Continuous Saphenous Nerve Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty

NCT01332045 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 40

Last updated 2012-01-19

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Our study will compare the use of continuous saphenous nerve block performed at the adductor canal in addition to Local Infiltration Analgesia (LIA) versus a Sham block in addition to LIA for total knee replacement. The investigators hypothesize that the saphenous nerve block performed at the level of the adductor canal in addition to LIA provides better pain relief than the LIA alone without significantly compromising muscle strength and physiotherapy, enabling patients to mobilize early with reduced opioid consumption and les side effects.

The investigators will enroll a total of 40 patients (20 patients will receive continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA and 20 will receive the sham block and LIA). Until discharge, the investigators will record patients' pain scores, opioid consumption, side effects and physical therapy progress.

If our study proves that the continuous saphenous nerve block in addition to LIA can effectively reduce postoperative pain scores to an acceptable level with better physical therapy progress and less opioid consumption, it could be seen as a more attractive alternative to LIA alone or other traditionally used methods of postoperative pain control that compromises muscle strength and physiotherapy.

Conditions

  • Pain, Postoperative

Interventions

PROCEDURE

continuous saphenous nerve block

Postoperative intermittent boluses of 15 Ml Ropivacaine 7,5 mg/Ml every 12 hours for three days

PROCEDURE

Saline boluses in nerve catheter

A nerve catheter will be placed in the adductor canal using saline instead of Ropivacaine for intermittent boluses.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Henning Lykke Andersen

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Henning L. Andersen, M.D. · Frederiksberg Hospital

  • Dusanka Zaric, M.D., Ph.d. · Frederiksberg Hospital.

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
40 Years
Max Age
75 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2011-04-30
Primary Completion
2012-01-31
Completion
2012-01-31

Countries

  • Denmark

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01332045 on ClinicalTrials.gov