The Effect of Transvaginal vs. Conventional Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy on the Postoperative Course
NCT01552421 · Status: TERMINATED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50
Last updated 2013-09-24
Summary
Uncomplicated laparoscopic cholecystectomy will in most patients result in moderate to severe pain until the first postoperative day. This will subside during the second and third postoperative day \[1\]. A feeling of low general well-being will also be present until the first postoperative day and subside during the next couple of days \[2\].
To achieve faster recovery after laparoscopic interventions it has been shown that a reduction in the size of laparoscopic ports and thereby incisions can reduce postoperative pain \[3,4\].
A new minimal invasive surgical technique is based on the principle of completely eliminating the use of ports through the abdominal wall. This new technique is called Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES) and is defined by acquiring minimal invasive access to the abdominal cavity through the body's natural openings like the mouth and stomach, anus, urethra and vagina. With the NOTES technique one can completely avoid incisions in the abdominal wall and thereby reduce the surgical trauma. The benefits of this technique is a reduction of postoperative pain, elimination of incisional hernias, prevention of wound infections, reduction of peritoneal adherence formation, achieving a faster recovery and a better cosmetic result \[7,8\].
The most documented and well-described way for gaining NOTES access to the abdominal cavity is through the vagina, transvaginal (TV). TV NOTES has mainly been used for cholecystectomy because of the direct line of vision to the upper abdomen and gallbladder that is achieved through this opening.
Compilation of results show that TV NOTES cholecystectomy can be implemented with low complication rates \[20-22\]. One retrospective case-control and one prospective observational study report less postoperative pain, reduced consumption of analgesics and faster recovery for TV NOTES compared to conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy \[23,24\]. To date there are no systematic prospective randomized data on whether or not TV NOTES cholecystectomy leads to a better surgical outcome.
In the present study the postoperative course after TV NOTES cholecystectomy will be compared to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in a prospective randomized and blinded trial. The outcome of the randomization between the two surgical techniques will be blinded to patient and the nurse staff for the first 72 hours after the operation. The primary outcome parameter will be postoperative pain score during the first 24 hours. Secondary outcome parameters are postoperative pain score for the first 72 hours, fatigue, well-being, nausea, consumption of analgesics, complications, cosmetic result and sexual function.
The hypothesis being that TV NOTES cholecystectomy gives less postoperative pain, fatigue and nausea, a reduction in analgesics and a better cosmetic result and general well-being than conventional 4 port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.
Conditions
- Cholecystolithiasis
- Surgery
- Pain
Interventions
- PROCEDURE
-
TV NOTES cholecystectomy
Transvaginal NOTES cholecystectomy
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
University of Copenhagen
collaborator OTHER -
University Hospital, Gentofte, Copenhagen
collaborator OTHER -
Bispebjerg Hospital
collaborator OTHER -
Herlev Hospital
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Anders Meller Donatsky, MD · Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital
-
Lars Nannestad Jørgensen, MD, DSc, Prof. · Department of Surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital, University of Copenhagen
-
Sami Assaadzadeh, MD · Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital
-
Jacob Rosenberg, MD, DSc, Prof. · Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen
-
Peter Vilmann, MD, DSc, Prof. · Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen
-
Søren Meisner, MD · Department of surgery K, Bispebjerg Hospital
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- PARALLEL
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- FEMALE
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2012-09-30
- Primary Completion
- 2013-12-31
- Completion
- 2014-12-31
Countries
- Denmark
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Feasibility of Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
NCT01232959 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
Early Versus Late Intervention After Biliary Tract Injury Post Cholecystectomy
NCT04134546 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Post-operative Pain at Umbilical Wound After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Transumbilical Versus Infraumbilical Incision
NCT02738710 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
"The Efficiency of Laparoscopic-assisted Transversus Abdominis Plane Block for Post-laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Pain
NCT04641403 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgical Management of Post Cholecystectomy Bile Duct Injury
NCT05243225 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Effect of Transversus Abdominis Plan Block and Recto-Intercostal Fascial Plan Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT06673524 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Risk of Umbilical Trocar-site Hernia After SILC Cholecystectomy Versus Conventional Cholecystectomy
NCT01740973 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Compliance of Clinical Pathways in Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Evaluation of Different Implementation Methods
NCT02667249 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy For Acute Mild Biliary Pancreatitis: A Prospective Comparative Study
NCT06498492 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystecomy
NCT04113590 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Randomised Comparison Between Single Incision Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy and Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01094379 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Transversus Abdominis Plane Block and Postoperative Pain After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT01595165 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Needlescopic Versus Transvaginal/Transumbilical Cholecystectomy
NCT01685775 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy vs Hybrid Natural Orifice Translumenal Surgery
NCT00835250 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery: Laparoscopic-Assisted Transvaginal Cholecystectomy
NCT00910325 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE1/PHASE2
-
Trocar-site Infiltration Versus TAP-block
NCT05094193 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Modified Laparoscopic Transcystic Biliary Drainage in the Management of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis
NCT06011941 ·Status: NOT_YET_RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Effects of Subcostal TAP Block and Local Anesthetic Infiltration After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT05769881 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Peritoneal Damage in Laparoscopic Surgery
NCT03020641 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Trocar Site Hernia After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy, Supra Versus Infraumbilical Incision for Umbilical Trocar Entry
NCT04254237 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Cost Effectiveness Analysis of Cholecystectomy, Projected Long Term Outcomes and Complications Evaluation
NCT01117415 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Comparison of Bile Duct Injuries Following Open Cholecystectomy Versus Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT00840138 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoendoscopic Rendez Vous Versus Standard Two Stage Approach for the Management of Cholelithiasis/Choledocholithiasis
NCT00416234 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Low-pressure vs Standard-pressure in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy
NCT04146090 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Emergency Versus Elective Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis in the Era of Laparoscopy.
NCT05502744 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA