Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study To Evaluate The Effects And Safety Of Treatment, Treatment Withdrawal, Followed By Re-Treatment With CP-690,550 In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis (NCT NCT01186744)

NCT ID: NCT01186744

Last Updated: 2018-12-26

Results Overview

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE3

Target enrollment

666 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Weeks 4, 8 12, and 16 (Period B)

Results posted on

2018-12-26

Participant Flow

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for up to 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
Overall Study
STARTED
218
157
31
82
45
133
Overall Study
COMPLETED
10
5
25
70
39
107
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
208
152
6
12
6
26

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for up to 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
Overall Study
Lack of Efficacy
156
99
0
2
2
5
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
1
2
0
1
1
2
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
15
16
2
1
1
4
Overall Study
Screen failure
1
1
0
1
0
0
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
14
10
2
5
0
6
Overall Study
Study terminated by Sponsor
1
0
0
0
0
0
Overall Study
Other
9
10
1
2
1
5
Overall Study
Adverse Event
10
14
1
0
1
4
Overall Study
Death
1
0
0
0
0
0

Baseline Characteristics

A Study To Evaluate The Effects And Safety Of Treatment, Treatment Withdrawal, Followed By Re-Treatment With CP-690,550 In Subjects With Moderate To Severe Chronic Plaque Psoriasis

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=218 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=157 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg
n=133 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID or up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
Total
n=666 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
42.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=39 Participants
45.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.6 • n=41 Participants
44.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.0 • n=35 Participants
45.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=31 Participants
48.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.8 • n=146 Participants
46.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.4 • n=19 Participants
44.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2 • n=147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants
n=39 Participants
50 Participants
n=41 Participants
11 Participants
n=35 Participants
27 Participants
n=31 Participants
11 Participants
n=146 Participants
44 Participants
n=19 Participants
208 Participants
n=147 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
153 Participants
n=39 Participants
107 Participants
n=41 Participants
20 Participants
n=35 Participants
55 Participants
n=31 Participants
34 Participants
n=146 Participants
89 Participants
n=19 Participants
458 Participants
n=147 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: The Period B-Full Analysis Set (FAS-B) included all participants who were re-randomized at the end of Period A and received at least 1dose of investigational drug (CP-690,550 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID) or placebo at the beginning of Period B.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of body surface area (BSA) affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI75 response defined as at least a 75 percent (%) reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal Period (Period B)
Week 4
61.4 percentage of participants
Interval 52.5 to 69.1
90.3 percentage of participants
Interval 72.9 to 96.8
91.1 percentage of participants
Interval 78.0 to 96.6
63.4 percentage of participants
Interval 52.0 to 72.8
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal Period (Period B)
Week 8
39.6 percentage of participants
Interval 31.2 to 47.9
70.3 percentage of participants
Interval 50.6 to 83.3
86.6 percentage of participants
Interval 72.5 to 93.7
36.2 percentage of participants
Interval 25.8 to 46.7
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal Period (Period B)
Week 12
33.4 percentage of participants
Interval 25.4 to 41.5
63.2 percentage of participants
Interval 43.4 to 77.7
77.2 percentage of participants
Interval 61.7 to 87.0
32.4 percentage of participants
Interval 22.4 to 42.7
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index 75 (PASI75) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal Period (Period B)
Week 16
26.1 percentage of participants
Interval 18.8 to 33.9
56.2 percentage of participants
Interval 36.7 to 71.8
62.3 percentage of participants
Interval 45.8 to 75.0
23.3 percentage of participants
Interval 14.7 to 33.1

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12
23.8 percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 31.4
60.6 percentage of participants
Interval 41.1 to 75.4
66.3 percentage of participants
Interval 50.4 to 78.1
26.7 percentage of participants
Interval 17.6 to 36.8
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
52.3 percentage of participants
Interval 43.4 to 60.4
80.6 percentage of participants
Interval 61.9 to 90.8
80.0 percentage of participants
Interval 65.1 to 89.1
57.3 percentage of participants
Interval 45.9 to 67.2
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
32.5 percentage of participants
Interval 24.6 to 40.6
67.7 percentage of participants
Interval 48.4 to 81.2
80.0 percentage of participants
Interval 65.1 to 89.1
34.4 percentage of participants
Interval 24.2 to 44.8
Percentage of Participants Maintaining a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
18.0 percentage of participants
Interval 11.9 to 25.2
49.9 percentage of participants
Interval 31.0 to 66.2
63.9 percentage of participants
Interval 48.0 to 76.1
22.9 percentage of participants
Interval 14.4 to 32.6

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. PASI75 response is defined as at least 75% reduction in PASI relative to Baseline/Day 1. Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C. PASI responses at each period were relative to Baseline-A, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=2 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=3 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=38 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI75 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Those Who Had a Greater Than (>)50% Reduction of Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI75 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Those Who Had a Greater Than (>)50% Reduction of Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
40.68 percentage of participants
Interval 28.14 to 53.21
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
13.16 percentage of participants
Interval 2.41 to 23.91
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI75 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Those Who Had a Greater Than (>)50% Reduction of Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
49.15 percentage of participants
Interval 36.4 to 61.91
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
31.58 percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 46.36
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PASI75 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Those Who Had a Greater Than (>)50% Reduction of Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
50.85 percentage of participants
Interval 38.09 to 63.6
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 100.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
31.58 percentage of participants
Interval 16.8 to 46.36

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: The Period C-Full Analysis Set (FAS-C) included all FAS-B participants who were advanced to the re-treatment period (Period C) during the 16 weeks of Period B and had received at least one dose of investigational drug (CP-690,550 5 mg BID or 10 mg BID) during Period C.

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=98 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=13 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=15 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=58 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PGA of Mild, Moderate, or Severe During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline
7.14 percentage of participants
Interval 2.04 to 12.24
23.08 percentage of participants
Interval 0.17 to 45.98
6.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 19.29
5.17 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 10.87
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PGA of Mild, Moderate, or Severe During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
51.02 percentage of participants
Interval 41.12 to 60.92
23.08 percentage of participants
Interval 0.17 to 45.98
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 9.48 to 57.19
25.86 percentage of participants
Interval 14.59 to 37.13
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PGA of Mild, Moderate, or Severe During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
55.10 percentage of participants
Interval 45.25 to 64.95
30.77 percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
40.0 percentage of participants
Interval 15.21 to 64.79
39.66 percentage of participants
Interval 27.07 to 52.24
Percentage of Participants Achieving a PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PGA of Mild, Moderate, or Severe During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
48.98 percentage of participants
Interval 39.08 to 58.88
30.77 percentage of participants
Interval 5.68 to 55.86
53.33 percentage of participants
Interval 28.09 to 78.58
41.38 percentage of participants
Interval 28.7 to 54.05

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: The Period A-Full Analysis Set (FAS-A) included all participants who were randomized at baseline and received at least 1 dose of the randomized investigational drug (CP-690,550 5mg BID or 10 mg BID) during Period A.

The PASI quantifies the severity of a participant's psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite scoring by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (each scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk \[including axillae and groin\], and lower limbs \[including buttocks), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. PASI75 response defined as 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to PASI75 Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
24.3 weeks
Interval 24.1 to 24.6
8.7 weeks
Interval 8.1 to 15.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The PGA of psoriasis is scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema, induration, and scaling across all psoriatic lesions. Average erythema, induration, and scaling are scored separately over the whole body according to a 5-point severity scale (0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe). PGA response defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=329 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
24.1 weeks
Interval 16.6 to 24.4
8.1 weeks
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to less than (\<)50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PASI50-75 response defined as a reduction of at least 50% but less than 75%. The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess participant health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving Both a PASI50-75 Response and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤5 Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
12.69 percentage of participants
Interval 9.1 to 16.27
21.19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.82 to 25.57
Percentage of Participants Achieving Both a PASI50-75 Response and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤5 Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
18.73 percentage of participants
Interval 14.53 to 22.93
19.40 percentage of participants
Interval 15.17 to 23.64
Percentage of Participants Achieving Both a PASI50-75 Response and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤5 Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
18.13 percentage of participants
Interval 13.98 to 22.28
13.13 percentage of participants
Interval 9.52 to 16.75
Percentage of Participants Achieving Both a PASI50-75 Response and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) ≤5 Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
10.88 percentage of participants
Interval 7.52 to 14.23
10.15 percentage of participants
Interval 6.92 to 13.38

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

Adequate response defined as \>50% reduction of the Visit A4/Week 24 (last visit in Period A) PASI response.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participant Maintaining an Adequate Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
85.9 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 90.9
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
90.0 percentage of participants
Interval 81.0 to 94.9
Percentage of Participant Maintaining an Adequate Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
68.4 percentage of participants
Interval 59.5 to 75.7
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 99.5
97.7 percentage of participants
Interval 84.6 to 99.7
72.0 percentage of participants
Interval 60.6 to 80.6
Percentage of Participant Maintaining an Adequate Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12
58.5 percentage of participants
Interval 49.4 to 66.6
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 99.5
93.0 percentage of participants
Interval 79.9 to 97.7
58.8 percentage of participants
Interval 47.0 to 68.8
Percentage of Participant Maintaining an Adequate Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 30.5 to 54.6
92.3 percentage of participants
Interval 72.1 to 98.0
93.0 percentage of participants
Interval 79.9 to 97.7
32.8 percentage of participants
Interval 16.3 to 50.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

Adequate response defined as \>50% reduction of the Visit A4/Week 24 (last visit in Period A) PASI response.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to Loss of Adequate Response During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
16.1 weeks
Interval 14.1 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.4 weeks
Interval 12.6 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 8 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; Overall number (n) indicates the total number of participants with PASI Score ≥125% of baseline at least once during Weeks 4 to 8 of Period B.

The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI responses at each period are relative to Baseline-A where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A. Weeks 4 and 8 are relative to the Period B baseline and are the same as Weeks 28 and 32, which are relative to Period A baseline. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of two-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=44 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Period Between Week 24 and Week 32 (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Period Between Week 24 and Week 32 (Period B)
Week 8 (n=31,70,43,106)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Period Between Week 24 and Week 32 (Period B)
Overall (n=31,82,44,132)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; Overall number (n) indicates the total number of participants with PASI Score ≥125% of baseline at least once during Weeks 4 to 16 of Period B.

The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. PASI responses at each period are relative to Baseline-A where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of two-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=31,70,43,106)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=30,53,43,87)
1.15 percentage of participants
Interval -3.39 to 1.09
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,72)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PASI Score ≥125% of Baseline-A or New Type of Psoriasis (Pustular, Erythrodermic) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Overall (n=31,82,45,132)
0.76 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

Adequate PASI response defined as less than or equal to 50% reduction of the Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate PASI Response and Maintaining PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
85.9 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 90.9
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
100.0 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
90.0 percentage of participants
Interval 81.0 to 94.9
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate PASI Response and Maintaining PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
68.4 percentage of participants
Interval 59.5 to 75.7
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 99.5
97.7 percentage of participants
Interval 84.6 to 99.7
72.0 percentage of participants
Interval 60.6 to 80.6
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate PASI Response and Maintaining PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12
58.4 percentage of participants
Interval 49.3 to 66.5
96.7 percentage of participants
Interval 78.6 to 99.5
93.0 percentage of participants
Interval 79.9 to 97.7
58.8 percentage of participants
Interval 47.0 to 68.8
Percentage of Participants Maintaining Adequate PASI Response and Maintaining PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
43.5 percentage of participants
Interval 31.0 to 55.3
92.3 percentage of participants
Interval 72.1 to 98.0
93.0 percentage of participants
Interval 79.9 to 97.7
32.8 percentage of participants
Interval 16.3 to 50.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A) and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to Loss of >50% of the Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response and Loss of PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
16.1 weeks
Interval 14.1 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.4 weeks
Interval 12.6 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=81 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=52 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at the Beginning of Period C
Week 4
37.0 percentage of participants
Interval 27.6 to 48.5
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 66.6
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 2.1 to 66.6
7.7 percentage of participants
Interval 3.0 to 19.2
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at the Beginning of Period C
Week 8
48.5 percentage of participants
Interval 38.2 to 60.0
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 8.0 to 74.2
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 16.3 to 82.8
32.3 percentage of participants
Interval 21.2 to 47.3
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at the Beginning of Period C
Week 16
57.2 percentage of participants
Interval 46.2 to 68.8
64.3 percentage of participants
Interval 22.0 to 98.6
42.9 percentage of participants
Interval 16.3 to 82.8
100.0 percentage of participants
95% confidence interval could not be estimated due to censoring.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=81 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=52 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to Regain PASI75 and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response (Clear or Almost Clear) at the Beginning of Period C
12.4 weeks
Interval 7.6 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.4 weeks
Interval 8.6 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.4 weeks
Interval 16.1 to 17.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. PASI responses at each period are relative to Baseline-A, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A. 95% confidence interval constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=81 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=7 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=52 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (PGA of Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Who Had Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response at the Beginning of Period C
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (PGA of Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Who Had Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response at the Beginning of Period C
Week 4
37.04 percentage of participants
Interval 26.52 to 47.55
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.21
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 40.21
7.69 percentage of participants
Interval 0.45 to 14.93
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (PGA of Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Who Had Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response at the Beginning of Period C
Week 8
41.98 percentage of participants
Interval 31.23 to 52.72
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 62.04
42.86 percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.52
28.85 percentage of participants
Interval 16.53 to 41.16
Percentage of Participants Regaining PASI75 and PGA Response (PGA of Clear or Almost Clear) During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Who Had Lost Both PASI75 Response and PGA Response at the Beginning of Period C
Week 16
41.98 percentage of participants
Interval 31.23 to 52.72
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 62.04
42.86 percentage of participants
Interval 6.2 to 79.52
21.15 percentage of participants
Interval 10.05 to 32.25

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=59 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=2 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=3 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=38 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to PASI75 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) For Those Who Had a >50% Reduction of Visit A4/Week 24 PASI Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
8.1 weeks
Interval 5.9 to 16.1
4.5 weeks
Interval 4.3 to 4.7
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.4 weeks
Interval 16.1 to 17.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=91 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=10 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=55 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PGA of Mild, Moderate, or Severe at the Beginning of Period C
8.1 weeks
Interval 5.0 to 16.1
16.3 weeks
Interval 16.1 to 16.4
13.1 weeks
Interval 6.0 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.1 weeks
Interval 8.4 to 16.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. Baseline defined as the last observation up to the first dosing date in Period A. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
7.85 percentage of participants
Interval 4.96 to 10.75
22.39 percentage of participants
Interval 17.92 to 26.85
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
23.87 percentage of participants
Interval 19.27 to 28.46
50.45 percentage of participants
Interval 45.09 to 55.8
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
38.07 percentage of participants
Interval 32.84 to 43.3
60.60 percentage of participants
Interval 55.36 to 65.83
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
38.97 percentage of participants
Interval 33.72 to 44.23
59.40 percentage of participants
Interval 54.14 to 64.66

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. PASI responses in each period are relative to Baseline-A, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation until first dosing date in Period A. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 4
59.40 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
87.10 percentage of participants
Interval 7.94 to 39.43
86.67 percentage of participants
Interval 14.29 to 40.24
63.41 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 8
38.35 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
70.97 percentage of participants
Interval 17.83 to 55.81
86.67 percentage of participants
Interval 35.4 to 61.24
34.15 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 12
33.83 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
67.74 percentage of participants
Interval 18.02 to 56.49
77.78 percentage of participants
Interval 29.38 to 58.51
30.49 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 16
27.82 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
64.52 percentage of participants
Interval 20.89 to 59.36
62.22 percentage of participants
Interval 18.32 to 50.49
24.39 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PASI75 response defined as at least a 75% reduction in PASI relative to baseline. PASI responses in each period are relative to Baseline-A, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation until first dosing date in Period A. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
60.83 percentage of participants
Interval 52.1 to 69.57
70.37 percentage of participants
Interval 53.15 to 87.59
73.81 percentage of participants
Interval 60.51 to 87.11
34.67 percentage of participants
Interval 23.9 to 45.44
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
68.33 percentage of participants
Interval 60.01 to 76.66
62.96 percentage of participants
Interval 44.75 to 81.18
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 52.41 to 80.92
48.00 percentage of participants
Interval 36.69 to 59.31
Percentage of Participants With a PASI75 Response During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
61.67 percentage of participants
Interval 52.97 to 70.37
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 36.81 to 74.3
69.05 percentage of participants
Interval 55.07 to 83.03
45.33 percentage of participants
Interval 34.07 to 56.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5-point scale where 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
14.20 percentage of participants
Interval 10.44 to 17.96
37.91 percentage of participants
Interval 32.72 to 43.11
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
30.51 percentage of participants
Interval 25.55 to 35.47
54.03 percentage of participants
Interval 48.69 to 59.37
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
37.16 percentage of participants
Interval 31.95 to 42.37
58.81 percentage of participants
Interval 53.54 to 64.08
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
37.16 percentage of participants
Interval 31.95 to 42.37
55.22 percentage of participants
Interval 49.9 to 60.55

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5-point scale where 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of two-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 4
48.12 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
77.42 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 38.3
77.78 percentage of participants
Interval 14.84 to 44.48
57.32 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 8
33.08 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
74.19 percentage of participants
Interval 22.81 to 59.73
82.22 percentage of participants
Interval 35.4 to 62.88
32.93 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 12
26.32 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
70.97 percentage of participants
Interval 24.21 to 61.62
66.67 percentage of participants
Interval 24.68 to 56.09
28.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During Double-Blind Withdrawal Treatment (Period B)
Week 16
21.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
58.06 percentage of participants
Interval 10.11 to 49.92
62.22 percentage of participants
Interval 25.4 to 56.94
28.05 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

PGA response was defined as 0 (clear) or 1 (almost clear) on a 5-point scale where 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. 95% confidence interval is constructed using the normal approximation to the binomial distribution of one-sample proportion.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
59.17 percentage of participants
Interval 50.37 to 67.96
62.96 percentage of participants
Interval 44.75 to 81.18
61.90 percentage of participants
Interval 47.22 to 76.59
40.00 percentage of participants
Interval 28.91 to 51.09
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
55.00 percentage of participants
Interval 46.1 to 63.9
55.56 percentage of participants
Interval 36.81 to 74.3
59.52 percentage of participants
Interval 44.68 to 74.37
49.33 percentage of participants
Interval 38.02 to 60.65
Percentage of Participants With PGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
63.33 percentage of participants
Interval 54.71 to 71.96
62.96 percentage of participants
Interval 44.75 to 81.18
54.76 percentage of participants
Interval 39.71 to 69.81
49.33 percentage of participants
Interval 38.02 to 60.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals the number of participants with an observation.

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic Body Surface Area (BSA) During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
22.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
18.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic Body Surface Area (BSA) During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline (n=331,335)
27.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
27.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic Body Surface Area (BSA) During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,323)
17.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
12.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic Body Surface Area (BSA) During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=311,306)
13.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
8.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic Body Surface Area (BSA) During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=277,279)
12.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
6.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
2.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
1.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.3
3.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
6.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
1.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
1.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
8.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.2
2.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
7.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.2
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
6.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
2.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
7.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.0
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
6.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
2.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
2.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
6.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
12.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.2
2.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
11.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.3
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
7.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
2.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
3.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
10.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.7
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
2.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.0
9.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.6
Mean Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
4.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
2.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
3.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.3
7.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals number of participants with an observation

Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=326 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
-5.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
-9.0 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,323)
-10.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
-14.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=311,306)
-14.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
-18.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=277,279)
-15.2 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
-19.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=128 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
4.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.6
0.0 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
-0.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.3
2.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
6.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
0.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
-0.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.4
4.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
4.7 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
0.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
0.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.6
4.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.0
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
4.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
0.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
0.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7
3.7 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

Baseline was defined as the last observation until first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-5.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
0.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.5
0.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
-2.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.0
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-4.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
-0.2 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.3
0.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.9
-1.0 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.0
Mean Change From Baseline in Total Percent of Psoriatic BSA During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-6.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.8
0.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.6
0.6 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.2
-4.0 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals number of participants with an observation

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Baseline (n=331,335)
28.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.25
25.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.17
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
20.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.20
14.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
14.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.06
9.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.96
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,306)
12.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
7.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.88
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
12.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.17
6.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.89
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
26.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
26.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.06
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
21.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
17.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.91
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
17.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
11.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.83
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper Limbs, Week 16 (n=311,306)
13.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
8.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.70
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
12.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
6.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.65
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Baseline (n=331,335)
26.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.23
25.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.18
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
20.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.16
17.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
16.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.11
11.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.94
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,306)
13.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
8.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
12.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
6.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.85
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
28.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.14
28.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
24.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.13
20.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.99
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
18.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
13.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.93
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,306)
13.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
7.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.79
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
11.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.90
6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
2.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.70
4.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.53
0.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.34
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.79
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
12.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.59
4.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.44
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.44
11.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.99
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
15.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.97
4.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.80
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.46
13.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.34
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
11.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.03
3.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.00
2.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.72
13.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.96
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
9.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.76
3.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.19
2.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.80
9.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.11
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
3.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.50
2.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.42
3.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.55
5.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.00
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
7.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.97
2.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.48
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.55
7.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.19
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
8.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.25
2.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.58
3.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.68
8.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.41
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
6.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.00
3.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.59
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.62
8.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.38
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
6.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.28
3.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.70
3.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.66
6.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.13
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
2.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.59
1.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.52
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.53
3.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.88
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
6.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
1.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.53
1.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.53
5.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.00
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
7.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.29
1.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.56
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.37
7.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.73
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
5.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
1.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.61
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.39
4.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.67
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
5.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.05
2.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.74
1.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.91
4.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.90
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
2.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.49
1.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.37
2.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.44
3.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
5.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.90
1.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.33
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.38
4.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.75
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
7.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.30
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.36
1.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.53
6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.07
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
5.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
1.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.35
2.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.80
7.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.24
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
5.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.78
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.42
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.03
6.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.30

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

Assessment of BSA with psoriasis performed separately for 4 body regions: head and neck, upper limbs, trunk (including axillae and groin), and lower limbs (including buttocks). The %surface area with psoriasis was estimated by means of the handprint method, where the full palmar hand of the participant (fully extended palm, fingers and thumb together) represented approximately 1% of the total BSA. The number of handprints of psoriatic skin in a body region was used to determine the extent (%) to which a body region was involved with psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
18.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.95
4.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.23
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.61
18.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.62
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
7.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
3.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.33
2.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.76
12.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.09
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
6.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
3.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.25
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.08
9.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.01
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.31
4.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.50
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.46
9.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.97
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
13.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.40
3.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.72
3.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.63
12.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.73
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
8.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.23
3.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.82
4.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.90
11.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.92
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
6.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.97
4.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.99
3.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
8.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.83
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
5.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
4.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
4.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.24
7.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.33
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
11.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.35
2.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.77
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.85
10.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.73
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
6.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.10
2.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.68
3.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.72
11.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.33
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
5.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.15
2.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.73
3.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.76
10.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.16
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
4.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.16
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.96
4.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.34
7.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.54
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
10.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.27
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.44
3.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.15
9.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.21
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
6.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.06
1.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.27
2.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
9.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.81
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
5.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
1.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.38
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.10
8.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.73
Mean Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
3.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.64
1.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.45
3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.33
6.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.26

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals number of participants with an observation

Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=326 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-7.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.71
-11.7 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.86
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-13.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
-16.0 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,306)
-15.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.13
-17.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.07
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-14.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.21
-18.6 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-4.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.58
-8.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.80
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-9.7 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.77
-14.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,306)
-13.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.89
-17.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.03
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-14.2 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
-18.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.01
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-5.5 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.67
-8.6 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.86
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-9.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.87
-13.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.03
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,306)
-12.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
-16.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.17
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-13.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
-17.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-4.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.57
-8.6 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.85
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-10.4 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.82
-14.8 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.99
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,306)
-15.9 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
-20.3 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.10
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-17.1 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.09
-21.2 percent change in psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=128 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
9.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.53
-0.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.44
8.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.49
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
12.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.86
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.41
0.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.50
10.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.87
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
10.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.95
-0.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.58
1.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.69
11.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.71
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
8.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.66
-0.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.42
1.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.75
7.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.70
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
4.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.76
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.33
-0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.29
2.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.14
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
6.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.96
0.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.47
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.54
4.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.99
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
4.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.86
1.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.51
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.50
4.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.14
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
4.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.95
1.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.55
0.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.46
2.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.75
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.74
0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.50
0.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.51
1.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.17
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
5.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.97
0.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.54
-0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.56
4.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.34
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
3.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.75
0.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.68
-0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.63
2.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.75
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
3.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.71
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.73
0.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.09
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.81
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
3.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.68
-0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.42
-0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.39
1.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
5.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.98
0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.43
-0.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.66
2.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.83
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
3.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.84
-0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.47
0.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.84
4.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.19
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
3.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.76
0.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.51
0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.86
3.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.94

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

Baseline defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-10.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.53
-0.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.92
0.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.81
-6.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.40
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-10.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.51
0.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.07
1.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.91
-8.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.68
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-11.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.84
0.4 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.41
-0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.77
-8.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.04
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-4.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.94
0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.26
0.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.69
-1.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.90
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-6.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.11
0.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.50
0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.53
-3.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.85
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-7.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.20
0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.97
1.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.99
-5.0 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.15
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-4.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.88
-0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.20
1.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.87
0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.12
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-4.8 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.88
0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.43
1.5 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.92
-1.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.04
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-5.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.02
0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.82
2.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 2.46
-4.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.44
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-3.6 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.97
-0.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.36
-1.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.93
-0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.44
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-4.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.85
-0.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.52
-0.7 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.78
-1.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.50
Mean Change From Baseline in Percent of Psoriatic BSA by Body Region During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-6.1 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.93
0.2 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 0.60
-0.9 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.14
-2.3 percent psoriatic BSA
Standard Error 1.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline (n=331,335)
21.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
20.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
13.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
10.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,323)
10.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=311,307)
8.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=277,279)
7.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
5.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
6.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
5.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
6.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
9.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
9.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
Mean PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
7.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
6.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
Mean PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=326 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
-7.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-10.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Change From Baseline-A in PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,323)
-11.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-14.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-A in PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=311,307)
-13.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
-15.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-A in PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=277,279)
-13.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
-16.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-B defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=128 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-B in PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean Change From Baseline-B in PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
5.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-B in PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
4.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-B in PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
4.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-C defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-4.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
-2.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-C in PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-5.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-C in PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-5.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
-4.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lwer limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Baseline (n=331,335)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=326 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=326,331)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Trunk, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=322,323)
-1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 24 (n=277,279)
-1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=311,307)
-1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=128 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

Combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score; range=0(no disease)-72(maximal disease). Body divided into 4 sections=head, upper/lower limbs, trunk; each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI. For each section percent area of skin involved was estimated:0(0%)-6(90-100%) and severity estimated by clinical signs of erythema, induration, scaling; ranged 0-4: 0=none, 1=slight, 2=moderate, 3=marked, 4=very marked. Final PASI=sum of severity parameters for each section\*area score\*weighing factor (head=0.1, upper limbs=0.2, trunk=0.3, lower limbs=0.4). PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1; higher scores represent greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 02
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 01
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Head/Neck, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Induration Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Upper limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Head/Neck, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Trunk, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Erythema Lower limbs, Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
-1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline in PASI Component Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Scaling Lower limbs, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; NRI

PASI quantifies the severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA) affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of the body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During Period A
Week 4
28.70 percentage of participants
Interval 23.83 to 33.57
54.63 percentage of participants
Interval 49.3 to 59.96
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During Period A
Week 8
55.29 percentage of participants
Interval 49.93 to 60.64
75.52 percentage of participants
Interval 70.92 to 80.13
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During Period A
Week 16
65.26 percentage of participants
Interval 60.13 to 70.39
79.40 percentage of participants
Interval 75.07 to 83.73
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During Period A
Week 24
59.52 percentage of participants
Interval 54.23 to 64.8
73.13 percentage of participants
Interval 68.39 to 77.88

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PASI quantifies the severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA) affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of the body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During Period A
Week 8
8.76 percentage of participants
Interval 5.72 to 11.81
24.78 percentage of participants
Interval 20.15 to 29.4
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During Period A
Week 16
18.73 percentage of participants
Interval 14.53 to 22.93
36.72 percentage of participants
Interval 31.55 to 41.88
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During Period A
Week 4
1.21 percentage of participants
Interval 0.03 to 2.39
6.27 percentage of participants
Interval 3.67 to 8.86
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During Period A
Week 24
20.24 percentage of participants
Interval 15.91 to 24.57
37.31 percentage of participants
Interval 32.13 to 42.49

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PASI quantifies the severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and the percent of BSA) affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of the body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0 to 72.0, with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During Period A
Week 4
0.91 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.93
2.09 percentage of participants
Interval 0.56 to 3.62
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During Period A
Week 24
8.16 percentage of participants
Interval 5.21 to 11.11
17.31 percentage of participants
Interval 13.26 to 21.37
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During Period A
Week 8
2.72 percentage of participants
Interval 0.97 to 4.47
7.46 percentage of participants
Interval 4.65 to 10.28
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During Period A
Week 16
7.25 percentage of participants
Interval 4.46 to 10.04
15.82 percentage of participants
Interval 11.91 to 19.73

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
49.17 percentage of participants
Interval 40.22 to 58.11
96.30 percentage of participants
Interval 89.17 to 100.0
92.86 percentage of participants
Interval 85.07 to 100.0
42.67 percentage of participants
Interval 31.47 to 53.86
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
84.17 percentage of participants
Interval 77.64 to 90.7
100.00 percentage of participants
Interval 100.0 to 100.0
92.86 percentage of participants
Interval 85.07 to 100.0
69.33 percentage of participants
Interval 58.9 to 79.77
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
89.17 percentage of participants
Interval 83.61 to 94.73
92.59 percentage of participants
Interval 82.71 to 100.0
95.24 percentage of participants
Interval 88.8 to 100.0
81.33 percentage of participants
Interval 72.52 to 90.15
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 50% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI50) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
79.17 percentage of participants
Interval 71.9 to 86.43
85.19 percentage of participants
Interval 71.79 to 98.58
85.71 percentage of participants
Interval 75.13 to 96.3
82.67 percentage of participants
Interval 74.1 to 91.23

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
15.83 percentage of participants
Interval 9.3 to 22.36
48.15 percentage of participants
Interval 29.3 to 66.99
45.24 percentage of participants
Interval 30.19 to 60.29
12.00 percentage of participants
Interval 4.65 to 19.35
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
35.00 percentage of participants
Interval 26.47 to 43.53
48.15 percentage of participants
Interval 29.3 to 66.99
47.62 percentage of participants
Interval 32.51 to 62.72
17.33 percentage of participants
Interval 8.77 to 25.9
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
44.17 percentage of participants
Interval 35.28 to 53.05
33.33 percentage of participants
Interval 15.55 to 51.11
45.24 percentage of participants
Interval 30.19 to 60.29
21.33 percentage of participants
Interval 12.06 to 30.6
Percentage of Participants Achieving at Least a 90% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI90) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
42.50 percentage of participants
Interval 33.66 to 51.34
48.15 percentage of participants
Interval 29.3 to 66.99
47.62 percentage of participants
Interval 32.51 to 62.72
21.33 percentage of participants
Interval 12.06 to 30.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
19.17 percentage of participants
Interval 12.12 to 26.21
18.52 percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 33.17
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 9.02 to 33.84
13.33 percentage of participants
Interval 5.64 to 21.03
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
5.00 percentage of participants
Interval 1.1 to 8.9
18.52 percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 33.17
23.81 percentage of participants
Interval 10.93 to 36.69
5.33 percentage of participants
Interval 0.25 to 10.42
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
15.00 percentage of participants
Interval 8.61 to 21.39
18.52 percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 33.17
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 9.02 to 33.84
9.33 percentage of participants
Interval 2.75 to 15.92
Percentage of Participants Achieving 100% Reduction in PASI Relative to Baseline-A (PASI100) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
20.83 percentage of participants
Interval 13.57 to 28.1
14.81 percentage of participants
Interval 1.42 to 28.21
26.19 percentage of participants
Interval 12.89 to 39.49
10.67 percentage of participants
Interval 3.68 to 17.65

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

PASI quantifies the severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by the investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head and neck, upper limbs, trunk, and lower limbs), with adjustment for the percent of BSA involved for each body region and for the proportion of the body region to the whole body. The PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=329 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
0.92 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.96
0.60 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.44
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,323)
0.62 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.48
0.62 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.47
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=311,307)
0.96 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.05
0.98 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.08
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=277,279)
1.08 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 2.3
0.36 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 1.06
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Overall (n=329,333)
2.13 percentage of participants
Interval 0.57 to 3.69
2.10 percentage of participants
Interval 0.56 to 3.64

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=132 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,128)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,70,43,104)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,53,42,84)
1.19 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval -3.51 to 1.13
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Overall (n=31,82,45,132)
0.76 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

PASI quantifies severity of psoriasis based on both lesion severity and percent of BSA affected. PASI is a composite score by investigator of degree of erythema, induration, and scaling (scored separately) for each of 4 body regions (head/neck, upper limbs, trunk, lower limbs), with adjustment for percent of BSA involved for each body region and for proportion of body region to the whole body. PASI score can vary in increments of 0.1 and range from 0.0-72.0; higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Baseline-A defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,101)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
2.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 7.52
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With a PASI Score ≥125% of the Baseline-A PASI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Overall (n=27,75,42,120)
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
2.38 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 6.99
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline (n=331,335)
6.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
6.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,321)
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=310,307)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Itch Severity Item (ISI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=274,278)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,69,43,104)
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=29,53,41,84)
3.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
4.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
4.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
5.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,100)
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends. Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=326 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in ISI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,331)
-3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-4.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline-A in ISI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=322,321)
-3.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-5.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline-A in ISI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=310,307)
-3.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-5.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
Mean Change From Baseline-A in ISI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=274,278)
-3.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-5.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends. Baseline-B defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=127 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-B in ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,45,38,70)
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Change From Baseline-B in ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Change From Baseline-B in ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,69,43,104)
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
-0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Change From Baseline-B in ISI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=29,53,41,84)
3.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,72,41,118)
-3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Change From Baseline-C in ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
-2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Change From Baseline-C in ISI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=23,67,39,100)
-3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
-2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with a Baseline-A ISI greater than (\>) 0, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=325 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=327 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
20.00 percentage of participants
Interval 15.65 to 24.35
37.92 percentage of participants
Interval 32.66 to 43.18
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
19.38 percentage of participants
Interval 15.09 to 23.68
37.31 percentage of participants
Interval 32.07 to 42.55
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
12.92 percentage of participants
Interval 9.28 to 16.57
25.69 percentage of participants
Interval 20.95 to 30.42
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
16.92 percentage of participants
Interval 12.85 to 21.0
41.28 percentage of participants
Interval 35.95 to 46.62

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with a Baseline-C ISI greater than (\>) 0, where Baseline-C is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=104 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=18 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=71 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
23.08 percentage of participants
Interval 14.98 to 31.17
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
7.41 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 17.29
11.27 percentage of participants
Interval 3.91 to 18.62
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
38.46 percentage of participants
Interval 29.11 to 47.81
5.56 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 16.14
18.52 percentage of participants
Interval 3.87 to 33.17
18.31 percentage of participants
Interval 9.31 to 27.31
Percentage of Participants With ISI Score of 0 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
28.85 percentage of participants
Interval 20.14 to 37.55
11.11 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 25.63
25.93 percentage of participants
Interval 9.4 to 42.46
15.49 percentage of participants
Interval 7.08 to 23.91

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with a Baseline-A ISI \>1, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
27.62 percentage of participants
Interval 22.68 to 32.56
46.03 percentage of participants
Interval 40.53 to 51.54
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
34.29 percentage of participants
Interval 29.04 to 39.53
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 54.59 to 65.41
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
34.92 percentage of participants
Interval 29.66 to 40.19
60.00 percentage of participants
Interval 54.59 to 65.41
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
31.11 percentage of participants
Interval 26.0 to 36.22
55.24 percentage of participants
Interval 49.75 to 60.73

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with a Baseline-C ISI \>1, where Baseline-C is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
55.79 percentage of participants
Interval 45.8 to 65.78
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
33.87 percentage of participants
Interval 22.09 to 45.65
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
41.05 percentage of participants
Interval 31.16 to 50.94
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 32.62
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 32.62
22.58 percentage of participants
Interval 12.17 to 32.99
Percentage of Participants Achieving an ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
50.53 percentage of participants
Interval 40.47 to 60.58
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
35.71 percentage of participants
Interval 10.61 to 60.81
41.94 percentage of participants
Interval 29.65 to 54.22

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with a Baseline-A ISI ≥2, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
81.59 percentage of participants
Interval 77.31 to 85.87
88.89 percentage of participants
Interval 85.42 to 92.36
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
73.97 percentage of participants
Interval 69.12 to 78.81
84.76 percentage of participants
Interval 80.79 to 88.73
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
80.32 percentage of participants
Interval 75.93 to 84.71
87.94 percentage of participants
Interval 84.34 to 91.53
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
65.71 percentage of participants
Interval 60.47 to 70.96
74.92 percentage of participants
Interval 70.13 to 79.71

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with a Baseline-C ISI ≥2, where Baseline-C is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
78.95 percentage of participants
Interval 70.75 to 87.15
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 4.91 to 52.24
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 4.91 to 52.24
64.52 percentage of participants
Interval 52.61 to 76.43
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
80.00 percentage of participants
Interval 71.96 to 88.04
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 4.91 to 52.24
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 32.62
61.29 percentage of participants
Interval 49.17 to 73.41
Percentage of Participants Achieving ISI ≥2-Point Reduction During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
69.47 percentage of participants
Interval 60.21 to 78.73
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
28.57 percentage of participants
Interval 4.91 to 52.24
62.90 percentage of participants
Interval 50.88 to 74.93

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A ISI \>1, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 4
27.8 percentage of participants
Interval 23.2 to 33.2
47.2 percentage of participants
Interval 41.8 to 52.9
ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 8
41.2 percentage of participants
Interval 36.0 to 46.9
67.8 percentage of participants
Interval 62.5 to 72.9
ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 16
52.4 percentage of participants
Interval 46.8 to 58.2
78.6 percentage of participants
Interval 73.7 to 83.1
ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 24
72.4 percentage of participants
Interval 55.1 to 87.3
83.4 percentage of participants
Interval 77.9 to 88.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A ISI \>1, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=313 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=313 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to ISI Score of ≤1 During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
16.4 weeks
Interval 16.1 to 24.6
8.0 weeks
Interval 5.1 to 8.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with a Baseline-C ISI \>1, where Baseline-C is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 16
90.3 percentage of participants
Interval 69.9 to 98.9
40.5 percentage of participants
Interval 18.3 to 73.5
49.5 percentage of participants
Interval 21.8 to 85.0
79.1 percentage of participants
Interval 46.8 to 98.0
ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 4
41.3 percentage of participants
Interval 32.1 to 51.9
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 46.1
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 46.1
22.8 percentage of participants
Interval 14.2 to 35.5
ISI Score of ≤1 During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 8
59.8 percentage of participants
Interval 50.0 to 69.7
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 11.8 to 59.4
21.4 percentage of participants
Interval 7.5 to 52.8
37.9 percentage of participants
Interval 27.0 to 51.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C ISI \>1, where Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to ISI Score of ≤1 During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
8.3 weeks
Interval 6.0 to 12.4
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
16.1 weeks
Interval 10.1 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A ISI ≥2, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=315 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 4
82.2 percentage of participants
Interval 77.8 to 86.2
90.3 percentage of participants
Interval 86.7 to 93.3
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 8
89.5 percentage of participants
Interval 85.8 to 92.6
96.5 percentage of participants
Interval 94.0 to 98.2
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 16
93.6 percentage of participants
Interval 90.5 to 96.0
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.5 to 99.1
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A) - Percentage of Participants With a Response
Week 24
96.2 percentage of participants
Interval 92.5 to 98.4
97.8 percentage of participants
Interval 95.5 to 99.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A ISI ≥2, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=313 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=313 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
4.1 weeks
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
4.1 weeks
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C ISI ≥2, where Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participant With a Response
Week 16
91.0 percentage of participants
Interval 83.6 to 95.9
57.1 percentage of participants
Interval 25.6 to 91.1
36.5 percentage of participants
Interval 17.0 to 66.9
100.0 percentage of participants
95% confidence interval could not be estimated due to censoring.
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participant With a Response
Week 4
80.0 percentage of participants
Interval 71.5 to 87.3
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 11.8 to 59.4
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 3.8 to 46.1
61.8 percentage of participants
Interval 49.9 to 73.8
ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) - Percentage of Participant With a Response
Week 8
86.7 percentage of participants
Interval 78.9 to 92.6
35.7 percentage of participants
Interval 16.7 to 65.7
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 11.8 to 59.4
75.1 percentage of participants
Interval 63.8 to 85.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C ISI \>1, where Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The severity of itch (pruritus) due to psoriasis was assessed using the ISI, a single item, horizontal numeric rating scale. Participants were asked to rate "your worst itching due to psoriasis over the past 24 hours" on a numeric rating scale anchored by the terms "No itching" (0) and "Worst possible itching" (10) at the ends.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=95 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=62 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to ISI Reduction (2-point Decrease in ISI Score) During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
4.3 weeks
Interval 4.1 to 4.4
16.6 weeks
Interval 4.4 to
95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
4.9 weeks
Interval 4.3 to 7.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline (n=330,333)
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
12.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=326,330)
6.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
4.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=321,319)
5.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=310,303)
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=273,277)
5.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
2.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
8.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
3.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
7.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
Mean DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
4.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.3
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
3.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
6.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
5.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
Mean DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
5.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
3.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
4.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
6.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
3.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
5.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=325 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=328 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4 (n=325,328)
-5.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
-7.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8 (n=320,317)
-7.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
-9.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16 (n=309,301)
-7.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-9.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Score During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 (n=272,275)
-7.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-9.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-B defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=127 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
5.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
4.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
4.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
3.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
4.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
3.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
5.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.3
3.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals number of participants with an observation

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.2
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-5.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
-3.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Score During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-6.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
-3.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=326,330)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 24 (n=271,276)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=326,330)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Baseline (n=330,333)
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=326,330)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=321,320)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=310,303)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 24 (n=273,277)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Baseline (n=331,332)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=321,318)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=310,302)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Baseline (n=331,333)
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
3.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=326,330)
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=321,319)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 16 (n=310,303)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 24 (n=273,277)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Baseline (n=331,333)
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=326,330)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=321,320)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=310,303)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 24 (n=272,277)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Baseline (n=330,333)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=321,319)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 16 (n=309,303)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 24 (n=273,277)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Baseline (n=331,332)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=326,330)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=321,320)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=310,303)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 24 (n=272,277)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.30
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,126)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,103)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
2.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
2.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
2.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
2.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.31
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=30,82,42,127)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=28,44,37,68)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Baseline (n=31,82,45,133)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3).

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.33
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=22,65,39,101)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.32
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
2.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.36
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.27
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=27,74,41,119)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.24
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 16 (n =22,66,39,101)
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Baseline (n=27,75,42,120)
0.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
0.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.04

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=325 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=328 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=310,300)
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=310,300)
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=325,328)
-1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=320,318)
-1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=309,301)
-1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-2.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Daily Activities, Week 24 (n=272,275)
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-2.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=326,327)
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=321,316)
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Personal Relationships, Week 24 (n=271,274)
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=326,328)
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
-2.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=321,317)
-2.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 18 (n=310,301)
-2.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-2.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 24 (n=273,275)
-2.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-2.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=326,328)
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=310,301)
-1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=321,318)
-1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Leisure, Week 24 (n=272,275)
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=325,328)
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=320,317)
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 16 (n=308,301)
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Work and School, Week 24 (n=272,275)
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=326,327)
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=321,317)
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-A in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Treatment, Week 24 (n=272,274)
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-B defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=127 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=30 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=43 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,126)
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.25
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=30,82,42,127)
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.16
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.00
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.02
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.00
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=30,82,43,127)
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,104)
1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=28,44,38,68)
1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.22
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=30,68,43,103)
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=28,44,37,68)
0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Mean Change From Baseline-B in DLQI Subscale Scores During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Work and School, Week 12 (n=28,52,41,83)
0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.04
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The DLQI can be analyzed under 6 subscales by combining questions and is categorized as follows: symptoms and feelings (maximum score=6); daily activities (maximum score=6); leisure (maximum score=6); work and school (maximum score=3); personal relationships (maximum score=6); and treatment (maximum score=3). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=119 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=74 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.05
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Personal Relationships, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Symptoms and Feelings, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.19
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.21
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 4 (n=27,74,41,119)
-0.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.14
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.15
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.13
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Leisure, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.28
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.12
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.17
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.03
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.06
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Work and School, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 4 (n=27,74,42,119)
-0.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 16 (n=22,66,39,101)
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.10
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.11
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Daily Activities, Week 16 (n=22,65,39,101)
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.23
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.18
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.20
Mean Change From Baseline-C in DLQI Subscale Scores During the CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Treatment, Week 8 (n=26,71,41,118)
-0.07 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.07
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.09
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.08

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with a Baseline-A DLQI ≥5, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A. n=participants with an observation.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=284 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=281 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
59.86 percentage of participants
Interval 54.16 to 65.56
75.44 percentage of participants
Interval 70.41 to 80.48
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
70.42 percentage of participants
Interval 65.11 to 75.73
80.78 percentage of participants
Interval 76.18 to 85.39
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
70.77 percentage of participants
Interval 65.49 to 76.06
79.00 percentage of participants
Interval 74.24 to 83.77
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
59.86 percentage of participants
Interval 54.16 to 65.56
72.95 percentage of participants
Interval 67.76 to 78.15

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B participants with Baseline-B DLQI ≥5.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=9 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=9 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=3 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=12 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-B Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
33.33 percentage of participants
16.67 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-B Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
11.11 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-B Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12
11.11 percentage of participants
11.11 percentage of participants
66.67 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-B Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
11.11 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
33.33 percentage of participants
8.33 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C DLQI ≥5

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=76 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=40 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-C Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
65.79 percentage of participants
Interval 55.12 to 76.46
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
47.50 percentage of participants
Interval 32.02 to 62.98
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-C Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
77.63 percentage of participants
Interval 68.26 to 87.0
12.50 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 35.42
25.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 55.01
55.00 percentage of participants
Interval 39.58 to 70.42
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≥5 Point Reduction From Baseline-C Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
64.47 percentage of participants
Interval 53.71 to 75.23
12.50 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 35.42
12.50 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 35.42
47.50 percentage of participants
Interval 32.02 to 62.98

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with a Baseline-A DLQI ≤1, where Baseline-A is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=320 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=320 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
13.44 percentage of participants
Interval 9.7 to 17.17
26.88 percentage of participants
Interval 22.02 to 31.73
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
25.94 percentage of participants
Interval 21.14 to 30.74
41.88 percentage of participants
Interval 36.47 to 47.28
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
30.94 percentage of participants
Interval 25.87 to 36.0
53.13 percentage of participants
Interval 47.66 to 58.59
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
30.63 percentage of participants
Interval 25.57 to 35.68
50.00 percentage of participants
Interval 44.52 to 55.48

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B participants with Baseline-B DLQI \>1 where Baseline-B defined as last observation up to first dosing date in Period B.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=31 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=13 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=12 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=25 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4
12.90 percentage of participants
7.69 percentage of participants
41.67 percentage of participants
4.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8
9.68 percentage of participants
7.69 percentage of participants
33.33 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12
9.68 percentage of participants
7.69 percentage of participants
8.33 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16
9.68 percentage of participants
7.69 percentage of participants
16.67 percentage of participants
0.00 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with a Baseline-C DLQI \>1, where Baseline-C is defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=93 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=12 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=16 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=61 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.00 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
24.73 percentage of participants
Interval 15.96 to 33.5
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 37.75
37.50 percentage of participants
Interval 13.78 to 61.22
24.59 percentage of participants
Interval 13.78 to 35.4
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
40.86 percentage of participants
Interval 30.87 to 50.85
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 37.75
31.25 percentage of participants
Interval 8.54 to 53.96
26.23 percentage of participants
Interval 15.19 to 37.27
Percentage of Participants Achieving DLQI ≤1 Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
40.86 percentage of participants
Interval 30.87 to 50.85
16.67 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 37.75
37.50 percentage of participants
Interval 13.78 to 61.22
29.51 percentage of participants
Interval 18.06 to 40.95

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). Severity is measured using the following categories of scores: 0-1=no effect on patients' lives; 2-5=small effect; 6-10=moderate effect; 11-20=very large effect; 21-30=extremely large effect.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=333 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Extremely large effect (21-30;n=330,333)
15.8 percentage of participants
15.8
15.9 percentage of participants
15.9
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, No effect (0-1) (n=326,330)
15.6 percentage of participants
15.6
29.4 percentage of participants
29.4
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Small effect (2-5;n=326,330)
35.9 percentage of participants
35.9
37.3 percentage of participants
37.3
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Moderate effect (6-10;n=326,330)
25.8 percentage of participants
25.8
22.1 percentage of participants
22.1
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Very large effect (11-20;n=326,330)
18.7 percentage of participants
18.7
9.7 percentage of participants
9.7
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Extremely large effect (21-30;n=326,330)
4.0 percentage of participants
4.0
1.5 percentage of participants
1.5
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, No effect (0-1) (n=321,319)
28.0 percentage of participants
28.0
45.5 percentage of participants
45.5
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Small effect (2-5;n=321,319)
34.0 percentage of participants
34.0
34.8 percentage of participants
34.8
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Very large effect (11-20;n=321,319)
11.8 percentage of participants
11.8
5.0 percentage of participants
5.0
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Extremely large effect (21-30;n=321,319)
2.5 percentage of participants
2.5
2.2 percentage of participants
2.2
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, No effect (0-1) (n=310,303)
34.2 percentage of participants
34.2
59.4 percentage of participants
59.4
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Moderate effect (6-10;n=310,303)
18.4 percentage of participants
18.4
10.6 percentage of participants
10.6
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Very large effect (11-20;n=310,303)
11.0 percentage of participants
11.0
6.3 percentage of participants
6.3
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Extremely large effect (21-30;n=310,303)
1.9 percentage of participants
1.9
1.7 percentage of participants
1.7
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Very large effect (11-20;n=273,277)
12.8 percentage of participants
12.8
3.2 percentage of participants
.32
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Extremely large effect (21-30;n=273,277)
2.9 percentage of participants
2.9
1.8 percentage of participants
1.8
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, No effect (0-1) (n=330,333)
3.0 percentage of participants
3.0
3.9 percentage of participants
3.9
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Small effect (2-5;n=330,333)
15.2 percentage of participants
15.2
17.1 percentage of participants
17.1
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Moderate effect (6-10;n=330,333)
27.0 percentage of participants
27.0
21.3 percentage of participants
21.3
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Very large effect (11-20;n=330,333)
39.1 percentage of participants
39.1
41.7 percentage of participants
41.7
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Moderate effect (6-10;n=321,319)
23.7 percentage of participants
23.7
12.5 percentage of participants
12.5
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Small effect (2-5;n=310,303)
34.5 percentage of participants
34.5
22.1 percentage of participants
22.1
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, No effect (0-1) (n=273,277)
38.1 percentage of participants
38.1
61.0 percentage of participants
61.0
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Small effect (2-5;n=273,277)
27.1 percentage of participants
27.1
24.9 percentage of participants
24.9
Percentage of Participants by DLQI Severity Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Moderate effect (6-10;n=273,277)
19.0 percentage of participants
19.0
9.0 percentage of participants
9.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A DLQI ≥5, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=283 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=279 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
60.1 percentage of participants
Interval 54.5 to 65.9
76.6 percentage of participants
Interval 71.5 to 81.4
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
85.7 percentage of participants
Interval 81.3 to 89.6
94.9 percentage of participants
Interval 91.6 to 97.2
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
91.9 percentage of participants
Interval 83.2 to 97.1
96.1 percentage of participants
Interval 92.9 to 98.1
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
77.4 percentage of participants
Interval 72.4 to 82.2
88.7 percentage of participants
Interval 84.6 to 92.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A participants with Baseline-A DLQI ≥5, where Baseline-A was defined as the last observation before the first dosing date in Period A.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=283 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=279 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
4.4 weeks
Interval 4.3 to 4.7
4.1 weeks
Interval 4.1 to 4.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C DLQI ≥5, where Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The DLQI questions are rated by the participant as 0 (not at all/not relevant) to 3 (very much) with a total score range of 0 (best) to 30 (worst); higher scores indicate poor quality of life. The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=76 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=40 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4
65.8 percentage of participants
Interval 55.2 to 76.2
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
0.0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 0.0
47.5 percentage of participants
Interval 33.5 to 63.9
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8
80.9 percentage of participants
Interval 71.3 to 88.9
12.5 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 61.3
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 6.9 to 68.5
72.5 percentage of participants
Interval 58.3 to 85.1
Percentage of Participants With DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16
88.4 percentage of participants
Interval 79.1 to 94.8
12.5 percentage of participants
Interval 1.9 to 61.3
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 6.9 to 68.5
81.3 percentage of participants
Interval 67.3 to 91.9

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C participants with Baseline-C DLQI ≥5, where Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

The DLQI is a general dermatology questionnaire that consists of 10 items that assess health related quality of life (daily activities, personal relationships, symptoms and feelings, leisure, work and school, and treatment). The minimally important difference for the DLQI has been estimated as a 2 to 5 point change from baseline.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=76 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=8 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=40 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Median Time to DLQI ≥5-Point Reduction From Baseline-A Response During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
4.4 weeks
Interval 4.3 to 5.7
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
NA weeks
Median and 95% confidence interval cannot be estimated due to \<50% of events occurring and/or censoring issue.
8.1 weeks
Interval 4.7 to 8.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score\*10) plus 50. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and standard deviations (SDs) of 10, in the general population. In norm-based scoring, each scale is scored to have same average (50)/SD (10). With this method anytime a scale score is below 50, health status is below average, and each point is one-tenth of a SD. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=334 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Physical Health Score (n=330,334)
48.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
47.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Mental Health Score (n=330,334)
45.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
46.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Physical Health Score (n=273,276)
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
52.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Short-Form 36 (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS) Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Mental Health Score (n=273,276)
48.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score\*10) plus 50. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and SDs of 10, in the general population. In norm-based scoring, each scale is scored to have same average (50)/SD (10). With this method anytime a scale score is below 50, health status is below average, and each point is one-tenth of a SD. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Physical Health Score (n=27,75,42,120)
49.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
51.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
53.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
49.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Physical Health Score (n=22,65,34,98)
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
52.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.4
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Mental Health Score (n=22,65,34,98)
53.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
50.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
50.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
Mean SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Mental Health Score (n=27,75,42,120)
48.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
51.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
50.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
51.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score\*10) plus 50. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and SDs of 10, in the general population. In norm-based scoring, each scale is scored to have same average (50)/SD (10). With this method anytime a scale score is below 50, health status is below average, and each point is one-tenth of a SD. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=273 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=275 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Physical Health Score
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
5.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Mental Health Score
3.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). A PCS score and MCS score are based on a normalized sum of the 8 scale scores; PCS/MCS summary concept score = (raw score\*10) plus 50. Linear transformations were performed to transform scores to a mean of 50 and SDs of 10, in the general population. In norm-based scoring, each scale is scored to have same average (50)/SD (10). With this method anytime a scale score is below 50, health status is below average, and each point is one-tenth of a SD. Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=98 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=22 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=34 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=65 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Physical Health Score
1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
-0.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 PCS and MCS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Mental Health Score
4.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Role Physical (n=273,276)
50.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
53.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Bodily Pain (n=273,276)
50.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
53.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 General Health (n=273,276)
49.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Physical Functioning (n=331,335)
48.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
48.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Physical Functioning (n=273,276)
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Role Physical (n=331,335)
47.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
47.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Bodily Pain (n=331,334)
44.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
44.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline General Health (n=330,335)
48.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
48.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Vitality (n=331,334)
49.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
49.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Vitality (n=273,276)
51.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
54.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Social Functioning (n=331,334)
44.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
44.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Social Functioning (n=273,276)
48.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
51.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Role Emotional (n=331,335)
45.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
45.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Role Emotional (n=273,276)
49.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Mental Health (n=331,334)
45.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
46.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Mental Health (n=273,276)
48.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
51.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Health Transition Score (n=331,334)
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24 Health Transition Score (n=272, 276)
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Physical Functioning (n=27,75,42,120)
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.3
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Role Physical (n=27,75,42,120)
49.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
53.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Bodily Pain (n=27,75,42,120)
47.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
52.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
54.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
48.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Bodily Pain (n=22,65,34,98)
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
53.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.1
53.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline General Health (n=27,75,42,120)
48.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
52.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.7
51.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.4
49.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 General Health (n=22,65,34,98)
50.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
51.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.4
51.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Social Functioning (n=22,65,34,98)
53.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
52.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.7
52.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Role Emotional (n=27,75,42,120)
48.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
50.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.7
51.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Role Emotional (n=22,65,34,98)
53.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
50.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
50.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.3
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Mental Health (n=27,75,42,120)
48.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.0
51.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
50.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Health Transition (n=27,75,42,120)
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
3.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Health Transition (n=22,65,34,98)
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
3.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
2.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Physical Functioning (n=22,65,34,98)
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
51.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
52.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
52.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Role Physical (n=22,65,34,98)
51.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
52.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
54.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
51.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Vitality (n=27,75,42,120)
51.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
53.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.2
54.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
52.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Vitality (n=22,65,34,98)
54.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
52.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.2
54.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.7
53.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Social Functioning (n=27,75,42,120)
48.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
51.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
51.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.4
49.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Mental Health (n=22,65,34,98)
52.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
52.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
51.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life. Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=273 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=276 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Bodily Pain (n=273,275)
4.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
9.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
General Health (n=273,276)
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
1.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.4
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Vitality (n=273,275)
1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
4.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Social Functioning (n=273,275)
3.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
6.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Physical Functioning (n=273,276)
1.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
4.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.5
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Role Physical (n=273,276)
2.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
5.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Role Emotional (n=273,276)
3.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
5.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Mental Health (n=273,275)
3.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
4.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.6
Mean Change From Baseline-A in SF-36 Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Health Transition (n=272,275)
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

The SF-36 is a general health status questionnaire that assesses 8 domains of functional health and well being: Physical Functioning, Role Limitations due to Physical Health Problems, Bodily Pain, Social Functioning, Mental Health, Role Limitations due to Emotional Problems, Vitality, and General Health Perceptions. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning). Higher scores indicate a better health related quality of life. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=98 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=22 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=34 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=65 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Physical Functioning
0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
-0.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Role Physical
2.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
1.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Bodily Pain
6.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
-1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.4
3.8 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
General Health
1.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
-0.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
-1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.8
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Vitality
3.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
-3.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.3
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Social Functioning
4.7 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
-1.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.7
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.9
2.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.1
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Role Emotional
4.6 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
-1.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
1.9 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
-1.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Mental Health
4.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
1.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.9
Mean Change From Baseline-C in SF-36 Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Health Transition Score
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 16 and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=330 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline Severe (n=330,335)
66.1 percentage of participants
63.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Clear (n=325,331)
0.3 percentage of participants
1.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Almost Clear (n=320,321)
21.3 percentage of participants
41.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Moderate (n=320,321)
30.0 percentage of participants
22.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Mild (n=273,277)
23.8 percentage of participants
20.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Moderate (n=273,277)
30.0 percentage of participants
13.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Clear (n=330,335)
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Almost clear (n=330,335)
0.0 percentage of participants
0.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Mild (n=330,335)
3.6 percentage of participants
1.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Baseline, Moderate (n=330,335)
30.3 percentage of participants
34.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Almost Clear (n=325,331)
11.7 percentage of participants
20.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Mild (n=325,331)
24.9 percentage of participants
30.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Moderate (n=325,331)
40.6 percentage of participants
37.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4, Severe (n=325,331)
22.5 percentage of participants
10.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Clear (n=320,321)
1.9 percentage of participants
5.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Mild (n=320,321)
31.9 percentage of participants
25.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8, Severe (n=320,321)
15.0 percentage of participants
5.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Clear (n=310,303)
5.5 percentage of participants
16.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Almost Clear (n=310,303)
27.1 percentage of participants
43.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Mild (n=310,303)
30.6 percentage of participants
20.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Moderate (n=310,303)
27.7 percentage of participants
11.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16, Severe (n=310,303)
9.0 percentage of participants
6.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Clear (n=273,277)
8.1 percentage of participants
20.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Almost Clear (n=273,277)
27.8 percentage of participants
41.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each Patient Global Assessment (PtGA) of Psoriasis Category During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24, Severe (n=273,277)
10.3 percentage of participants
4.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B; n equals the number of participants with observations

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline, Clear (n=31,82,45,133)
35.3 percentage of participants
16.1 percentage of participants
24.4 percentage of participants
19.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline, Mild (n=31,82,45,133)
15.0 percentage of participants
25.8 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
12.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline, Moderate (n=31,82,45,133)
3.0 percentage of participants
12.9 percentage of participants
2.2 percentage of participants
7.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4, Moderate (n=30,82,43,126)
27.0 percentage of participants
6.7 percentage of participants
7.0 percentage of participants
15.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4, Severe (n=30,82,43,126)
11.1 percentage of participants
3.3 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8, Clear (n=30,68,43,104)
5.8 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
20.9 percentage of participants
7.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8, Almost Clear (n=30,68,43,104)
29.8 percentage of participants
30.0 percentage of participants
48.8 percentage of participants
27.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8, Mild (n=30,68,43,104)
26.0 percentage of participants
36.7 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
23.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8, Moderate (n=30,68,43,104)
23.1 percentage of participants
10.0 percentage of participants
7.0 percentage of participants
26.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12, Mild (n=28,52,41,83)
24.1 percentage of participants
32.1 percentage of participants
22.0 percentage of participants
36.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12, Moderate (n=28,52,41,83)
24.1 percentage of participants
10.7 percentage of participants
4.9 percentage of participants
28.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12, Severe (n=28,52,41,83)
14.5 percentage of participants
3.6 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
13.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16, Clear (n=27,45,38,68)
7.4 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
18.4 percentage of participants
4.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16, Almost Clear (n=27,45,38,68)
25.0 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
52.6 percentage of participants
28.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16, Mild (n=27,45,38,68)
25.0 percentage of participants
18.5 percentage of participants
21.1 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16, Moderate (n=27,45,38,68)
30.9 percentage of participants
25.9 percentage of participants
7.9 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16, Severe (n=27,45,38,68)
11.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline, Almost Clear (n=31,82,45,133)
46.6 percentage of participants
45.2 percentage of participants
62.2 percentage of participants
61.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline, Severe (n=31,82,45,133)
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4, Clear (n=30,82,43,126)
11.1 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
8.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4, Almost Clear (n=30,82,43,126)
33.3 percentage of participants
43.3 percentage of participants
58.1 percentage of participants
34.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4, Mild (n=30,82,43,126)
17.5 percentage of participants
23.3 percentage of participants
11.6 percentage of participants
30.5 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8, Severe (n=30,68,43,104)
15.4 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
14.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12, Clear (n=28,52,41,83)
4.8 percentage of participants
17.9 percentage of participants
14.6 percentage of participants
1.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 12, Almost Clear (n=28,52,41,83)
32.5 percentage of participants
35.7 percentage of participants
58.5 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline, Clear (n=27,75,42,120)
5.0 percentage of participants
22.2 percentage of participants
19.0 percentage of participants
2.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline, Almost Clear (n=27,75,42,120)
18.3 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
18.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline, Mild (n=27,75,42,120)
17.5 percentage of participants
18.5 percentage of participants
16.7 percentage of participants
18.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline, Moderate (n=27,75,42,120)
33.3 percentage of participants
25.9 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
37.3 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline, Severe (n=27,75,42,120)
25.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
22.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4, Almost Clear (n=27,74,42,118)
41.5 percentage of participants
37.0 percentage of participants
50.0 percentage of participants
23.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4, Mild (n=27,74,42,118)
23.7 percentage of participants
33.3 percentage of participants
11.9 percentage of participants
41.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4, Severe (n=27,74,42,118)
4.2 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
4.8 percentage of participants
4.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8, Clear (n=26,71,41,118)
15.3 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants
19.5 percentage of participants
7.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8, Mild (n=26,71,41,118)
24.6 percentage of participants
30.8 percentage of participants
19.5 percentage of participants
38.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8, Moderate (n=26,71,41,118)
9.3 percentage of participants
19.2 percentage of participants
7.3 percentage of participants
16.9 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16, Clear (n=22,65,38,101)
20.8 percentage of participants
13.6 percentage of participants
18.4 percentage of participants
10.8 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16, Almost Clear (n=22,65,38,101)
47.5 percentage of participants
31.8 percentage of participants
57.9 percentage of participants
43.1 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16, Mild (n=22,65,38,101)
18.8 percentage of participants
36.4 percentage of participants
10.5 percentage of participants
27.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16, Severe (n=22,65,38,101)
2.0 percentage of participants
4.5 percentage of participants
7.9 percentage of participants
4.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4, Clear (n=27,74,42,118)
10.2 percentage of participants
18.5 percentage of participants
19.0 percentage of participants
5.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 4, Moderate (n=27,74,42,118)
20.3 percentage of participants
11.1 percentage of participants
14.3 percentage of participants
25.7 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8, Almost Clear (n=26,71,41,118)
46.6 percentage of participants
26.9 percentage of participants
51.2 percentage of participants
36.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 8, Severe (n=26,71,41,118)
4.2 percentage of participants
3.8 percentage of participants
2.4 percentage of participants
1.4 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants in Each PtGA of Psoriasis Category During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 16, Moderate (n=22,65,38,101)
10.9 percentage of participants
13.6 percentage of participants
5.3 percentage of participants
13.8 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. Response defined as score of 0 or 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 4
11.78 percentage of participants
Interval 8.31 to 15.26
21.19 percentage of participants
Interval 16.82 to 25.57
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 16
30.51 percentage of participants
Interval 25.55 to 35.47
54.63 percentage of participants
Interval 49.3 to 59.96
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 8
22.36 percentage of participants
Interval 17.87 to 26.84
45.37 percentage of participants
Interval 40.04 to 50.7
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Week 24
29.61 percentage of participants
Interval 24.69 to 34.53
51.64 percentage of participants
Interval 46.29 to 56.99

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. Response defined as score of 0 or 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=100 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=14 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=17 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=63 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PtGA of Mild, Moderate or Severe During CP-690,550 Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Baseline (n=14,63,17,100)
8.00 percentage of participants
Interval 2.68 to 13.32
14.29 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 32.62
23.53 percentage of participants
Interval 3.37 to 43.69
6.35 percentage of participants
Interval 0.33 to 12.37
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PtGA of Mild, Moderate or Severe During CP-690,550 Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 8 (n=14,63,17,100)
54.00 percentage of participants
Interval 44.23 to 63.77
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
41.18 percentage of participants
Interval 17.78 to 64.57
34.92 percentage of participants
Interval 23.15 to 46.69
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PtGA of Mild, Moderate or Severe During CP-690,550 Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 16 (n=14,63,17,100)
53.00 percentage of participants
Interval 43.22 to 62.78
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
58.82 percentage of participants
Interval 35.43 to 82.22
41.27 percentage of participants
Interval 29.11 to 53.43
Percentage of Participants With PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C) Among Participants Who Had a PtGA of Mild, Moderate or Severe During CP-690,550 Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Week 4 (n=14,63,17,100)
42.00 percentage of participants
Interval 32.33 to 51.67
21.43 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 42.92
35.29 percentage of participants
Interval 12.58 to 58.01
19.05 percentage of participants
Interval 9.35 to 28.74

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: FAS-B

The PtGA asks the participant to evaluate the overall cutaneous disease at that point in time on a single item, 5 point scale. The scale is scored as follows: 0=clear; 1=almost clear; 2=mild; 3=moderate; and 4=severe. Response defined as score of 0 or 1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=107 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=19 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=39 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=66 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B) Among Participants Who Had a Response of Clear or Almost Clear at Beginning of Period B
Week 4
55.5 percentage of participants
Interval 45.5 to 64.4
94.7 percentage of participants
Interval 68.1 to 99.2
82.0 percentage of participants
Interval 65.9 to 91.0
50.7 percentage of participants
Interval 38.0 to 62.0
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B) Among Participants Who Had a Response of Clear or Almost Clear at Beginning of Period B
Week 8
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 24.5 to 42.4
89.2 percentage of participants
Interval 63.1 to 97.2
71.4 percentage of participants
Interval 54.3 to 83.0
32.8 percentage of participants
Interval 21.6 to 44.4
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B) Among Participants Who Had a Response of Clear or Almost Clear at Beginning of Period B
Week 12
24.2 percentage of participants
Interval 16.4 to 32.9
77.3 percentage of participants
Interval 50.1 to 90.8
68.8 percentage of participants
Interval 51.6 to 80.9
21.3 percentage of participants
Interval 12.2 to 32.2
Percentage of Participants Maintaining PtGA Response of Clear or Almost Clear During the Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B) Among Participants Who Had a Response of Clear or Almost Clear at Beginning of Period B
Week 16
0.0 percentage of participants
95% CI could not be estimated due to censoring.
77.3 percentage of participants
Interval 50.1 to 90.8
0.0 percentage of participants
95% CI could not be estimated due to censoring.
16.0 percentage of participants
Interval 7.5 to 27.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=329 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=332 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
VAS, Week 24 (n=269,274)
75.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
80.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.0
Mean EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Utility Score, Baseline (n=329,332)
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Utility Score, Week 24 (n=270,272)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EuroQol 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) Health State Profile Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
VAS, Baseline (n=329,332)
69.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.3
70.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.3

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Utility Score (n=27,75,42,120)
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline VAS (n=27,75,42,120)
75.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.8
79.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.4
76.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 3.5
76.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.2
Mean EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 VAS (n=22,65,34,96)
83.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.2
82.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.5
82.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 2.7
82.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 1.7
Mean EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Utility Score (n=22,65,34,96)
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=269 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=271 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Week 24 Utility Score (n=269,269)
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Week 24 VAS (n=268, 271)
5.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
9.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Scoring formula developed by EuroQol Group assigns a utility value for each domain in the profile. Score is transformed and results in a total score range -0.594 to 1.000; higher score indicates a better health state. The VAS component rates current health state on a scale from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state); higher scores indicate a better health state. Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=96 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=22 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=34 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=65 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Utility Score
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Utility Score and VAS Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Visual Analogue Score
6.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.5
-1.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.6
6.4 scores on a scale
Standard Error 3.8
4.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 1.7

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation.

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=329 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=332 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Self-Care, Baseline (n=330,332)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Self-Care, Week 24 (n=270,272)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Usual Activities Baseline (n=330,332)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Usual Activities Week 24 (n=270,273)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Pain/Discomfort Baseline (n=330,332)
1.8 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.9 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Anxiety/Depression Baseline (n=330,332)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Anxiety/Depression Week 24 (n=270,274)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Mobility, Baseline (n=329,332)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Mobility, Week 24 (n=270,274)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Pain/Discomfort Week 24 (n=270,274)
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Baseline and Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C; n equals the number of participants with an observation

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed").

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Mobility (n=27,75,42,120)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Mobility (n=22,65,34,96)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Usual Activities (n=27,75,42,120)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Pain/Discomfort (n=27,75,42,120)
1.7 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.6 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Pain/Discomfort (n=22,65,34,96)
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.4 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.5 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Anxiety/Depression (n=27,75,42,120)
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Baseline Self-Care (n=27,75,42,120)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Self-Care (n=22,65,34,96)
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.0 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Usual Activities (n=22,65,34,96)
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.1 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Week 56 Anxiety/Depression (n=22,65,34,96)
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.2 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
1.3 score on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 24 (Period A)

Population: FAS-A; n=number of participants with an observation

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Baseline-A defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period A.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=269 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=271 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Mobility (n=269,271)
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Self-Care (n=270,269)
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Anxiety / Depression (n=270,271)
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Usual Activities (n=270,270)
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-A in EQ-5D Domain Scores During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment Period (Period A)
Pain / Discomfort (n=270,271)
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.5 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Week 56 (Period C)

Population: FAS-C

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility score. Health State Profile component assesses level of current health for 5 domains: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain and discomfort, and anxiety and depression. The score for each of the 5 dimensions can range from 1 to 3; 1 indicates better health state (no problems); 3 indicates worst health state ("confined to bed"). Baseline-C defined as the last observation up to first dosing date in Period C.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=96 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=22 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=34 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=65 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Mobility
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Self-Care
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Usual Activities
-0.2 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.0
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Pain / Discomfort
-0.3 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.0 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
Mean Change From Baseline-C in EQ-5D Domain Scores During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
Anxiety / Depression
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1
-0.1 scores on a scale
Standard Error 0.1

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 16, and 24 (Period A)

Population: Safety-A

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=331 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=335 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Erythrodermic psoriasis
0.0 percentage of participants
0.6 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Guttate psoriasis
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During the Initial CP-690,550 Treatment (Period A)
Pustular psoriasis
0.0 percentage of participants
0.3 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, 12, and 16 (Period B)

Population: Safety-B

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=133 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=31 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=45 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=82 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Erythrodermic psoriasis
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Guttate psoriasis
0.8 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal (Period B)
Pustular psoriasis
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Weeks 4, 8, and 16 (Period C)

Population: Safety-C

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
Placebo BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=120 Participants
Participants received placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=27 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID / CP-690,550 10 mg BID
n=42 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12, or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=75 Participants
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
Percentage of Participants With Pustular, Erythrodermic, or Guttate Psoriasis During CP-690,550 Re-Treatment (Period C)
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants
0.0 percentage of participants

Adverse Events

CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)

Serious events: 6 serious events
Other events: 101 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)

Serious events: 9 serious events
Other events: 94 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg

Serious events: 1 serious events
Other events: 25 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg

Serious events: 3 serious events
Other events: 65 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 41 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg

Serious events: 4 serious events
Other events: 108 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=218 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=157 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=31 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=82 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg
n=133 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
Cardiac disorders
Acute myocardial infarction
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular tachycardia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Endocrine disorders
Goitre
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diverticular perforation
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Pancreatitis acute
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Chest pain
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Drug ineffective
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster multi-dermatomal
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Peritonsillar abscess
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Respiratory fume inhalation disorder
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Traumatic lung injury
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Pregnancy test positive
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Transaminases increased
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypokalaemia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Intervertebral disc degeneration
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteoarthritis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Osteonecrosis
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Adenocarcinoma pancreas
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Colon cancer metastatic
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Metastases to liver
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Prostate cancer
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Hypomania
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephrolithiasis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythrodermic psoriasis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pustular psoriasis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
CP-690,550 5 mg BID (Period A)
n=218 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 milligram (mg) tablets orally twice daily (BID) for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg BID (Period A)
n=157 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 continuous weeks during Period A (Initial Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=31 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 5 mg/Placebo/CP-690,550 5 mg
n=82 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 5 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 5 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg/CP-690,550 10 mg
n=45 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
CP-690,550 10 mg / Placebo / CP-690,550 10 mg
n=133 participants at risk
Participants received CP-690,550 10 mg tablets orally BID for 24 weeks in Period A (Initial Treatment) followed by placebo tablets orally BID for 4, 8, 12 or 16 weeks during Period B (Double-Blind Treatment Withdrawal) followed by CP-690,550 10 mg for up to 28 weeks in Period C (Double-Blind Re-Treatment)
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Excoriation
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukocytosis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Bundle branch block left
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Cor pulmonale
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery disease
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Coronary artery occlusion
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Myocardial infarction
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Tachycardia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Cardiac disorders
Ventricular extrasystoles
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Eye disorders
Conjunctivitis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal discomfort
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain lower
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
2.3%
5/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.1%
5/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
3.2%
7/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.0%
8/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
2.3%
5/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dysphagia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Flatulence
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Gastritis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Haemorrhoids
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
4.6%
10/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.5%
6/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Tooth loss
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Toothache
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.5%
4/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Fatigue
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Influenza like illness
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Malaise
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
General disorders
Pyrexia
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Hepatobiliary disorders
Hyperbilirubinaemia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Immune system disorders
Seasonal allergy
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Acute sinusitis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Asymptomatic bacteriuria
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bacterial infection
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.5%
10/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Ear infection
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Folliculitis
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.3%
7/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Gastroenteritis viral
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.5%
4/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Helicobacter infection
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes simplex
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Herpes zoster
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Hordeolum
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Influenza
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.5%
4/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.3%
6/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Laryngitis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
8.3%
18/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.6%
15/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
9.7%
3/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
18.3%
15/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
17.8%
8/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
17.3%
23/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Rash pustular
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Sinusitis
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
3/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Skin candida
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Subcutaneous abscess
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Tooth abscess
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Tooth infection
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
4.1%
9/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.5%
7/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
17.1%
14/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
11.1%
5/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
13.5%
18/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
3.2%
7/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.3%
6/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.8%
9/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Vaginitis bacterial
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Viral infection
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Infections and infestations
Viral upper respiratory tract infection
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod bite
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Joint injury
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Laceration
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle strain
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Post-traumatic pain
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Procedural pain
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Scapula fracture
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Spinal column injury
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Alanine aminotransferase increased
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Aspartate aminotransferase increased
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Bacterial test positive
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood cholesterol increased
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatine phosphokinase increased
4.6%
10/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.3%
6/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
26.7%
12/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
10.5%
14/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood creatinine increased
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood glucose fluctuation
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood glucose increased
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood triglycerides increased
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Blood urine present
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
5/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Haemoglobin decreased
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Low density lipoprotein increased
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Investigations
Red blood cells urine positive
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Dyslipidaemia
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypercholesterolaemia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.5%
7/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperlipidaemia
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.1%
5/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypertriglyceridaemia
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hypoglycaemia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
1.4%
3/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
7.5%
10/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthritis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
4.1%
9/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
3/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.5%
6/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Groin pain
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint effusion
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal pain
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Musculoskeletal stiffness
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain in extremity
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Acrochordon
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Dysplastic naevus
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Neoplasm
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Seborrhoeic keratosis
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Skin papilloma
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Squamous cell carcinoma
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tongue neoplasm
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
Tongue neoplasm benign
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
5/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Headache
2.8%
6/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
6/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.1%
5/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
8.9%
4/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
12.8%
17/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Paraesthesia
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Nervous system disorders
Post herpetic neuralgia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Psychiatric disorders
Stress
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephropathy
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal cyst
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Breast pain
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Dysmenorrhoea
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Menstruation delayed
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Vaginal haemorrhage
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Asthma
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
1.8%
4/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.5%
2/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.7%
3/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.0%
8/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Nasal congestion
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
2.3%
5/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.9%
3/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
16.1%
5/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.7%
3/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Paranasal cyst
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Respiratory tract congestion
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sinus congestion
0.92%
2/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Sleep apnoea syndrome
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Upper respiratory tract congestion
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Acne
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.64%
1/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Actinic keratosis
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.75%
1/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dermatitis contact
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.5%
2/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hair growth abnormal
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.3%
2/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.4%
2/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.0%
4/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.8%
6/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
1.2%
1/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rosacea
0.46%
1/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.3%
3/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin exfoliation
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Haemorrhage
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
2.3%
5/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
5/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
3.2%
1/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
6.1%
5/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
4.4%
2/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
5.3%
7/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
Vascular disorders
Intermittent claudication
0.00%
0/218
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/157
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/31
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/82
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
2.2%
1/45
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.
0.00%
0/133
The same event may appear as both an adverse event (AE) and a serious adverse event (SAE). However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as nonserious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and nonserious event during the study.

Additional Information

Pfizer ClinicalTrials.gov Call Center

Pfizer, Inc.

Phone: 1-800-718-1021

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER