Trial Outcomes & Findings for Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia (NCT NCT01603394)
NCT ID: NCT01603394
Last Updated: 2014-07-08
Results Overview
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
TERMINATED
PHASE4
9 participants
Baseline, Week 6
2014-07-08
Participant Flow
A total of 24 participants were screened, of which nine participants at five study centers in the following four countries: Austria (2), Germany (1), South Africa (1) and USA (1) were enrolled and received at least one dose of pregabalin during the study.
This was a Phase 4, open-label, pilot study of pregabalin and prediction of treatment response in post herpetic neuralgia (PHN) participants. The duration of the treatment period was 6 weeks (4 weeks dose optimization +2 weeks fixed dose), with a 1-week taper/placebo washout administered at the end of study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pregabalin (300-600 mg/Day; 150 mg/Day Starting Dose)
During the first week of treatment, participants received the starting dose of pregabalin of 150 mg/day Participants were then optimized to a dose of 300, 450 or 600 mg/day pregabalin based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit: V3 (Week 1), V4 (Week 2), V5 (Week 3) and V6 (Week 4).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pregabalin (300-600 mg/Day; 150 mg/Day Starting Dose)
During the first week of treatment, participants received the starting dose of pregabalin of 150 mg/day Participants were then optimized to a dose of 300, 450 or 600 mg/day pregabalin based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit: V3 (Week 1), V4 (Week 2), V5 (Week 3) and V6 (Week 4).
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Pilot Study Of Pregabalin And Prediction Of Treatment Response In Patients With Postherpetic Neuralgia
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pregabalin (300-600 mg/Day; 150 mg/Day Starting Dose)
n=9 Participants
During the first week of treatment, participants received the starting dose of pregabalin of 150 mg/day Participants were then optimized to a dose of 300, 450 or 600 mg/day pregabalin based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit: V3 (Week 1), V4 (Week 2), V5 (Week 3) and V6 (Week 4).
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Customized
|
9 Age at least 18 years
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: All visitsPopulation: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
NPSI: participant rated questionnaire to evaluate different symptoms of neuropathic pain (dimensions: burning \[superficial\] spontaneous pain, pressing \[deep\] spontaneous pain, paroxysmal pain, evoked pain, and paresthesia/dyesthesia \[P/D\]). Includes 10 descriptors quantified on a 0 (no symptoms) to 10 (worst symptoms imaginable) and 2 temporal items assessing duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. Questionnaire generates a score in each of the relevant dimensions and a total score of 0-100. Higher score indicates a greater intensity of pain.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline. Then for each of the above phenotypes the distribution of the pregabalin responders (using 30% and 50%) were to be compared.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 6/Early TerminationPopulation: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
PGIC: participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The daily pain diary consists of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants describe their pain during the previous 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment is performed daily at bedtime on a telephone via interactive voice response system (IVRS). The endpoint mean pain score is defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in the open-label phase. Daily pain IVRS diaries were completed daily at bedtime from Visit 1 (Screening) through Visit 7/Early Termination. Participants were asked to complete their first IVRS daily at bedtime on the morning after Visit 1.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
To explore whether sensory symptom cluster analysis is useful for predicting treatment response in paticipants with PHN, identification of the phenotype was initially required of all participants using three different approaches (with or without the baseline PHQ-8, GAD-7 Pain Related Sleep Interference Score Scale, PCS): 1. PainDETECT at baseline, 2. PainPREDICT at baseline, 3. NPSI at baseline.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Visit 2 (Week 0) and Week 6/Early TerminationPopulation: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The PHQ-8 is a self-administered version of the PRIME-MD diagnostic instrument for common mental disorders. The PHQ-9 is the depression module, which scores each of the 9 DSM-IV criteria as 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day). The PHQ-8 is a validated subset of the PHQ-9, which comprises the first 8 items of the measure. The GAD-7 is a 7-item questionnaire that assesses anxiety. Participants respond as to how each item applies to them on a 4 point response scale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) consists of 5 questions. Questions 1, 2, 3, and 4 measure pain on an 11-point scale from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain possible).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Week 0), Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The PCS is a 13-item self report instrument and requires a Grade 6 reading level and has been translated into 12 languages. It instructs participants to reflect on past experience of pain and indicate their experience using a 5-point scale. The PCS was designed for research on catastrophizing and pain experience. Catastrophizing is associated with heightened pain and is "an exaggerated negative mental set brought to bear during actual or anticipated painful experience." It is a multidimensional construct compromising elements of rumination, magnification, and helplessness and its factor structure has been replicated. It has a total score and three subscale scores (score range of 0-52).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 WeekPopulation: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The numeric rating scale for pain (NRS-Pain) consists of an 11-point NRS ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). A rating of 1-3 is considered mild pain; 4-6, moderate pain; and 7-10, severe pain.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Visit 2 (Week 0), and Week 6/Early TerminationPopulation: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The Short-Form 12 Health Survey (SF-12v2) is a self-administered, validated questionnaire that measures each of the following 8 health aspects: Physical functioning, role limitations due to physical problems, social functioning, bodily pain, mental health, role limitations due to emotional problems, vitality, and general health perception over the past week. Higher scores indicate a better health-related quality of life.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: Only 9 of the 200 participants were enrolled into the trial, so we are unable to get adequate results from this study.
The pain-related sleep interference item rating scale is scored on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS-Sleep). It is self-administered by the participant in order to rate how pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours, ranging from 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain). Participants are to describe how their pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours by choosing the appropriate number on the numeric rating scale.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Pregabalin (300-600 mg/Day; 150 mg/Day Starting Dose)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pregabalin (300-600 mg/Day; 150 mg/Day Starting Dose)
n=9 participants at risk
During the first week of treatment, participants received the starting dose of pregabalin of 150 mg/day Participants were then optimized to a dose of 300, 450 or 600 mg/day pregabalin based on efficacy and tolerability at each weekly visit: V3 (Week 1), V4 (Week 2), V5 (Week 3) and V6 (Week 4).
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
22.2%
2/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.1%
1/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Edema peripheral
|
22.2%
2/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
22.2%
2/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle rigidity
|
11.1%
1/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
44.4%
4/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sedation
|
11.1%
1/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Somnolence
|
11.1%
1/9 • AEs: The time the participant had taken at least one dose of study treatment through last participant visit. SAEs: The time the participant provides informed consent through and including 28 calendar days after the last administration of study treatment.
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious AE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as nonserious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER