Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Compared to Metformin Alone, in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes (NCT NCT01541215)

NCT ID: NCT01541215

Last Updated: 2021-07-02

Results Overview

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

135 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Week 0, week 26

Results posted on

2021-07-02

Participant Flow

The trial was conducted at 84 sites in 25 countries.

Eligible subjects entered an 11- to 12-week run-in period where they were to undergo a 3-4 week titration of metformin to a maximum tolerated dose of metformin (≥1000 mg and ≤2000 mg per day) followed by an 8-week maintenance period.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
STARTED
66
69
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
Exposed
66
68
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
COMPLETED
56
53
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
NOT COMPLETED
10
16
Follow up 1 (Weeks 53-104)
STARTED
52
0
Follow up 1 (Weeks 53-104)
COMPLETED
50
0
Follow up 1 (Weeks 53-104)
NOT COMPLETED
2
0
Follow up 2 (Weeks 105-156)
STARTED
48
0
Follow up 2 (Weeks 105-156)
COMPLETED
48
0
Follow up 2 (Weeks 105-156)
NOT COMPLETED
0
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
Withdrawal criteria
6
8
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
Non-compliance
4
4
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
Adverse Event
0
1
Treatment Period (52 Weeks)
Unclassified
0
3
Follow up 1 (Weeks 53-104)
Lost to Follow-up
1
0
Follow up 1 (Weeks 53-104)
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Efficacy and Safety of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Compared to Metformin Alone, in Children and Adolescents With Type 2 Diabetes

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Total
n=134 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
14.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73 • n=99 Participants
14.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.73 • n=107 Participants
14.57 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.72 • n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
41 Participants
n=99 Participants
42 Participants
n=107 Participants
83 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
25 Participants
n=99 Participants
26 Participants
n=107 Participants
51 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
16 Participants
n=99 Participants
23 Participants
n=107 Participants
39 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
50 Participants
n=99 Participants
45 Participants
n=107 Participants
95 Participants
n=206 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
1 Participants
n=107 Participants
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
42 Participants
n=99 Participants
45 Participants
n=107 Participants
87 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
10 Participants
n=206 Participants
Glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c)
7.87 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.35 • n=99 Participants
7.69 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34 • n=107 Participants
7.78 percentage of HbA1c
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.34 • n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set.

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the primary analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in HbA1c (Glycosylated Haemoglobin)
-0.643 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.215
0.415 Percentage of HbA1c
Standard Error 0.216

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set.

Change in FPG from baseline to week 26. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)
-1.076 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.436
0.801 mmol/L
Standard Error 0.449

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Full analysis set.

Percentage of subjects having HbA1c \<7.0%. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
63.7 Percentage of subjects
36.5 Percentage of subjects

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set.

Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 26. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the world health organisation (WHO) Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
-0.254 SDS score
Standard Error 0.039
-0.208 SDS score
Standard Error 0.039

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
Yes
27 Participants
16 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0%
No
29 Participants
36 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<=6.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Yes
28 Participants
19 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
No
31 Participants
39 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<=6.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
Yes
25 Participants
13 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Maximum 6.5%
No
31 Participants
39 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 26 weeks. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: 1. an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself 2. any asymptomatic blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Yes
31 Participants
21 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
No
28 Participants
37 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.0% without severe or minor hypoglycaemic episodes after 52 weeks. Severe hypoglycaemia: An episode requiring assistance of another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions. Minor hypoglycaemia was defined as meeting either of the below criteria: 1. an episode with symptoms consistent with hypoglycaemia with confirmation by blood glucose \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL), and which was handled by the subject him/herself 2. any asymptomatic blood glucose value \<2.8 mmol/L (50 mg/dL) or plasma glucose value \<3.1 mmol/L (56 mg/dL) All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
Yes
22 Participants
16 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.0% Without Severe or Minor Hypoglycaemic Episodes
No
34 Participants
36 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.5% after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Yes
43 Participants
29 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
No
16 Participants
29 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Number of subjects achieving HbA1c \<7.5% after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
Yes
36 Participants
23 Participants
Number of Subjects Having HbA1c Below 7.5%
No
20 Participants
29 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in HbA1c
-0.732 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.423
0.677 percentage of HbA1c
Standard Deviation 1.523

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in FPG from baseline to week 52. All available data were used for the analysis, including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in FPG
-1.627 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.717
0.983 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.954

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 26 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=39 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=46 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Mean 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
-2.384 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.638
0.198 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.056

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in mean 7-point self-measured plasma glucose after 52 weeks. Subjects were instructed to measure their plasma glucose at following timepoints: before breakfast, 90 minutes after start of breakfast, before lunch, 90 minutes after start of lunch, before dinner, 90 minutes after start of dinner and at bedtime. Mean 7-point SMPG was defined as the area under the profile (calculated using the trapezoidal method) divided by time. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=41 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=39 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in 7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose
-2.309 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.968
-0.748 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.944

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of analysed=participants with available data for specified timepoints.

Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=41 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=46 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Breakfast
-1.528 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.168
-0.319 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.228
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Lunch
-0.358 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.281
-0.658 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.421
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Dinner
0.397 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.790
-0.226 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.806

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of analysed=participants with available data for specified timepoints.

Change in post-prandial increments (from before meal to 90 min after breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=42 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=38 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Breakfast
-1.802 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.338
0.053 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.124
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Lunch
-0.735 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.809
-1.219 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.038
Change in Post-prandial Increments (From Before Meal to 90 Min After Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
Dinner
-0.028 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 3.501
-0.195 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.803

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of analysed=participants with available data.

Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 26 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=40 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=46 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
-0.428 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.172
-0.362 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.733

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of analysed=participants with available data.

Change in mean post-prandial increment across all three meals (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) after 52 weeks. Post-prandial increment for each meal (breakfast, lunch, and dinner) was derived from the 7-point SMPG profile as the difference between post-prandial plasma glucose values and the plasma glucose values before the meal. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=41 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=39 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Mean Post-prandial Increment Across All Three Meals (Breakfast, Lunch, and Dinner)
-0.747 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 2.245
-0.397 mmol/L
Standard Deviation 1.594

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change from baseline in body weight after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
-2.48 kg
Standard Deviation 5.59
-0.87 kg
Standard Deviation 3.84

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change from baseline in body weight after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Body Weight
-2.27 kg
Standard Deviation 8.05
1.02 kg
Standard Deviation 4.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in BMI SDS from baseline to week 52. BMI SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' BMI provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in BMI Standard Deviation Score (SDS)
-0.361 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.542
-0.166 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.330

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Systolic Blood Pressure
-1.65 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.69
0.03 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.05
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Diastolic Blood Pressure
-1.27 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.39
0.97 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in blood pressure (systolic and diastolic blood pressure) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Systolic Blood Pressure
-0.77 mmHg
Standard Deviation 11.77
2.81 mmHg
Standard Deviation 8.48
Change in Blood Pressure (Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure)
Diastolic Blood Pressure
0.46 mmHg
Standard Deviation 10.01
1.83 mmHg
Standard Deviation 7.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=57 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
0.9 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 76.4
1.0 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 77.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Insulin
1.0 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.6
1.1 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 142.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=55 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
0.62 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 110.3
0.88 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 131.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting pro-insulin) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=49 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Pro-insulin
0.62 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 118.0
0.79 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 121.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=55 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
0.690 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 102.4
0.923 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 197.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (Pro-insulin/insulin ratio) after week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=49 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Pro-insulin/Insulin Ratio
0.689 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 106.6
0.770 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 225.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=57 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
0.98 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 29.3
1.03 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting glucagon) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting Glucagon
1.01 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.0
1.05 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 32.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 26. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
0.93 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 39.7
0.84 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 82.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (fasting C-peptide) at week 52. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Fasting C-peptide
0.94 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 40.8
0.83 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 56.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 26 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=51 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B)
1.24 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 96.9
1.01 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 119.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HOMA-B) after 52 weeks. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=51 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=49 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-B
1.48 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 105.0
0.93 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 166.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 26 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Homeostasis Model Assessment as an Index of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR)
0.73 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.5
0.98 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 80.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HOMA-IR) after 52 weeks. HOMA-IR is an index of insulin resistance and was calculated from fasting insulin. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: HOMA-IR
0.82 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 86.4
1.08 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 140.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
0.975 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 17.7
1.008 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (total cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Total Cholesterol
1.013 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.0
1.026 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 13.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=57 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Cholesterol
0.998 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 24.8
0.993 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 20.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (LDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=48 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: LDL Cholesterol
1.042 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 46.3
1.035 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 21.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Very Low-density Lipoprotein (VLDL) Cholesterol
0.890 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 51.6
1.035 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 35.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (VLDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=51 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: VLDL Cholesterol
0.983 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4
1.003 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 45.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol
0.997 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.7
0.981 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (HDL cholesterol) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=51 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: HDL Cholesterol
1.028 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 16.0
1.000 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 18.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides
0.894 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.6
1.038 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 36.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (triglycerides) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Triglycerides
0.964 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 50.5
1.036 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 48.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=59 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids
1.023 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 67.4
0.985 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 47.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Full analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Ratio to baseline (free fatty acids) after 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=54 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=51 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Ratio to Baseline: Free Fatty Acids
0.928 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 58.2
0.868 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 54.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Safety analysis set - included all subjects receiving at least one dose of liraglutide/placebo (134 subjects). Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change from baseline in pulse 26 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Pulse
1.40 beats/minute
Standard Deviation 10.89
0.33 beats/minute
Standard Deviation 7.69

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change from baseline in pulse 52 weeks. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Pulse
-0.05 beats/minute
Standard Deviation 10.39
-0.28 beats/minute
Standard Deviation 7.88

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in height SDS from baseline to week 26. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Height SDS
-0.100 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.133
-0.042 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.210

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in height SDS from baseline to week 52. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Baseline in Height SDS
-0.192 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.223
-0.134 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.293

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Change in bone age from baseline to week 52. If the baseline (week 0) bone age assessment indicated that all epiphyses were fused, then the assessment was not repeated at week 52.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=31 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=26 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)
1.197 years
Standard Deviation 0.899
1.088 years
Standard Deviation 0.889

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data

Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V. The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of participants at different Tanner stages at week 0, week 26 and week 52.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 52 · Stage V
43 Participants
34 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 0 · Stage V
38 Participants
29 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 26 · Stage I
3 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 26 · Stage II
0 Participants
2 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 26 · Stage III
5 Participants
4 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 26 · Stage IV
11 Participants
18 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 26 · Stage V
43 Participants
34 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 52 · Stage II
1 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 52 · Stage III
4 Participants
2 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 0 · Stage I
1 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 0 · Stage II
2 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 0 · Stage III
4 Participants
10 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 0 · Stage IV
8 Participants
9 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 0 · Stage V
26 Participants
23 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 26 · Stage I
0 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 26 · Stage II
1 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 26 · Stage III
2 Participants
4 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 26 · Stage IV
5 Participants
10 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 26 · Stage V
29 Participants
22 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 52 · Stage I
0 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 52 · Stage II
0 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 52 · Stage III
1 Participants
2 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 52 · Stage IV
5 Participants
9 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Female - Breast development - Week 52 · Stage V
27 Participants
22 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 0 · Stage I
2 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 0 · Stage II
1 Participants
3 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 0 · Stage III
2 Participants
6 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 0 · Stage IV
9 Participants
11 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 0 · Stage V
11 Participants
6 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 26 · Stage I
2 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 26 · Stage II
1 Participants
1 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 26 · Stage III
2 Participants
4 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 26 · Stage IV
7 Participants
8 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 26 · Stage V
13 Participants
10 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 52 · Stage II
2 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 52 · Stage III
0 Participants
2 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 52 · Stage IV
7 Participants
6 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Male - Penis Development - Week 52 · Stage V
15 Participants
13 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 0 · Stage I
3 Participants
3 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 0 · Stage II
3 Participants
0 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 0 · Stage III
8 Participants
10 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 0 · Stage IV
14 Participants
25 Participants
Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)
Pubic Hair Development - Week 52 · Stage IV
8 Participants
17 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Growth (Height Velocity)
1.633 cm/year
Standard Deviation 2.016
2.486 cm/year
Standard Deviation 2.834

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=56 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=53 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Growth (Height Velocity)
1.345 cm/year
Standard Deviation 1.730
1.817 cm/year
Standard Deviation 2.043

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 26

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Height velocity SDS scores at week 26. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=60 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=58 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Height Velocity SDS
-1.24 SDS score
Standard Deviation 1.695
-0.557 SDS score
Standard Deviation 2.058

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 52

Population: Safety analysis set. Number of participants analysed=participants with available data.

Height velocity SDS scores at week 52. Height velocity is change in height per year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=48 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Height Velocity SDS
-0.887 SDS score
Standard Deviation 1.460
-0.551 SDS score
Standard Deviation 1.711

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-26 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 26.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes
92 hypoglycaemic episodes
43 hypoglycaemic episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-52 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes according to American Diabetes Association (ADA) classification from baseline (week 0) to week 52.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Hypoglycaemic Episodes
160 hypoglycaemic episodes
63 hypoglycaemic episodes

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-26 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of adverse events during 26 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-26)
310 events
230 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-52 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of adverse events during entire treatment period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Adverse Events (Week 0-52)
426 events
321 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-26 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of serious adverse events during 26 weeks.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-26)
7 events
4 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: 0-52 weeks

Population: Safety analysis set

Total number of serious adverse events during entire treatment period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 0-52)
10 events
5 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 53-104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104.

This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during follow-up 1 (week 53 to 104).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-104)
30 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 53-104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104.

This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during follow up 1 (week 53 to 104).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-104)
7 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data.

Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=50 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 104
1.149 cm/year
Standard Deviation 1.776

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data.

The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=41 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Height Velocity SDS- Week 104
-0.523 SDS score
Standard Deviation 1.466

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data.

Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 104. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=49 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 104
-0.133 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.338

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104. Number analyzed= subjects with available data.

Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage III
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage IV
5 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage V
21 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 104 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 104 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 104 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 104 · Stage IV
5 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Breast development- Week 104 · Stage V
11 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage II
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage IV
7 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage V
14 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 104 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 104 · Stage II
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 104 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 104 · Stage IV
5 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Penis development- Week 104 · Stage V
8 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage III
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage IV
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage V
22 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage III
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage IV
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage V
13 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage II
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage III
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage IV
6 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage V
14 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage II
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage IV
4 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 104
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 104 · Stage V
9 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 104

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-104. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data.

Change in bone age from week 52 to week 104. This outcome is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=13 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 104
1.231 Years
Standard Deviation 0.992

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 53-156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-156.

This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of adverse events reported during the follow-up period (weeks 53 to 156).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Adverse Events (Week 53-156)
47 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 53-156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-156.

This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm. Number of serious adverse events reported during the follow up period (week 53 to 156).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Number of Serious Adverse Events (Week 53-156)
9 events

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-156. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data at week 156.

Growth (i.e., height velocity) is the change in height per year and is measured in cm/year. The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by the time (in days) between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=45 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Growth (Height Velocity)- Week 156
1.100 cm/year
Standard Deviation 1.504

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 0, week 156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-156. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data at week 156.

The height velocity was calculated as the difference between current height and height at baseline (week 0) divided by time between those measurement time points and multiplied by 365 days. Height velocity SDS was calculated using following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=27 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Height Velocity SDS- Week 156
0.142 SDS score
Standard Deviation 1.156

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-156. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data at week 156.

Change in height SDS from week 52 to week 156. Height SDS was calculated using the following formula: Z=\[(value /M)\^L - 1\] / S\*L; where L, M and S are median (M), skewness (L) and variation coefficient (S) of children/adolescents' height provided for each sex and age. For each subject, a standard deviation score Z (SDS) was calculated based on age and sex referring to the values L, M and S. The method is described in the WHO Multicentre Growth Reference, which also contains the values for L, M and S by age and sex. For Z (SDS) scores below -3 and above 3, the score was adjusted as described in the WHO instruction. All available data were used for the analysis including data collected after treatment discontinuation and initiation of rescue medication. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=36 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Week 52 in Height SDS- Week 156
-0.224 SDS score
Standard Deviation 0.446

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-156. Number analyzed= subjects with available data.

Pubertal development was assessed in 3 areas (breast, penis and pubic hair development) by the Tanner staging in accordance with stages I-V, where stage I represents "pre-adoloscent development" and stage V represents "pubertal development equivalent to that of an adult". The Tanner staging assessment was no longer required to be performed once a subject reached the Tanner stage V, as judged by the investigator. Reported results are number of subjects at different Tanner stages at week 52 and week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=52 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 156 · Stage III
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage III
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage IV
5 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 52 · Stage V
21 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 156 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 156 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 156 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 156 · Stage IV
3 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Breast development- Week 156 · Stage V
11 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage II
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage IV
7 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 52 · Stage V
14 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 156 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 156 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 156 · Stage IV
3 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Penis development- Week 156 · Stage V
9 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage III
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage IV
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage V
22 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage III
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage IV
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Female- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage V
11 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage I
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage II
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage III
2 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage IV
6 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 52 · Stage V
14 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage I
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage II
0 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage III
1 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage IV
3 Participants
Change in Pubertal Assessment/Progression (Tanner Staging)- Week 156
Male- Pubic hair development- Week 156 · Stage V
10 Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52, week 156

Population: Safety analysis set- Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52) and provided safety follow-up data anytime during week 53-156. Overall number of participants analyzed= subjects with available data at week 156.

Change in bone age from week 52 to week 156. This outcome measure is applicable only for the Liraglutide 1.8 mg treatment arm.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=9 Participants
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Change From Week 52 in Bone Age Assessment (X-ray of Left Hand and Wrist)- Week 156
1.778 Years
Standard Deviation 1.277

Adverse Events

Liraglutide 1.8 mg

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 45 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 49 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1

Serious events: 7 serious events
Other events: 7 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2

Serious events: 2 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 participants at risk
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 participants at risk
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1
n=52 participants at risk
Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 104.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2
n=48 participants at risk
Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 156.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Abscess neck
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis perforated
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Diabetes mellitus inadequate control
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Fibroadenoma of breast
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Investigations
Glycosylated haemoglobin increased
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Nervous system disorders
Nervous system disorder
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Scoliosis
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Vertigo
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Psychiatric disorders
Depressive symptom
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Surgical and medical procedures
Fasciotomy
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Surgical and medical procedures
Metabolic surgery
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Appendicitis
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Malocclusion
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/68 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Liraglutide 1.8 mg
n=66 participants at risk
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive liraglutide subcutaneous injections once daily (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for 52 weeks (26 weeks double blind treatment period followed by a 26-week open-label extension period). The liraglutide dosing was started at 0.6 mg/day during the first week and escalated in weekly increments of 0.6 mg over the following 2-3 weeks. Dose escalation was based on tolerability, as judged by the investigator and on the average of three fasting plasma glucose (FPG) measurements performed by the subject at home on the 3 consecutive days before the dose escalation visit being \>6.1 mmol/L (110 mg/dL). Subjects were treated with doses of 0.6, 1.2 or 1.8 after dose escalation. Subjects treated with liraglutide for more than 3 months were asked to return for follow-up visits one and two years after the end of the open label period (after trial drug cessation at week 52).
Placebo
n=68 participants at risk
After the run-in period, subjects were randomized to receive placebo (in combination with metformin with or without basal insulin, on a background of diet and exercise) for a 26 weeks double blind treatment period. The liraglutide placebo was administered once daily subcutaneously in equivalent volume as liraglutide. After 26 weeks, participants discontinued placebo and continued treatment with metformin (with or without basal insulin) during the open-label period.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1
n=52 participants at risk
Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 104.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2
n=48 participants at risk
Subjects who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during the treatment period (week 0-52), were followed-up at week 156.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
16.7%
11/66 • Number of events 22 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
7.4%
5/68 • Number of events 6 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 3 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
11.8%
8/68 • Number of events 9 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.00%
0/66 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 7 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Decreased appetite
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
4.4%
3/68 • Number of events 3 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
22.7%
15/66 • Number of events 21 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
16.2%
11/68 • Number of events 13 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
12.1%
8/66 • Number of events 10 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.9%
2/68 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
4.5%
3/66 • Number of events 10 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
8.8%
6/68 • Number of events 11 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
7.6%
5/66 • Number of events 6 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
10.6%
7/66 • Number of events 8 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.9%
2/68 • Number of events 2 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Nervous system disorders
Headache
21.2%
14/66 • Number of events 27 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
19.1%
13/68 • Number of events 39 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperglycaemia
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Influenza
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 6 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
8.8%
6/68 • Number of events 9 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
16.7%
11/66 • Number of events 16 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
27.9%
19/68 • Number of events 28 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
28.8%
19/66 • Number of events 25 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
13.2%
9/68 • Number of events 12 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.9%
1/52 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 6 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
8.8%
6/68 • Number of events 10 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 6 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
2.1%
1/48 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
General disorders
Pyrexia
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
7.4%
5/68 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
6.1%
4/66 • Number of events 5 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
1.5%
1/68 • Number of events 1 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 2 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
5.9%
4/68 • Number of events 4 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
9.1%
6/66 • Number of events 10 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
7.4%
5/68 • Number of events 8 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/52 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
25.8%
17/66 • Number of events 46 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
8.8%
6/68 • Number of events 8 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
3.8%
2/52 • Number of events 2 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".
0.00%
0/48 • Week 0 - 156. All presented AEs are TEAEs. A TEAE was defined as an event that had onset date on or after the first day of exposure to trial product and no later than 7 days after the last day of trial product administration.
Adverse events were reported per reporting group for treatment period and follow up period. Results are based on SAS which included subjects: who received at least one dose of liraglutide or placebo for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg- Treatment period" and "Placebo" and who received liraglutide for more than 3 months during treatment period (week 0-52) and provided follow-up data anytime during weeks 53-104 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 1" and weeks 105-156 for "Liraglutide 1.8 mg: Follow-up 2".

Additional Information

Clinical Reporting Anchor and Disclosure (1452)

Novo Nordisk A/S

Phone: (+1) 866-867-7178

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee At the end of the trial, one or more scientific publications may be prepared collaboratively by the investigator(s) and Novo Nordisk. Novo Nordisk reserves the right to postpone publication and/or communication for up to 60 days to protect intellectual property.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER