Trial Outcomes & Findings for Open-label Safety Extension Study of 15 and 20 mg of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Long-term Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults (NCT NCT01323478)

NCT ID: NCT01323478

Last Updated: 2014-02-11

Results Overview

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

71 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline to end of the 4-week safety follow-up period

Results posted on

2014-02-11

Participant Flow

Patients eligible to participate in Study 13267B were patients who had completed lead-in Study 13267A (NCT01140906) immediately prior to inclusion into present study, 13267B. The doses of Vortioxetine used in this long-term safety extension study were the same as those used in lead-in Study 13267A (NCT01140906).

The study consisted of a 52-week open-label period and a 4-week Safety Follow-up Period.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
Overall Study
STARTED
71
Overall Study
COMPLETED
47
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
24

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
Overall Study
Adverse Event
7
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
4
Overall Study
Non-compliance With Study Product
3
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal of Consent
1
Overall Study
Administrative or Other Reasons
8

Baseline Characteristics

Open-label Safety Extension Study of 15 and 20 mg of Vortioxetine (Lu AA21004) in Long-term Treatment of Major Depressive Disorder in Adults

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 Participants
Age, Continuous
44.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7 • n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
53 Participants
n=99 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
18 Participants
n=99 Participants
MADRS: Baseline present study, 13267B
16.2 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.0 • n=99 Participants
CGI-S: Baseline present study, 13267B
3.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=99 Participants
HAM-A: Baseline present study, 13267B
11.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.6 • n=99 Participants
MADRS: Baseline from lead-in study 13267A (NCT01140906)
31.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.3 • n=99 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to end of the 4-week safety follow-up period

Population: all-patients-treated set (APTS)

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 Participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
Patients With AEs
56 participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
Patients With Serious AEs (SAEs)
1 participants
Number of Patients With Adverse Events (AEs)
Patients With AEs Leading to Withdrawal
7 participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline to Week 52

Population: APTS

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 Participants
Percentage of Patients Who Withdrew Due to Intolerance to Treatment
9.9 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Population: full-analysis set (FAS), observed cases (OC)

The Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a depression rating scale consisting of 10 items, each rated 0 (no symptom) to 6 (severe symptom). The 10 items represent the core symptoms of depressive illness. The rating should be based on a clinical interview with the patient, moving from broadly phrased questions about symptoms to more detailed ones, which allow a precise rating of severity, covering the last 7 days. Total score from 0 to 60. The higher the score, the more severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
Change From Baseline in MADRS Total Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment
-10.9 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 9.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Population: FAS, OC

The Clinical Global Impression - Severity of Illness (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale rated from 1 (normal, not at all ill) to 7 (among the most extremely ill patients). The investigator should use his/her total clinical experience with this patient population to judge how mentally ill the patient is at the time of rating.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
Change From Baseline in CGI-S Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment
-1.49 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.46

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Population: FAS, OC

The Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) consists of 14 items that assess anxious mood, tension, fear, insomnia, intellectual (cognitive) symptoms, depressed mood, behaviour at interview, somatic (sensory), cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, autonomic, and somatic (muscular) symptoms. Each symptom is rated from 0 (absent) to 4 (maximum severity). Total score from 0 to 56. The higher the score, the more severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
Change From Baseline in HAM-A Total Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment
-7.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 7.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline from lead-in study 13267A (NCT01140906) and Week 52

Population: FAS, OC

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
Proportion of Responders at Week 52 (Response Defined as a >=50% Decrease in MADRS Total Score)
93.6 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Population: FAS, OC

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
Proportion of Remitters at Week 52 (Remission Defined as a MADRS Total Score <=10)
80.9 percentage of patients

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: FAS, OC

The Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) comprises self-rated items designed to measure impairment. The patient rates the extent to which his or her (1) work, (2) social life or leisure activities and (3) home life or family responsibilities are impaired on a 10-point visual analogue scales, on which 0 = normal functioning and 10 = severe functional impairment. The three items may be summed into a single dimensional measure of global functional impairment that ranges from 0 (unimpaired) to 30 (highly impaired). The higher the score, the more severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=34 Participants
SDS Total Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment
4.85 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.84

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 52

Population: APTS, OC

The Arizona Sexual Experience Scale (ASEX) is a 5-item, patient selfrated scale that evaluates a patient's recent sexual experience. Patients are asked to assess their own experience over the last week (for example, "How strong is your sex drive?", "Are your orgasms satisfying?") and respond on a 6-point scale for each item. The ASEX is used to identify individuals with sexual dysfunction. Possible total score ranges from 5 to 30, with the higher score indicating more patient sexual dysfunction.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=47 Participants
ASEX Total Score After 52 Weeks of Treatment
18.60 units on a scale
Standard Error 0.96

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Up to 52 weeks

Population: Suicidal Ideation and Behaviour Based on C-SSRS Scores by Columbia Classification Algorithm for Suicide Assessment (C-CASA) - APTS

The Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was developed by researchers at Columbia University as a tool to systematically assess suicidal ideation and behaviour in patients during participation in a clinical study. The C-SSRS is composed of questions that address suicidal behaviour and questions that address suicidal ideation, with subquestions that assess severity. The tool was administered via an interview with the patient. Different versions of the C-SSRS are available. In this study, the Since Last Visit Version was used at all visits. In order to assess the potential relationship between Vortioxetine and suicidality more accurately and systematically, C-SSRS data were collected during the Entire Study Period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 Participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
Preparatory action towards imminent suicidal behav
0 participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
No suicidal ideation or behaviour
67 participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
Any non-suicidal self-injurious behavior
0 participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
Suicidal Ideation
4 participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
Not fatal suicide attempt
0 participants
Risk of Suicidality Using C-SSRS Scores
Completed suicide
0 participants

Adverse Events

Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 47 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 participants at risk
Hepatobiliary disorders
Cholelithiasis
1.4%
1/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Vortioxetine 15 or 20 mg/Day
n=71 participants at risk
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
5.6%
4/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
5.6%
4/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
7.0%
5/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
31.0%
22/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
5.6%
4/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
12.7%
9/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
7.0%
5/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
7.0%
5/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Accidental overdose
7.0%
5/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
5.6%
4/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
19.7%
14/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Nervous system disorders
Headache
19.7%
14/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
5.6%
4/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
9.9%
7/71 • Serious Adverse Events: 52-week open label period and 4-week safety follow-up period Other Adverse Events: 52-week open label period

Additional Information

H. Lundbeck A/S

H. Lundbeck A/S

Phone: +45 3630 1311

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The primary publication must be published before any secondary publications. H. Lundbeck A/S will ensure that the authorship of all publications based on this study is in accordance with the criteria defined by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE).
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER