Do We Need High-Flexing Total Knee Arthroplasty to Improve the Survivorship and to Decrease the Incidence of Osteolysis?

NCT01422642 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 111

Last updated 2011-08-30

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if there are any clinical or ROM differences in total knee arthroplasty with standard NexGen LPS prosthesis and NexGen LPS-Flex prosthesis.

Conditions

Interventions

DEVICE

legacy posterior stabilized high-flexion (NexGen LPS-Flex)

NexGen legacy posterior stabilized high-flexion (NexGen LPS-Flex) total knee system

DEVICE

legacy posterior stabilized standard (NexGen LPS)

NexGen legacy posterior stabilized standard (NexGen LPS) total knee system

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Ewha Womans University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Young-Hoo Kim, MD · Ewha Womans University School of Medicine

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
48 Years
Max Age
85 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2001-01-31
Primary Completion
2001-04-30
Completion
2011-06-30

Countries

  • South Korea

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Entities

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01422642 on ClinicalTrials.gov