  • Blood Loss

Sponsors & Collaborators

Principal Investigators

  • Ronald D. Miller, MD, MS · University of California, San Francisco

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-05-31
Primary Completion
2013-05-31
Completion
2013-05-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Companies

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01604668 on ClinicalTrials.gov