Trial Outcomes & Findings for Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Overactive Bladder (NCT NCT01369485)
NCT ID: NCT01369485
Last Updated: 2014-09-11
Results Overview
The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between the active and sham treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours" is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). The primary objective of the open label phase of the study is to evaluate and confirm the continued efficacy of the VERV™ System for long-term use. The primary objective was assessed with rate of responders, where responder was defined as a subject who achieved a decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes at 12 weeks compared to baseline.
COMPLETED
NA
163 participants
12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)
2014-09-11
Participant Flow
After informed consent was obtained, subjects had a 10-day washout period from any anti-cholinergic medications prescribed for treatment of overactive bladder prior to initiating study treatment.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Randomized Active Treatment Group
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Patients completing ther randomized phase of the study were rolled over to receive active treatment with VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months.
|
Randomized Sham Treatment Group
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Patients completing ther randomized phase of the study were rolled over to receive active treatment with VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
STARTED
|
80
|
83
|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
COMPLETED
|
57
|
66
|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
NOT COMPLETED
|
23
|
17
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
STARTED
|
57
|
66
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
COMPLETED
|
24
|
26
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
NOT COMPLETED
|
33
|
40
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Randomized Active Treatment Group
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Patients completing ther randomized phase of the study were rolled over to receive active treatment with VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months.
|
Randomized Sham Treatment Group
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
Patients completing ther randomized phase of the study were rolled over to receive active treatment with VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
Adverse Event
|
7
|
5
|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
12
|
8
|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
4
|
|
Randomized Phase (Day 0 to Week 12)
expired patches
|
2
|
0
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
Adverse Event
|
11
|
9
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
Lost to Follow-up
|
2
|
3
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
Physician Decision
|
3
|
4
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
Withdrawal by Subject
|
17
|
20
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
Death
|
0
|
1
|
|
Open Label Phase (Week 12 to Month 12)
1 pacemaker, 1 noncompliance, 1 hospice
|
0
|
3
|
Baseline Characteristics
Safety and Effectiveness of a Non-invasive Neuromodulation Device on Urgency Urinary Incontinence in Overactive Bladder
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Total
n=163 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
60.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.3 • n=99 Participants
|
62.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.8 • n=107 Participants
|
61.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.1 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
70 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
68 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
138 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
15 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native American
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
1 participants
n=107 Participants
|
2 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
African American
|
11 participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 participants
n=107 Participants
|
23 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Caucasian
|
65 participants
n=99 Participants
|
66 participants
n=107 Participants
|
131 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Other
|
2 participants
n=99 Participants
|
2 participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
80 participants
n=99 Participants
|
83 participants
n=107 Participants
|
163 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)Population: Intent to treat population. Responders are defined as patients who had a greater than or equal to 50% decrease in mean number urgency incontinence episodes over 24 hours.
The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between the active and sham treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours" is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). The primary objective of the open label phase of the study is to evaluate and confirm the continued efficacy of the VERV™ System for long-term use. The primary objective was assessed with rate of responders, where responder was defined as a subject who achieved a decrease of ≥50% in mean urgency urinary incontinence episodes at 12 weeks compared to baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=25 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=26 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate Proportion of Responders Based on the Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
|
31 Number of responders
3.03
|
38 Number of responders
2.79
|
16 Number of responders
|
19 Number of responders
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label)The primary objective of the randomized phase of the study is to evaluate the 12 week and 12 month median change from baseline in mean urgency (urinary) incontinence episodes (leaks) between treatment groups. The mean of the number of urinary incontinence episodes over 24 hours" is defined as the mean of the number of UIEs recorded per 24 hour period for three consecutive days (via a 3-day diary). Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=68 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=75 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=25 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=26 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluate the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency (Urinary) Incontinence Episodes (Leaks) Between the Active and Sham Treatment Groups
|
-3.7 Episodes/day
Interval -4.7 to -1.0
|
-1.7 Episodes/day
Interval -3.3 to -1.0
|
-1.2 Episodes/day
Interval -3.2 to -0.3
|
-1.0 Episodes/day
Interval -2.3 to -0.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks and 12 MonthsEvaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median urinary frequency between the active and sham treatment groups. Mean urinary frequency episodes calculated for each patient during time period. The median change in frequency was then calculated for each treatment group. Distribution of changes from baseline were then assessed prospectively for normality using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. Since departure from normality was actually observed in the distribution, the Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=25 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=26 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measure Change in the Median of the Mean Urinary Frequency
|
-1.0 Episodes/24 hours
Inter-Quartile Range 3.07 • Interval -2.7 to 0.3
|
-1.3 Episodes/24 hours
Inter-Quartile Range 2.91 • Interval -3.0 to -0.3
|
-1.0 Episodes/24 hours
Interval -3.3 to 0.3
|
-2.8 Episodes/24 hours
Interval -4.3 to 0.0
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksEvaluate the 12 week median change from baseline in mean volume (ml) per void between the active and sham treatment groups
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measure Median Change in Mean Volume Per Void
|
1.0 ml
Inter-Quartile Range 50.20 • Interval -26.6 to 23.5
|
8.8 ml
Inter-Quartile Range 51.43 • Interval -24.3 to 33.3
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksEvaluate the 12 week change from baseline in median for mean number of urgency episodes between the active and sham treatment groups. Patients were required to complete seven 3-day voiding diaries throughout the course of the study. The voiding diary collected the following information: amount voided (in ml); urgency associated with each toileted void , approximate time of leak, and presence of urge preceding leak.The mean number of urgency episodes over 24 hours was then calculated for each patient during the observation period. The change in median for the mean of the number of urgency episodes over 24 hours) for each treatment group was then calculated. Distribution of changes from baseline were assessed prospectively using the Kolmogorov - Smirnoff test. The Wilcoxon Rank-Sum test was performed to compare the median change between treatment groups and the p-values for the test of equality of medians were reported along with the medians.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measure Decrease in the Median Change From Baseline in Mean Urgency Episodes
|
-1.7 Difference in episodes/24 Hours
Inter-Quartile Range 3.08 • Interval -3.3 to 0.3
|
-1.7 Difference in episodes/24 Hours
Inter-Quartile Range 3.32 • Interval -3.3 to -0.3
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksOAB Symptom Composite Score (OAB-SCS) is a composite symptom score of toilet voids, urgency severity and urge urinary incontinence combining the Indevus Urgency Severity Scale (IUSS) for capture of urgency severity per toilet void with 24-hour frequency and UUI episodes. IUSS Score/void and/or UUI is assigned an OAB-SCS Point/Void: 0(none)=1, 1(mild/easily tolerated)=2, 2(moderate discomfort interfering with activities)=3, 3(severe/extreme urgency discomfort that abruptly stopped all activity or tasks)=4, UUI without void=5. Overall OAB-SCS Score is calculated for each day by multiplying the OAB-SCS Points/Void and/or UUIs by the number of events meeting criteria and adding the individual scores together. The minimum overall OAB-SCS score in a 24 hour period would be a 1 (representing a single mild void with a OAB -SCS Point/Void score of 0). The score would increase based upon the number voids/events and overall severity each event. Medians calculated for each treatment group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Measure Improvement in the Median of the Mean OAB-Symptom Composite Score
|
-5.8 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 16.46 • Interval -14.7 to 1.3
|
-8.0 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 15.67 • Interval -15.3 to 0.3
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label).Population: Intent to Treat
The OAB-q is validated to measure symptom bother and life impact due to OAB. It consists of an 8-item Bother Scale to assess individual symptoms and a 25-item HRQL scale that in turn consists of 4 subscales (coping-8 items, concern-7 items, sleep-5 items and social-5 items) to assess impact on life. Responses for each item in the Bother Scale range from 1 (bothered not at all by the symptom) to 6 (Bothered A Very Great Deal). Scores are then added generating an overall Bother Score (severity) ranging from 8 to 48. For HRQL, individual responses range between 1-None of the Time to a 6-All of the Time. Subscale scores range from 8-48 (coping) 7-42 (concern), 5-30 (sleep) and 5-30 (social). Subscale scores are then added to generate the HRQL ranging between 25-150. Raw HRQL scores are transformed for standardization purposes as follows: ((Highest Possible Score-Actual Raw Score)/Range of Scores)\*1 00 so that scores could range from 0 (All of the Time) to 100 (None of the Time).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=56 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=66 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=25 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=28 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Median Total Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) of OAB-q From Baseline (Screening) to Week 12
|
8.8 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 20.28 • Interval 1.6 to 20.0
|
9.2 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 22.05 • Interval -0.8 to 27.2
|
19.2 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 23.88 • Interval 2.4 to 28.8
|
24.0 units on a scale
Inter-Quartile Range 20.30 • Interval 9.2 to 32.4
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 Weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)Population: Intent to Treat
PPBC is a 6-point scale (from 'no problems at all' to 'many severe problems') describing the problem level of the bladder condition at that moment. Improvement is defined as a reduction in the number and/or severity of observed problems.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=15 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=18 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) From Baseline (Screening Period) to Week 12 as Defined as an Improvement in Severity.
|
53.7 percentage of patients that improved
|
44.2 percentage of patients that improved
|
60.0 percentage of patients that improved
|
64.3 percentage of patients that improved
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 WeeksPopulation: Intent to Treat
TBS is a patient-reported outcome comprised of a 4-point scale of checkboxes to describe the change in condition during treatment (greatly improved to worsened). Improvement was defined as a change in the patient's assessment of overall condition to improved or greatly improved over the course of treatment. Analysis was based upon the number of patients who reported an improvement in condition.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=56 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=66 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Treatment Benefit Scale (TBS)
|
55.4 percentage patients improved (responded)
|
42.4 percentage patients improved (responded)
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeksPopulation: Intent to treat population for those who had prior treatment for OAB.
Overall satisfaction with treatment was assessed (OAB-SAT-q) an 11 question list with multiple scaled checkboxes to allow the subject to rate the treatment with regard to satisfaction, bother from side effects, treatment endorsement, and convenience.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=32 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=34 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Assessment of Improvement as Measure by Overactive Bladder Satisfaction With Treatment Questionnaire (OAB-SAT)
|
65.3 percentage of patient prefer treatment
|
57.6 percentage of patient prefer treatment
|
—
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 12 weeks (Randomized Phase) and 12 Months (Open Label Phase)Population: Intent to treat
CGI is an Investigator assessment, which rates the severity of illness at baseline on a scale of 1 (normal, not ill at all) to 7 (Amongst the most extremely ill patients), and then rates improvement at 12 weeks on a scale of 1 (very much improved) to 10 (very much worse). The analysis was based upon the number of patients that "much" and "very much" improved.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Active Treatment Group
n=80 Participants
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Sham Treatment Group
n=83 Participants
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=9 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=13 Participants
Patients received active treatment with the VERV™ System for up to 9 additional months as part of the open label phase of the study.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change Clinical Global Impressions at 12 Weeks
|
23.2 % patients much or very much improved
|
24.2 % patients much or very much improved
|
36.0 % patients much or very much improved
|
46.5 % patients much or very much improved
|
Adverse Events
Randomized Active Treatment Group
Randomized Sham Treatment Group
Open Label Active Treatment Group
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Randomized Active Treatment Group
n=80 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Randomized Sham Treatment Group
n=82 participants at risk
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=57 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for up to 9 additional months, one per week during the open label phase.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=66 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for up to 9 additional months, one per week during the open label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Heart Attack
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Randomized Active Treatment Group
n=80 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Randomized Sham Treatment Group
n=82 participants at risk
Sham version of (VERV™ System)
Sham version of (VERV™ System): Inactive (sham) electrode patches are worn for 12 weeks, one per week. The patch is placed by the subject. All subjects will have access to active patches for 9 months after the sham-controlled 12-week portion of the study is complete.
|
Open Label Active Treatment Group
n=57 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for up to 9 additional months, one per week during the open label phase.
|
Open Label Sham Treatment Group
n=66 participants at risk
VERV™ System
(VERV™ System): Active electrode patches are worn for up to 9 additional months, one per week during the open label phase.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Skin Irritation
|
15.0%
12/80 • Number of events 17 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
6.1%
5/82 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
8.8%
5/57 • Number of events 8 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
18.2%
12/66 • Number of events 27 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Change in Bowel Habit
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary Tract Infection
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
2.4%
2/82 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Redness and Itchiness
|
22.5%
18/80 • Number of events 26 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
14.6%
12/82 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
12.3%
7/57 • Number of events 10 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
16.7%
11/66 • Number of events 18 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Rash
|
8.8%
7/80 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
7.3%
6/82 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
10.5%
6/57 • Number of events 6 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
10.6%
7/66 • Number of events 9 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Blistering
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.7%
3/82 • Number of events 4 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Allergic Reaction to Sulfa
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.2%
1/82 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal Pain
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
6.1%
5/82 • Number of events 5 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Chest Pain/Shortness of Breath
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Cold/Flu
|
2.5%
2/80 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.7%
3/82 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Environmental Allergies
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Nausea/Vomiting due to Food Poisoning
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Kidney/Ureteral Stones and bleedling
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.2%
1/82 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Foot Infection
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
General disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.2%
1/82 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
General disorders
Sleeping Difficulties
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.2%
1/82 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Burning sensation at Patch Site
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
2.4%
2/82 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.5%
2/57 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
3.0%
2/66 • Number of events 3 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Pain at Patch Site
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/82 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.5%
1/66 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Numbness
|
0.00%
0/80 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
2.4%
2/82 • Number of events 2 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.8%
1/57 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tingling Sensation
|
1.2%
1/80 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
1.2%
1/82 • Number of events 1 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/57 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
0.00%
0/66 • Adverse Events reported over the course of 12 month treatment.
80 Active Treatment and 82 Sham patients included in analysis; 1 Sham patient withdrew on Day 1 prior to device placement and was excluded.
|
Additional Information
John Lombard, Manager Clinical Research
Ethicon Surgical Care
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place