Trial Outcomes & Findings for Supporting Parents Program: Intervention for Families in CPS (NCT NCT01332851)
NCT ID: NCT01332851
Last Updated: 2018-06-07
Results Overview
Official child welfare administrative records indicating whether child was removed from the birth parent home within one year of parent completing intervention (or one year after estimated date intervention would have been completed, for parents who did not complete). Data were analyzed with a survival model that predicted hazard of being removed from the birth parent home.
COMPLETED
NA
270 participants
1 year post intervention
2018-06-07
Participant Flow
DCFS volunteer scanned WA State DSHS database monthly (January 2011- January 2014); created list of possibly eligible families (N=1070). Potential participants contacted (n=556; n=514 unable to be contacted), permission received to forward their contact information to the study (n=251; n=172 ineligible, n=133 declined).
4 participants were not randomized (2 already had the study intervention, 1 refused to sign the HIPAA agreement, and 1 was not located). 19 additional caregivers were enrolled post randomization when the study parent lost custody of their child. They were not "randomized" to a condition, but they were consented to participate and supplied data.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
PFR is a parenting intervention based on attachment theory and is strengths based. It is a 10 week intervention that is delivered in the home. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts which focus on the content area covered that day and applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child. On alternate weeks, the provider watches the video with the parent, reflecting on both the parent's and the child's needs. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral (R&R)
This condition consists of 1) Resource and Referral personal assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant receives a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). The R\&R provider makes two follow-up check in calls with the families. In addition, families can call the Research and Referral Specialist if additional needs arise. The resource packet includes information organized by type of need or resource. These packets are updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
124
|
123
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Intervention
|
107
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Follow up 1
|
116
|
112
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Follow up 2
|
111
|
111
|
|
Overall Study
Completed Follow up 3
|
113
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
113
|
110
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
11
|
13
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
PFR is a parenting intervention based on attachment theory and is strengths based. It is a 10 week intervention that is delivered in the home. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts which focus on the content area covered that day and applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child. On alternate weeks, the provider watches the video with the parent, reflecting on both the parent's and the child's needs. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral (R&R)
This condition consists of 1) Resource and Referral personal assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant receives a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). The R\&R provider makes two follow-up check in calls with the families. In addition, families can call the Research and Referral Specialist if additional needs arise. The resource packet includes information organized by type of need or resource. These packets are updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
4
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
7
|
11
|
Baseline Characteristics
Supporting Parents Program: Intervention for Families in CPS
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
Total
n=247 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
parent age in years
|
26.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.19 • n=39 Participants
|
27.04 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.25 • n=41 Participants
|
26.72 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.74 • n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parent gender · Female
|
112 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
113 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
225 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Parent gender · Male
|
12 Participants
n=39 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=41 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=35 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
124 participants
n=39 Participants
|
123 participants
n=41 Participants
|
247 participants
n=35 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 1 year post interventionOfficial child welfare administrative records indicating whether child was removed from the birth parent home within one year of parent completing intervention (or one year after estimated date intervention would have been completed, for parents who did not complete). Data were analyzed with a survival model that predicted hazard of being removed from the birth parent home.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Welfare Outcomes: CWS Removal From Birth Parent Home
|
7 participants
|
16 participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: ITT, all 247 parents were coded on the sensitivity measure and were analyzed.
Parent sensitivity was measured at all four time points by a modified total score of the Nursing Child Assessment Teaching Scale (NCATS; Barnard, 1994), a videotaped interaction to assess caregiver sensitivity, stimulation of the child, and emotional responsiveness during interaction were scored. The scale was modified to exclude some items from the original measure that demonstrated low variability in other studies. A total score was based on 45 items, possible range 0 - 45. Items covered mutuality (e.g. contingency, gaze, and positive affect), caregiver verbal and nonverbal support of child, and sensitive instruction during the teaching task. Items were scored yes (1) or no (0), and yes scores were summed. Cronbach's alpha for the sensitivity scale ranged from .68 to .72. A single, blinded coder was trained to reliability by a certified NCATS instructor and passed regular reliability checks. Higher scores indicate greater parental sensitivity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observation Coded by Blind Coders)
3 month fu
|
27.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.54
|
27.39 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.59
|
|
Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observation Coded by Blind Coders)
Baseline
|
26.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.22
|
27.97 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.71
|
|
Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observation Coded by Blind Coders)
post intervention
|
27.34 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.97
|
26.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.63
|
|
Parental Sensitivity (Video Recorded Observation Coded by Blind Coders)
6 month fu
|
28.07 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.31
|
27.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.20
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: All 247 children in the study were included
Secure base behavior was measured with the Toddler Attachment Sort-45 (TAS-45; Kirkland, Bimler, Drawneek, McKim, \& Schölmerich, 2004). The TAS-45 is based on 39 items from the Attachment Q-Sort (AQS; Waters, 1987), an attachment measure that has been extensively validated (van IJzendoorn, Vereijken, Bakermans-Kranenburg, \& Riksen-Walraven, 2004), plus six items tapping atypical affective communication. After home visits, research visitors sorted cards for 45 descriptive statements of child attachment behavior into five piles representing "most like" to "least like" the child. Item scores were standardized within individuals and then compared to a security profile to arrive at an security score. Higher value indicates greater secure base behavior. Because scores are based standardized item scores weighted by proximity to the secure profile, the possible range is large, difficult to determine, and not reported in the instrument manual. The observed range was from -.62 to +1.00.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Secure Base Behavior (Observation During Research Visit; Higher Score Indicates Greater Security)
Baseline
|
.45 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .36
|
.46 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .34
|
|
Secure Base Behavior (Observation During Research Visit; Higher Score Indicates Greater Security)
6 month follow up
|
.62 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .33
|
.57 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .31
|
|
Secure Base Behavior (Observation During Research Visit; Higher Score Indicates Greater Security)
Post Intervention
|
.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .35
|
.51 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .35
|
|
Secure Base Behavior (Observation During Research Visit; Higher Score Indicates Greater Security)
3 month follow up
|
.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .32
|
.56 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up from post intervention (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: ITT: All 247 parents were included in this analysis.
Parenting stress was measured by scales selected from the Parenting Stress Index and the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-3, PSI-SF; Abidin, 1995). The Parent-Child Dysfunctional Interaction Scale from the PSI-SF (11 items). Items were rated on 4-point scales (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Two items measuring parental educational attainment from the original parenting competence scale were omitted due to excessive missing data. Higher scores indicate greater parental stress associated with feelings of dysfunctional parent-child interactions (i.e., interactions are not reinforcing or satisfying). Alphas ranged from .71-.94 across time points. Possible range 11-55, observed range 12 to 43.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parenting Stress: Dysfunctional Interaction
Baseline
|
18.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.28
|
18.60 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.67
|
|
Parenting Stress: Dysfunctional Interaction
3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
18.48 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.73
|
18.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.04
|
|
Parenting Stress: Dysfunctional Interaction
6-month post-intervention follow-up
|
21.26 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.78
|
21.70 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline 3-month post-intervention (~7 months post baseline), 6-month follow up (~ ten months post baseline)Population: ITT: All 247 parents were included in this analysis.
At baseline, 3-month post-intervention follow-up, and 6-month post-intervention follow-up, parenting stress was measured by scales selected from the Parenting Stress Index and the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form (PSI-3, PSI-SF; Abidin, 1995). The Parenting Competence Scale from the PSI-3 (11 items) was used. Items were rated on 4-point scales (strongly agree to strongly disagree). Two items measuring parental educational attainment from the original parenting competence scale were omitted due to excessive missing data. Higher scores indicate greater parental stress associated with feelings of incompetence. Alphas ranged from .71-.94 across time points. Possible range 11 - 55, observed range 11 - 39.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Parent Stress: Competence (Higher Score Means More Stress)
Baseline
|
16.03 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.75
|
16.59 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.21
|
|
Parent Stress: Competence (Higher Score Means More Stress)
3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
19.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.52
|
19.95 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.07
|
|
Parent Stress: Competence (Higher Score Means More Stress)
6-month post-intervention follow-up
|
19.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.54
|
19.33 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.03
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: ITT: All 247 children were analyzed.
Child social-emotional competence (11 items; alphas = .69-.70) was measured by the Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA; Briggs-Gowan \& Carter, 2002). Possible range is 0 - 22. Parent report of child social-emotional competence in the last month were rated on a 3-point scale (not true/rarely; somewhat true/sometimes; very true/often). Higher scores indicate more competence.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Social Emotional Development (Higher Scores Indicate More Competence)
Post-intervention
|
17.40 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.10
|
17.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
|
Child Social Emotional Development (Higher Scores Indicate More Competence)
Baseline
|
15.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.30
|
16.30 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.56
|
|
Child Social Emotional Development (Higher Scores Indicate More Competence)
3-month follow-up
|
17.55 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.90
|
17.41 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.93
|
|
Child Social Emotional Development (Higher Scores Indicate More Competence)
6-month follow-up
|
17.72 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.81
|
17.78 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.95
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: ITT: all 247 children were included in the analysis.
Child behavior problems (31 items; alphas =.77-.79) were measured by parent report on the Brief Infant Toddler Social and Emotional Assessment (BITSEA; Briggs-Gowan \& Carter, 2002). Descriptions of positive and problematic social-emotional behaviors in the last month were rated on a 3-point scale (not true/rarely; somewhat true/sometimes; very true/often; items score 0, 1, 2 respectively). Higher score indicates more child behavior problems as noted by the parent. Possible range is 0 - 62.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Behavior Problems
6-month follow-up
|
11.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.51
|
11.87 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.43
|
|
Child Behavior Problems
Baseline
|
10.84 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.79
|
10.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.47
|
|
Child Behavior Problems
Post-intervention
|
11.01 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.12
|
12.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.08
|
|
Child Behavior Problems
3-month follow-up
|
11.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 6.60
|
11.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.75
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at the 3 month follow up (~ 7 months post baseline)Population: ITT: all 247 children were analyzed
Bayley Behavior Ratings (Bayley, 1993) to assess emotion regulation. At baseline and again at the 3-month follow-up, blinded research visitors rated the child's behavior during administration of a standardized developmental test using the Bayley Behavior Rating Scales (BRS; Bayley 1993). Seven items in the BRS comprise the emotion regulation scale and capture how well the child adapts to challenging stimuli and frustration (alphas = .79-.83). Possible range is 1 - 5, the mean of seven items scored from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate better emotional regulation.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Emotion Regulation
Baseline
|
3.73 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .66
|
3.80 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.60
|
|
Child Emotion Regulation
3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
3.82 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .64
|
3.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.65
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and at the 3 month follow up (~ 7 months post baseline)Population: ITT: all 247 children were analyzed
At baseline and again at the 3-month follow-up, blinded research visitors rated the child's behavior during administration of a standardized developmental test using the Bayley Behavior Rating Scales (BRS; Bayley 1993). Engagement/exploration consists of six items rated for exploratory behavior in the testing situation (alphas = .75-.76). The items were scored on a rage of 1 to 5, the mean of the six items was computed and the possible range is 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more engagement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Engagement/Exploration
Baseline
|
4.19 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .63
|
4.21 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .55
|
|
Child Engagement/Exploration
3-month post-intervention follow-up
|
4.15 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .57
|
4.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .58
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: ITT: all 247 children were analyzed
Atypical, affective communication were measured with the Toddler Attachment Sort-45 (TAS-45; Kirkland, Bimler, Drawneek, McKim, \& Schölmerich, 2004). The TAS-45 is based on 39 items from the Attachment Q-Sort (AQS; Waters, 1987), an attachment measure that has been extensively validated (van IJzendoorn, Vereijken, Bakermans-Kranenburg, \& Riksen-Walraven, 2004), plus six additional items tapping atypical, affective communication. Immediately after research home visits, the research visitors sorted cards for 45 descriptive statements of child attachment behavior into five piles representing "most like" to "least like" the child. Item scores were standardized within individuals and then scaled with weights for the D hotspot. Because scores are based on standardized item scores, the possible range is large, difficult to determine, and not reported in the instrument manual. Observed range -1.511 to + .860.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 Participants
PFR is based on attachment theory and is strengths based. The 10 week intervention is delivered in the home of the family. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity which includes videotaping or viewing and reflecting on a videotaped session, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts, one with the content area covered that day and one applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child and alternates every other week with watching the video with the parent. When the parent and provider watch the video of the previous session, they reflect about what the needs are of both the parent and the child. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 Participants
This condition will consist of 1) Resource and Referral Personal Assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant in this arm of the intervention trial receive a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist hired by the project. The service consists of a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need (such as a phone number to a housing assistance program, location of local food bank). In addition, families in this condition will have the Research and Referral Specialist's phone number they can call if an additional need arises. The resource packet will include information organized by type of need or resource. These packets will be updated regularly as services change over time.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Atypical Affective Communication (Observation)
Baseline
|
-.91 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .47
|
-.94 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .44
|
|
Child Atypical Affective Communication (Observation)
Post-intervention
|
-.96 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .42
|
-.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .42
|
|
Child Atypical Affective Communication (Observation)
3-month follow-up
|
-1.02 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .36
|
-1.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .38
|
|
Child Atypical Affective Communication (Observation)
6-month follow-up
|
-1.05 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .33
|
-.99 units on a scale
Standard Deviation .34
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Coding Interactive Behavior-Child \& Parent Outcomes (CIB; Feldman, 1998). Parent-child 10-minute free play interaction coded for child social engagement, child negative affect, and dyadic reciprocity; parental sensitivity and reciprocity, parental intrusiveness, and parental withdrawal. NOTE: THIS MEASURE WAS COLLECTED AND CODED. HOWEVER, THE MEASURE SUFFERED FROM LOW INTERNAL CONSISTENCY AND RESTRICTED VARIATION (I.E., A LARGE PORTION OF SCORES WERE NEAR THE MAXIMUM POSSIBLE VALUE). WE DID COMPARE SCORES BY CONDITION AND ALL COMPARISONS INDICATED NONSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN PFR AND R\&R CONDITIONS. DUE TO LOW RELIABILITY AND RESTRICTED VARIATION OF THE MEASURE, IT WAS DECIDED TO NOT REPORT THESE RESULTS.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Caregiving Helplessness Questionnaire (CHQ; George, Coulson, Majany, \& Soloman, 1995) subscales: parent-child frightened and parent helplessness. NOTE: THIS MEASURE WAS COLLECTED AND COMPARISONS BETWEEN PFR AND R\&R INDICATED NONSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. DUE TO LOW INTERNAL CONSISTENCY OF THE MEASURE, IT WAS DECIDED TO NOT REPORT PFR VS. R\&R COMPARISONS FOR THIS MEASURE.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, post intervention (approximately 4 months from baseline, 3 month follow up (~7 months from baseline), 6 month follow up (~ 10 months from baseline)Population: NOTE: THIS MEASURE WAS DROPPED FROM THE STUDY
"About My Baby": three open-ended questions; coded to assess "mindfulness" representations of the child's mental life. NOTE: THIS MEASURE WAS DROPPED FROM THE STUDY. OPEN-ENDED QUESTIONS WERE INCLUDED IN INITIAL ASSESSMENTS. ANSWERS WERE REVIEWED BY THE RESEARCH TEAM, AND IT WAS DECIDED THAT RELIABLE AND VALID CODING WAS NOT POSSIBLE.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Post intervention (~ 4 months post baseline)Parent Opinion Questionnaire (POQ; Azar et al., 1984): questionnaire to assess unrealistic parental expectations of child behavior in the areas of self-care, help and affection to parents, leaving children alone, proper feelings and behavior punishment, and family responsibility. NOTE: THIS MEASURE WAS COLLECTED. RESPONDENTS WERE OFFENDED BY SOME QUESTIONS, WE REDUCED THE NUMBER OF QUESTIONS AT BASELINE AND COLLECTED THE FULL INSTRUMENT AT FOLLOW UP 1. HOWEVER, IT SHOWED LIMITED VARIABILITY. COMPARISONS BETWEEN PFR AND R\&R CONDITIONS INDICATED NONSIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES. DUE TO THE LIMITED VARIABILITY, IT WAS DECIDED NOT TO REPORT THESE RESULTS.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
Resource & Referral
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Promoting First Relationships (PFR)
n=124 participants at risk
PFR is a strengths-based 10 week in-home parenting intervention based on attachment theory. Each week has a theme for discussion, an activity, and time for "joining" - checking in with the parent, listening to their concerns and establishing a positive, supportive relationship. The sessions include handouts which focus on the content area covered that day and applying a topic to their relationship with their child. The provider also videotapes playtime between parent and child. On alternate weeks, the provider watches the video with the parent, reflecting on both the parent's and the child's needs. The provider helps the parent develop greater empathy and understanding of the child's needs and feelings, and helps the parent identify her own feelings and needs around parenting.
Promoting First Relationships (PFR): PFR is a parenting intervention based on attachment theory and is strengths based. It is a 10 week intervention that is delivered in the home of the family.
|
Resource & Referral
n=123 participants at risk
This condition consists of 1) Resource and Referral assistance provided over the phone, and 2) Local Services Resource Packet. The participant receives a phone call from a Resource and Referral Specialist to conduct a needs assessment to identify the particular needs or concerns of the family (such as housing needs, mental health, tangible goods). If a need is identified, the Referral and Referral Specialist will provide the family with local information regarding the stated need. The R\&R provider makes two follow-up check in calls with the families. In addition, families can call the Research and Referral Specialist if additional needs arise. The resource packet includes information organized by type of need or resource. These packets are updated regularly as services change over time.
Resource and Referral: Needs assessment, followed with a resource packet sent by mail
|
|---|---|---|
|
Investigations
CPS reports
|
29.0%
36/124 • Number of events 73 • Up to 2 years post baseline
|
34.1%
42/123 • Number of events 69 • Up to 2 years post baseline
|
|
Investigations
Removal from home
|
5.6%
7/124 • Number of events 7 • Up to 2 years post baseline
|
13.0%
16/123 • Number of events 16 • Up to 2 years post baseline
|
Additional Information
Dr. Monica Oxford
Family and Child Nursing, University of Washington
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place