Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (NCT NCT01572038)
NCT ID: NCT01572038
Last Updated: 2020-09-25
Results Overview
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
1436 participants
From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
2020-09-25
Participant Flow
A total of 1697 patients were screened: 261 failed screening and 1436 were enrolled in the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1436
|
|
Overall Study
Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug
|
1436
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
445
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
991
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Death
|
648
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
204
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
81
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
20
|
|
Overall Study
Patient Decision
|
14
|
|
Overall Study
Progressive Disease
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
Site Closed Before Completing Form
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
Enrolled into Another Trial
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Participated in Another Trial
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Termination by Sponsor
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Patient Deterioration
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Sponsor Decision
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
54.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.10 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
1429 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
1032 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
88 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
|
28 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Applicable as per Local Regulations
|
222 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age Categorical (≤65 or >65 Years Old)
≤65 Years Old
|
1167 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age Categorical (≤65 or >65 Years Old)
>65 Years Old
|
269 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino
|
269 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Chinese
|
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Japanese
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Mixed Ethnicity
|
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Indian
|
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Other
|
495 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity
Not Applicable as per Local Regulations
|
574 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Europe
|
1009 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Asia
|
177 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
North America
|
34 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
South America
|
121 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Africa
|
71 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Other (Australia)
|
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Grade 0 or 1
|
1371 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Grade 2
|
63 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Missing
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Visceral Disease at Baseline
Visceral Disease
|
992 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Visceral Disease at Baseline
Non-visceral Disease
|
444 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Positive
|
918 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Negative
|
512 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Unknown
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Prior Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy Received
Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy
|
786 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Prior Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy Received
No Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy
|
650 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy Received for Breast Cancer
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy
|
400 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy Received for Breast Cancer
No Previous Trastuzumab Therapy
|
1036 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Docetaxel
|
775 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
|
588 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Nab-Paclitaxel
|
65 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
None
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Measurable or Non-Measurable Disease (per RECIST v1.1) at Baseline
Measurable Disease
|
1198 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Measurable or Non-Measurable Disease (per RECIST v1.1) at Baseline
Non-Measurable Disease
|
238 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE - Any Grade
|
1419 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
879 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any Serious TEAE
|
535 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Death
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
|
1037 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab - Any Grade
|
946 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Taxane - Any Grade
|
1342 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Grade ≥3
|
286 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab - Grade ≥3
|
245 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Taxane - Grade ≥3
|
514 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Pertuzumab
|
334 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Trastuzumab
|
386 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Taxane
|
354 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Pertuzumab
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Trastuzumab
|
133 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Taxane
|
286 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
|
1320 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE to Monitor - Grade ≥3
|
535 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE of Special Interest
|
91 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Within 28 Days of Treatmt Discontinuation
|
975 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Total Number of Deaths
|
658 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Progressive Disease
|
581 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Other
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Adverse Event (Total)
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Infections and Infestations (SOC)
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Peritonitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonia (PT)
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory Tract Infection (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Sepsis (PT)
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Septic Shock (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Disorders (SOC)
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Arrest (PT)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Failure (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Failure Congestive (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardio-respiratory Arrest (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Myocardial Infarction (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Right Ventricular Failure (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
General Disorders & Admin. Site Conditions (SOC)
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Death (PT)
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC)
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Neutropenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Thrombocytopenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC)
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Aspiration (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis Chronic (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Nervous System Disorders (SOC)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Encephalopathy (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Ischemic Stroke (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hypoglycaemia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Failure (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Delirium (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Total Number of Deaths
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Progressive Disease
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Other
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Adverse Event (Total)
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Infections and Infestations (SOC)
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Peritonitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonia (PT)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory Tract Infection (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Sepsis (PT)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
General Disorders & Admin. Site Conditions (SOC)
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Death (PT)
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC)
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Neutropenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Thrombocytopenia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Disorders (SOC)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Arrest (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardio-Respiratory Arrest (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC)
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Nervous System Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Encephalopathy (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hypoglycaemia (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Failure (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. If a participant experienced the same AE at more than one severity grade, only the most severe grade was presented.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 3
|
119 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Grade (Gr.) 3
|
676 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Gr. 4
|
172 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Gr. 5
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
163 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
56 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 3
|
100 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 5
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 3
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
139 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 3
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 3
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 3
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
148 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 3
|
75 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
62 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 3
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
158 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
104 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
77 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
67 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
116 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 3
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
63 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
62 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 3
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 3
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 4
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 3
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 4
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 5
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the system organ classes are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab (Rel to Ptz)
|
1037 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
629 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
|
491 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
|
462 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Investigations
|
252 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Nervous System Disorders
|
207 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
|
188 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
|
184 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
|
182 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Infections and Infestations
|
151 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab (Rel to Trz)
|
946 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
435 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
|
434 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
|
384 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Investigations
|
262 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Nervous System Disorders
|
184 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
|
179 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
|
163 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
|
153 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Taxane (Rel to Tax)
|
1342 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Gastrointestinal Disorders
|
984 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
|
938 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
|
834 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Nervous System Disorders
|
764 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
|
457 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
|
386 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Infections and Infestations
|
293 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
|
290 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
|
227 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Investigations
|
201 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Eye Disorders
|
174 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Onycholysis
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuz. (Rel to Ptz)
|
286 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Diarrhoea
|
59 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Neutropenia
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Febrile Neutropenia
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Fatigue
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Asthenia
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Cardiac Failure
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Trastuz. (Rel to Trz)
|
245 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Diarrhoea
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Neutropenia
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Febrile Neutropenia
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Fatigue
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Cardiac Failure
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Asthenia
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Taxane (Rel to Tax)
|
514 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutropenia
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Febrile Neutropenia
|
86 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Diarrhoea
|
80 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Fatigue
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Peripheral Neuropathy
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Asthenia
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Leukopenia
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Mucosal Inflammation
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Paraesthesia
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutropenic Sepsis
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Anaemia
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Vomiting
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neurotoxicity
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Discont. = discontinuation; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Pertuzumab Discontinuation (Ptz Discont)
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Cardiac Failure
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Diarrhoea
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Dyspnoea
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Infusion Related Reaction
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Sepsis
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Hypersensitivity
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Trastuzumab Discontinuation(Trz Discont)
|
133 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Cardiac Failure
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Diarrhoea
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Sepsis
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Dyspnoea
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Hypersensitivity
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Taxane Discontinuation (Tax Discont)
|
286 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Paraesthesia
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Diarrhoea
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Fatigue
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Asthenia
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Onycholysis
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Toxicity
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neurotoxicity
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Polyneuropathy
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Oedema Peripheral
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Febrile Neutropenia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neutropenia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Dyspnoea
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Decreased Appetite
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Mucosal Inflammation
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Rash
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Anaemia
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Arthralgia
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Drug Hypersensitivity
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Dysgeusia
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Disorder
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Dystrophy
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Skin Toxicity
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pneumonia
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Sepsis
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pleural Effusion
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pneumonitis
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Cardiac Failure
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Myalgia
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Interrupt. = interruption; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Dyspnoea
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Influenza
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Asthenia
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Pertuzumab Interruption (Ptz Interrupt)
|
334 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Diarrhoea
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Neutropenia
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Pneumonia
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Pyrexia
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Trastuzumab Interruption (Trz Interrupt)
|
386 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Diarrhoea
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Pyrexia
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Neutropenia
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Dyspnoea
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Anaemia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Pneumonia
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Chills
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Infusion Related Reaction
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Influenza
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Asthenia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Vomiting
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Anaemia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Taxane Interruption (Tax Interrupt)
|
354 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neutropenia
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Diarrhoea
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Leukopenia
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Dyspnoea
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Pyrexia
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neuropathy Peripheral
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Fatigue
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Infusion Related Reaction
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Asthenia
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Erythema
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Pneumonia
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Flushing
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Hypersensitivity
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; AEs may fall within multiple categories.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Any TEAE to Monitor
|
1320 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Infusion-/Administration-Related Reactions
|
1096 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Rash/Skin Reactions
|
668 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Mucositis
|
618 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Cardiac Dysfunction
|
478 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Neutropenia/Febrile Neutropenia
|
439 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Anaphylaxis and Hypersensitivity
|
124 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Diarrhoea Grade ≥3
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE to Monitor
|
535 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenia/Febrile Neutropenia (Category)
|
279 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT)
|
145 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
|
90 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT)
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT)
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT)
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenic Sepsis (PT)
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Infusion-/Admin.-Related Reactions (Category)
|
123 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT)
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
IRR/ARR: Drug Hypersensitivity (PT)
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT)
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT)
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT)
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Infusion Related Reaction (PT)
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT)
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea Grade ≥3 (Category)
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT)
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Dysfunction (Category)
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT)
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PT)
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure (PT)
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Mucositis (Category)
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT)
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Stomatitis (PT)
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Rash/Skin Reactions (Category)
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Rash (PT)
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Anaphylaxis and Hypersensitivity (Category)
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Anaphyl./Hypersens.: Drug Hypersensitivity (PT)
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes (ALT or AST) increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Any TEAE of Special Interest
|
91 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Decline in LVEF (Category)
|
90 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT)
|
75 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PT)
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure (PT)
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure Congestive (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Elevated ALT or AST (Category)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Hepatic Failure (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
187 Participants
|
44 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
27 Participants
|
19 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
385 Participants
|
74 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
632 Participants
|
109 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
63 Participants
|
37 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
|
845 Participants
|
192 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
224 Participants
|
62 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
|
1081 Participants
|
239 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Serious TEAE
|
415 Participants
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Leading to Death
|
17 Participants
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
688 Participants
|
191 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Leading to Death
|
14 Participants
|
16 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
491 Participants
|
349 Participants
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
|
547 Participants
|
434 Participants
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Serious TEAE
|
300 Participants
|
210 Participants
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
171 Participants
|
105 Participants
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
|
709 Participants
|
541 Participants
|
64 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
502 Participants
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
837 Participants
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
273 Participants
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
610 Participants
|
269 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
197 Participants
|
89 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
353 Participants
|
182 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
283 Participants
|
252 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
493 Participants
|
386 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
169 Participants
|
117 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
573 Participants
|
303 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
181 Participants
|
103 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
353 Participants
|
179 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
|
135 Participants
|
400 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
|
238 Participants
|
641 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
|
77 Participants
|
209 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Congestive heart failure was defined as the Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With a Congestive Heart Failure Event
|
478 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Congestive heart failure was defined as SMQ 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the MedDRA version 22.1. Time to onset of the first episode of congestive heart failure was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not experience any congestive heart failure at the time of data-cut were censored at the date of the last attended visit whilst on-treatment (including visits up to and including 28 days after last dose of study treatment). Only treatment emergent congestive heart failure events are included.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Onset of the First Episode of Congestive Heart Failure
|
NA Months
Interval 73.82 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
All participants must have had a baseline LVEF ≥50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The change from baseline LVEF values were reported at every 3 cycles over the course of the study and at the final treatment, worst treatment, and maximum decrease values. The final treatment value was defined as the last LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The worst treatment value was defined as the lowest LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The maximum decrease value was defined as the largest decrease of LVEF value from baseline, or minimum increase if a participant's post-baseline LVEF measures were all larger than the baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.81
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.80
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.97
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.53
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
64.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.49
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.60
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
-2.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.94
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.67
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.75
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
-1.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.38
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
-1.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.87
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.46
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.63
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.80
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.84
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.41
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.98
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.89
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.31
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.68
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.78
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.33
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.20
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
-2.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.95
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
-2.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.86
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.04
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
-3.3 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.47
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.12
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-5.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.48
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-8.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.70
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-9.3 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 3.51
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 126
|
-9.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated using data from a single participant.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
-3.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.34
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
-3.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.19
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Final Treatment Value
|
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Worst Treatment Value
|
-7.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.88
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Maximum Decrease Value
|
-7.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.45
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.56
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.66
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
-2.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.50
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.79
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.93
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
All participants must have had a baseline LVEF greater than or equal to (≥)50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The number of participants are reported according to four change from baseline in LVEF value categories over the course of the study: 1) an increase or decrease from baseline LVEF less than (\<)10% points or no change in LVEF; 2) an absolute LVEF value \<45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points to \<15% points; 3) an absolute LVEF value \<45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥15% points; or 4) an absolute LVEF value ≥45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points. BL = baseline; Decr. = decrease; Incr. = increase
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
1190 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
114 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
1110 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
136 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
1005 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
139 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
906 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
116 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
780 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
109 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
719 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
92 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
639 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
88 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
588 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
91 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
553 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
78 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
518 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
70 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
485 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
446 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
292 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
62 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
414 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
65 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
405 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
358 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
69 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
340 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
49 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
314 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
291 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
284 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
263 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
249 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
237 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
224 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
224 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
214 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
196 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
192 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
174 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
161 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
140 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
115 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
92 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
68 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
56 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
0 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
431 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
87 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
|
472 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
|
86 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 3
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 4
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Missing
|
27 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 1
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 2
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 3
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 2 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Normal
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Missing
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
198 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Missing
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Normal
|
1327 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 2 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Missing to Normal
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Normal
|
257 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
648 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
109 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
128 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 1
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 2
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 3
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 3 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Normal
|
1251 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Grade 2
|
111 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Missing
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to Normal
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to 2
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 3 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 3 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Normal
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Normal
|
565 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
255 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
210 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
76 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 4
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Missing
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
54 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
51 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 4
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 1
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 2
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 1
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 2
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to 1
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Missing to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Missing to Grade 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Normal to Normal
|
1391 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Normal to Missing
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Missing to Normal
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to 1
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Missing to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Normal
|
702 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
392 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
190 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 4
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 3
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 4
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Normal
|
1222 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 1
|
149 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to Normal
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 2
|
169 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Normal
|
844 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 1
|
232 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Missing
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 3 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 3 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Normal
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Normal
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Grade 1
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Grade 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Grade 1 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Grade 2 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Normal
|
424 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 1
|
615 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 2
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Missing
|
285 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to Normal
|
1020 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to Low
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to High
|
261 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to Normal
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to High
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): High to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): High to High
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to Normal
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to High
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to Missing
|
53 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to Normal
|
1206 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to Low
|
77 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Low
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to Normal
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to Low
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to High
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Normal
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Low
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Missing
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to Normal
|
904 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to Low
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to High
|
283 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to Normal
|
66 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to Low
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to High
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): High to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): High to High
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Normal
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to High
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Missing
|
50 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Normal to Normal
|
810 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Normal to Low
|
390 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to Low
|
101 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to Normal
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to Low
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to High
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Normal
|
37 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Low
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Missing
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Normal
|
953 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Low
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to High
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Missing
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Normal
|
201 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Low
|
97 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to High
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): High to Normal
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): High to High
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to Normal
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to Missing
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Normal
|
223 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Low
|
837 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Low to Normal
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Low to Low
|
305 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): High to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): High to Low
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Low
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Missing
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to Normal
|
802 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to Low
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to High
|
365 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to Normal
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to Low
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to High
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to Normal
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to High
|
82 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to Normal
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to High
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to Missing
|
53 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to Normal
|
747 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to Low
|
420 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to High
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Low to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Low to Low
|
70 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to Normal
|
64 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to Low
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to High
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Low
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to High
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Missing
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to Normal
|
975 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to Low
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to High
|
111 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to Normal
|
131 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to Low
|
61 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to High
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): High to Normal
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): High to High
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Normal
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Low
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to High
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Missing
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Normal
|
350 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Low
|
767 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Low to Normal
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Low to Low
|
197 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to Normal
|
44 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to Low
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to High
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Normal
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Low
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Missing
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to Normal
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to High
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to Normal
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): High to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Normal
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Low
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to High
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Missing
|
1319 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Normal to Normal
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Normal to Low
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Low to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Low to Low
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): High to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Normal
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Low
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to High
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Missing
|
1321 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Normal
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Missing
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Normal
|
176 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 1
|
960 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 2
|
175 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 3
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 4
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to Normal
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Grade 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Normal
|
994 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
298 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 4
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Missing
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to 2
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 3 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Normal
|
1231 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to 2
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 4 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 4 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Normal
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to Missing
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 3 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Missing
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to Normal
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to 1
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to 4
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to 4
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Normal
|
57 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Grade 1
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Grade 4
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to 1
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Missing
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Normal
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Grade 1
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
534 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Grade 2
|
115 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Missing
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Normal
|
75 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 1
|
151 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
190 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to 2
|
74 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to Missing
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to 1
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to 2
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Normal
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Grade 1
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 4
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Missing
|
33 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 2
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 3
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Missing
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 2
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Normal
|
785 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 1
|
43 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 1
|
357 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 2
|
86 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 3
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Missing
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 2
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to Missing
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 3 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 3 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Normal
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Grade 1
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 1
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 2
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Grade 2
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
192 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to Missing
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Normal
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Grade 1
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 2 to 2
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 2 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 3 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Normal
|
1100 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
122 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 4
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 1
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 2
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to Missing
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 3
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Normal
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Grade 1
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Normal
|
1060 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Normal
|
857 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
319 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Missing
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Normal
|
1051 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
183 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 2
|
81 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to 1
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Normal
|
610 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 1
|
425 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 3
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Normal
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 1
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 2
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to 1
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Normal
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 1
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Normal
|
562 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 1
|
386 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 2
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 3
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Missing
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Normal
|
120 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 1
|
187 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 2
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 3
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Missing
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 1
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to 1
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 1
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Normal
|
605 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 1
|
329 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 2
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Missing
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to Normal
|
44 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 1
|
241 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 2
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 3
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to Missing
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Missing
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Normal
|
786 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
378 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
117 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Missing
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 1
|
88 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 2
|
35 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Missing
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to 1
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Normal
|
22 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Grade 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Normal
|
933 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Grade 1
|
190 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Grade 4
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to 2
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Normal
|
498 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 1
|
227 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 2
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 3
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Missing
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to Normal
|
64 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 1
|
187 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 2
|
75 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 3
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to Missing
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to Normal
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 1
|
52 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 2
|
45 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 3
|
21 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to Missing
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 1
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 2
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 3
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to Missing
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Normal
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 1
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 2
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 3
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Missing
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Normal
|
340 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Grade 2
|
40 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Missing
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Normal
|
1061 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 1
|
173 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Normal
|
69 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Missing
|
15 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Missing
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 3 to 3
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 4 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Normal
|
85 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Grade 1
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Grade 3
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Missing
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 4
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Missing
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
|
55 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 4 to 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Normal
|
81 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 3
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 4
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 2
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Normal
|
18 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Grade 1
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Grade 2
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Normal
|
990 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
|
367 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Missing
|
29 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Grade 2 to 2
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Normal
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
|
7 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Missing
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Normal
|
1075 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 1
|
256 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 2
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 3
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 4
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Missing
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 1
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.
Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Normal
|
717 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Low
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to High
|
402 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to Normal
|
69 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to Low
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to High
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): High to Normal
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): High to High
|
98 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to Normal
|
42 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to High
|
19 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to Missing
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Normal
|
828 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Low
|
293 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to High
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Low to Normal
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Low to Low
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to Normal
|
104 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to Low
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to High
|
6 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Normal
|
47 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Low
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to High
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Missing
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to Normal
|
540 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to Low
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to High
|
201 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High): Normal to Missing
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Normal
|
166 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Low
|
107 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to High
|
34 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): High to Normal
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): High to High
|
101 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High): Missing to Normal
|
46 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Missing to Low
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Missing to High
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High):Missing to Missing
|
195 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to Normal
|
393 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to Low
|
353 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to High
|
8 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Normal
|
12 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Low
|
294 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Missing
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to Normal
|
61 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to Low
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to High
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to Normal
|
66 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to Low
|
44 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to High
|
17 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(Low): Missing to Missing
|
133 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to Normal
|
665 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to Low
|
2 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to High
|
508 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Low to Normal
|
54 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Low to High
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): High to Normal
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): High to High
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to Normal
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to High
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to Missing
|
59 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to Normal
|
971 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to Low
|
201 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to High
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Low to Normal
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Low to Low
|
36 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to Normal
|
57 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to Low
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Normal
|
60 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Low
|
13 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Missing
|
58 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Normal to Normal
|
328 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Normal to High
|
499 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to Normal
|
10 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to Low
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to High
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): High to Normal
|
74 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): High to High
|
449 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to Normal
|
16 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to High
|
30 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to Missing
|
25 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to Normal
|
716 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to Low
|
102 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to High
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to Normal
|
5 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to Low
|
9 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to High
|
1 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to Normal
|
426 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to Low
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to High
|
66 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Normal
|
39 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Low
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to High
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Missing
|
26 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to Normal
|
1091 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to Low
|
20 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to High
|
110 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Low to Normal
|
72 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Low to Low
|
14 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): High to Normal
|
28 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): High to High
|
24 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Normal
|
38 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Low
|
3 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to High
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Missing
|
32 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Normal to Normal
|
530 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Normal to Low
|
691 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Low to Normal
|
4 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Low to Low
|
82 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): High to Normal
|
41 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): High to Low
|
11 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Normal
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Low
|
23 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Missing
|
31 Participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
|
20.67 Months
Interval 18.89 to 23.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
19.38 Months
Interval 17.51 to 21.75
|
23.79 Months
Interval 15.9 to 28.85
|
25.17 Months
Interval 14.42 to 29.44
|
22.37 Months
Interval 17.51 to 32.72
|
22.83 Months
Interval 12.02 to 27.86
|
NA Months
Interval 15.74 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
21.98 Months
Interval 19.65 to 24.25
|
14.72 Months
Interval 12.22 to 19.55
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
21.49 Months
Interval 19.45 to 23.98
|
12.88 Months
Interval 8.67 to 15.9
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
19.38 Months
Interval 16.92 to 22.11
|
23.23 Months
Interval 19.58 to 25.59
|
19.22 Months
Interval 11.7 to 37.09
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
18.23 Months
Interval 16.13 to 20.57
|
27.24 Months
Interval 23.75 to 34.4
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
19.12 Months
Interval 16.59 to 21.49
|
23.49 Months
Interval 20.57 to 25.63
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
20.60 Months
Interval 18.53 to 23.82
|
20.73 Months
Interval 17.05 to 23.79
|
32.13 Months
Interval 11.63 to 61.57
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
15.38 Months
Interval 13.67 to 19.02
|
23.39 Months
Interval 20.67 to 25.0
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Survival
|
65.31 Months
Interval 60.88 to 70.87
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overall Survival
|
66.56 Months
Interval 61.9 to 73.49
|
63.57 Months
Interval 47.57 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
55.56 Months
Interval 41.49 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
NA Months
Interval 49.84 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
53.22 Months
Interval 33.35 to 63.87
|
NA Months
Interval 44.16 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Survival
|
70.01 Months
Interval 64.33 to 81.08
|
50.10 Months
Interval 41.26 to 53.98
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overall Survival
|
67.25 Months
Interval 63.44 to 76.52
|
31.15 Months
Interval 20.5 to 39.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Survival
|
66.53 Months
Interval 61.67 to 77.27
|
64.03 Months
Interval 56.61 to 72.25
|
70.87 Months
Interval 39.69 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overall Survival
|
57.10 Months
Interval 52.4 to 63.44
|
81.08 Months
Interval 71.66 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overall Survival
|
57.10 Months
Interval 51.06 to 62.82
|
79.80 Months
Interval 71.79 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overall Survival
|
66.66 Months
Interval 62.39 to 77.27
|
60.19 Months
Interval 52.34 to 67.71
|
NA Months
Interval 16.13 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.
Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overall Survival
|
54.08 Months
Interval 48.66 to 60.75
|
73.50 Months
Interval 65.61 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.
The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
79.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.07 to 81.72
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.
Best overall response (BOR) was defined as the best response recorded from the first dose of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death in the absence of disease progression. The hierarchy used to determine BOR: Complete Response (CR)\>Partial Response (PR)\>Stable Disease (SD)\>Progressive Disease (PD)\>Not Evaluable. Note that CR or PR was confirmed ≥4 weeks later. RECIST v1.1 responses are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum.; PD = At least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and absolute increase of ≥5 mm.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Complete Response (Confirmed)
|
14.6 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Partial Response (Confirmed)
|
64.9 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Stable Disease
|
15.3 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Progressive Disease
|
4.2 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Not Evaluable
|
1.1 Percentage of participants
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.
The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=968 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=230 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
81.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.13 to 84.1
|
70.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.63 to 75.85
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline and those who had received any taxane chemotherapy were included in the analysis.
The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=657 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
n=481 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
n=53 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
78.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 75.04 to 81.48
|
82.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.4 to 85.44
|
77.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.79 to 87.72
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.
The clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) that lasted at least 6 months, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Clinical benefit responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD; at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions and absolute increase of ≥5 mm), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical Benefit Rate (CR or PR, or SD for at Least 6 Months) Based on Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v.1.1
|
86.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 84.14 to 88.13
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of first confirmed response (CR or PR) to first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline and a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) were included in this analysis.
Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from when a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). DOR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not progressed or died after having had a confirmed response were censored at the date of their last tumor measurement. Response was assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter until event occurrence or end of study. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=952 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
20.01 Months
Interval 18.2 to 22.21
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From date of first study treatment until date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.
Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first study treatment administration to the date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). TTR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not have CR or PR were censored at the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at Day 1. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Response for Participants With Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
|
2.464 Months
Interval 2.398 to 2.497
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. Participants were given a series of statements in each subscale and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B total score, ranging from 0 to 148, was the sum of the scores for each subscale, provided that at least 80% of the items had been answered; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. If any of the 5 subscale scores were missing, the total score was also set to missing. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
-1.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.132
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
99.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.548
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
0.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.526
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-1.93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.611
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
0.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.211
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
3.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.426
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
3.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.764
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
3.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.689
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
4.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.175
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
3.59 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.570
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
3.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.311
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
3.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.877
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
3.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.586
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
3.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.838
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
1.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.791
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
2.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.658
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
2.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.811
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
1.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.268
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
1.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.221
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.784
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
0.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.014
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.207
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
0.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.475
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.633
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
-0.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.419
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
-1.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.951
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.807
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
-1.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.526
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
-1.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.030
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
0.62 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.183
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
0.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.289
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
0.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.474
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
2.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.636
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
1.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.195
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
1.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.262
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
3.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.385
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
2.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.617
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
-0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.585
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-4.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.323
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-4.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.232
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-8.64 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.187
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-20.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.357
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
-1.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.923
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
-1.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.201
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the physical well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B physical well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
-0.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.788
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
-0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.178
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
-0.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.474
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
-0.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.269
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
-0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.133
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.775
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
0.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.309
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.950
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.474
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-2.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.092
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-5.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.946
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
-0.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.366
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
-0.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.393
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
-0.10 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.630
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
-0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.696
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.338
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
-0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.579
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.494
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
-0.72 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.507
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
-0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.379
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
-0.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.029
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
-0.81 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.249
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
-0.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.391
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
-0.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.332
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.599
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.652
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
0.69 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.543
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
0.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.616
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
0.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.690
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.761
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
0.71 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.584
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
0.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.894
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
0.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.512
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
-0.04 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.647
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.604
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
0.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.698
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.564
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.280
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
-0.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.765
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.695
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
20.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.044
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
-1.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.557
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-1.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.994
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
-0.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.604
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the social well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B social well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
22.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.993
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
-0.41 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.145
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-1.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.320
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
-1.02 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.728
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
-1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.846
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
-1.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.949
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
-1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.986
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
-1.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.881
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
-1.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.856
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
-1.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.994
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
-1.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.107
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
-1.45 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.852
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
-1.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.953
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
-1.77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.066
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
-1.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.154
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
-1.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.238
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
-1.84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.475
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
-2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.657
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
-1.77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.236
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
-1.88 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.117
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
-2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.528
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
-2.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.278
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
-2.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.586
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
-2.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.434
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
-2.49 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.846
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
-2.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.777
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
-2.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
-2.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.487
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
-2.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.355
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
-1.97 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.102
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
-2.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.676
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
-2.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.609
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
-1.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.831
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
-2.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.316
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
-1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.258
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
-1.76 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.074
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
-1.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.387
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
-1.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.663
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-2.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.386
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.600
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-2.85 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.485
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-1.92 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.946
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
-1.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.911
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
-1.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.080
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the emotional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 6 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B emotional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 24, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
2.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.171
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.763
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
2.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.275
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
2.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.130
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
1.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.115
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
1.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.451
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
2.25 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.367
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
1.82 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.414
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
2.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.311
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
1.84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.325
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
1.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.256
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
1.59 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.462
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.336
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
1.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.074
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.351
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
1.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.421
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
1.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.308
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
1.72 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.463
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.750
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
2.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.384
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
1.97 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.558
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
2.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.686
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.388
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
2.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.769
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
2.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.041
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
2.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.949
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
2.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.902
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
2.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.721
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.241
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
1.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.944
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
1.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.185
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
0.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.217
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.121
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
0.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.001
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
0.37 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.193
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
15.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.990
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
1.69 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.219
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
1.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.526
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
1.64 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.624
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
2.02 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.686
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
1.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.778
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
2.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.861
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.877
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
2.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.040
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the functional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B functional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
16.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.096
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
-0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.961
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-0.79 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.437
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
-0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.572
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.577
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
0.78 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.758
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
0.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.797
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
0.89 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.804
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
0.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.903
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
0.71 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.064
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.961
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
0.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.209
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.687
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
0.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.927
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
0.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.038
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
0.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.049
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.227
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
0.23 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.931
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
-0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.090
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
0.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.925
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.100
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
-0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.178
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
-0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.264
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
-0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.476
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.378
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
-0.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.391
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
-0.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.197
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
-0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.046
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
-0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.022
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
-0.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.250
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
0.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.587
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
0.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.161
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
1.27 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.663
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.651
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
0.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.327
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
1.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.922
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
1.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.902
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
0.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.507
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-0.25 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.439
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-0.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.316
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-2.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.916
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-5.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.828
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.132
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
-0.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.558
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.
The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the breast cancer subscale, participants were given a series of 10 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B breast cancer subscale score, ranging from 0 to 40, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
|
1.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.882
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
|
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.313
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
|
0.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.163
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
|
0.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.240
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
|
1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.957
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
|
0.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.189
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
|
0.68 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.399
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
|
0.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.982
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
|
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.814
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
|
-1.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.963
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
|
-1.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.842
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
|
24.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.296
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
|
0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.101
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
|
-0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.759
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
|
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.633
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
|
0.89 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.770
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
|
0.74 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.822
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
|
1.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.180
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
|
1.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.043
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
|
1.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.898
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
|
1.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.231
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
|
1.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.043
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
|
1.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.968
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
|
1.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.113
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
|
1.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.030
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
|
1.12 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.210
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
|
1.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.499
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
|
1.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.414
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
|
1.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.679
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
|
0.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.430
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
|
0.76 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.555
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
|
0.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.355
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
|
0.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.586
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
|
1.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.960
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
|
0.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.532
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
|
0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.142
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
|
0.85 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.925
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
|
1.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.899
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
|
0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.100
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
|
0.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.690
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
|
-2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.055
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
|
-7.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.307
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
|
0.88 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.574
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
|
0.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.477
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
1.8%
26/1436 • Number of events 30 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
|
1.0%
15/1436 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
1.0%
15/1436 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic sepsis
|
0.70%
10/1436 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
|
0.70%
10/1436 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Vascular device infection
|
0.63%
9/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
|
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
|
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
|
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Extradural abscess
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Infection
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic infection
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bacterial pyelonephritis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Biliary sepsis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridial infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium colitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Device related sepsis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Dysentery
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enteritis infectious
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis bacterial
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis C
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster disseminated
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Large intestine infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung abscess
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Necrotising fasciitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oesophageal candidiasis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonal sepsis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pyomyositis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Salmonellosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis fungal
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Varicella
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
|
4.9%
71/1436 • Number of events 75 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
3.3%
47/1436 • Number of events 56 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Bone marrow failure
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile bone marrow aplasia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
2.5%
36/1436 • Number of events 43 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer perforation
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileal stenosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestinal obstruction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal stenosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
1.3%
18/1436 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
|
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Death
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Catheter site inflammation
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Device related thrombosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Drug intolerance
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Inflammatory pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Infusion site extravasation
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Malaise
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Nodule
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
1.1%
16/1436 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
|
0.77%
11/1436 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
|
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax spontaneous
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
|
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
|
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Carbon monoxide poisoning
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chemical burns of eye
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured sacrum
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Inflammation of wound
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple fractures
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
|
0.84%
12/1436 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial thrombosis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular insufficiency
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Intracardiac mass
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular failure
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve disease
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Sinus node dysfunction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
|
1.3%
18/1436 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.77%
11/1436 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Computerised tomogram abdomen abnormal
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cauda equina syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Intracranial pressure increased
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropsychiatric lupus
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Progressive supranuclear palsy
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Restless legs syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transient global amnesia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Transverse sinus thrombosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Trigeminal neuralgia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
|
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fracture pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
|
1.4%
20/1436 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
|
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Subclavian vein thrombosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
B-cell type acute leukemia
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast neoplasm
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bronchial carcinoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer pain
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial cancer
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lentigo maligna
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lobular breast carcinoma in situ
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine tumour of the lung
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Papillary thyroid cancer
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal adenocarcinoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Thyroid cancer
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour embolism
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
|
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
|
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis haemorrhagic
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
|
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis sclerosing
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver injury
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety disorder
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric decompensation
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pemphigus
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
|
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast haematoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Eye disorders
Cataract
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Product Issues
Device breakage
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Product Issues
Device loosening
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Endocrine disorders
Hypogonadism
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Internal fixation of fracture
|
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
67.8%
974/1436 • Number of events 2753 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
35.7%
512/1436 • Number of events 918 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
23.7%
340/1436 • Number of events 531 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
16.4%
235/1436 • Number of events 347 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
14.6%
210/1436 • Number of events 326 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
14.3%
206/1436 • Number of events 314 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
10.4%
149/1436 • Number of events 187 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
9.8%
141/1436 • Number of events 170 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
|
5.5%
79/1436 • Number of events 92 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
31.8%
457/1436 • Number of events 829 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
29.7%
426/1436 • Number of events 1123 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
|
20.0%
287/1436 • Number of events 490 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
18.0%
258/1436 • Number of events 387 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
|
17.9%
257/1436 • Number of events 344 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Influenza like illness
|
6.7%
96/1436 • Number of events 136 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
5.6%
81/1436 • Number of events 114 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Chills
|
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 84 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
5.2%
74/1436 • Number of events 86 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
48.3%
693/1436 • Number of events 813 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
25.4%
365/1436 • Number of events 596 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
20.3%
292/1436 • Number of events 466 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
|
11.6%
167/1436 • Number of events 208 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
|
11.4%
163/1436 • Number of events 197 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
9.5%
137/1436 • Number of events 183 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Onycholysis
|
8.2%
118/1436 • Number of events 179 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
|
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 94 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 542 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
|
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 537 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
15.4%
221/1436 • Number of events 366 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
14.3%
205/1436 • Number of events 271 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
|
9.8%
141/1436 • Number of events 193 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
|
8.4%
120/1436 • Number of events 158 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Taste disorder
|
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 92 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neurotoxicity
|
5.0%
72/1436 • Number of events 118 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 550 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
19.8%
284/1436 • Number of events 476 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
15.3%
220/1436 • Number of events 289 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
13.6%
196/1436 • Number of events 292 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
13.6%
195/1436 • Number of events 248 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
|
9.4%
135/1436 • Number of events 185 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
|
8.9%
128/1436 • Number of events 157 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
18.9%
271/1436 • Number of events 410 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
18.3%
263/1436 • Number of events 360 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
13.6%
195/1436 • Number of events 260 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
8.6%
124/1436 • Number of events 156 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
7.0%
100/1436 • Number of events 135 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
12.7%
183/1436 • Number of events 309 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
12.5%
180/1436 • Number of events 294 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
11.4%
164/1436 • Number of events 269 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
7.7%
110/1436 • Number of events 155 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
|
6.9%
99/1436 • Number of events 125 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
6.5%
93/1436 • Number of events 117 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
|
21.7%
312/1436 • Number of events 521 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
15.5%
222/1436 • Number of events 439 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
5.8%
84/1436 • Number of events 162 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
10.6%
152/1436 • Number of events 217 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
9.0%
129/1436 • Number of events 165 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
|
6.8%
98/1436 • Number of events 121 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
|
19.1%
274/1436 • Number of events 447 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
|
5.3%
76/1436 • Number of events 122 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
10.9%
157/1436 • Number of events 183 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
5.4%
78/1436 • Number of events 94 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 87 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
|
10.9%
157/1436 • Number of events 215 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
6.8%
98/1436 • Number of events 115 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
|
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
|
11.8%
169/1436 • Number of events 220 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER