Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study to Determine if a New Nicotine Replacement Therapy Can Safely Help Smokers to Quit Smoking (NCT NCT01296698)

NCT ID: NCT01296698

Last Updated: 2012-04-23

Results Overview

Number of participants with carbon monoxide (CO)-verified self-report of continuous abstinence from smoking from Week 2 through Week 6.

Recruitment status

TERMINATED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

257 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

through Week 6

Results posted on

2012-04-23

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
Placebo
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Overall Study
STARTED
244
13
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
244
13

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
Placebo
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Overall Study
Adverse Event
1
0
Overall Study
Death
1
0
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
19
1
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
12
0
Overall Study
Difficulty Contacting Subject
2
0
Overall Study
Study Terminated by Sponsor
209
12

Baseline Characteristics

Study to Determine if a New Nicotine Replacement Therapy Can Safely Help Smokers to Quit Smoking

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
Placebo
n=244 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=13 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Total
n=257 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age Continuous
47.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.0 • n=39 Participants
49.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4 • n=41 Participants
47.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.9 • n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
131 Participants
n=39 Participants
8 Participants
n=41 Participants
139 Participants
n=35 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
113 Participants
n=39 Participants
5 Participants
n=41 Participants
118 Participants
n=35 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
244 participants
n=39 Participants
13 participants
n=41 Participants
257 participants
n=35 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: through Week 6

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Number of participants with carbon monoxide (CO)-verified self-report of continuous abstinence from smoking from Week 2 through Week 6.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through Week 26

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Number of participants with carbon monoxide (CO)-verified self report of continuous abstinence from smoking from Week 2 to Weeks 4, 6, 12, 16, and 26.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through Week 26

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error).

Number of participants with carbon monoxide (CO)-verified self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence from smoking at Weeks 2, 4, 6, 12, 16, and 26.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 1

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 1.

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=142 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=6 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
16.7 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 11.7
14.9 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 7.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 2

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 2.

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=124 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=7 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
15.8 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 11.4
18.0 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 14.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 3

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 3.

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=76 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=5 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
13.1 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 9.4
15.8 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 9.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 4

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 4.

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=44 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=3 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
12.2 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 10.8
10.5 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 5.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 5

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 5.

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=21 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=1 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
10.9 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 11.3
4.0 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 6

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants at Week 6. Analysis of data for the remainder of the study weeks was not possible because the trial terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error).

Mean number of daily doses by study week.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=5 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Mean Number of Daily Doses
13.3 Daily Doses
Standard Deviation 12.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants who had used study medication at least one day.

Percentage of participants who used more than 64 doses in any one-day period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=149 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=8 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants With High Dosage
2.0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to data collected from participants who had used study medication at least one day.

Percentage of participants who used more than four doses in any one-hour period.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=149 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=8 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Percentage of Participants With High Usage
28.2 Percentage of Participants
25 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced the Desire/Urge to Smoke on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Desire/Urge to Smoke on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
2.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Desire/Urge to Smoke on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
30.4 Percentage of Participants
100 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Desire/Urge to Smoke on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
33.7 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Desire/Urge to Smoke on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
22.8 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Desire/Urge to Smoke on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
10.9 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
30.4 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
27.2 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
23.9 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
15.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Irritability/Frustration/Anger on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
3.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Restlessness on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Restlessness on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
43.5 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Restlessness on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
25.0 Percentage of Participants
100 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Restlessness on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
12.0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Restlessness on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
13.0 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Restlessness on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
6.5 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Difficulty Concentrating on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Difficulty Concentrating on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
53.3 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Difficulty Concentrating on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
18.5 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Difficulty Concentrating on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
15.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Difficulty Concentrating on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
9.8 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Difficulty Concentrating on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
3.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Anxiety on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Anxiety on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
44.6 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Anxiety on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
23.9 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Anxiety on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
15.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Anxiety on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
13.0 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Anxiety on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
3.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
66.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
19.6 Percentage of Participants
100 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
9.8 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
3.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Dysphoric or Depressed Mood on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
1.1 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Insomnia on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Insomnia on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
56.5 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Insomnia on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
22.8 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Insomnia on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
10.9 Percentage of Participants
50.0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Insomnia on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
3.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Insomnia on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
6.5 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: within 12 Weeks

Population: Analysis was limited to participants who used study medication at least once and who completed the questionnaire.

Participants are asked if during the last 24 hours they experienced Increased Appetite on a 5-grade categorical scale from Not at all to Extremely so.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo
n=92 Participants
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=2 Participants
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Highest Rating of Increased Appetite on a Categorical Scale
Not at all
54.3 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Increased Appetite on a Categorical Scale
Somewhat
13.0 Percentage of Participants
100 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Increased Appetite on a Categorical Scale
Moderately so
15.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Increased Appetite on a Categorical Scale
Very much so
15.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants
Highest Rating of Increased Appetite on a Categorical Scale
Extremely so
2.2 Percentage of Participants
0 Percentage of Participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through Week 12

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Participants are asked to rate their general perception of the investigational product on a scale of 1-10, where 1=very poor and 10=excellent.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through 12 Weeks

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Participants are asked to rate the product in its effectiveness for dealing with cravings, on a scale of 1-5, where 1=not at all effective, and 5=extremely effective.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through 12 Weeks

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Participants are asked to rate the product for speed of action, on a scale of 1-9, where 1=extremely slow and 9=extremely fast.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through 12 Weeks

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Participants are asked to rate how their opinion has changed since the first time they used it, on a score of 1-5, where 1=I like it much less now and 5=I like it much more now.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: through 12 Weeks

Population: The study was terminated prematurely due to a technical issue (randomization error) and no data are available.

Participants are asked to rate how convenient the product is to use, on a scale of 1-5, where 1=not at all convenient and 5=extremely convenient.

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Placebo

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 33 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Nicotine

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 8 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=242 participants at risk
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=13 participants at risk
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure Congestive
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
General disorders
Death
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
General disorders
Device Malfunction
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Nervous system disorders
Loss of Consciousness
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnoea
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Placebo
n=242 participants at risk
0 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Nicotine
n=13 participants at risk
1 mg Oral NRT, up to 4 times per hour for 12 weeks
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
1.2%
3/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gingival Pain
0.41%
1/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Oral Pain
1.7%
4/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Sensitivity of Teeth
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
1.2%
3/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in Extremity
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
8.3%
20/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
0.00%
0/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Nervous system disorders
Migraine
1.2%
3/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
7.7%
1/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Hiccups
0.00%
0/242 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.
38.5%
5/13 • Adverse events were collected during study and during telephone interview after study termination. Serious adverse events and adverse events categorized as probably or very likely related to study product were followed until they resolved or stabilized.
Two subjects who did not receive study medication were excluded from the safety analysis set as defined in the Statistical Analysis Plan.

Additional Information

Joyce Hauze, RPS Sr. Specialist, Clinical Research Operations

Johnson & Johnson Consumer and Personal Products Worldwide

Phone: 928-277-0715

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Principal Investigators agreed not to discuss or publish the details/results of this study.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER