Trial Outcomes & Findings for Magnetic Resonance Image Verified Early Response to Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) (NCT NCT01235598)
NCT ID: NCT01235598
Last Updated: 2014-03-12
Results Overview
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
41 participants
From Baseline to Week 16
2014-03-12
Participant Flow
The Participant Flow refers to the Randomized Set (RS) population which consists of all subjects randomized into the study.
The study population consists of subjects with a diagnosis of adult-onset Rheumatoid Arthritis of at least 3 months duration but not longer than 15 years. In addition, subjects must be on Disease Modifying Anti-Rheumatic Drugs (DMARD) therapy for at least 12 weeks with a stable dose / route of administration for at least 8 weeks prior to Baseline.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
13
|
28
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
12
|
24
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
1
|
4
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
3
|
|
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Magnetic Resonance Image Verified Early Response to Certolizumab Pegol in Subjects With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA)
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=13 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Total
n=40 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
|
11 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
|
2 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Age, Continuous
|
48.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.4 • n=99 Participants
|
51.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=107 Participants
|
50.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.1 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
10 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
32 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
3 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Poland
|
2 participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 participants
n=107 Participants
|
9 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Denmark
|
6 participants
n=99 Participants
|
11 participants
n=107 Participants
|
17 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
|
1 participants
n=99 Participants
|
3 participants
n=107 Participants
|
4 participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
Sweden
|
4 participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 participants
n=107 Participants
|
10 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score at Week 16 Compared to Baseline for Certolizumab Pegol Arm
|
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.3 • Interval -3.0 to 0.0
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 8Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score at Week 8 Compared to Baseline for Certolizumab Pegol Arm
|
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 4Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score at Week 4 Compared to Baseline for Certolizumab Pegol Arm
|
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 2Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score at Week 2 Compared to Baseline for Certolizumab Pegol Arm
|
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
—
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 1Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. Total synovitis score ranges from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 21. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Synovitis Measured by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Score at Week 1 Compared to Baseline for Certolizumab Pegol Arm
|
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Contrast enhancement can be quantified in terms of the dynamic MRI parameters initial rate of enhancement (IRE), maximum enhancement (ME), and number of voxels (Nvox) with Plateau and Washout pattern. These parameters are extracted by examining individual signal intensity versus time curves derived from defined regions of interest. Nvox indicates the number of voxels showing enhancement patterns. It is representative of the size or volume of enhancement and representative of underlying inflammation. The higher the value, the higher the volume . ME and IRE values quantify the intensity of signal within the enhancing voxels. The absolute values and changes from Baseline in the MRI parameters of IRE, ME, and Nvox of the selected hand and wrist were estimated at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. The values presented are for Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) and Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints combined. A negative value in IRE change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Parameter, Initiation Rate of Enhancement (IRE)
|
-0.0044 percent per second
Standard Deviation 0.0140
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Contrast enhancement can be quantified in terms of the dynamic MRI parameters initial rate of enhancement (IRE), maximum enhancement (ME), and number of voxels (Nvox) with Plateau and Washout pattern. These parameters are extracted by examining individual signal intensity versus time curves derived from defined regions of interest. Nvox indicates the number of voxels showing enhancement patterns. It is representative of the size or volume of enhancement and representative of underlying inflammation. The higher the value, the higher the volume . ME and IRE values quantify the intensity of signal within the enhancing voxels. The absolute values and changes from Baseline in the MRI parameters of IRE, ME, and Nvox of the selected hand and wrist were estimated at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. The values presented are for Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) and Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints combined. A negative value in ME change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Parameter, Maximal Enhancement (ME)
|
-0.0172 percent change over pre-contrast
Standard Deviation 0.4459
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. As pre-specified in the protocol, this analysis is restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm.
Contrast enhancement can be quantified in terms of the dynamic MRI parameters initial rate of enhancement (IRE), maximum enhancement (ME), and number of voxels (Nvox) with Plateau and Washout pattern. These parameters are extracted by examining individual signal intensity versus time curves derived from defined regions of interest. Nvox indicates the number of voxels showing enhancement patterns. It is representative of the size or volume of enhancement and representative of underlying inflammation. The higher the value, the higher the volume . ME and IRE values quantify the intensity of signal within the enhancing voxels. The absolute values and changes from Baseline in the MRI parameters of IRE, ME, and Nvox of the selected hand and wrist were estimated at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 16. The values presented are for Proximal Interphalangeal (PIP) and Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints combined. A negative value in Nvox change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) Parameter, Number of Voxels (Nvox) With Plateau and Washout Pattern
|
-813.3 voxels
Standard Deviation 1457.3
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response: EULAR response is based upon current Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) level and corresponding change from Baseline in DAS28. Good EULAR response is defined as: DAS28 C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline by \> 1.2; moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following: * DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 * DAS28(CRP) \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from Baseline \> 0.6 * DAS28(CRP) \> 5.1 and decrease from Baseline \> 1.2
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
Good Response
|
71.4 percentage of subjects
|
66.7 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
Moderate Response
|
23.8 percentage of subjects
|
25.0 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
No Response
|
4.8 percentage of subjects
|
8.3 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
Subjects who meet the ACR20 criteria are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Criteria (ACR20) at Week 16
Response
|
86.4 percentage of subjects
|
75.0 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 20 % Criteria (ACR20) at Week 16
No Response
|
13.6 percentage of subjects
|
25.0 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
Subjects who meet the ACR50 criteria are those subjects with at least 50 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Criteria (ACR50) at Week 16
Response
|
68.2 percentage of subjects
|
58.3 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 50 % Criteria (ACR50) at Week 16
No Response
|
31.8 percentage of subjects
|
41.7 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
Subjects who meet the ACR70 criteria are those subjects with at least 70 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=22 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Criteria (ACR70) at Week 16
Response
|
45.5 percentage of subjects
|
58.3 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Meeting the American College of Rheumatology 70 % Criteria (ACR70) at Week 16
No Response
|
54.5 percentage of subjects
|
41.7 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
DAS28\[CRP\] is a composite index and is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/l), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.36 x lognat (CRP+1) + 0.014 x Global Assessment of Arthritis + 0.96 where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. A DAS(28) score of higher than 5.1 is indicative of high disease activity whereas a DAS score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. A patient is considered to be in remission if they have a DAS28 lower than 2.6. A negative value in DAS28\[CRP\] change from Baseline indicates an improvement from Baseline.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in the Disease Activity Score-28 (C-Reactive Protein) (DAS28 (CRP)) Response
|
-2.27 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.86
|
-2.50 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.23
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication, and had a valid Baseline efficacy assessment and at least one valid post-Baseline efficacy assessment.
DAS28\[CRP\] is a composite index and is calculated using the Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC) C-reactive protein (CRP in mg/l), and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (VAS in mm) using the following formula: 0.56 x √(TJC) + 0.28 x √(SJC) + 0.36 x lognat (CRP+1) + 0.014 x Global Assessment of Arthritis + 0.96 where 28 joints are examined and a lower score indicates less disease activity. A DAS(28) score of higher than 5.1 is indicative of high disease activity whereas a DAS score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity. A patient is considered to be in remission if they have a DAS28 lower than 2.6.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28 (CRP)) Remission Status (DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6) at Week 16
Remission
|
57.1 percentage of subjects
|
58.3 percentage of subjects
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28 (CRP)) Remission Status (DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6) at Week 16
No Remission
|
42.9 percentage of subjects
|
41.7 percentage of subjects
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
Radiographic assessment of bone mineral density in one hand and wrist were conducted by Digital X Ray (DXR) using a standardized imaging methodology. The hand and wrist to be assessed by DXR were the same as for the Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs). The same hand and wrist were used for all x rays. The evaluation of all DXRs was performed centrally. A positive value in Bone Mineral Density change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=20 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=11 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Bone Mineral Density as Measured by Digital XRay (DXR)
|
-0.00606 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.01185
|
-0.00630 g/cm^2
Standard Deviation 0.01032
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
The joint assessment was carried out on 28 joints. Swelling and tenderness were graded on a 2-point scale (answered with Yes/No). "No" indicated "Not tender"; "Yes" indicated a positive tenderness response that was defined as a positive response to questioning (tender), spontaneous response elicited (tender and winced) or withdrawal by subject on examination (tender, winced, and withdrew)." If there were missing observations in the TJC, then the remaining observations were assessed and weighted by dividing by the number of non-missing joint counts and multiplying by 28. TJC ranges from 0 to 28 with 0 indicating no tender joints and 28 indicating tenderness in all joints. A negative value in TJC change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=23 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Tender Joint Count (TJC)
|
-9.28 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.85
|
-9.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 8.55
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
The joint assessment was carried out on 28 joints. Swelling and tenderness were graded on a 2-point scale (answered with Yes/No). "No" indicated "None" swelling response and "Yes" indicated that there was "a detectable synovial thickening with or without loss of bony contours, or bulging synovial proliferation with or without cystic characteristics." If there were missing observations in the SJC, then the remaining observations were assessed and weighted by dividing by the number of non-missing joint counts and multiplying by 28. SJC ranges from 0 to 28 with 0 indicating no swollen joints and 28 indicating swelling in all joints. A negative value in SJC change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=23 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Swollen Joint Count (SJC)
|
-7.06 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 4.67
|
-7.92 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 5.81
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication.
The Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is a subject reported questionnaire that provides an assessment of the impact of the disease and its treatment on physical function. The HAQ-DI assesses the degree of difficulty experienced in 8 domains of daily living activities using 20 questions. The domains are dressing and grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and common daily activities, and each domain (activity) consists of 2 or 3 items. For each question the level of difficulty is scored from 0 to 3 where 0 = no difficulty, 1 = some difficulty, 2 = much difficulty and 3 = unable to do. A total score is computed from the item scores using the scoring rules provided by the author (Fries, 1980). The total score ranges from 0 to 3 with lower scores meaning lower disability. A negative value in HAQ-DI change from Baseline indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=23 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline to Week 16 in Health Assessment Questionnaire - Disability Index (HAQ-DI)
|
-0.54 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
-0.79 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.49
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication, and had a valid Baseline efficacy assessment and at least one valid post-Baseline efficacy assessment.
The C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is considered a marker of inflammation in subjects with Rheumatoid Arthritis. A ratio to Baseline \< 1 indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=12 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Ratio to Baseline at Week 16
|
0.491 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 175.1 • Interval 0.179 to 0.947
|
0.219 ratio
Geometric Coefficient of Variation 147.9
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
EULAR (European League Against Rheumatism) response: EULAR response is based upon current Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) level and corresponding change from Baseline in DAS28. Good EULAR response is defined as: DAS28 C-Reactive Protein (CRP) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline by \> 1.2; moderate response is defined as achievement of one of the following: * DAS28(CRP) ≤ 3.2 and decrease from Baseline \> 0.6 and ≤ 1.2 * DAS28(CRP) \> 3.2 and ≤ 5.1 and decrease from Baseline \> 0.6 * DAS28(CRP) \> 5.1 and decrease from Baseline \> 1.2 A negative correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with better EULAR responses.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=20 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 16
|
-0.20 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
Subjects who meet the ACR20 criteria are those subjects with at least 20 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). A negative correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with an ACR20 response at Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With American College of Rheumatology 20 % Criteria (ACR20) at Week 16
|
-0.11 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
Subjects who meet the ACR50 criteria are those subjects with at least 50 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). A negative correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with an ACR50 response at Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With American College of Rheumatology 50 % Criteria (ACR50) at Week 16
|
-0.34 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
Subjects who meet the ACR70 criteria are those subjects with at least 70 % improvement from Baseline for Tender Joint Count (TJC), Swollen Joint Count (SJC), and at least 3 of the 5 remaining core set measures: 1) Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI), 2) C-Reactive Protein (CRP), 3) Patient's Assessment of Arthritis Pain-Visual Analog Scale (PAAP-VAS), 4) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS), 5) Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity-Visual Analog Scale (PhGA-VAS). A negative correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with an ACR70 response at Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=21 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With American College of Rheumatology 70 % Criteria (ACR70) at Week 16
|
-0.08 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
The DAS28(CRP) was calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC), C-Reactive Protein (CRP in mg/L) and the Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity - Visual Analog Scale (PtGADA-VAS in mm). A positive correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with reductions in DAS28(CRP) at Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=20 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28 (CRP)) Response at Week 16
|
0.19 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (observed case) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication. Correlations between the change from Baseline in total synovitis score at Week 16 and the clinical efficacy variables are restricted to the Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) arm only.
Radiographic assessment of bone mineral density in one hand and wrist were conducted by Digital X Ray (DXR) using a standardized imaging methodology. The hand and wrist to be assessed by DXR were the same as for the Magnetic Resonance Images (MRIs). The same hand and wrist were used for all x rays. The evaluation of all DXRs was performed centrally. A negative correlation coefficient indicates that reductions in synovitis from Baseline to Week 16 are associated with increases in bone mineral density at Week 16.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=17 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Correlation of Change in Synovitis From Baseline as Measured by Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) With Changes in Hand Bone Mineral Density as Measured by Digital XRay (DXR) at Week 16
|
0.32 Spearman rank correlation coefficient
|
—
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 1Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication, and had a valid Baseline efficacy assessment and at least one valid post-Baseline efficacy assessment.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions (the distal radioulnar; the radiocarpal joint; the intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints) and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=13 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Synovitis Score at Week 1 Placebo (PBO) Versus Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
|
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.0
|
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 2Population: The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS) (last observation carried forward) which consists of all randomized subjects that received at least one dose of study medication, and had a valid Baseline efficacy assessment and at least one valid post-Baseline efficacy assessment.
Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS): Synovitis is defined as an area in the synovial compartment that shows above normal postgadolinium enhancement of a thickness greater than the width of the normal synovium. T1-weighted images were acquired before and after the administration of intravenous contrast agent containing gadolinium. Intravenous contrast was required to demonstrate enhancing synovitis. Synovitis was scored 0 to 3 in 3 wrist regions (the distal radioulnar; the radiocarpal joint; the intercarpal and carpometacarpal joints) and in each of the second through fifth metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints. A score of 0 is normal, with no enhancement or enhancement up to the thickness of normal synovium, while scores of 1 to 3 (mild, moderate, severe) refer to increments of one-third of the presumed maximum volume of enhancing tissue in the synovial compartment. A negative value in synovitis change from Baseline score indicates an improvement.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=13 Participants
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg for subcutaneous injection at Weeks 0, 2 and 4 followed by 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 6 to Week 40
|
Placebo Followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
n=27 Participants
Placebo, saline solution for subcutaneous injection at Week 0 followed by Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400 mg at Weeks 2, 4, and 6, then Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 200 mg 2-weekly from Week 8 to Week 40
|
|---|---|---|
|
Change From Baseline for the Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) Rheumatoid Arthritis Magnetic Resonance Image Scoring System (RAMRIS) Synovitis Score at Week 2 Placebo (PBO) Versus Certolizumab Pegol (CZP)
|
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.4
|
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.6
|
Adverse Events
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) at Any Time
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) at Any Time
n=40 participants at risk
Eligible subjects were allocated to the following study treatments in a 2:1 ratio:
* Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400mg for subcutaneous injection (sc) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by CZP 200mg sc and placebo (saline solution) at Week 6 and CZP 200mg at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 or
* Placebo (saline solution) at Day 0 and then CZP 400mg sc at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 followed by CZP 200mg sc at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
|
|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Splinter haemorrhages
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post procedural haemorrhage
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder transitional cell carcinoma stage I
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Sensory Loss
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Surgical and medical procedures
Tonsillectomy
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Bladder cancer
|
2.5%
1/40 • Number of events 1 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) at Any Time
n=40 participants at risk
Eligible subjects were allocated to the following study treatments in a 2:1 ratio:
* Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) 400mg for subcutaneous injection (sc) at Weeks 0, 2, and 4, followed by CZP 200mg sc and placebo (saline solution) at Week 6 and CZP 200mg at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16 or
* Placebo (saline solution) at Day 0 and then CZP 400mg sc at Weeks 2, 4, and 6 followed by CZP 200mg sc at Weeks 8, 10, 12, 14, and 16
|
|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site pain
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site discolouration
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Nodule
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Injection site swelling
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
20.0%
8/40 • Number of events 8 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
12.5%
5/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Oral herpes
|
10.0%
4/40 • Number of events 9 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
|
10.0%
4/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis bacterial
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 5 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Abscess
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pneumonia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Investigations
Hepatic enzyme increased
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendon pain
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
10.0%
4/40 • Number of events 14 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Haematuria
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
15.0%
6/40 • Number of events 6 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
10.0%
4/40 • Number of events 4 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
7.5%
3/40 • Number of events 3 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hot flush
|
5.0%
2/40 • Number of events 2 • Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) were reported from Baseline (Week 0) to the end of the study (Week 50).
Subjects that did not receive at least one dose of Certolizumab Pegol (CZP) were excluded. Only Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) occurring while receiving CZP are reported.
|
Additional Information
UCB Clinical Trials Call Center
UCB
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: GT60