Cost-effectiveness of Outpatient Versus Hospital Cardiac Rehabilitation

NCT01567189 · Status: UNKNOWN · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 138

Last updated 2012-03-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The hypothesis is that home based clinical rehabilitation (CR) is less expensive than hospital based CR with similar clinical effectiveness. The investigators will compare the results of two forms of CR on

1. direct and indirect healthcare costs
2. effectiveness on mortality, morbidity, modifiable risk factors control, functional capacity measured by exercise testing, health related quality of life and satisfaction rate
3. cost/effectiveness analysis

Conditions

Interventions

BEHAVIORAL

Cardiac rehabilitation

* Training sessions: 8 weeks of supervised physical training sessions. Stress intensity will be calculated from the peak heart rate reached during stress test: 60-70% during the first month and 70-85% during the second one. Patients will be advised to do at least 1 hour of outdoor exercise with the same intensity on the days when they do not attend hospital. * Health education sessions and relaxation sessions: one per week. * Smoking and diet checking: as recommended by doctor.

BEHAVIORAL

Cardiac rehabilitation

The only difference in the hospital's program is that training sessions will be out of hospital with the same target heart rate that in this case will be controlled with pulsometer or Borg scale. The recommended frequency of sessions will be: at least 5 days a week with a minimum of 1 hour / day.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Basque Health Service

    lead OTHER_GOV

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2012-04-30
Primary Completion
2013-04-30
Completion
2013-04-30

Countries

  • Spain

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01567189 on ClinicalTrials.gov