Trial Outcomes & Findings for Multicenter Study of HGT-1110 Administered Intrathecally in Children With Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) (NCT NCT01510028)
NCT ID: NCT01510028
Last Updated: 2021-06-14
Results Overview
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date. Drug-related and device-related types of TEAEs were analyzed and reported. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0 grading scale. Severity of all AEs or SAEs was recorded as grade 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 corresponding, respectively, to a severity of mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal. Here SDI refers to surgical device implantation.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
24 participants
From start of study treatment up to Week 42
2021-06-14
Participant Flow
The study was conducted at 5 main sites for cohorts 1 to 3 in Brazil, Denmark, Germany, France, and Australia and 3 main sites for cohort 4 in Denmark, France, and Germany between 02 February 2012 (first participant first visit) and 20 January 2017 (last participant last visit).
A total of 34 participants were screened and 24 participants were enrolled in the study. Out of which 23 participants completed the study.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, recombinant human arylsulfatase A \[rhASA\]) every other week (EOW) by intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD) for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
6
|
5
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
Participants received 10 milligram (mg) dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, recombinant human arylsulfatase A \[rhASA\]) every other week (EOW) by intrathecal drug delivery device (IDDD) for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Multicenter Study of HGT-1110 Administered Intrathecally in Children With Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
Total
n=24 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
31.5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.50 • n=39 Participants
|
47.3 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 20.23 • n=41 Participants
|
52.2 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 31.17 • n=35 Participants
|
48.5 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 24.22 • n=31 Participants
|
44.9 Months
STANDARD_DEVIATION 22.85 • n=146 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: White
|
5 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Asian
|
0 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
4 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Race: Other
|
1 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Ethnicity: Not Hispanic or Latino
|
6 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=31 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=146 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 42Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date. Drug-related and device-related types of TEAEs were analyzed and reported. The severity of AEs was assessed by the investigator using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 4.0 grading scale. Severity of all AEs or SAEs was recorded as grade 1, 2, 3, 4, or 5 corresponding, respectively, to a severity of mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal. Here SDI refers to surgical device implantation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
TEAE
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
SHP611-related TEAE
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
SDI-related TEAE
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
IDDD-related TEAE
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
SOPH-A-PORT IDDD-related TEAE
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
IT administration process related TEAE
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
Severe TEAE
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Type and Severity
Serious TEAE
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Clinical laboratory test included serum chemistry, hematology and urinalysis. Clinical laboratory abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGT) increased
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increased
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Blood iron decreased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Amylase increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Hepatic enzymes increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Eosinophil count increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Eosinophilia
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Mean cell volume decreased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Neutrophil count increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
White blood cell count increased
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Lymphopenia
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Leukocytosis
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Clinical Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Proteinuria
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Vital sign assessments included blood pressure, heart rate, respiratory rate and body temperature. Vital sign abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date. Vital sign abnormalities included pyrexia which was considered as TEAE and was reported.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
12-lead ECG was recorded and measured with the participant in rested supine position for at least 10 minutes. ECG abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Complete physical examination included evaluation of the port and catheter track. Height or length and weight were recorded and used to calculate growth. Body weight and height measurements were used to calculate the body mass index (BMI). Head circumference was measured in uniform manner for all participants. Clinical significance was defined as any variation in physical findings that had medical relevance resulting in an alteration in medical care. Clinically significant abnormalities related to physical examination were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities in Physical Examination Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAE)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From start of study treatment up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
CSF chemistry assessments (including cell counts, glucose and protein) was measured. CSF chemistry abnormalities were recorded and reported as TEAE. An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. TEAEs were defined as all AEs that occurred at or after the first dose of the investigational product or device implant surgery (whichever occurred earlier) and through the last follow-up date.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Chemistry Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
CSF Protein Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) Chemistry Abnormalities Reported as Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
CSF Albumin Increased
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Number of participants with positive anti-SHP611 antibody results in serum and in CSF were reported. A participant was considered positive if they had at least 1 positive result during the study.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum and CSF anti-SHP611 antibody positive
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum anti-SHP611 antibody (Ab) positive
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum neutralizing anti-SHP611 antibody positive
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
CSF anti-SHP611 antibody positive
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
CSF neutralizing anti-SHP611 antibody positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum or CSF anti-SHP611 antibody positive
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum or CSF neutralizing anti-SHP611 Ab positive
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-SHP611 Antibodies in Cerebrospinal Fluid (CSF) and or Serum
Serum and CSF neutralizing anti-SHP611 Ab positive
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The GMFM-88 was used to measure motor function. The GMFM-88 item scores were used to calculate domain-specific percent score for each of the 5 GMFM-88 dimensions (lying and rolling; sitting; crawling and kneeling; standing; walking, running, and jumping), and a total GMFM-88 (percent) score was calculated based on each dimension score. Each of the 88 items was rated on a 4-point scale: 0=does not initiate; 1=initiates; 2=partially completes; and 3=completes. The GMFM-88 total scores ranged from 0% (no mobility) to a score of 100%, that is (i.e,) the score that can be obtained by an average 5-year-old or older child with normal motor abilities.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Motor Function Using Gross Motor Function Measure 88 (GMFM-88) Total Score at Week 40
|
-31.9 Score on a Scale
Standard Error 8.76
|
-29.0 Score on a Scale
Standard Error 8.58
|
-19.5 Score on a Scale
Standard Error 8.54
|
-18.1 Score on a Scale
Standard Error 9.14
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The FEES assessment was performed to evaluate the structure and function of the upper throat during swallowing and for an assessment of aspiration risk. Each participant had this assessment performed at the clinical site using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy. FEES for texture utilized was evaluated. Data was presented only for the shifts observed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Solids to Solids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thin Liquids to Thin Liquids
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thin Liquids to Thickened Liquids
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thin Liquids to Puree Texture
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thin Liquids to Solids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thickened Liquids to Thin Liquids
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thickened Liquids to Thickened Liquids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thickened Liquids to Puree Texture
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Thickened Liquids to Solids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Puree Texture to Thin Liquids
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Puree Texture to Thickened Liquids
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Puree Texture to Puree Texture
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Puree Texture to Solids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Solids to Thin Liquids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Solids to Thickened Liquids
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing (FEES) for Texture Utilized at Week 40
Solids to Puree Texture
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The FEES assessment was performed to evaluate the structure and function of the upper throat during swallowing and for an assessment of aspiration risk. Each participant had this assessment performed at the clinical site using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy. Feeding assessment for laryngeal penetration was assessed. Data was presented only for the shifts observed. Here TL refers to thin liquids, THL refers to thickened liquids, PT refers to puree texture, WCC refers to with cough and clearance and WCNC refers to with cough and no clearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to Without Cough (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Without Cough to Without Cough (TL)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to Without Cough (TL)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to Normal (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to WCC (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Without Cough to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to WCC (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Normal to WCNC (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Without Cough to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
Without Cough to WCC (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCNC to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCNC to Without Cough (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Laryngeal Penetration) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (Solids)
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
2 Participants
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The FEES assessment was performed to evaluate the structure and function of the upper throat during swallowing and for an assessment of aspiration risk. Each participant had this assessment performed at the clinical site using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy. Feeding assessment for aspiration through vocal cords were assessed. Data was presented only for the shifts observed. Here TL refers to thin liquids, THL refers to thickened liquids, PT refers to puree texture, WCC refers to with cough and clearance and WCNC refers to with cough and no clearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Without Cough to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Without Cough to Without Cough (TL)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Normal to Normal (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Normal to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCC to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Without Cough to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
Normal to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (Solids)
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
2 Participants
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCC to WCC (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Feeding Assessment (Aspiration Through Vocal Cords) at Week 40
WCNC to Normal (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The FEES assessment was performed to evaluate the structure and function of the upper throat during swallowing and for an assessment of aspiration risk. Each participant had this assessment performed at the clinical site using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy. FEES for dose residue clear after subsequent swallowing was assessed. Data was presented only for the shifts observed. Here TL refers to thin liquids, THL refers to thickened liquids, PT refers to puree texture.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to No (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
No to Yes (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
No to No (TL)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to Yes (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Normal (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Yes (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to Yes (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Yes (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to No (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to No (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
No to Normal (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Yes (Solids)
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
2 Participants
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to Normal (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Normal to Yes (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Dose Residue Clear After Subsequent Swallowing at Week 40
Yes to Yes (TL)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
The FEES assessment was performed to evaluate the structure and function of the upper throat during swallowing and for an assessment of aspiration risk. Each participant had this assessment performed at the clinical site using transnasal flexible laryngoscopy. FEES for aspiration risk was assessed. Data was presented only for the shifts observed. Here TL refers to thin liquids, THL refers to thickened liquids, PT refers to puree texture, WCC refers to with cough and clearance and WCNC refers to with cough and no clearance.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to Low (Solids)
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
2 Participants
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
NA Participants
Data was not available for this texture as the assessment was considered normal.
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to High (TL)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to Low (TL)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to Low (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to High (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Low to Low (THL)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Moderate to Low (PT)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Shift in Functional Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing for Aspiration Risk at Week 40
Moderate to Moderate (PT)
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Evaluation of peripheral nerve function by ENG studies was performed to measure nerve conduction velocity (NCV), amplitude (AMP),distal latency (DL), and F-wave latency. Categorized amplitude values were assessed. Data was presented only for number of participants who reported change in amplitude greater than (\>) 0.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Sensory Wrist Amplitude (Baseline)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Sensory Wrist Amplitude (Week 40)
|
1 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Peroneal Motor Fibular Head Amplitude (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Peroneal Motor Fibular Head Amplitude (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Peroneal Motor Ankle Amplitude (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Peroneal Motor Ankle Amplitude (Week 40)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Sural Sensory B-point (Baseline)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Sural Sensory B-point (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Tibial Motor Ankle Amplitude (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Tibial Motor Ankle Amplitude (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Tibial Motor Knee Amplitude (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Tibial Motor Knee Amplitude (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Ulnar Motor Wrist Amplitude (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Ulnar Motor Wrist Amplitude (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Ulnar Motor Elbow Amplitude (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Motor Wrist Amplitude (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Motor Wrist Amplitude (Week 40)
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Motor Elbow Amplitude (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Median Motor Elbow Amplitude (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Amplitude Values at Week 40
Ulnar Motor Elbow Amplitude (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Evaluation of peripheral nerve function by ENG studies was performed to measure nerve conduction velocity (NCV), amplitude (AMP),distal latency (DL), and F-wave latency. Categorized nerve conduction velocity values were assessed. Data was presented only for number of participants who reported change in nerve conduction velocity \> 0. Here MME refers to median motor elbow, WCV for wrist conduction velocity, PMA for peroneal motor ankle, FHCV to fibular head conduction velocity, TMA for tibial motor ankle, KCV for knee conduction velocity and UME for ulnar motor elbow,
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
MME to WCV (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
MME to WCV (Week 40)
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
PMA to FHCV (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
UME to WCV (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
UME to WCV (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
PMA to FHCV (Week 40)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
TMA to KCV (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Nerve Conduction Velocity at Week 40
TMA to KCV (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery.
Evaluation of peripheral nerve function by ENG studies was performed to measure nerve conduction velocity (NCV), amplitude (AMP),distal latency (DL), and F-wave latency. Categorized amplitude values were assessed. Data was presented only for number of participants who reported change in distal latency \> 0. Here MMW refers to median motor wrist, APB for abductor pollicis brevis, MSW for median sensory wrist, DDL for digit distal latency, PMA for peroneal motor ankle, EDB for extensor digitorum brevis, SSB-point DL for sural sensory B-point distal latency, TMA for tibial motor ankle, abductor hallucis for AH distal latency and, UMW for ulnar motor wrist.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
PMA to EDB Distal Latency (Week 40)
|
4 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
SS B-Point Distal Latency (Baseline)
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
SS B-Point Distal Latency (Week 40)
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
TMA to AH Distal Latency (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
TMA to AH Distal Latency (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
4 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
UMW to ADM Distal Latency (Baseline)
|
4 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
UMW to ADM Distal Latency (Week 40)
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
MMW to APB distal latency (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
MMW to APB distal latency (Week 40)
|
3 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
MSW to DDL (Baseline)
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
MSW to DDL (Week 40)
|
0 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
2 Participants
|
3 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Change in Nerve Conduction as Measured by Electroneurography (ENG) Assessments by Categorized Distal Latency at Week 40
PMA to EDB Distal Latency (Baseline)
|
6 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
5 Participants
|
6 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery. Participants from SHP611 10 mg and SHP611 30 mg were excluded from the analysis. Since, analysis was planned for participants received SHP611 100 mg with different manufacturing processes (Process A and B).
The VABS-II test measures adaptive behaviors, including the ability to cope with environmental changes, to learn new everyday skills, and to demonstrate independence. This test measures the following 4 key domains: communication, daily living skills, socialization, motor skills, and the adaptive behavior composite (ABC) (a composite of the other 4 domain). Items in each domain are rated as either 0 (does not), 1(sometimes) or 2(independently) performs a given behavior or skill. The 4 domain standard scores range from 20-160 and higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. ABC scores have a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15 (range = 20 to 160) and higher scores indicate a higher level of functioning. A positive change value indicates improvement in adaptive functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Communication(Baseline)
|
52.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
97.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.52
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Communication(Week 40)
|
-10.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
-25.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.19
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Daily Living Skills(Baseline)
|
49.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
80.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.02
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Daily Living Skills(Week 40)
|
-4.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.66
|
-27.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.47
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Socialization(Baseline)
|
50.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
86.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.61
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Socialization(Week 40)
|
-0.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.71
|
-18.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.09
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Motor Skills(Baseline)
|
31.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.00
|
83.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 24.83
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Motor Skills(Week 40)
|
6.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.97
|
-43.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 23.18
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Adaptive Behavior CSS(Baseline)
|
43.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
84.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.54
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Adaptive Behavior Composite Standard Score as Measured by Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales, Second Edition (VABS-II) at Week 40
Adaptive Behavior CSS(Week 40)
|
-5.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
-25.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.44
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 40Population: Safety set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product or underwent device implant surgery. Participants from SHP611 10 mg and SHP611 30 mg were excluded from the analysis. Since, analysis was planned for participants received SHP611 100 mg with different manufacturing processes (Process A and B).
COMFORT questionnaire was used to assess health status and the impact of disease on the ability of participants with MLD to carry out activities of daily life. The questionnaire was organized by 8 domains (ie, personal care; positioning, transfer, or mobility; eating; pain and discomfort during the day; sleep; emotions; communication; and play and leisure activities). The COMFORT scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating a decline in the functioning.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Communication (Baseline)
|
27.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.27
|
16.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.65
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Communication (Week 40)
|
24.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 26.81
|
21.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.92
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Eating difficulty (Baseline)
|
21.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.94
|
2.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.77
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Eating difficulty (Week 40)
|
25.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 22.44
|
11.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.29
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Emotions (Baseline)
|
60.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.13
|
55.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 12.55
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Emotions (Week 40)
|
-15.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.57
|
-1.4 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.27
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Pain and discomfort during the day (Baseline)
|
16.6 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.16
|
6.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.05
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Pain and discomfort during the day (Week 40)
|
13.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.23
|
0.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 11.74
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Personal care (Baseline)
|
48.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.26
|
36.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.99
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Personal care (Week 40)
|
18.1 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.94
|
7.3 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.95
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Play and leisure activities (Baseline)
|
46.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.81
|
16.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 16.33
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Play and leisure activities (Week 40)
|
1.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 28.15
|
30.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.88
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Positioning, transfer or mobility (Baseline)
|
42.2 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.44
|
18.0 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 18.80
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Positioning, transfer or mobility (Week 40)
|
6.7 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.82
|
8.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.14
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Sleep (Baseline)
|
11.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.52
|
18.9 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
—
|
—
|
|
Change From Baseline in Domain-specific Caregiver Observed Metachromatic Leukodystrophy (MLD) Functioning and Outcomes Reporting Tool (COMFORT) Scores at Week 40
Sleep (Week 40)
|
6.8 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 17.08
|
4.5 Score on a scale
Standard Deviation 15.60
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: Pharmacokinetic (PK) set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Cmax is the maximum observed serum concentration of SHP611.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of SHP611
Baseline
|
214.53 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 162.104
|
500.83 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 260.978
|
715.17 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 339.856
|
799.60 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 494.452
|
|
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of SHP611
Week 38
|
157.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 36.062
|
275.40 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 156.329
|
888.75 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 225.457
|
1494.83 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1297.295
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Tmax is the time to reach maximum observed drug concentration of SHP611 during a dosing interval.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Tmax) of SHP611 in Plasma
Baseline
|
7.06 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 1.086
|
6.81 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 3.462
|
5.97 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 4.802
|
9.61 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 8.344
|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Drug Concentration (Tmax) of SHP611 in Plasma
Week 38
|
5.08 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 1.450
|
11.22 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 1.780
|
18.16 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 11.661
|
7.02 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 3.824
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
The AUC0-inf is the area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity of SHP611.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of SHP611
Baseline
|
4355 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
10105 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 3307.4
|
22123 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4217.4
|
23117 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 10380.1
|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Infinity (AUC0-inf) of SHP611
Week 38
|
2767 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
9589 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
—
|
48648 Hour * nanogram/milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 6906.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
AUC0-last is the area under the concentration-time curve from the time of dosing to the last measurable concentration of SHP611.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of SHP611
Baseline
|
2532 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1178.4
|
8738 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 3106.4
|
15022 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 10755.2
|
16288 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 10691.4
|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUC0-last) of SHP611
Week 38
|
1972 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 211.5
|
6156 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 3904.5
|
24820 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 16954.3
|
29219 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 21261.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Area under the concentration-time curve over the interval from 0 to 24 hours after dosing of SHP611.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of SHP611
Baseline
|
2530 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1178.0
|
6258 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2995.3
|
11918 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 6376.1
|
13114 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8012.0
|
|
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of SHP611
Week 38
|
1960 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 224.0
|
4596 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2316.1
|
18264 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2162.7
|
31115 hour * nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 15805.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Lambda z is first order elimination rate constant associated with the terminal portion of the curve, determined as the negative slope of the terminal log-linear phase of the drug concentration-time curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
First Order Rate Constant (Lambda z) Associated With the Terminal (Log-linear) Portion of the Curve for SHP611
Baseline
|
0.0934 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
0.0561 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation 0.01900
|
0.0461 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation 0.02439
|
0.0607 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation 0.01949
|
|
First Order Rate Constant (Lambda z) Associated With the Terminal (Log-linear) Portion of the Curve for SHP611
Week 38
|
0.0506 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
0.0640 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
—
|
0.0857 Per hour (/h)
Standard Deviation 0.04415
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
The t1/2 is the time in hours required for the concentration of the drug to reach half of its original value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) of SHP611
Baseline
|
7.42 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
13.60 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 4.932
|
17.47 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 9.238
|
12.34 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 4.373
|
|
Terminal Elimination Half Life (t1/2) of SHP611
Week 38
|
13.70 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
10.83 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
—
|
9.32 Hour (h)
Standard Deviation 4.800
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
CL/F was defined as the total body clearance of the drug for extravascular administration divided by the fraction of dose absorbed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Total Body Clearance (CL/F) After Intrathecal Administration of SHP611
Baseline
|
2.30 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
3.25 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 1.185
|
4.60 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 0.878
|
5.28 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 3.179
|
|
Total Body Clearance (CL/F) After Intrathecal Administration of SHP611
Week 38
|
3.61 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
3.13 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
—
|
2.08 Liter per hour (L/h)
Standard Deviation 0.295
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdose; Week 38: Predose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 24, 48 hours postdosePopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Volume of distribution was associated with the terminal slope following extravascular administration of SHP611 divided by the fraction of dose absorbed.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) After Intrathecal Administration of SHP611
Baseline
|
24.58 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
69.97 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 49.912
|
121.88 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 83.481
|
106.95 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 100.026
|
|
Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) After Intrathecal Administration of SHP611
Week 38
|
71.41 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
48.88 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation was not calculated due to insufficient number of participants.
|
—
|
28.95 Liter (L)
Standard Deviation 18.345
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 32, 36, and 40 weeksPopulation: PK set consisted of participants who received at least 1 dose of investigational product and had at least 1 measurable serum concentration or 1 measurable CSF concentration of SHP611.
Concentration of SHP611 in CSF was determined using validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the original drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process A.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 Participants
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks. In this cohort, participants received SHP611 produced with the revised drug substance manufacturing process referred to as Process B.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Baseline
|
280.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 685.857
|
0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 0
|
0 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 0
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 4
|
182.93 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 165.913
|
78.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 102.516
|
2935.17 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2632.398
|
6152.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 6546.986
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 8
|
85.47 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 79.316
|
1854.07 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2633.858
|
4171.20 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4874.122
|
3825.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2182.056
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 12
|
57.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 57.365
|
1556.17 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1557.666
|
2310.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2544.814
|
2304.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2155.558
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 16
|
93.83 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 147.188
|
2805.68 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 3499.878
|
2395.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1550.648
|
2606.20 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1212.857
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 20
|
112.78 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 143.216
|
1364.65 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 2784.474
|
5182.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 5081.080
|
4423.33 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4195.406
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 24
|
132.57 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 235.783
|
802.67 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 903.025
|
5402.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 7352.246
|
7914.60 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 8243.114
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 28
|
525.06 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 874.710
|
3274.62 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4493.212
|
6273.83 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 6839.101
|
3682.58 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4331.130
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 32
|
70.12 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 126.513
|
573.62 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 376.224
|
1831.40 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 988.294
|
6110.00 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4099.500
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 36
|
72.40 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 125.574
|
1046.05 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1087.321
|
3917.50 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4650.791
|
3116.67 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 336.502
|
|
Concentration of SHP611 in Cerebrospinal Fluid
Week 40
|
659.15 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 1602.414
|
243.60 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 313.107
|
2931.83 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 4098.389
|
6663.75 Nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 7947.148
|
Adverse Events
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device dislocation
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device failure
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device occlusion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Implant site effusion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Implant site infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral pharyngitis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Febrile convulsion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Muscle spasticity
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
SHP611 10 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 10 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 30 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 30 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process A)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
SHP611 100 mg (Process B)
n=6 participants at risk
Participants received 100 mg dose of SHP611 (HGT-1110, rhASA) EOW by IDDD for 38 weeks.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Infections and infestations
Acute tonsillitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cystitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Enterovirus infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Eosinophilia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphopenia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Kyphosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Lordosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendinous contracture
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon disorder
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pain
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye swelling
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Eye disorders
Visual acuity reduced
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Anal fissure
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 7 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 5 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastrooesophageal reflux disease
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingivitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary duct obstruction
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Salivary hypersecretion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 5 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 7 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 11 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Complication of device removal
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Crying
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device dislocation
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Device malfunction
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Disease progression
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Gait disturbance
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Implant site cyst
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Implant site effusion
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Implant site pain
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Pain
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 15 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 17 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 11 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Phimosis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Congenital, familial and genetic disorders
Talipes
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Febrile infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Impetigo
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Implant site infection
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lung infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral candidiasis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Otitis media
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Respiratory tract infection viral
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Rhinitis
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Tonsillitis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 5 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 5 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral pharyngitis
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Endotracheal intubation complication
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Fall
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Incision site oedema
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural complication
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural oedema
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative fever
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Postoperative wound complication
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
83.3%
5/6 • Number of events 5 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Vaccination complication
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Wrong technique in drug usage process
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Albumin csf increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Amylase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Blood alkaline phosphatase increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Blood iron decreased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Blood pressure increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Body temperature increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Csf lymphocyte count increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Csf mononuclear cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Csf protein increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Csf white blood cell count increased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Eosinophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Gamma-Glutamyltransferase increased
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Mean cell volume decreased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Red blood cells csf positive
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count increased
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Proteinuria
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary incontinence
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Urinary retention
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cytolytic hepatitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dehydration
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Iron deficiency
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Akathisia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Areflexia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Ataxia
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebellar syndrome
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Clonus
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Convulsion
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Disturbance in attention
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Drooling
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dysarthria
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dystonia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Epilepsy
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Febrile convulsion
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Hypotonia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Motor dysfunction
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Muscle spasticity
|
66.7%
4/6 • Number of events 4 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Myoclonus
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Neuralgia
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Speech disorder developmental
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Abnormal behaviour
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Agitation
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Decreased eye contact
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Initial insomnia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Restlessness
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Sleep disorder
|
50.0%
3/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Balanitis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vulvovaginal erythema
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Aspiration
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial obstruction
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Choking
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Laryngeal inflammation
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 2 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal obstruction
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Pharyngeal erythema
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinitis allergic
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Tonsillar hypertrophy
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Eczema
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema nodosum
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hirsutism
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Keloid scar
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
33.3%
2/6 • Number of events 3 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash pruritic
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
16.7%
1/6 • Number of events 1 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
0.00%
0/6 • From start of study treatment up to safety follow up (Week 42)
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee If a multicenter publication is not submitted within twelve (12) months after conclusion, abandonment or termination of the Study at all sites, or after Sponsor confirms there shall be no multicenter Study publication, the Institution and/or such Principal Investigator may publish the results from the Institution site individually.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER