Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer (NCT NCT01572038)

NCT ID: NCT01572038

Last Updated: 2020-09-25

Results Overview

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

1436 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Results posted on

2020-09-25

Participant Flow

A total of 1697 patients were screened: 261 failed screening and 1436 were enrolled in the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Overall Study
STARTED
1436
Overall Study
Received at Least One Dose of Study Drug
1436
Overall Study
COMPLETED
445
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
991

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Overall Study
Death
648
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
204
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
81
Overall Study
Physician Decision
20
Overall Study
Patient Decision
14
Overall Study
Progressive Disease
8
Overall Study
Site Closed Before Completing Form
6
Overall Study
Enrolled into Another Trial
3
Overall Study
Participated in Another Trial
3
Overall Study
Termination by Sponsor
2
Overall Study
Patient Deterioration
1
Overall Study
Sponsor Decision
1

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab (Herceptin) and a Taxane in First-Line Treatment in Participants With Human Epidermal Growth Factor 2 (HER2)-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Age, Continuous
54.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.10 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1429 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
1032 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
88 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
28 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Not Applicable as per Local Regulations
222 Participants
n=99 Participants
Age Categorical (≤65 or >65 Years Old)
≤65 Years Old
1167 Participants
n=99 Participants
Age Categorical (≤65 or >65 Years Old)
>65 Years Old
269 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Hispanic/Latino
269 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Chinese
57 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Japanese
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Mixed Ethnicity
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Indian
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Other
495 Participants
n=99 Participants
Ethnicity
Not Applicable as per Local Regulations
574 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Europe
1009 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Asia
177 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
North America
34 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
South America
121 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Africa
71 Participants
n=99 Participants
Geographic Region of Enrollment
Other (Australia)
24 Participants
n=99 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Grade 0 or 1
1371 Participants
n=99 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Grade 2
63 Participants
n=99 Participants
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status at Baseline
Missing
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
Visceral Disease at Baseline
Visceral Disease
992 Participants
n=99 Participants
Visceral Disease at Baseline
Non-visceral Disease
444 Participants
n=99 Participants
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Positive
918 Participants
n=99 Participants
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Negative
512 Participants
n=99 Participants
Hormone Receptor Status of Disease at Baseline
Unknown
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
Prior Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy Received
Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy
786 Participants
n=99 Participants
Prior Neoadjuvant or Adjuvant Chemotherapy Received
No Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy
650 Participants
n=99 Participants
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy Received for Breast Cancer
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy
400 Participants
n=99 Participants
Previous Trastuzumab Therapy Received for Breast Cancer
No Previous Trastuzumab Therapy
1036 Participants
n=99 Participants
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Docetaxel
775 Participants
n=99 Participants
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Paclitaxel
588 Participants
n=99 Participants
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
Nab-Paclitaxel
65 Participants
n=99 Participants
Initial Type of Taxane Received During the Study: Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, or Nab-Paclitaxel
None
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
Measurable or Non-Measurable Disease (per RECIST v1.1) at Baseline
Measurable Disease
1198 Participants
n=99 Participants
Measurable or Non-Measurable Disease (per RECIST v1.1) at Baseline
Non-Measurable Disease
238 Participants
n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE - Any Grade
1419 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
879 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any Serious TEAE
535 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Death
31 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
1037 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab - Any Grade
946 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Taxane - Any Grade
1342 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Grade ≥3
286 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab - Grade ≥3
245 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Related to Taxane - Grade ≥3
514 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Pertuzumab
334 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Trastuzumab
386 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Interruption of Taxane
354 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Pertuzumab
140 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Trastuzumab
133 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Leading to Discontinuation of Taxane
286 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
1320 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE to Monitor - Grade ≥3
535 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE of Special Interest
91 Participants
Overview of the Number of Participants With at Least One Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event, Severity Determined According to National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, Version 4.0 (NCI-CTCAE v4.0)
Any TEAE Within 28 Days of Treatmt Discontinuation
975 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Total Number of Deaths
658 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Progressive Disease
581 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Other
42 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Adverse Event (Total)
35 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Infections and Infestations (SOC)
11 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Peritonitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonia (PT)
5 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory Tract Infection (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Sepsis (PT)
3 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Septic Shock (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Disorders (SOC)
7 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Arrest (PT)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Failure (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Failure Congestive (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardio-respiratory Arrest (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Myocardial Infarction (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Right Ventricular Failure (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
General Disorders & Admin. Site Conditions (SOC)
6 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Death (PT)
6 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC)
3 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Neutropenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Thrombocytopenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC)
3 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Aspiration (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis Chronic (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Nervous System Disorders (SOC)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Encephalopathy (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Ischemic Stroke (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hypoglycaemia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Failure (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Over the Course of the Study by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Delirium (PT)
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

All adverse events leading to death, regardless of whether they were classified as treatment emergent, are listed by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT) according to the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. Admin. = administration; Mediast. = mediastinal

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Total Number of Deaths
38 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Progressive Disease
18 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Other
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Number of Deaths by Cause: Adverse Event (Total)
19 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Infections and Infestations (SOC)
6 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Peritonitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pneumonia (PT)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory Tract Infection (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Sepsis (PT)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
General Disorders & Admin. Site Conditions (SOC)
4 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Death (PT)
4 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Blood and Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC)
3 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Neutropenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Thrombocytopenia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Disorders (SOC)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardiac Arrest (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Cardio-Respiratory Arrest (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Respiratory, Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC)
2 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Pancreatitis (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Nervous System Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Encephalopathy (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hypoglycaemia (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC)
1 Participants
Number of Participants Who Died Within 6 Months of Starting Study Treatment by Reported Cause of Death (Adverse Events Leading to Death by System Organ Class and Preferred Term)
Hepatic Failure (PT)
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs by system organ class (SOC) and preferred term (PT); PTs that are part of a given SOC are listed in the rows directly below each SOC within the results table. If a participant experienced the same AE at more than one severity grade, only the most severe grade was presented.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 3
119 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Grade (Gr.) 3
676 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Gr. 4
172 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Any TEAE - Gr. 5
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
163 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gastrointestinal Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vomiting (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
56 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Skin & Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 3
100 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions (SOC)-Gr. 5
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 3
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 3
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
139 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Nervous System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 3
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neuropathy Peripheral (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 3
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Syncope (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 3
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Headache (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 3
148 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 4
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Infections and Infestations (SOC) - Gr. 5
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 3
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pneumonia (PT) - Gr. 5
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Device Infection (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Device Related Infection (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 3
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders (SOC)-Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
62 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 3
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Pulmonary Embolism (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
158 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
104 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 3
77 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 4
67 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 5
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 3
51 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 4
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT) - Gr. 5
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 3
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Anaemia (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 3
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 4
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 3
116 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 4
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Investigations (SOC) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 3
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 3
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
63 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypokalaemia (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
62 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Vascular Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 3
45 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Psychiatric Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 3
43 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 4
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Injury, Poisoning & Proced. Complicat. (SOC)-Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
35 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Cardiac Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Immune System Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Renal and Urinary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 3
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 4
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Neoplasms Benign, Malignant & Unspec. (SOC) -Gr. 5
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 3
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 4
0 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events, Occurring in ≥1% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Hepatobiliary Disorders (SOC) - Gr. 5
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the system organ classes are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab (Rel to Ptz)
1037 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Gastrointestinal Disorders
629 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
491 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
462 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Investigations
252 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Nervous System Disorders
207 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
188 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
184 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
182 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Ptz: Infections and Infestations
151 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Trastuzumab (Rel to Trz)
946 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Gastrointestinal Disorders
435 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
434 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
384 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Investigations
262 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Nervous System Disorders
184 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
179 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
163 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Trz: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
153 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Any TEAE Related to Taxane (Rel to Tax)
1342 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Gastrointestinal Disorders
984 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Skin and Subcutaneous Tissue Disorders
938 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Gen. Disorders & Admin.Site Conditions
834 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Nervous System Disorders
764 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Blood & Lymphatic System Disorders
457 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Musculo. & Connective Tissue Disorders
386 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Infections and Infestations
293 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Resp., Thoracic & Mediast. Disorders
290 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Metabolism and Nutrition Disorders
227 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Investigations
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Any Grade That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥10% of Participants by System Organ Class
Rel to Tax: Eye Disorders
174 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Onycholysis
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuz. (Rel to Ptz)
286 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Diarrhoea
59 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Neutropenia
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Febrile Neutropenia
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Ejection Fraction Decreased
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Neutrophil Count Decreased
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Fatigue
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Asthenia
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Ptz: Cardiac Failure
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Trastuz. (Rel to Trz)
245 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Diarrhoea
32 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Neutropenia
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Ejection Fraction Decreased
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Febrile Neutropenia
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Neutrophil Count Decreased
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Fatigue
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Cardiac Failure
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Trz: Asthenia
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Taxane (Rel to Tax)
514 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutropenia
140 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Febrile Neutropenia
86 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Diarrhoea
80 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutrophil Count Decreased
34 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Fatigue
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Peripheral Neuropathy
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Asthenia
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Leukopenia
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: White Blood Cell Count Decreased
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Mucosal Inflammation
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Paraesthesia
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neutropenic Sepsis
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Anaemia
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Vomiting
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events That Were Related to Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Rel to Tax: Neurotoxicity
7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Discont. = discontinuation; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
37 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Pertuzumab Discontinuation (Ptz Discont)
140 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
37 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Cardiac Failure
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Diarrhoea
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Dyspnoea
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Infusion Related Reaction
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Sepsis
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: Hypersensitivity
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Trastuzumab Discontinuation(Trz Discont)
133 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Cardiac Failure
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Left Ventricular Dysfunction
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Diarrhoea
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Sepsis
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Dyspnoea
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: Hypersensitivity
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Taxane Discontinuation (Tax Discont)
286 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neuropathy Peripheral
52 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Paraesthesia
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Diarrhoea
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Fatigue
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Asthenia
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Onycholysis
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Toxicity
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neurotoxicity
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Polyneuropathy
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Oedema Peripheral
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Febrile Neutropenia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Neutropenia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Dyspnoea
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Decreased Appetite
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Ejection Fraction Decreased
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: General Physical Health Deterioration
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Mucosal Inflammation
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Rash
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Anaemia
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Arthralgia
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Drug Hypersensitivity
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Dysgeusia
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Disorder
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Nail Dystrophy
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Skin Toxicity
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pneumonia
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Sepsis
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pleural Effusion
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Pneumonitis
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Cardiac Failure
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Discontinuation of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.2% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Discont: Myalgia
3 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs and the preferred terms are presented in descending order according to the total frequency of occurrence. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. Interrupt. = interruption; Ptz = pertuzumab; Tax = taxane; Trz = trastuzumab

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Dyspnoea
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Influenza
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Asthenia
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Pertuzumab Interruption (Ptz Interrupt)
334 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
51 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Diarrhoea
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Neutropenia
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Pneumonia
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Pyrexia
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Trastuzumab Interruption (Trz Interrupt)
386 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
52 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Diarrhoea
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Pyrexia
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Neutropenia
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Dyspnoea
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Ptz Interrupt: Anaemia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Pneumonia
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Chills
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Infusion Related Reaction
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Influenza
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Asthenia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Vomiting
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Anaemia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Trz Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Any TEAE, Taxane Interruption (Tax Interrupt)
354 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neutropenia
46 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Diarrhoea
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Leukopenia
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Dyspnoea
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Pyrexia
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neutrophil Count Decreased
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Ejection Fraction Decreased
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Neuropathy Peripheral
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Nasopharyngitis
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Drug Hypersensitivity
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Fatigue
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Infusion Related Reaction
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Asthenia
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Erythema
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Pneumonia
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Flushing
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Leading to Dose Interruption of Study Treatment (Pertuzumab, Trastuzumab, or Taxane), Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Preferred Term
Tax Interrupt: Hypersensitivity
7 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; AEs may fall within multiple categories.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Any TEAE to Monitor
1320 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Infusion-/Administration-Related Reactions
1096 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Rash/Skin Reactions
668 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Mucositis
618 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Cardiac Dysfunction
478 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Neutropenia/Febrile Neutropenia
439 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Anaphylaxis and Hypersensitivity
124 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor of Any Grade, Occurring in ≥5% of Participants by Category
Diarrhoea Grade ≥3
120 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first dose of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, it was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. If a participant had more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE to Monitor
535 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenia/Febrile Neutropenia (Category)
279 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenia (PT)
145 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Febrile Neutropenia (PT)
90 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutrophil Count Decreased (PT)
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Leukopenia (PT)
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
White Blood Cell Count Decreased (PT)
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Neutropenic Sepsis (PT)
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Infusion-/Admin.-Related Reactions (Category)
123 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Hypertension (PT)
27 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
IRR/ARR: Drug Hypersensitivity (PT)
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Asthenia (PT)
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Fatigue (PT)
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Dyspnoea (PT)
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Infusion Related Reaction (PT)
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Paraesthesia (PT)
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea Grade ≥3 (Category)
120 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Diarrhoea (PT)
120 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Dysfunction (Category)
51 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT)
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PT)
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure (PT)
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Mucositis (Category)
33 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Mucosal Inflammation (PT)
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Stomatitis (PT)
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Rash/Skin Reactions (Category)
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Rash (PT)
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Anaphylaxis and Hypersensitivity (Category)
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Grade ≥3 Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events to Monitor, Occurring in ≥0.5% of Participants by Category and Preferred Term
Anaphyl./Hypersens.: Drug Hypersensitivity (PT)
13 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs of special interest included LVEF decreased, liver enzymes (ALT or AST) increased, and suspected transmission of infectious agent by the study drug. MedDRA version 22.1 was used to code AEs; preferred terms (PT) that are part of a given category are listed in the rows directly below each category within the results table. If a participant experienced more than one event in a category, they were counted only once in that category.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Any TEAE of Special Interest
91 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Decline in LVEF (Category)
90 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Ejection Fraction Decreased (PT)
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Left Ventricular Dysfunction (PT)
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure (PT)
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Cardiac Failure Congestive (PT)
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Elevated ALT or AST (Category)
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events of Special Interest by Category and Preferred Term
Hepatic Failure (PT)
1 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
187 Participants
44 Participants
5 Participants
27 Participants
19 Participants
4 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
385 Participants
74 Participants
9 Participants
37 Participants
16 Participants
14 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
632 Participants
109 Participants
22 Participants
63 Participants
37 Participants
16 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
845 Participants
192 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
224 Participants
62 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
1081 Participants
239 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Serious TEAE
415 Participants
120 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Leading to Death
17 Participants
14 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
688 Participants
191 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE. TEAEs to monitor included anaphylaxis and hypersensitivity, cardiac dysfunction, diarrhoea Grade ≥3, pregnancy-related AEs, interstitial lung disease, infusion-/administration-related reactions, mucositis, (febrile) neutropenia, rash/skin reactions, and suspected transmission of infectious agent.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Leading to Death
14 Participants
16 Participants
1 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
491 Participants
349 Participants
36 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE Related to Pertuzumab - Any Grade
547 Participants
434 Participants
52 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Serious TEAE
300 Participants
210 Participants
22 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
171 Participants
105 Participants
9 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), TEAEs Leading to Death, Grade ≥3 TEAEs, Any-Grade and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab, and TEAEs to Monitor
Any TEAE to Monitor - Any Grade
709 Participants
541 Participants
64 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
502 Participants
33 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
837 Participants
41 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
273 Participants
13 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
610 Participants
269 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
197 Participants
89 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
353 Participants
182 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
283 Participants
252 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
493 Participants
386 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
169 Participants
117 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
573 Participants
303 Participants
3 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
181 Participants
103 Participants
2 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
353 Participants
179 Participants
3 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after, or 7 months after (only for serious AEs related to study drug), the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were adverse events (AEs) that started or worsened in severity on or after the first administration of study drug, up to and including 28 days after the last dose. The investigator graded all AEs for severity per NCI-CTCAE v4.0; if not listed, the AE was assessed as follows: Grade 1 = mild; Grade 2 = moderate; Grade 3 = severe; Grade 4 = life-threatening/disabling; Grade 5 = death. The investigator determined whether an AE was related to study drug and independently assessed severity and seriousness of each AE.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Serious TEAE
135 Participants
400 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any TEAE - Grade 3 or Higher (≥3)
238 Participants
641 Participants
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overview of the Number of Participants With Serious Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Grade ≥3 TEAEs, and Grade ≥3 TEAEs Related to Pertuzumab
Any Grade ≥3 TEAE Related to Pertuzumab
77 Participants
209 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Congestive heart failure was defined as the Standardised MedDRA Query (SMQ) 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities, version 22.1 (MedDRA version 22.1).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With a Congestive Heart Failure Event
478 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: From Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Congestive heart failure was defined as SMQ 'Cardiac failure (wide)' from the MedDRA version 22.1. Time to onset of the first episode of congestive heart failure was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not experience any congestive heart failure at the time of data-cut were censored at the date of the last attended visit whilst on-treatment (including visits up to and including 28 days after last dose of study treatment). Only treatment emergent congestive heart failure events are included.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Time to Onset of the First Episode of Congestive Heart Failure
NA Months
Interval 73.82 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

All participants must have had a baseline LVEF ≥50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The change from baseline LVEF values were reported at every 3 cycles over the course of the study and at the final treatment, worst treatment, and maximum decrease values. The final treatment value was defined as the last LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The worst treatment value was defined as the lowest LVEF value observed before all study treatment discontinuation. The maximum decrease value was defined as the largest decrease of LVEF value from baseline, or minimum increase if a participant's post-baseline LVEF measures were all larger than the baseline value.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.81
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.80
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.97
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.53
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
64.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.46
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.49
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.60
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.52
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
-2.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.94
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.67
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.75
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
-1.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.38
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
-1.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.87
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.46
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.13
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.63
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.45
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.80
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
-1.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.84
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.41
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.98
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.89
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.31
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.68
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
-1.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.78
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.33
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.20
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
-2.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.95
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
-2.5 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.86
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.04
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
-3.3 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.47
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-1.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.12
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-5.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.48
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-8.6 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.70
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-9.3 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 3.51
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 126
-9.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be calculated using data from a single participant.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
-3.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.34
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
-3.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 8.19
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Final Treatment Value
-2.0 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Worst Treatment Value
-7.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.88
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL: Maximum Decrease Value
-7.7 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 7.45
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
-2.1 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.56
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.66
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
-2.2 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.50
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
-1.8 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.77
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.79
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Values Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
-1.9 Percentage points of LVEF
Standard Deviation 6.93

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, predose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

All participants must have had a baseline LVEF greater than or equal to (≥)50% to enroll in the study; patients with significant cardiac disease or baseline LVEF below 50% were not eligible for this study. The number of participants are reported according to four change from baseline in LVEF value categories over the course of the study: 1) an increase or decrease from baseline LVEF less than (\<)10% points or no change in LVEF; 2) an absolute LVEF value \<45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points to \<15% points; 3) an absolute LVEF value \<45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥15% points; or 4) an absolute LVEF value ≥45% points and a decrease from baseline LVEF ≥10% points. BL = baseline; Decr. = decrease; Incr. = increase

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
1190 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
5 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 3 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
114 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
1110 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 6 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
136 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
1005 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
4 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 9 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
139 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
906 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
6 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 12 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
116 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
780 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
3 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
6 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 15 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
109 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
719 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
5 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 18 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
92 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
639 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
4 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 21 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
88 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
588 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 24 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
91 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
553 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 27 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
78 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
518 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 30 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
70 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
485 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 33 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
72 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
446 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
292 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 36 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
62 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
414 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 39 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
65 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
405 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 42 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
46 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
358 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 45 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
69 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
340 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 48 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
49 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
314 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 51 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
43 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
3 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 54 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
30 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
291 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 57 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
41 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
284 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 60 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
29 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
263 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 63 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
39 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
249 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 66 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
35 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
237 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 69 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
33 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
224 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 72 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
35 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
224 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 75 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
29 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
214 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 78 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
29 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
196 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 81 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
30 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
192 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 84 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
23 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
174 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 87 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
22 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
161 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 90 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
16 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
140 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 93 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
16 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
115 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 96 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
13 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
92 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 99 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
14 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
68 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 102 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
14 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
56 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 105 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
9 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
41 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 108 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
8 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
34 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 111 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
8 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
19 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 114 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
4 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
11 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 117 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
6 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
4 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 120 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
3 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 123 · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
1 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Cycle 126 · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
0 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
431 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
2 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
26 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
End of Treatment · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
87 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · Incr. or Decr. from BL <10% Points, or No Change
472 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10%-<15% Points
4 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF<45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥15% Points
22 Participants
Number of Participants by Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Categories Over the Course of the Study
Day 28 of Follow-Up · LVEF≥45% Points and Decr. from BL ≥10% Points
86 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 3
45 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 4
27 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Missing
27 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 1
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 2
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 1 to 3
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Grade 2 to 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Normal
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Grade 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Missing to Missing
32 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 2
198 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 3
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Missing
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Normal
1327 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Grade 1
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Normal to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to Normal
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to 1
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 1 to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Grade 2 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Missing to Normal
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (High): Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Normal
257 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Normal to Grade 1
648 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 1
109 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 2
128 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to 3
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 1
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 2
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to 3
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 2 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Grade 3 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Grade 1
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Grade 2
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Hemoglobin (Low): Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Normal
1251 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Grade 2
111 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Grade 3
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Normal to Missing
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to Normal
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to 2
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 2 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 3 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Grade 3 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Normal
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Grade 2
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 3
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (High): Missing to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Normal
565 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 1
255 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 2
210 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 3
76 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Grade 4
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Normal to Missing
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 1
54 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 2
51 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to 4
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 1
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 2
37 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 2 to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 1
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 2
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to 1
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Missing to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Missing to Grade 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Normal to Normal
1391 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Normal to Missing
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Missing to Normal
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to 1
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (High): Missing to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Normal
702 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 1
392 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 2
190 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 3
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Grade 4
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 3 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 3
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to 4
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Grade 4 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 1
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Lymphocytes (Low): Missing to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Normal
1222 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 1
149 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Grade 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Normal to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Platelet Count: Grade 1 to Normal
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 2
169 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Normal
844 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Absolute Neutrophil Count: Normal to Grade 1
232 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Missing
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 1
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 2
33 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 1 to 3
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 3 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Grade 3 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Normal
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 1
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
White Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Normal
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Grade 1
52 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Grade 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Normal to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Grade 1 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Grade 2 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Normal
424 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 1
615 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 2
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Grade 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
International Normalized Ratio: Missing to Missing
285 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Clinical laboratory tests for hematology and coagulation parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to Normal
1020 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to Low
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Normal to High
261 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to Normal
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Low to High
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): High to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): High to High
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to Normal
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to High
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (High): Missing to Missing
53 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to Normal
1206 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to Low
77 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Normal to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Low
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Low to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to Normal
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to Low
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): High to High
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Normal
40 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Low
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Basophils (Low): Missing to Missing
37 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to Normal
904 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to Low
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Normal to High
283 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to Normal
66 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to Low
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Low to High
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): High to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): High to High
35 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Normal
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to High
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (High): Missing to Missing
50 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Normal to Normal
810 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Normal to Low
390 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to Low
101 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Low to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to Normal
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to Low
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): High to High
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Normal
37 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Low
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Eosinophils (Low): Missing to Missing
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Normal
953 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Low
47 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to High
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Normal to Missing
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Normal
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Low
97 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to High
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Low to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): High to Normal
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): High to High
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to Normal
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (High): Missing to Missing
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Normal
223 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Low
837 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Normal to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Low to Normal
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Low to Low
305 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): High to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): High to Low
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Low
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Hematocrit (Low): Missing to Missing
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to Normal
802 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to Low
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Normal to High
365 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to Normal
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to Low
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Low to High
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to Normal
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): High to High
82 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to Normal
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to High
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (High): Missing to Missing
53 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to Normal
747 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to Low
420 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Normal to High
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Low to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Low to Low
70 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to Normal
64 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to Low
40 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): High to High
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Low
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to High
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Monocytes (Low): Missing to Missing
45 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to Normal
975 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to Low
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Normal to High
111 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to Normal
131 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to Low
61 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Low to High
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): High to Normal
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): High to High
45 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Normal
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Low
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to High
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (High): Missing to Missing
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Normal
350 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Normal to Low
767 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Low to Normal
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Low to Low
197 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to Normal
44 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to Low
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): High to High
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Normal
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Low
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Red Blood Cells (Low): Missing to Missing
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to Normal
46 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Normal to High
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to Normal
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Low to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): High to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Normal
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Low
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to High
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (High): Missing to Missing
1319 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Normal to Normal
46 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Normal to Low
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Low to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Low to Low
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): High to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Normal
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Low
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to High
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Hematology and Coagulation Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
PTT (Low): Missing to Missing
1321 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on NCI-CTC v4.0 from Grades 1 (least severe) to 4 (most severe). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Normal
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Missing to Missing
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Normal
176 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 1
960 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 3 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 2
175 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 3
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Grade 4
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Normal to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to Normal
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 2
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Grade 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Missing to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Normal
994 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
298 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Grade 4
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Normal to Missing
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 2 to 2
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Grade 3 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Normal
1231 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to 2
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 2 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 4 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Grade 4 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Normal
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to Missing
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 3 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Missing
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to Normal
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to 1
120 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 1 to 4
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to 4
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Grade 4 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Normal
57 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Grade 1
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Grade 4
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to 1
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Missing to Missing
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Normal
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Grade 1
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Missing to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Grade 1
534 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Grade 2
115 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Missing
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Normal
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 1
151 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to 1
190 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to 2
74 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to Missing
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to 1
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to 2
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 2 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Normal
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Grade 1
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 4
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Missing
33 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 1
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 2
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 3
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Missing
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 2
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Normal
785 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 1
43 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 1
357 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 2
86 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Grade 3
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Normal to Missing
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 2
35 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 1 to Missing
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 3 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 3 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Normal
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Grade 1
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 1
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 2
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Grade 2 to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Grade 2
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Albumin: Missing to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 1
192 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 2
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to Missing
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 2 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Grade 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Normal
32 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Grade 1
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 2 to 2
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
47 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 1 to 1
47 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Grade 3 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 2 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 3 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Normal
1100 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 1
122 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 3
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Grade 4
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 1
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 2
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to Missing
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 3 to 3
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Normal
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Grade 1
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Normal to Normal
1060 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Normal
857 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
319 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 2
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 3
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Missing
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Normal
1051 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 1
183 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 2
81 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 3
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to 1
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 2 to 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Normal
610 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 1
425 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 3
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Normal
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 1
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 2
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to 1
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Normal
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 1
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alanine Aminotransferase: Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Normal
562 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 1
386 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 2
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Grade 3
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Normal to Missing
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Normal
120 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 1
187 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 2
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to 3
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 1 to Missing
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 1
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 2 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to 1
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Grade 3 to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 1
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Grade 2
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Aspartate Aminotransferase: Missing to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Normal
605 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 1
329 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 2
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Grade 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Normal to Missing
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to Normal
44 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 1
241 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 2
72 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to 3
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 1 to Missing
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Alkaline Phosphatase: Grade 2 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (High): Missing to Missing
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Normal
786 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 1
378 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
117 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Calcium (Low): Normal to Missing
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 1
88 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 2
35 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Grade 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Normal to Missing
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Grade 1 to 1
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Normal
22 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Grade 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Total Bilirubin: Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Normal
933 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Grade 1
190 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Uric Acid: Normal to Grade 4
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 1 to 2
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Creatinine: Grade 2 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Normal
498 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 1
227 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 2
39 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Grade 3
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Normal to Missing
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to Normal
64 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 1
187 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 2
75 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to 3
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 1 to Missing
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to Normal
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 1
52 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 2
45 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to 3
21 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 2 to Missing
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 1
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 2
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to 3
47 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Grade 3 to Missing
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Normal
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 1
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 2
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Grade 3
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Gamma-Glutamyl Transpeptidase: Missing to Missing
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Normal to Normal
340 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Grade 1 to Normal
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Grade 2
40 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (High): Missing to Missing
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Normal
1061 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 1
173 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 2
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Normal to Grade 3
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 1 to 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Normal
69 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 1
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 2
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Glucose (Low): Missing to Missing
15 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Normal to Missing
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 1 to 1
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 3 to Normal
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 3 to 3
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Grade 4 to 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Normal
85 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Grade 1
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Grade 3
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (High): Missing to Missing
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 3
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Grade 4
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Normal to Missing
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to Normal
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to 1
55 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 1 to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Grade 4 to 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Normal
81 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 1
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 3
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Magnesium (Low): Missing to Grade 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Grade 4
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Normal to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 1
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 1 to 2
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Grade 4 to Normal
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Normal
18 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Grade 1
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Grade 2
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (High): Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Normal
990 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Grade 2
367 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Normal to Missing
29 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Grade 2 to Normal
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Grade 2 to 2
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Normal
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Grade 2
7 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Potassium (Low): Missing to Missing
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Normal
1075 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 1
256 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 2
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 3
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Grade 4
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Normal to Missing
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to Normal
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to NCI-CTC v4.0
Sodium (High): Grade 1 to 1
6 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Predose at each treatment cycle (1 cycle is 3 weeks) from Baseline until 28 days after the last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: Safety Population: all participants who received at least one dose of any study treatment.

Clinical laboratory tests for biochemistry parameters were performed at local laboratories. Laboratory toxicities were defined based on local laboratory normal ranges (for parameters with NCI-CTC grade not defined). Some laboratory parameters are bi-dimensional (i.e. can be graded in both the low and high direction). These parameters were split and presented in both directions. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to the first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Values from all visits, including unscheduled visits, were included in the derivation of the worst post-baseline grade. Not every abnormal laboratory value qualified as an adverse event, only if it met any of the following criteria: was clinically significant (per investigator); was accompanied by clinical symptoms; resulted in a change in study treatment; or resulted in a medical intervention or a change in concomitant therapy.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Normal
717 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Low
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to High
402 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Normal to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to Normal
69 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to Low
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Low to High
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): High to Normal
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): High to High
98 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to Normal
42 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to High
19 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (High): Missing to Missing
39 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Normal
828 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Low
293 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to High
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Normal to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Low to Normal
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Low to Low
72 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to Normal
104 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to Low
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): High to High
6 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Normal
47 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Low
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to High
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Blood Urea Nitrogen (Low): Missing to Missing
39 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to Normal
540 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to Low
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Normal to High
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High): Normal to Missing
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Normal
166 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Low
107 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to High
34 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Low to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): High to Normal
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): High to High
101 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High): Missing to Normal
46 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Missing to Low
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (High): Missing to High
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(High):Missing to Missing
195 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to Normal
393 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to Low
353 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Normal to High
8 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Normal
12 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Low
294 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Low to Missing
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to Normal
61 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to Low
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): High to High
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to Normal
66 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to Low
44 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance (Low): Missing to High
17 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Calc Creatinine Clearance(Low): Missing to Missing
133 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to Normal
665 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to Low
2 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Normal to High
508 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Low to Normal
54 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Low to High
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): High to Normal
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): High to High
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to Normal
41 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to High
32 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (High): Missing to Missing
59 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to Normal
971 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to Low
201 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Normal to High
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Low to Normal
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Low to Low
36 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to Normal
57 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to Low
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): High to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Normal
60 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Low
13 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Chloride (Low): Missing to Missing
58 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Normal to Normal
328 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Normal to High
499 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to Normal
10 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to Low
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Low to High
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): High to Normal
74 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): High to High
449 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to Normal
16 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to High
30 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (High): Missing to Missing
25 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to Normal
716 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to Low
102 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Normal to High
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to Normal
5 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to Low
9 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Low to High
1 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to Normal
426 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to Low
31 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): High to High
66 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Normal
39 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Low
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to High
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Lactate Dehydrogenase (Low): Missing to Missing
26 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to Normal
1091 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to Low
20 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Normal to High
110 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Low to Normal
72 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Low to Low
14 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): High to Normal
28 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): High to High
24 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Normal
38 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Low
3 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to High
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (High): Missing to Missing
32 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Normal to Normal
530 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Normal to Low
691 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Low to Normal
4 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Low to Low
82 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): High to Normal
41 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): High to Low
11 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Normal
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Low
23 Participants
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities in Biochemistry Parameters: Shift From Baseline to the Worst Post-Baseline Grade According to Normal Range Criteria
Total Protein (Low): Missing to Missing
31 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, Version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1)
20.67 Months
Interval 18.89 to 23.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
19.38 Months
Interval 17.51 to 21.75
23.79 Months
Interval 15.9 to 28.85
25.17 Months
Interval 14.42 to 29.44
22.37 Months
Interval 17.51 to 32.72
22.83 Months
Interval 12.02 to 27.86
NA Months
Interval 15.74 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
21.98 Months
Interval 19.65 to 24.25
14.72 Months
Interval 12.22 to 19.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
21.49 Months
Interval 19.45 to 23.98
12.88 Months
Interval 8.67 to 15.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
19.38 Months
Interval 16.92 to 22.11
23.23 Months
Interval 19.58 to 25.59
19.22 Months
Interval 11.7 to 37.09

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
18.23 Months
Interval 16.13 to 20.57
27.24 Months
Interval 23.75 to 34.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
19.12 Months
Interval 16.59 to 21.49
23.49 Months
Interval 20.57 to 25.63

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
20.60 Months
Interval 18.53 to 23.82
20.73 Months
Interval 17.05 to 23.79
32.13 Months
Interval 11.63 to 61.57

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until date of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time between the date of enrollment and the date of first radiographically documented progressive disease assessment (by the investigator using RECIST v1.1) or death, whichever occurred first. PFS was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had neither progressed nor died at the time of clinical cut-off or who were lost to follow-up were censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment (response assessment with the latest end date); if no post-baseline assessments were available, such participants were censored at Day 1. If a participant missed 2 or more consecutive visits, then they were censored at the last evaluable visit prior to the missed visits. Tumor assessments were performed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) for up to 36 months and at least every 12 cycles thereafter during treatment, and at least every 36 weeks post-treatment (if progression-free after 36 months), until disease progression.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Progression-Free Survival, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
15.38 Months
Interval 13.67 to 19.02
23.39 Months
Interval 20.67 to 25.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Overall Survival
65.31 Months
Interval 60.88 to 70.87

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1009 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=177 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=34 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
n=121 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
n=71 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
n=24 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Region of Enrollment: Overall Survival
66.56 Months
Interval 61.9 to 73.49
63.57 Months
Interval 47.57 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
55.56 Months
Interval 41.49 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
NA Months
Interval 49.84 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.
53.22 Months
Interval 33.35 to 63.87
NA Months
Interval 44.16 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1167 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=269 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Survival
70.01 Months
Interval 64.33 to 81.08
50.10 Months
Interval 41.26 to 53.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. There were 2 participants with missing evaluations for ECOG performance status at baseline who were excluded from this analysis.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1371 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=63 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by ECOG Performance Status at Baseline: Overall Survival
67.25 Months
Interval 63.44 to 76.52
31.15 Months
Interval 20.5 to 39.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study. Only participants who received any taxane chemotherapy during the study were included in this analysis.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=775 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=588 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=65 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Survival
66.53 Months
Interval 61.67 to 77.27
64.03 Months
Interval 56.61 to 72.25
70.87 Months
Interval 39.69 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=992 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=444 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Visceral Disease at Baseline: Overall Survival
57.10 Months
Interval 52.4 to 63.44
81.08 Months
Interval 71.66 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=786 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=650 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Prior (Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy: Overall Survival
57.10 Months
Interval 51.06 to 62.82
79.80 Months
Interval 71.79 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=918 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=512 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=6 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Hormone Receptor Status at Baseline: Overall Survival
66.66 Months
Interval 62.39 to 77.27
60.19 Months
Interval 52.34 to 67.71
NA Months
Interval 16.13 to
The median and upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of enrollment until death due to any cause. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: ITT Population: all participants enrolled in the study.

Overall survival was defined as time from the date of enrollment until the date of death due to any cause. Overall survival was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not died were censored at the last date they were known to be alive. When it was not possible to confirm the full death date, partial death dates were imputed to: 01 June of that year if only the year was known, 15th of that month if only the month and year were known. If the imputed date was before the last known alive date, the last known alive date was used as the imputation.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=400 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=1036 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Previous Trastuzumab Therapy: Overall Survival
54.08 Months
Interval 48.66 to 60.75
73.50 Months
Interval 65.61 to
The upper limit of the 95% confidence interval could not be calculated because not enough events had occurred during the study.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.

The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
79.5 Percentage of participants
Interval 77.07 to 81.72

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.

Best overall response (BOR) was defined as the best response recorded from the first dose of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death in the absence of disease progression. The hierarchy used to determine BOR: Complete Response (CR)\>Partial Response (PR)\>Stable Disease (SD)\>Progressive Disease (PD)\>Not Evaluable. Note that CR or PR was confirmed ≥4 weeks later. RECIST v1.1 responses are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum.; PD = At least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study, and absolute increase of ≥5 mm.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Complete Response (Confirmed)
14.6 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Partial Response (Confirmed)
64.9 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Stable Disease
15.3 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Progressive Disease
4.2 Percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants by Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
Not Evaluable
1.1 Percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.

The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=968 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=230 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Age (≤65 vs. >65 Years): Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
81.7 Percentage of participants
Interval 79.13 to 84.1
70.0 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.63 to 75.85

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression or death. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline and those who had received any taxane chemotherapy were included in the analysis.

The overall response rate was defined as the percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as their best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later), as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Participants without post-baseline tumor assessments were considered non-responders.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=657 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
n=481 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
n=53 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Subgroup Analysis by Taxane Chemotherapy: Overall Response Rate (Complete Response or Partial Response) Based on Best Overall Response (Confirmed) as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
78.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 75.04 to 81.48
82.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 78.4 to 85.44
77.4 Percentage of participants
Interval 63.79 to 87.72

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter, until disease progression. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.

The clinical benefit rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose best confirmed response (≥4 weeks later) was a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR), or stable disease (SD) that lasted at least 6 months, as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1 from the start of study treatment until disease progression/recurrence or death. Clinical benefit responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.; SD = Neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease (PD; at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions and absolute increase of ≥5 mm), taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Clinical Benefit Rate (CR or PR, or SD for at Least 6 Months) Based on Best Overall Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v.1.1
86.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 84.14 to 88.13

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of first confirmed response (CR or PR) to first documented disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline and a documented confirmed response (CR or PR) were included in this analysis.

Duration of response (DOR) was defined as the time from when a confirmed best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) was first documented to first documented disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first). DOR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who had not progressed or died after having had a confirmed response were censored at the date of their last tumor measurement. Response was assessed every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) up to 36 months, and at least every 12 cycles thereafter until event occurrence or end of study. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=952 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Duration of Response as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
20.01 Months
Interval 18.2 to 22.21

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: From date of first study treatment until date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). The median (full range) duration of follow-up was 68.73 (0.03-87.29) months.

Population: Only participants with measurable disease at baseline were included in the analysis.

Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from the first study treatment administration to the date of first confirmed response (CR or PR). TTR was analyzed using a Kaplan-Meier approach. Participants who did not have CR or PR were censored at the date of their last evaluable tumor assessment. Participants for whom no post-baseline tumor assessments were available were censored at Day 1. Responses according to RECIST v1.1 are defined as follows: CR = Disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to \<10 millimetres (mm).; PR = At least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1198 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Time to Response for Participants With Best Overall Response of Complete Response or Partial Response, as Assessed by the Investigator Using RECIST v1.1
2.464 Months
Interval 2.398 to 2.497

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. Participants were given a series of statements in each subscale and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B total score, ranging from 0 to 148, was the sum of the scores for each subscale, provided that at least 80% of the items had been answered; a higher score indicated a better quality of life. If any of the 5 subscale scores were missing, the total score was also set to missing. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
-1.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.132
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
99.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.548
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
0.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.526
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-1.93 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.611
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
0.87 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.211
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
3.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.426
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
3.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.764
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
3.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.689
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
4.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.175
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
3.59 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.570
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
3.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.311
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
3.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.877
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
3.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.586
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
3.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.838
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
1.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.791
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
2.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.658
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
2.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.811
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
1.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.268
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
1.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.221
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.784
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
0.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.014
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.207
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
0.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.475
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.633
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
-0.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.419
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
-1.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.951
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.807
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
-1.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.526
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
-1.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.030
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
0.62 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.183
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
0.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.289
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
0.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.474
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
2.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.636
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
1.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.195
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
1.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.262
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
3.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.385
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
2.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.617
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
-0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.585
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-4.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.323
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-4.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.232
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-8.64 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.187
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-20.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.357
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
-1.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.923
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Breast Cancer (FACT-B) Questionnaire Total Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
-1.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.201

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the physical well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B physical well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
-0.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.788
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
-0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.178
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
-0.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.474
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
-0.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.269
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
-0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.133
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.775
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
0.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.309
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.950
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.474
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-2.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.092
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-5.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.946
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
-0.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.366
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
-0.95 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.393
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
-0.10 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.630
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
-0.20 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.696
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.338
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
-0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.579
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.494
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
-0.72 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.507
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
-0.44 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.379
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
-0.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.029
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
-0.81 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.249
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
-0.36 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.391
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
-0.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.332
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.599
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.652
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
0.69 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.543
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
0.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.616
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
0.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.690
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.761
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
0.71 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.584
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
0.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.894
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
0.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.512
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
-0.04 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.647
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.604
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
0.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.698
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.564
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
0.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.280
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
-0.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.765
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
-0.35 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.695
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
20.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.044
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
-1.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.557
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-1.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.994
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Physical Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
-0.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.604

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the social well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B social well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
22.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.993
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
-0.41 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.145
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-1.09 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.320
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
-1.02 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.728
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
-1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.846
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
-1.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.949
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
-1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.986
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
-1.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.881
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
-1.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.856
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
-1.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.994
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
-1.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.107
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
-1.45 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.852
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
-1.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.953
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
-1.77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.066
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
-1.73 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.154
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
-1.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.238
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
-1.84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.475
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
-2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.657
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
-1.77 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.236
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
-1.88 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.117
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
-2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.528
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
-2.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.278
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
-2.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.586
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
-2.24 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.434
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
-2.49 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.846
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
-2.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.777
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
-2.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.624
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
-2.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.487
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
-2.38 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.355
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
-1.97 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.102
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
-2.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.676
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
-2.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.609
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
-1.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.831
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
-2.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.316
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
-1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.258
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
-1.76 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.074
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
-1.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.387
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
-1.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.663
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-2.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.386
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.600
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-2.85 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.485
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-1.92 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.946
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
-1.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.911
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Social Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
-1.61 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.080

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the emotional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 6 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B emotional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 24, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
2.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.171
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.763
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
2.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.275
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
2.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.130
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
1.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.115
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
1.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.451
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
2.25 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.367
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
1.82 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.414
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
2.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.311
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
1.84 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.325
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
1.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.256
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
1.59 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.462
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
1.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.336
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
1.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.074
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
1.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.351
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
1.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.421
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
1.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.308
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
1.72 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.463
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
2.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.750
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
2.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.384
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
1.97 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.558
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
2.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.686
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.388
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
2.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.769
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
2.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.041
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
2.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.949
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
2.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.902
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
2.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.721
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.241
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
1.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.944
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
1.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.185
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
0.75 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.217
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.121
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
0.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.001
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
0.37 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.193
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
15.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.990
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
1.69 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.219
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
1.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.526
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
1.64 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.624
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
2.02 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.686
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
1.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.778
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
2.03 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.861
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.877
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Emotional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
2.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.040

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the functional well-being subscale, participants were given a series of 7 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B functional well-being subscale score, ranging from 0 to 28, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
16.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.096
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
-0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.961
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-0.79 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.437
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
-0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.572
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.577
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
0.78 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.758
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
0.83 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.797
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
0.89 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.804
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
0.53 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.903
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
0.71 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.064
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
0.60 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.961
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
0.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.209
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.687
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
0.26 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.927
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
0.31 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.038
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
0.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.049
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
0.28 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.227
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
0.23 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.931
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
-0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.090
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
0.21 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.925
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.100
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
-0.06 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.178
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
-0.07 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.264
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
-0.47 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.476
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.378
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
-0.40 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.391
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
-0.18 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.197
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
-0.29 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.046
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
-0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.022
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
-0.08 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.250
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
0.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.587
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
0.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.161
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
1.27 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.663
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
0.46 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.651
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
0.96 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.327
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
1.14 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.922
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
1.42 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.902
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
0.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.507
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-0.25 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.439
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-0.58 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.316
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-2.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.916
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-5.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.828
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
-0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.132
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Functional Well-Being Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
-0.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.558

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, every 3 cycles (1 cycle is 3 weeks) during treatment period, and 28 days post-treatment safety follow-up. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Population: ITT Population: only enrolled female participants were included in the analysis.

The FACT-B questionnaire (version 4) was administered only to female participants to assess quality of life in five subscales: physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being, and breast cancer. For the breast cancer subscale, participants were given a series of 10 statements and were asked to rate how true each statement was for them during the past 7 days on a 5-point scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The calculated FACT-B breast cancer subscale score, ranging from 0 to 40, was the sum of the scores for each statement only if at least 50% of items had been answered; the higher the score, the better the quality of life. Baseline was defined as the last non-missing measurement taken prior to first dose of study treatment (including unscheduled assessments). Post-baseline values were summarized for planned visits only.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1429 Participants
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Asia
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
North America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
South America
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Africa
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Other (Australia)
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 87
1.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.882
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 90
0.51 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.313
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 93
0.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.163
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 96
0.65 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.240
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 99
1.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.957
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 102
0.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.189
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 105
0.68 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.399
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 108
0.19 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.982
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 111
0.01 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.814
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 114
-1.67 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.963
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 117
-1.56 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.842
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Baseline (BL): Absolute Value at Visit
24.98 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.296
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 3
0.48 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.101
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 6
-0.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.759
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 9
0.52 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.633
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 12
0.89 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.770
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 66
0.74 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.822
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 15
1.16 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.180
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 18
1.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.043
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 21
1.30 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.898
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 24
1.39 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.231
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 27
1.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.043
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 30
1.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.968
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 33
1.34 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.113
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 36
1.33 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.030
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 39
1.12 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.210
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 42
1.11 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.499
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 45
1.13 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.414
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 48
1.00 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.679
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 51
0.99 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.430
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 54
0.76 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.555
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 57
0.70 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.355
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 60
0.80 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.586
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 63
1.32 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.960
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 69
0.54 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.532
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 72
0.50 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.142
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 75
0.85 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.925
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 78
1.22 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.899
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 81
0.27 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.100
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 84
0.55 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.690
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 120
-2.17 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.055
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Cycle 123
-7.94 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.307
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at End of Treatment
0.88 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.574
Change From Baseline in FACT-B Questionnaire Breast Cancer Subscale Score Over the Course of the Study
Change from BL at Day 28 of Follow-Up
0.66 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.477

Adverse Events

Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane

Serious events: 535 serious events
Other events: 1394 other events
Deaths: 658 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
1.8%
26/1436 • Number of events 30 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Cellulitis
1.0%
15/1436 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
1.0%
15/1436 • Number of events 15 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic sepsis
0.70%
10/1436 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Sepsis
0.70%
10/1436 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Vascular device infection
0.63%
9/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Device related infection
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Erysipelas
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Arthritis bacterial
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pyelonephritis
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Bacteraemia
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Diverticulitis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Extradural abscess
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Infection
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Neutropenic infection
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal infection
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Wound infection
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Abscess limb
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Bacterial pyelonephritis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Biliary sepsis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Catheter site infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Clostridial infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium colitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile colitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Clostridium difficile infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Device related sepsis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Dysentery
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Enteritis infectious
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Enterocolitis bacterial
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Gangrene
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Gastrointestinal infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Hepatitis C
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster disseminated
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Large intestine infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Localised infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Lung abscess
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Meningitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Necrotising fasciitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Oesophageal candidiasis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Osteomyelitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Paronychia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Peritonitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia bacterial
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Post procedural infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pseudomonal sepsis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Pyomyositis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Salmonellosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Septic shock
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis fungal
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Soft tissue infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Staphylococcal sepsis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Varicella
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile neutropenia
4.9%
71/1436 • Number of events 75 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
3.3%
47/1436 • Number of events 56 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Bone marrow failure
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Febrile bone marrow aplasia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
2.5%
36/1436 • Number of events 43 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Colitis
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Rectal haemorrhage
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fistula
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Crohn's disease
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Food poisoning
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastric ulcer perforation
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haematemesis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Ileal stenosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestinal obstruction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Large intestine polyp
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Lower gastrointestinal haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oesophageal stenosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis chronic
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Small intestinal obstruction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Pyrexia
1.3%
18/1436 • Number of events 21 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Asthenia
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
General physical health deterioration
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 7 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Death
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Chills
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Catheter site inflammation
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Device related thrombosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Drug intolerance
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Inflammatory pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Infusion site extravasation
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Malaise
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Nodule
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Systemic inflammatory response syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
1.1%
16/1436 • Number of events 16 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pulmonary embolism
0.77%
11/1436 • Number of events 11 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleural effusion
0.42%
6/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Lung disorder
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumonitis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory failure
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Acute respiratory distress syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Interstitial lung disease
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pleuritic pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pneumothorax spontaneous
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femur fracture
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Infusion related reaction
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ankle fracture
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Femoral neck fracture
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Hip fracture
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rib fracture
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Carbon monoxide poisoning
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Chemical burns of eye
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fractured sacrum
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Humerus fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Inflammation of wound
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Limb injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Lower limb injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Multiple fractures
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Overdose
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radiation injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Radius fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Toxicity to various agents
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Ulna fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Upper limb fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wound
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure
0.84%
12/1436 • Number of events 13 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.56%
8/1436 • Number of events 10 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial thrombosis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac arrest
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure congestive
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular dysfunction
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Pericardial effusion
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Supraventricular tachycardia
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Acute coronary syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac failure chronic
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac tamponade
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardio-respiratory arrest
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Cardiovascular insufficiency
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Intracardiac mass
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Left ventricular failure
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Mitral valve disease
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Right ventricular failure
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Sinus node dysfunction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
1.3%
18/1436 • Number of events 19 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
0.77%
11/1436 • Number of events 18 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Computerised tomogram abdomen abnormal
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Weight decreased
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Ischaemic stroke
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Seizure
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Aphasia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Cauda equina syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral haemorrhage
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral infarction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Cerebrovascular disorder
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Cognitive disorder
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Generalised tonic-clonic seizure
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Hepatic encephalopathy
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Hypoaesthesia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Intracranial pressure increased
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Loss of consciousness
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropsychiatric lupus
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Presyncope
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Progressive supranuclear palsy
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Restless legs syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Spinal cord compression
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Transient global amnesia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Transverse sinus thrombosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Tremor
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Trigeminal neuralgia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis of jaw
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 9 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spinal osteoarthritis
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Fracture pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc protrusion
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal chest pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pathological fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Immune system disorders
Drug hypersensitivity
1.4%
20/1436 • Number of events 20 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Immune system disorders
Hypersensitivity
0.35%
5/1436 • Number of events 5 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyponatraemia
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 6 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypocalcaemia
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypophosphataemia
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoalbuminaemia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Hypertensive crisis
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Haematoma
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Circulatory collapse
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Jugular vein thrombosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Peripheral ischaemia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Subclavian vein thrombosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Superior vena cava syndrome
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Thrombosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
B-cell type acute leukemia
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Breast neoplasm
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bronchial carcinoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Cancer pain
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Endometrial cancer
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Gastrointestinal stromal tumour
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lentigo maligna
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lobular breast carcinoma in situ
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Lung neoplasm
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastatic squamous cell carcinoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neuroendocrine tumour of the lung
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Papillary thyroid cancer
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Rectal adenocarcinoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Renal cancer
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Thyroid cancer
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tumour embolism
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Acute kidney injury
0.49%
7/1436 • Number of events 8 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure
0.21%
3/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Cystitis haemorrhagic
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal impairment
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary tract obstruction
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis
0.28%
4/1436 • Number of events 4 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholecystitis acute
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholangitis sclerosing
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholestasis
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatic failure
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hepatocellular injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Liver injury
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 3 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety disorder
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Confusional state
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Delirium
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Psychiatric decompensation
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorder
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Angioedema
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pemphigus
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin ulcer
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion spontaneous
0.14%
2/1436 • Number of events 2 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions
Abortion
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast haematoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Ovarian cyst
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Uterine prolapse
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Eye disorders
Cataract
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Eye disorders
Glaucoma
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Eye disorders
Retinal detachment
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Product Issues
Device breakage
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Product Issues
Device loosening
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Endocrine disorders
Hypogonadism
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Surgical and medical procedures
Internal fixation of fracture
0.07%
1/1436 • Number of events 1 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Pertuzumab + Trastuzumab + Taxane
n=1436 participants at risk
Participants received pertuzumab and trastuzumab intravenously (IV) plus taxane chemotherapy once of every 3 weeks per treatment cycle until predefined study end, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, disease progression, or death, whichever occurred first. Taxane chemotherapy was docetaxel, paclitaxel, or nab-paclitaxel, per the investigator's choice.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
67.8%
974/1436 • Number of events 2753 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
35.7%
512/1436 • Number of events 918 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
23.7%
340/1436 • Number of events 531 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
16.4%
235/1436 • Number of events 347 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
14.6%
210/1436 • Number of events 326 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
14.3%
206/1436 • Number of events 314 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
10.4%
149/1436 • Number of events 187 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
9.8%
141/1436 • Number of events 170 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
5.5%
79/1436 • Number of events 92 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Fatigue
31.8%
457/1436 • Number of events 829 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Asthenia
29.7%
426/1436 • Number of events 1123 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Mucosal inflammation
20.0%
287/1436 • Number of events 490 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Pyrexia
18.0%
258/1436 • Number of events 387 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
17.9%
257/1436 • Number of events 344 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
6.7%
96/1436 • Number of events 136 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Pain
5.6%
81/1436 • Number of events 114 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Chills
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 84 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
General disorders
Chest pain
5.2%
74/1436 • Number of events 86 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
48.3%
693/1436 • Number of events 813 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
25.4%
365/1436 • Number of events 596 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
20.3%
292/1436 • Number of events 466 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry skin
11.6%
167/1436 • Number of events 208 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Nail disorder
11.4%
163/1436 • Number of events 197 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
9.5%
137/1436 • Number of events 183 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Onycholysis
8.2%
118/1436 • Number of events 179 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Palmar-plantar erythrodysaesthesia syndrome
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 94 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 542 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Neuropathy peripheral
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 537 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
15.4%
221/1436 • Number of events 366 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
14.3%
205/1436 • Number of events 271 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Dysgeusia
9.8%
141/1436 • Number of events 193 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Peripheral sensory neuropathy
8.4%
120/1436 • Number of events 158 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Taste disorder
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 92 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Nervous system disorders
Neurotoxicity
5.0%
72/1436 • Number of events 118 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
22.8%
328/1436 • Number of events 550 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
19.8%
284/1436 • Number of events 476 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
15.3%
220/1436 • Number of events 289 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
13.6%
196/1436 • Number of events 292 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
13.6%
195/1436 • Number of events 248 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Bone pain
9.4%
135/1436 • Number of events 185 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
8.9%
128/1436 • Number of events 157 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
18.9%
271/1436 • Number of events 410 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
18.3%
263/1436 • Number of events 360 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
13.6%
195/1436 • Number of events 260 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
8.6%
124/1436 • Number of events 156 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
7.0%
100/1436 • Number of events 135 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
12.7%
183/1436 • Number of events 309 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
12.5%
180/1436 • Number of events 294 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
11.4%
164/1436 • Number of events 269 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
7.7%
110/1436 • Number of events 155 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Conjunctivitis
6.9%
99/1436 • Number of events 125 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
6.5%
93/1436 • Number of events 117 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anaemia
21.7%
312/1436 • Number of events 521 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
15.5%
222/1436 • Number of events 439 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
5.8%
84/1436 • Number of events 162 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
10.6%
152/1436 • Number of events 217 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
9.0%
129/1436 • Number of events 165 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Vascular disorders
Lymphoedema
6.8%
98/1436 • Number of events 121 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
19.1%
274/1436 • Number of events 447 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
5.3%
76/1436 • Number of events 122 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
10.9%
157/1436 • Number of events 183 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
5.4%
78/1436 • Number of events 94 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
5.2%
75/1436 • Number of events 87 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Ejection fraction decreased
10.9%
157/1436 • Number of events 215 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Investigations
Weight decreased
6.8%
98/1436 • Number of events 115 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.
Eye disorders
Lacrimation increased
11.8%
169/1436 • Number of events 220 • From Baseline until 28 days after last dose of study treatment. The median (full range) duration of exposure to any study treatment was 16.2 (0.0-86.4) months.

Additional Information

Medical Communications

Hoffmann-La Roche

Phone: 800-821-8590

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER