Trial Outcomes & Findings for An Observational Study of MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Patients With Sero-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Non-Responders or Intolerant to a Single TNF-Inhibitor (PORTSMAB) (NCT NCT01309282)
NCT ID: NCT01309282
Last Updated: 2016-08-12
Results Overview
The disease-activity score 28 (DAS28) score is a measure of validated instrument for the assessment of the overall severity of RA disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
COMPLETED
9 participants
Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24
2016-08-12
Participant Flow
A total of 9 participants were enrolled in one center from Portugal between 01 Jul 2010 and 30 Jun 2011. The first participant's screening visit was on 01 Jul 2010 and the last participant's last visit was on 19 Aug 2013. Although it was initially planned to involve two centers, it was only possible to involve a single center.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Rituximab
Participants with sero-positive \[Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP+)\] rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who had commenced therapy with rituximab (MabThera) following lack of response or intolerance to a single tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
9
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Rituximab
Participants with sero-positive \[Rheumatoid Factor (RF) and/or anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (CCP+)\] rheumatoid arthritis (RA), who had commenced therapy with rituximab (MabThera) following lack of response or intolerance to a single tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-inhibitor were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
An Observational Study of MabThera/Rituxan (Rituximab) in Patients With Sero-Positive Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Are Non-Responders or Intolerant to a Single TNF-Inhibitor (PORTSMAB)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
57.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.10 • n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
8 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The disease-activity score 28 (DAS28) score is a measure of validated instrument for the assessment of the overall severity of RA disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC), swollen joint count (SJC), patient's global assessment of disease activity, and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Disease-activity Score 28-Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate at Month 24
|
-2.31 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.88
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
A tender joint count (TJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It is associated with the level of pain. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for tenderness. Joints were classified as tender (1)/not tender (0) giving a total possible TJC score of 0 to 28. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in TJC at Month 24
|
-7.5 Tender joints
Standard Deviation 6.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
A swollen joint count (SJC) is the most specific clinical method to quantify abnormalities in participants with RA. It reflects the amount of inflamed synovial tissue. Twenty-eight joints were assessed for swelling. Joints were classified as swollen (1)/ not swollen (0) giving a total possible SJC score of 0 to 28. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in SJC at Month 24
|
-4.13 Swollen joints
Standard Deviation 2.30
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The ESR is an acute phase reactant and a measure of inflammation. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in ESR at Month 24
|
-28.50 Millimeter (mm)/hour
Standard Deviation 29.66
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The C-reactive protein is an inflammation marker. High levels of this protein indicate inflammation in diseases such as RA. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in C-reactive Protein at Month 24
|
-8.11 Milligrams/liter
Standard Deviation 24.42
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).Change from Baseline = score at observation minus score at Baseline. An increase in score from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity At Month 24
|
-34.29 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 13.94
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The Patient's Global Assessment of disease activity was assessed using VAS. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity).Change from Baseline = score at observation minus score at Baseline. An increase in score from Baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Month 24
|
-28.50 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.71
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, data is presented only for those participants who completed Month 24 visit (n=8).
The patient's assessment of pain was performed using a 100 mm VAS ranging from no pain (0) to unbearable pain (100). The distance in mm from the left edge of the scale was measured. A negative change from Baseline score indicates improvement in pain intensity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=8 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change From Baseline in Severity of Pain at Month 24
|
-23.15 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 30.48
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 0) and Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all the participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining full analysis set (n=9). However, the results are presented only for the participants with available data and who completed Month 24 visit (n=7).
The functional capacity was analyzed using Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI). It is a 20-question instrument that assesses the degree of difficulty a person has in accomplishing tasks in 8 domains (dressing, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reaching, gripping and activities of daily living). Responses in each domain are scored from 0 to 3 (0=no difficulty; 1=some difficulty; 2=much difficulty; 3=unable to do). Overall score was computed as sum of domain scores and divided by the number of domains. A total possible score ranged from 0 (best) to 3 (worst).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=7 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Mean Change Form Baseline in Functional Capacity at Month 24
|
-0.27 Scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.59
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At ScreeningPopulation: The analysis was conducted with all 9 participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining the full analysis set.
Adverse event, primary and secondary insufficient responses and monoclonal gammopathy were the reasons for starting rituximab therapy.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Reason for Change From First TNF-inhibitor Therapy to Rituximab
Adverse event - esophageal candidiasis
|
1 Participants
|
|
Reason for Change From First TNF-inhibitor Therapy to Rituximab
Insufficient Response: Primary
|
1 Participants
|
|
Reason for Change From First TNF-inhibitor Therapy to Rituximab
Insufficient Response: Secondary
|
6 Participants
|
|
Reason for Change From First TNF-inhibitor Therapy to Rituximab
Monoclonal gammopathy
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 24Population: The analysis was conducted with all 9 participants who complied with the inclusion and exclusion criteria, thus defining the full analysis set.
There are two patterns of re-treatment, namely treat-to-target and according to the clinic. Treat-to-target: a new cycle every 6 months if not in remission, with the participant receiving no new course of treatment as long as he is in remission. On demand (according to clinic): a new cycle when, in an assessment performed at least 16 weeks after the last treatment cycle, the participant shows moderate or high disease activity \[DAS28 \> 3.2 or difference in DAS28 (ΔDAS28) \> 0.6\]
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants on Each Pattern of Re-treatment
Treat-to-target
|
9 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants on Each Pattern of Re-treatment
On demand (according to clinic)
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6, 12 and 24Population: Safety population was used for the analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
An infusion reaction or injection site reaction is an event that occurs after infusion or injection which may include hypersensitivity reactions or anaphylactic reactions.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions
Month 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions
Month 12
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infusion Reactions or Injection Site Reactions
Month 24
|
1 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At Months 6, 12 and 24Population: Safety population was used for the analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
Follow-up of the infectious events was done after Month 6 visit, Month 12 visit and Month 24 visit.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infectious Events
Month 6
|
0 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infectious Events
Month 12
|
2 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Incidence of Infectious Events
Month 24
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Up to Month 24Population: Safety population was used for the analysis which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
An Adverse Events (AE) is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. A Serious Adverse Events (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 Participants
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events
Any AEs
|
5 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Events or Serious Adverse Events
Any SAEs
|
0 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Rituximab
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Rituximab
n=9 participants at risk
Participants with sero-positive (RF and/or CCP+) RA, who had commenced therapy with rituximab following lack of response or intolerance to a single TNF-inhibitor, were included in this arm.
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Odynophagia
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
General disorders
Idiosyncratic drug reaction
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Cutaneous lupus erythrematosus
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Lower respiratory tract infection
|
22.2%
2/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Investigations
White blood cell count decreased
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Left ankle fracture
|
11.1%
1/9 • Up to Month 24
All AEs and SAEs were collected for Safety population which included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug, whether prematurely withdrawn from the study or not and who complied with the criteria for inclusion.
|
Additional Information
Roche Trial Information Hotline
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER