Trial Outcomes & Findings for Biomarkers of Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy 2 (NCT NCT01380327)
NCT ID: NCT01380327
Last Updated: 2014-06-11
Results Overview
Outcome is the ratio of geometric means for baseline versus post-baseline German cockroach-specific serum IgE. This result is an indicator of immune modulation over time, however its clinical significance is unclear.
COMPLETED
PHASE1/PHASE2
99 participants
Baseline through 3 months of treatment
2014-06-11
Participant Flow
Five NIAID ICAC sites in the United States recruited the targeted number of study participants who fulfilled entry criteria between May 2011 and February 2012. Of the ninety-nine subjects enrolled in the study, eighty-nine achieved the milestone of randomization and are included in the Participant Flow: Overall Study Results Section.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
30
|
31
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
27
|
28
|
21
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
3
|
3
|
7
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
|
3
|
2
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Housing situation precluded ability to k
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Questionable onset of epilepsy
|
0
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Biomarkers of Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy 2
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
Total
n=89 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
10.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.6 • n=99 Participants
|
11.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=107 Participants
|
10.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.7 • n=206 Participants
|
10.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.5 • n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
9 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
26 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
20 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
63 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
30 participants
n=99 Participants
|
31 participants
n=107 Participants
|
28 participants
n=206 Participants
|
89 participants
n=7 Participants
|
|
German Cockroach-Specific Serum Immunoglobulin E (IgE) Levels
|
6.7 kU/L
n=99 Participants
|
4.9 kU/L
n=107 Participants
|
9.2 kU/L
n=206 Participants
|
6.4 kU/L
n=7 Participants
|
|
German Cockroach-Specific Serum Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Levels
|
4.1 mg/mL
n=99 Participants
|
4.3 mg/mL
n=107 Participants
|
5.1 mg/mL
n=206 Participants
|
4.5 mg/mL
n=7 Participants
|
|
German Cockroach-Specific Serum Immunoglobulin Subclass 4 (IgG4) Levels
|
0.1 mg/mL
n=99 Participants
|
0.1 mg/mL
n=107 Participants
|
0.5 mg/mL
n=206 Participants
|
0.2 mg/mL
n=7 Participants
|
|
German Cockroach-Specific IgE Fragment Antibody Binding (FAB) Activity
|
84.9 Percent antibody binding
n=99 Participants
|
78.3 Percent antibody binding
n=107 Participants
|
80.8 Percent antibody binding
n=206 Participants
|
81.5 Percent antibody binding
n=7 Participants
|
|
German Cockroach Prick Skin Test Wheal Size
|
5.0 mm
n=99 Participants
|
5.0 mm
n=107 Participants
|
5.8 mm
n=206 Participants
|
5.3 mm
n=7 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 3 months of treatmentPopulation: Intent-to-treat population with complete data.
Outcome is the ratio of geometric means for baseline versus post-baseline German cockroach-specific serum IgE. This result is an indicator of immune modulation over time, however its clinical significance is unclear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in German Cockroach-Specific Serum IgE Over Time
|
2.0 Ratio
Interval 1.6 to 2.5
|
2.7 Ratio
Interval 2.2 to 3.3
|
1.2 Ratio
Interval 1.0 to 1.5
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 3 months of treatmentPopulation: Intent-to-treat population with complete data.
Outcome is the ratio of geometric means for baseline versus post-baseline German cockroach-specific serum immunoglobulin G (IgG). This result is an indicator of immune modulation over time, however its clinical significance is unclear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=31 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=28 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in German Cockroach-Specific Serum IgG Over Time
|
1.3 Ratio
Interval 1.2 to 1.4
|
1.1 Ratio
Interval 1.1 to 1.2
|
1.0 Ratio
Interval 1.0 to 1.1
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 3 months of treatmentPopulation: Intent-to-treat population with complete data.
Outcome is the ratio of geometric means for baseline versus post-baseline German cockroach-specific serum immunoglobulin subclass 4 (IgG4). This result is an indicator of immune modulation over time, however its clinical significance is unclear.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=29 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=27 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in German Cockroach-Specific Serum IgG4 Over Time
|
1.6 Ratio
Interval 1.2 to 2.1
|
1.5 Ratio
Interval 1.1 to 1.9
|
1.0 Ratio
Interval 0.8 to 1.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline through 3 months of treatmentPopulation: Intent-to-treat population with complete data.
Outcome is change in mean IgE FAB activity level from baseline to post-baseline (status post 3 months of treatment). Serum from cockroach sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT)-treated participants were analyzed to determine if treatment inhibits in-vitro cockroach SLIT, using the per protocol allergenic extract doses. This result is an indicator of immune modulation over time, however its clinical significance is unclear.(Reference: Shamji MH et al. The IgE-facilitated allergen binding (FAB) assay: validation of a novel flow-cytometric based method for the detection of inhibitory antibody responses. J Immunol Methods 2006;317(1-2): 71-9).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=30 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=28 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=24 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in IgE Fragment Antibody Binding (FAB) Activity Over Time
|
-7.2 Percent antibody binding
Interval -20.8 to 6.5
|
19.2 Percent antibody binding
Interval 5.3 to 33.2
|
5.7 Percent antibody binding
Interval -9.5 to 20.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)Percent of participants who experienced at least one AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=34 Participants
Participants received twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=33 Participants
Participants received daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach (Blattella germanica) allergenic extract formulated in 50% glycerin at a concentration of 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\] placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=32 Participants
Participants received daily (placebo-low dose) or twice-daily (placebo - high dose) doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingual route) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percent of Participants With the Occurrence of Adverse Events (AEs)
|
59 Percentage of population
|
76 Percentage of population
|
66 Percentage of population
|
Adverse Events
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=34 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered concentrated (1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach allergenic extract (50% glycerin) placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=33 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered concentrated (1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach allergenic extract (50% glycerin) placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=32 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered daily or twice-daily doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal disorder
|
0.00%
0/34 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
0.00%
0/33 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
0.00%
0/34 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
0.00%
0/33 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - High Dose
n=34 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered concentrated (1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) twice-daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach allergenic extract (50% glycerin) placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (840 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Cockroach Sublingual Immunotherapy (SLIT) - Low Dose
n=33 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered concentrated (1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) daily doses of glycerinated German cockroach allergenic extract (50% glycerin) placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The extract was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 microliters, 1:20 w/v) was achieved.
|
Placebo
n=32 participants at risk
Participants with German cockroach allergy and mild to moderate asthma, rhinitis, or both self-administered daily or twice-daily doses of placebo placed under the tongue (sublingually) to dissolve. The treatment course and study duration was 3 months. Note: The placebo was also administered during the preliminary dosing visits, up to three or seven escalating doses, or until the maximum study dose (420 or 840 microliters, 1:20 weight per volume \[w/v\]) was achieved.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Wheezing
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 7 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
14.7%
5/34 • Number of events 5 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 8 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.6%
5/32 • Number of events 8 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Ear pruritus
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 8 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Eye disorders
Eye pruritus
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.6%
5/32 • Number of events 10 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 6 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.6%
5/32 • Number of events 6 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.0%
1/33 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral pruritus
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 5 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/34 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
0.00%
0/32 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tongue pruritus
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.2%
5/33 • Number of events 8 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
11.8%
4/34 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
2.9%
1/34 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
15.6%
5/32 • Number of events 6 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
17.6%
6/34 • Number of events 6 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
21.2%
7/33 • Number of events 9 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
12.5%
4/32 • Number of events 5 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
0.00%
0/33 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
|
20.6%
7/34 • Number of events 10 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
12.1%
4/33 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
3.1%
1/32 • Number of events 1 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal discomfort
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.1%
2/33 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 6 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
11.8%
4/34 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
0.00%
0/32 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Rhinorrhoea
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
18.2%
6/33 • Number of events 7 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.4%
3/32 • Number of events 3 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sneezing
|
5.9%
2/34 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
9.1%
3/33 • Number of events 4 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
6.2%
2/32 • Number of events 2 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Throat irritation
|
8.8%
3/34 • Number of events 5 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
30.3%
10/33 • Number of events 14 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
18.8%
6/32 • Number of events 8 • Participant enrollment to end of study (up to 3 months post-baseline)
This study graded the severity of adverse events experienced by the study participant according to criteria set forth in the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 3.0 (June 10, 2003)
|
Additional Information
Associate Director, Clinical Research Operations Program
DAIT/NIAID
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place