Trial Outcomes & Findings for Web-based Methodology Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine ER in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (NCT NCT01302938)

NCT ID: NCT01302938

Last Updated: 2021-01-28

Results Overview

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE4

Target enrollment

18 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Baseline, Week 12

Results posted on

2021-01-28

Participant Flow

Out of 237 participants screened, 118 participants received single-blind placebo matched to tolterodine 4 milligram (mg) capsule once daily during run-in period for 2 weeks. Only 18 participants were randomized to receive double-blind treatment due to early termination of the study.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Tolterodine
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
STARTED
12
6
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
6
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
2
0

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Tolterodine
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
1
0
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0

Baseline Characteristics

Web-based Methodology Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tolterodine ER in Subjects With Overactive Bladder

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Total
n=18 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Customized
18 to 44 years
4 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
7 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
45 to 64 years
7 participants
n=99 Participants
3 participants
n=107 Participants
10 participants
n=206 Participants
Age, Customized
Greater than or equal to (>=) 65 years
1 participants
n=99 Participants
0 participants
n=107 Participants
1 participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants
n=99 Participants
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
18 Participants
n=206 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
0 Participants
n=206 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing values imputed using Last observation carried forward (LOCF) method. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI). UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12
Baseline
11.5 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.5
9.9 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 12
Change at Week 12
-2.6 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.3
-0.3 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: FAS population. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Mean voided volume per micturition was calculated as sum of voided volume divided by the total number of micturition episodes with a recorded voided volume greater than 0 at that visit. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 4 (n=11,6)
161.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 57.4
185.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 58.3
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 1 (n=10,5)
163.7 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 59.8
194.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 60.3
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 12 (n=11,6)
161.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 57.4
185.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 58.3
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 1 (n=10,5)
49.8 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 66.3
27.9 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 51.1
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 4 (n=11,6)
45.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 84.0
19.2 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 41.2
Change From Baseline in Mean Voided Volume Per Micturition at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 12 (n=11,6)
31.9 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 68.3
-10.1 milliliter (mL)
Standard Deviation 30.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: FAS population. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

UUI episodes were defined as those with the Urinary Sensation Scale (USS) rating of 5 in the diary. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 1 (n=10,5)
3.2 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 7.7
2.3 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 5.7
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 4 (n=11,6)
2.7 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 7.7
2.3 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 5.7
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 12 (n=11,6)
2.7 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 7.7
2.3 episodes per 24 hours
Interval 1.0 to 5.7
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 1 (n=10,5)
-1.0 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -2.3 to 1.7
-0.7 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -2.7 to -0.3
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 4 (n=11,6)
-1.3 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -5.3 to 0.3
-1.9 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -3.7 to -0.7
Change From Baseline in Number of Urgency Urinary Incontinence (UUI) Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 12 (n=11,6)
-1.7 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -7.7 to 0.0
-1.2 episodes per 24 hours
Interval -3.0 to 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4

Population: FAS population. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

Micturitions include episodes of voluntary micturition and episodes of UUI. UUI episodes were defined as those micturitions with USS rating of 5 in the diary in participants with UUI at baseline. USS rating 5: Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and 4
Baseline for Week 1 (n=10,5)
11.7 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.6
9.9 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.8
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and 4
Baseline for Week 4 (n=11,6)
11.5 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.5
9.9 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.7
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and 4
Change at Week 1 (n=10,5)
-0.6 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.2
-0.7 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.4
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturitions Per 24 Hours at Week 1 and 4
Change at Week 4 (n=11,6)
-2.4 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.2
-1.0 micturitions per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis, as per change in planned analysis.

Nocturnal micturitions were defined as micturitions with USS rating 1-5 that occurred between the time the participant went to bed and the time he or she arose to start the next day. USS rating: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. The mean number of nocturnal micturitions per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of nocturnal micturitions divided by the total number of diary days collected at that visit.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: Data for this pre-specified outcome measure was collected and reported in individual participant listings but not statistically summarized for analysis, as per change in planned analysis.

The mean number of micturition-related nocturnal urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of greater than or equal to (\>=) 3 that occurred between time participant went to bed and time participant arose to start next day divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: FAS population. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

The mean number of micturition-related urgency episodes per 24 hours was calculated as the total number of micturitions with USS rating of \>= 3 divided by the total number of days that diary data was collected at that visit. USS total range 1 to 5: 1. No feeling of urgency, 2. Mild feeling of urgency, 3. Moderate feeling of urgency, 4. Severe feeling of urgency, 5. Unable to hold; leak urine. Baseline values for each time point were calculated separately considering only those participants who were evaluable at the given time point.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 12 (n=11,6)
9.0 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.1
8.1 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 1 (n=10,5)
9.1 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.2
8.5 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.1
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline for Week 4 (n=11,6)
9.0 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.1
8.1 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.0
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 1 (n=10,5)
-1.1 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.2
-1.6 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 0.8
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 4 (n=11,6)
-3.2 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.1
-1.6 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 1.9
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Micturition-Related Urgency Episodes Per 24 Hours at Week 1, 4 and 12
Change at Week 12 (n=11,6)
-3.9 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 2.8
-1.0 episodes per 24 hours
Standard Deviation 3.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 4, 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

PPBC: self-administered,single-item questionnaire to describe participant's perception of bladder-related problems. PPBC assessed on 6-point scale:1=no problems at all,2=some very minor problems,3=some minor problems,4=some moderate problems,5=severe problems,6=many severe problems. Results categorized as score change (SC) from baseline on 2-point scale:improvement (negative SC),no improvement (SC 0 or more) and on 4-point scale:major improvement (SC is negative in magnitude of 2 or more), minor improvement (SC is negative in magnitude of 1), no change (SC= 0),deterioration (positive SC).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: Severe Problems (n=12,6)
8 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: Many Severe Problems (n=12,6)
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 12: No Problems at all (n=12,6)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week12: Some Very Minor Problems(n=12,6)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 12: Some Minor Problems (n=12,6)
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 12: Severe Problems (n=12,6)
8 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Major improvement (4-point scale) (n=11,5)
2 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:No Change (4-point scale) (n=11,5)
3 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Improvement (2-point scale) (n=12,6)
7 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Major improvement (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
4 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Minor improvement (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:No Change (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
5 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Improvement (2-point scale) (n=12,6)
9 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Major improvement (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
7 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Minor improvement (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
2 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1:Some Very Minor Problems(n=11,5)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1: Some Minor Problems (n=11,5)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1: Many Severe Problems (n=11,5)
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1:Some Moderate Problems(n=11,5)
2 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: No Problems at all (n=12,6)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1: Severe Problems (n=11,5)
8 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 1: No Problems at all (n=11,5)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 12: Some Moderate Problems (n=12,6)
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: Some Very Minor Problems(n=12,6)
0 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: Some Minor Problems (n=12,6)
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 4: Some Moderate Problems (n=12,6)
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Deterioration (4-point scale) (n=11,5)
1 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Baseline, Week 12: Many Severe Problems (n=12,6)
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Improvement (2-point scale) (n=11,5)
7 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:No improvement (2-point scale) (n=11,5)
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:No improvement (2-point scale) (n=12,6)
5 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Deterioration (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:No improvement (2-point scale) (n=12,6)
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Minor improvement (4-point scale) (n=11,5)
5 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:No Change (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
3 participants
2 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Bladder Condition (PPBC) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Deterioration (4-point scale) (n=12,6)
0 participants
0 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline (Bl), Week 1, 4, 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Missing values imputed using LOCF method. 'n' = number of participants who were evaluable at specific time points for each arm group, respectively.

PPUS: a self-administered, single-item, validated questionnaire that measures the participant's perception of urinary urgency. It is sensitive to changes in perceptions of urinary urgency over time. Scale of 0 (usually not able to hold urine), 1 (usually able to hold urine \[without leaking\] until reaching toilet if go to toilet immediately), or 2 (usually able to finish what he/she is doing before going to toilet \[without leaking\]). Results categorized as SC from baseline on 3-point scale: improvement (positive SC), no change (SC 0), deterioration (negative SC).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 4:Not able to hold urine (n=12,6)
6 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:No change (n=11,5)
6 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Deterioration (n=11,5)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Improvement (n=12,6)
4 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:No change (n=12,6)
7 participants
5 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 4:Deterioration (n=12,6)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Improvement (n=12,6)
6 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:No change (n=12,6)
6 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 12:Deterioration (n=12,6)
0 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 1:Not able to hold urine (n=11,5)
6 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 1:Able to hold until reach toilet (n=11,5)
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 1:Able to finish what I am doing (n=11,5)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 4:Able to hold until reach toilet (n=12,6)
5 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 4:Able to finish what I am doing (n=12,6)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 12:Not able to hold urine (n=12,6)
6 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 12:Able to hold until reach toilet(n=12,6)
5 participants
4 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Bl,Week 12:Able to finish what I am doing (n=12,6)
1 participants
1 participants
Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Patient Perception of Urgency Scale (PPUS) at Week 1, 4 and 12
Week 1:Improvement (n=11,5)
4 participants
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

OAB-q: a self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire that assesses how much the participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated by participant on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Symptom bother score derived as sum of scores for items 1 to 8; lowest possible raw score: 8; highest possible score: 48. Data analyzed based on transformation of the score to a 0 to 100 scale \[(Actual total raw score - lowest possible value of raw score)/range\]\*100. Higher scores values indicative of greater symptom bother.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=10 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12
Baseline
66.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.8
54.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.7
Change From Baseline in Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) Symptom Bother Score at Week 12
Change at Week 12
-27.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.8
-12.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains (range): concern(7-42), coping(8-48), sleep(5-30), and social function(5-30). Total HRQL score (25-125) derived as sum of HRQL domains. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (HRQL domain or total) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicate better HRQL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=10 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Change at Week 12: Concern Subscale
29.4 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.8
16.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 20.8
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Baseline: Coping Subscale
50.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.9
56.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 33.3
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Change at Week 12: Sleep Subscale
21.6 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 31.2
8.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.4
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Change at Week 12: Total HRQL Score
22.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.6
12.0 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 14.4
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Baseline: Concern Subscale
41.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 25.8
53.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 37.2
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Baseline: Sleep Subscale
49.2 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 32.2
55.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 38.0
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Baseline: Total HRQL Score
54.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 21.1
58.5 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 35.1
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Domains and Total Score of Overactive Bladder Questionnaire (OAB-q) at Week 12
Change at Week 12: Coping Subscale
26.3 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 19.0
13.8 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 10.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline, Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

OAB-q: self-administered, 33-item, questionnaire, assesses how much participant has been bothered by selected bladder symptoms. Each item rated on Likert scale 1 (not at all) to 6 (a very great deal). Questions 9 to 33 constitute HRQL, includes domains (range): concern(7-42), coping(8-48), sleep(5-30), and social function(5-30). Total HRQL score (25-125) derived as sum of HRQL domains. Transformed score range 0 to 100 (HRQL domain or total) = \[(Highest possible raw score-Actual total raw score)/Raw score range\]\*100. Higher transformed scores indicate better HRQL.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=10 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Social Domain Score at Week 12
Baseline
84.0 units on a scale
Interval 56.0 to 100.0
92.0 units on a scale
Interval 20.0 to 100.0
Change From Baseline in Health Related Quality of Life (HRQL) Social Domain Score at Week 12
Change at Week 12
10.0 units on a scale
Interval -32.0 to 36.0
2.0 units on a scale
Interval -4.0 to 36.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

Participant experience questionnaire (PEQ) is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 1, "Where did you hear first about the study?" are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=17 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Other
4 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Friend
2 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Google or related internet search engine
3 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Web-site advertisement
3 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Blogger, on-line health group leader or activist
1 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
On-line Community
1 participants
Number of Participants With Response Regarding Source of First Information About Study
Email
3 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 2, "What led you to participate given the study drug is already available?" are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=17 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Contribute to research
8 participants
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Experience internet research study and try it out
2 participants
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Ease of participation
3 participants
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Free medication
3 participants
Number of Participants With Reason for Participation in the Study
Payment for participation
1 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

PEQ:self-administered, to assess perception of trial method. Question3, "How satisfied were you with items?" on scale 1(very satisfied) to 5(very dissatisfied)- recruitment; questionnaires,surveys(Ques,Sur); identification verification(IV); informed consent(IC) process; website experience; phone call; laboratory(lab) kit delivery; lab location; lab staff service(Ser); physical exam(PE) scheduling,location (sch,loc); PE visit; medication(med) first batch delivery; med second batch delivery; cell phone(CP) received; CP use; call center(CC) ser; medical support(supp); technical supp; overall.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=17 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE visit: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Recruitment: very satisfied
12 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Ques,Sur: somewhat satisfied
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IV: somewhat satisfied
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE visit: very satisfied
11 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Med first batch delivery: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Med first batch delivery: very satisfied
16 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Med second batch delivery: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Med second batch delivery: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Med second batch delivery: very satisfied
15 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CP received: very satisfied
17 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CP use: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CP use: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CP use: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CP use: very satisfied
14 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CC ser: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Technical supp: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Technical supp: very satisfied
14 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Overall: somewhat dis-satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Overall: somewhat satisfied
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Overall: very satisfied
11 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE visit: somewhat dis-satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE visit: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE visit: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CC ser: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
CC ser: very satisfied
12 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Medical supp: somewhat dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Medical supp: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Medical supp: very satisfied
15 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Technical supp:neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Recruitment: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IV: very satisfied
11 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IC: somewhat dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IC: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IC: somewhat satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IC: very satisfied
13 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Website experience: very dis-satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Website experience: somewhat satisfied
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Website experience: very satisfied
11 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Phone call: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Phone call: somewhat dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Phone call: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Recruitment: somewhat satisfied
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Ques,Sur: somewhat dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Phone call: very satisfied
14 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab kit delivery: very dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Ques,Sur: very satisfied
12 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IV: somewhat dis-satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
IV: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab staff Ser: very satisfied
13 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab kit delivery: very satisfied
16 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab location: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab location: somewhat satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab location: very satisfied
13 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab staff Ser: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
Lab staff Ser: somewhat satisfied
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE sch,loc: somewhat dis-satisfied
2 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE sch,loc: neither dis-satisfied nor satisfied
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Satisfaction Related to Study
PE sch,loc: very satisfied
12 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

PEQ:self-administered, assesses participants perception of trial method. Question4, "How satisfied were you with items?" on scale 1(very easy) to 5(very difficult)- a: teaching video explaining CP use; recording urinations using CP; size of text on CP; sending your urinary information(inf) using your CP, e: overall, suitability for capturing urinations as they happened.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=17 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP use video: neither difficult nor easy
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP use video: somewhat easy
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP use video: very easy
12 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Recording urinations using CP: somewhat easy
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Recording urinations using CP: very easy
14 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP text size: neither difficult nor easy
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP text size: somewhat easy
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
CP text size: very easy
12 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Sending urinary inf using CP: somewhat easy
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Sending urinary inf using CP: very easy
13 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Overall: neither difficult nor easy
1 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Overall: somewhat easy
3 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Cell Phone Diary
Overall: very easy
13 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 5, "What treatment did you think you were on?" are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=11 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Participant Perception Regarding Received Treatment in the Study
Placebo
3 participants
4 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Received Treatment in the Study
Tolterodine
8 participants
2 participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: FAS included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 baseline or post-baseline efficacy assessment. Here 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies participants evaluable for this measure.

PEQ is a web-based self-administered, exploratory questionnaire that assesses the participant's perception of trial method. Number of participants who responded to question 6, "How likely would you be to recommend a friend to enter a similar study?" are reported.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=17 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Participant Perception Regarding Recommending a Friend to Enter Similar Study
Very likely
11 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Recommending a Friend to Enter Similar Study
Somewhat likely
5 participants
Participant Perception Regarding Recommending a Friend to Enter Similar Study
Neither
1 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

Population: Safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 28 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AEs
6 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
SAEs
0 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

Population: Safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

AE:any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study medication in participant who received study drug. Relatedness to study medication was assessed by the investigator. Severity of AEs assessed as: mild (does not interfere with participant's usual function), moderate (interferes to some extent with participant's usual function) and severe (interferes significantly with participant's usual function). Mild, moderate and severe are not mutually exclusive; hence same participant may be included in more than 1 type of severity of AEs.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Relatedness and Severity
Treatment-related AEs
2 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Relatedness and Severity
Mild AEs
4 participants
3 participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Relatedness and Severity
Moderate AEs
3 participants
0 participants
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) by Relatedness and Severity
Severe AEs
1 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Baseline up to 28 days after last dose

Population: Safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants Who Discontinued the Study Due to Adverse Events
1 participants
0 participants

OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome

Timeframe: Week 12

Population: Safety set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study medication. 'N' (number of participants analyzed) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.

Criteria for potentially clinically significant (PCS) laboratory values: Hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell less than (\<) 0.8 lower limit of normal(LLN); platelet \<0.5 LLN, \>1.75 upper LN (ULN);white blood cell \<0.6 LLN, \>1.5 ULN; lymphocyte, total neutrophil(absolute\[AL\]),Total protein, albumin, phosphate \<0.8 LLN, \>1.2 ULN; basophil, eosinophil, monocyte \>1.2ULN; Total bilirubin \>1.5ULN; aspartate, alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase \>3ULN; Blood urea nitrogen, creatinine \>1.3ULN; sodium \<0.95LLN, \>1.05ULN; potassium, chloride, bicarbonate, calcium \<0.9LLN, \>1.1ULN.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Tolterodine
n=10 Participants
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities
1 participants
1 participants

Adverse Events

Tolterodine

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo

Serious events: 0 serious events
Other events: 1 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Adverse event data not reported

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Tolterodine
n=12 participants at risk
Tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Placebo
n=6 participants at risk
Placebo matched to tolterodine 4 mg extended release capsule once daily for 12 weeks.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
8.3%
1/12
16.7%
1/6
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
General disorders
Oedema peripheral
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
0.00%
0/12
16.7%
1/6
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis streptococcal
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Increased appetite
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
0.00%
0/12
16.7%
1/6
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle tightness
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6
Renal and urinary disorders
Dysuria
8.3%
1/12
0.00%
0/6

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER