Comparison of Treatments in Venous Insufficiency

NCT01298908 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 231

Last updated 2016-01-08

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Randomized controlled trial, a method used to implement the random allocation sequence is numbered containers.

The aim of the study is to compare operative treatment, ultrasound guided laser ablation and ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy in occluding/ablating of insufficiency in great saphenous trunks. On the grounds of the available data, the study hypothesis is that using laser or operative treatment more than 20 percent better outcome can be achieved compared to foam sclerotherapy.

Conditions

  • Venous Insufficiency

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Operative treatment

In operative treatment the great saphenous vein will be removed after flush ligation by femoral vein and stripping of the trunk.

PROCEDURE

Laser ablation

In intravenous laser treatment a thin laser fiber is inserted through a tiny distal entry point. The probe is guided into place using ultrasound and the procedure is performed under local tumescence anesthesia. Laser energy is delivered to seal the faulty vein.

PROCEDURE

Foam sclerotherapy

Ultrasound guided foam sclerotherapy involves an injection of foam (sodium tetradecyl sulfate mixed with air according to the Thessari method) directly into the venous trunk under ultrasound control.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Helsinki University Central Hospital

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Maarit Venermo, MD,PhD · Department of Vascular Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
20 Years
Max Age
70 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-10-31
Primary Completion
2012-12-31
Completion
2015-12-31

Countries

  • Finland

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01298908 on ClinicalTrials.gov