Trial Outcomes & Findings for Evaluation Of "Coaching Boys Into Men" (CBIM) Program (NCT NCT01367704)
NCT ID: NCT01367704
Last Updated: 2014-08-08
Results Overview
Recognition of disrespectful and harmful behaviors against girls as abusive comparing baseline and follow up mean scores, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "not abusive" to "extremely abusive" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale was developed by Silverman et al to assess perceptions of the degree of abusiveness of specified relationship behaviors and modeled as a mean of responses to 12 items.
COMPLETED
NA
2006 participants
3 months
2014-08-08
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Control School
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
|
Intervention School
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
998
|
1008
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
951
|
847
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
47
|
161
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Control School
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
|
Intervention School
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
47
|
161
|
Baseline Characteristics
Evaluation Of "Coaching Boys Into Men" (CBIM) Program
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Control School
n=998 Participants
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
|
Intervention School
n=1008 Participants
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
Total
n=2006 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
998 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1008 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2006 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
998 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
1008 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
2006 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
169 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
220 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
389 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
822 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
776 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1598 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
114 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
78 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
192 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
33 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
61 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
94 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
191 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
248 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
439 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
567 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
502 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
1069 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
86 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
107 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
193 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
7 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
19 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsRecognition of disrespectful and harmful behaviors against girls as abusive comparing baseline and follow up mean scores, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "not abusive" to "extremely abusive" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale was developed by Silverman et al to assess perceptions of the degree of abusiveness of specified relationship behaviors and modeled as a mean of responses to 12 items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control School
n=951 Participants
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
Intervention School
n=847 Participants
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Recognition of Abusive Behavior Scale
|
3.38 mean scores
Standard Deviation .82
|
3.37 mean scores
Standard Deviation .92
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsAssessment of gender-equitable attitudes comparing baseline mean score with follow up mean score, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "strongly agree" to "strongly disagree" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale includes questions modified from Barker's Gender-Equitable Norms Scale and modeled as a mean of responses to 11 items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control School
n=951 Participants
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
Intervention School
n=847 Participants
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Gender Equitable Attitudes Scale
|
3.09 mean scores
Standard Deviation .63
|
3.00 mean scores
Standard Deviation .65
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 monthsProclivity to intervene when witnessing disrespectful and harmful behaviors among peers comparing baseline and follow up mean scores, using a 5-point Likert-like scale ranging from "very unlikely" to "very likely" (minimum = 1 and maximum = 5). This scale was investigator developed by Miller (PI) et al to assess participants report of how likely they would be to do something to stop the behavior and modeled as a mean of 8 items.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Control School
n=951 Participants
Control schools (where the coaches do not receive the Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) training until following academic year 'wait list control')
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
Intervention School
n=847 Participants
Intervention schools (where coaches receive the CBIM training at start of sports season)
"Coaching Boys Into Men" program: Coaching Boys into Men (CBIM) program consists of a 60 minute training for high school coaches led by a violence prevention advocate to introduce coaches to the rationale for CBIM and the CBIM Coaches Kit. The Coaches use this CBIM toolkit to provide weekly discussions with their athletes (generally 10-15 minute mini-sessions) throughout their athletic season (11 weeks). Discussion topics include how to prevent disrespectful and harmful behaviors towards women and girls and how to promote healthy choices and relationships among youth.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to 3 Months Using the Intentions to Intervene Scale
|
3.51 mean scores
Standard Deviation .75
|
3.73 mean scores
Standard Deviation .81
|
Adverse Events
Control School
Intervention School
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Elizabeth Miller
Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place