Trial Outcomes & Findings for A 12-Day Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle and Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Six Concentrations of Topical E6201 Gel in Subjects With Psoriasis Vulgaris (NCT NCT01268527)
NCT ID: NCT01268527
Last Updated: 2021-06-11
Results Overview
The AUC was based on the baseline-corrected thickness of the psoriatic infiltrate (20 megahertz (MHz) Sonographic measurement) at specified days for each treatment field calculated by applying the linear trapezoidal rule. Sonographic measurements were performed using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial A-scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore, exact measurement of skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent band below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. The thickness was measured in micrometers (um) and was denoted as T.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
30 participants
Day 0 (Baseline), Day 8 (Visit 10), and Day 12 (End of Treatment)
2021-06-11
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Cohort 1
Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.2%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using separate tuberculin syringes that were filled with approximately 200 uL of each concentration of study treatment and comparator. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. The 3 concentrations of E6201 gel were dosed first in Cohort 1 to establish the safety and tolerability prior to dosing in Cohort 2.
|
Cohort 2
Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.05%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described for Cohort 1. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
15
|
15
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
A 12-Day Randomized, Blinded, Vehicle and Active Comparator-Controlled Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Six Concentrations of Topical E6201 Gel in Subjects With Psoriasis Vulgaris
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Cohort 1
n=15 Participants
Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.03%, 0.1%, and 0.2%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using separate tuberculin syringes that were filled with approximately 200 uL of each concentration of study treatment and comparator. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours. The 3 concentrations of E6201 gel were dosed first in Cohort 1 to establish the safety and tolerability prior to dosing in Cohort 2.
|
Cohort 2
n=15 Participants
Three concentrations of E6201 topical gel (0.005%, 0.01%, and 0.05%) and active comparator, calcipotriene cream (0.005%), were applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described for Cohort 1. Cohort 2 participants were not dosed until all participants in Cohort 1 completed treatment and safety data were collected and evaluated.
|
Total
n=30 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
47.4 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.44 • n=99 Participants
|
50.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.01 • n=107 Participants
|
49.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.05 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
25 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 0 (Baseline), Day 8 (Visit 10), and Day 12 (End of Treatment)Population: Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
The AUC was based on the baseline-corrected thickness of the psoriatic infiltrate (20 megahertz (MHz) Sonographic measurement) at specified days for each treatment field calculated by applying the linear trapezoidal rule. Sonographic measurements were performed using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial A-scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore, exact measurement of skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent band below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. The thickness was measured in micrometers (um) and was denoted as T.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Summary Statistics and Primary Pairwise Comparison (Vehicle-E6201) of Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Baseline-Corrected Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate
|
-1449.2 um.day
Interval -1660.0 to -1238.4
|
17.0 um.day
Interval -64.3 to 98.3
|
-694.4 um.day
Interval -1108.0 to -280.8
|
-1102.8 um.day
Interval -1351.8 to -853.8
|
-763.1 um.day
Interval -1548.2 to 22.1
|
-1758.2 um.day
Interval -2134.3 to -1382.1
|
-904.4 um.day
Interval -1303.4 to -505.4
|
-920.8 um.day
Interval -1588.3 to -253.3
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)Population: Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). Least Squares Means (LSM) and Confidence Intervals (CI) were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to End of Treatment (Day 12/Discontinuation)
|
-205.3 um
Interval -239.2 to -171.4
|
7.1 um
Interval -32.2 to 46.3
|
-94.4 um
Interval -154.5 to -34.3
|
-175.3 um
Interval -206.5 to -144.1
|
-162.4 um
Interval -194.1 to -130.7
|
-239.5 um
Interval -295.8 to -183.2
|
-125.2 um
Interval -202.3 to -48.2
|
-137.9 um
Interval -218.3 to -57.6
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8 (Visit 10)Population: Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
Psoriatic infiltrate thickness was determined by 20 MHz Sonographic measurements using a 20 MHz high-frequency sonograph. Serial-A scans were composed and represented on a monitor as a section of the skin. A lateral resolution of approximately 200 um and an axial resolution of 80 um were possible. Dependent on the echo patterns, components of the epidermis, dermis, and subcutis were represented. Therefore exact measurement of the skin thickness was possible. The inflammatory psoriatic infiltrate was seen as a clearly definable echo lucent back below the entrance echo. The thickness of the echo lucent psoriatic band was determined. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0). LSM and CI were obtained from ANCOVA model with factors for treatment and baseline psoriatic infiltrate thickness as a continuous covariate.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Change in Thickness of the Psoriatic Infiltrate From Baseline to Day 8
|
-151.7 um
Interval -215.1 to -88.3
|
17.3 um
Interval -20.2 to 54.8
|
-63.4 um
Interval -110.3 to -16.5
|
-110.7 um
Interval -147.3 to -74.0
|
-92.9 um
Interval -200.1 to 14.3
|
-190.3 um
Interval -243.6 to -136.9
|
-108.0 um
Interval -162.9 to -53.1
|
-102.7 um
Interval -172.6 to -32.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 12/Discontinuation (Visit 14/End of Treatment)Population: Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
Worsened
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
Unchanged (no effect)
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
90.0 Percentage of participants
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
Slight improvement
|
56.7 Percentage of participants
|
10.0 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
Clear improvement but not completely healed
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
|
86.7 Percentage of participants
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy at Day 12/Discontinuation
Completely healed
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 8 (Visit 10)Population: Full analysis population (Intent-to-treat population) included all randomized participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postbaseline efficacy assessment.
Clinical (global) assessment of the test fields was performed using a 5-point score: -1 = worsened, 0 = unchanged (no effect), 1 = slight improvement, 2 = clear improvement but not completely healed, and 3 = completely healed. Comparisons were made with the untreated plaque(s) beneath the hydrocolloid dressing. Clinically apparent differences in erythema and infiltration contributed to the global assessment. Baseline was defined as Visit 2 (Day 0).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
Clear improvement but not completely healed
|
30.0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
26.7 Percentage of participants
|
86.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
Unchanged (no effect)
|
20.0 Percentage of participants
|
90.0 Percentage of participants
|
33.3 Percentage of participants
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
16.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
Worsened
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
|
3.3 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
Slight improvement
|
46.7 Percentage of participants
|
6.7 Percentage of participants
|
66.7 Percentage of participants
|
53.3 Percentage of participants
|
60.0 Percentage of participants
|
13.3 Percentage of participants
|
83.3 Percentage of participants
|
100 Percentage of participants
|
|
Clinical (Global) Assessment of Efficacy on Day 8
Completely healed
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.Population: Safety population included all participants who received at least one application of at least one study treatment and had at least one postdose safety assessment.
TEAEs were defined as an adverse event (AE) that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment (baseline), or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Safety variables included TEAEs including skin reactions, diascopy and biopsy findings, clinical laboratory parameters, vital signs, and physical examinations. For Cohort 2, special attention was given to a close, daily monitoring of the application site for signs of skin irritation. Any suspected ecchymoses or petechiae were to be followed up with a diascopy test that was to be documented with digital photographs. Any positive diascopy test was to be followed up by biopsy for skin ultrastructural analysis (if agreed to by the participant, sponsor, and investigator). Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 Participants
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 Participants
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 Participants
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 Participants
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Treatment-related TEAEs
|
3 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
4 Percentage of participants
|
5 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Serious TEAEs
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to study treatment interruption
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Severe TEAEs
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to study treatment withdrawal
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
1 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Overview of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
TEAEs leading to study treatment dose decrease
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
0 Percentage of participants
|
Adverse Events
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
E6201 Vehicle
0.005% E6201 Gel
0.01% E6201 Gel
0.03% E6201 Gel
0.05% E6201 Gel
0.1% E6201 Gel
0.2% E6201 Gel
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Daivonex (Calcipotriene Cream)
n=30 participants at risk
Daivonex (calcipotriene cream) at 0.005% was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site using a tuberculin syringe that was filled with approximately 200 uL of Daivonex. Prior to each new application, remaining preparation residues were removed by gently cleansing each test field with a separate soft tissue. The fields to be treated were done in an occlusive manner for a treatment period of 12 days. Application time was to be kept as close as possible to the baseline application time, and was not to differ by more than +/- 4 hours.
|
E6201 Vehicle
n=30 participants at risk
E6201 vehicle was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.005% E6201 Gel
n=15 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.005%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.01% E6201 Gel
n=15 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.01%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.03% E6201 Gel
n=15 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.03%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.05% E6201 Gel
n=15 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.05%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.1% E6201 Gel
n=6 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.1%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
0.2% E6201 Gel
n=6 participants at risk
E6201 gel (0.2%) was applied once daily for 12 days to specific test fields determined at Baseline. Study treatments were applied at the research unit by designated personnel of the investigational site in the same manner as described earlier.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash erythematous
|
6.7%
2/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
13.3%
2/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
83.3%
5/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
66.7%
4/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
33.3%
5/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Scab
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
50.0%
3/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
83.3%
5/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Lividity
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
33.3%
2/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
|
3.3%
1/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
3.3%
1/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin erosion
|
3.3%
1/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
6.7%
1/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin haemorrhage
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/30 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/15 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
0.00%
0/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
16.7%
1/6 • From first dose of study treatment up to 30 days after the last dose, or until resolution, whichever came first, or up to approximately 10 months.
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were collected and defined as an AE that emerged during treatment, having been absent at pretreatment, or re-emerged during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment, or worsened in severity during treatment relative to the pretreatment state, when the AE was continuous. Few adverse events occurred in more than one treatment group.
|
Additional Information
Eisai Medical Information
Eisai Medical Research Inc.
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER