Trial Outcomes & Findings for Tranexamic Acid (TA) vs Combined Oral Contraceptive (COCP) Pilot Study (NCT NCT01428713)
NCT ID: NCT01428713
Last Updated: 2016-08-10
Results Overview
To assess 1. change in Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart Score (PBAC Score) from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of TA 2. change in quality of life (QOL) as evaluated by the PedsQL instrument from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of TA 3. change in Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart Score (PBAC Score) from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of COCP 4. change in quality of life (QOL) as evaluated by the PedsQL instrument from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of COCP PBAC score: Quantitative score to measure menstrual blood loss. Scale range: Minimum - 0 score, Maximum: No maximum Interpretation: Score \> 100 indicates heavy menstrual bleeding Peds QL score: Score to measure quality of life in children Scale range: Minimum: 0, Maximum 100 Calculation: Subscales are reverse scored (using formula 100 - a x 25) and then all subscales are averaged Eg: Subscale score of 3 is reverse scored as: 100 - (3 x 25) = 25 Interpretation: Higher score indicates better quality of life
COMPLETED
NA
17 participants
Baseline, 3 cycles
2016-08-10
Participant Flow
Post-menarchal young girls \</= 21 years of age with menorrhagia or menometrorrhagia, referred to hematology or gynecology clinics at Texas Children's Hospital (TCH) formed the study population.
The study design employed was a randomized crossover trial comparing the use of oral TA formulation Lysteda and the COCP formulation Lo/Ovral. Patients were randomized to one of two treatment groups, group A versus group B. Patients who were already on COCP underwent one cycle washout prior to randomization.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Group A: TA First, Then COCP
Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
Subsequently, patients who initially received TA, received COCP. COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between TA and COCP.
|
Group B: COCP First, Then TA
Patients received COCP first. COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between COCP and TA.
Subsequently, patients who initially received COCP, received TA. Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
6
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
5
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Group A: TA First, Then COCP
Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
Subsequently, patients who initially received TA, received COCP. COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between TA and COCP.
|
Group B: COCP First, Then TA
Patients received COCP first. COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between COCP and TA.
Subsequently, patients who initially received COCP, received TA. Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Non-compliance
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Tranexamic Acid (TA) vs Combined Oral Contraceptive (COCP) Pilot Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
All Study Participants
n=17 Participants
Group A: TA first, then COCP:
Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
Subsequently, patients who initially received TA, received COCP.
Group B: COCP first, then TA:
Patients received COCP first. COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between TA and COCP.
Subsequently, patients who initially received COCP, received TA.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
14.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.6 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
17 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
17 participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, 3 cyclesPopulation: 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
To assess 1. change in Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart Score (PBAC Score) from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of TA 2. change in quality of life (QOL) as evaluated by the PedsQL instrument from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of TA 3. change in Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart Score (PBAC Score) from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of COCP 4. change in quality of life (QOL) as evaluated by the PedsQL instrument from baseline to the end of 3 cycles of COCP PBAC score: Quantitative score to measure menstrual blood loss. Scale range: Minimum - 0 score, Maximum: No maximum Interpretation: Score \> 100 indicates heavy menstrual bleeding Peds QL score: Score to measure quality of life in children Scale range: Minimum: 0, Maximum 100 Calculation: Subscales are reverse scored (using formula 100 - a x 25) and then all subscales are averaged Eg: Subscale score of 3 is reverse scored as: 100 - (3 x 25) = 25 Interpretation: Higher score indicates better quality of life
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Group: TA
n=10 Participants
Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
|
Group: COCP
n=11 Participants
Patients received COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles.
|
|---|---|---|
|
To Assess the Efficacy of Oral TA and COCP in Adolescents With Menorrhagia.
PBAC (Pictorial Blood Assessment Chart) score
|
536.4 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 162.12
|
430.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 157.35
|
|
To Assess the Efficacy of Oral TA and COCP in Adolescents With Menorrhagia.
Peds QL (Pediatric Quality of Life) score
|
15.6 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 5.08
|
16.75 Scores on a scale
Standard Error 4.87
|
Adverse Events
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
Combined Oral Contraceptives (COCP)
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Tranexamic Acid (TA)
n=10 participants at risk
Patients received oral tranexamic acid at 1300 mg three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 cycles. The mean age of the study population was 14.2 years. Patients received oral TA (given according to US FDA label for adult women, an off-label use for adolescents \<18 years of age) at 1300 mg (two 650mg tablets) three times each day on days 1 to 5 of menstrual cycle for 3 consecutive cycles.
Subsequently, patients who initially received TA, received COCP and patients who initially received COCP, then received TA.
|
Combined Oral Contraceptives (COCP)
n=11 participants at risk
COCP formulation Lo/Ovral (components: Ethinyl estradiol 30 mcg and norgestrel 0.3 mg; each monthly pack containing 21 hormonal tablets and 7 inactive tablets). Patients received COCP with 3 weeks of hormonal pills and 1 week of placebo pills for 3 consecutive cycles. Each medication was prescribed for 3 menstrual cycles with a 1 month wash out in-between medications.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
breakthrough bleeding
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
nausea/vomiting
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
abdominal pain
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
headache
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
weight gain
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
mood swings
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
depression and seizure
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
generalized rash
|
0.00%
0/10 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
9.1%
1/11 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
|
General disorders
Lack of sleep
|
10.0%
1/10 • Number of events 1 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
0.00%
0/11 • 8 months
Only patients that completed each intervention were considered at risk. 10 patients completed TA and their results were analyzed. 11 patients completed COCP and their results were analyzed.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place