Trial Outcomes & Findings for Individual and Family Motivational Interviews for Substance Using Truant Teens (NCT NCT01170026)
NCT ID: NCT01170026
Last Updated: 2025-01-15
Results Overview
Number of Days in which a Participant Responded "Yes" to Marijuana use in the Past 90 Days" range = 0 to 90; higher scores indicate more marijuana use
COMPLETED
NA
69 participants
3 Month Follow-Up and 6 month follow-up
2025-01-15
Participant Flow
Recruited from Family Court
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Family Check-up/Individual MI
Two session motivational intervention to improve parent monitoring and communication with respect to adolescent risk behavior especially substance use plus 2 session Individual Motivational Intervention for the adolescent
Family Check-up/ Individual MI: The 2-session intervention protocol consists of an individual motivational interview plus the Family Check-Up (Dishion \& Kavanagh, 2003), a family based motivational interview. The experimental protocol provides a thorough assessment of both individual and family strengths and weaknesses with respect to substance use prevention and school attendance/performance.
|
Psychoeducation
Two sessions of psychoeducation for parents regarding adolescent risk behaviors especially substance use
Individual and family psychoeducation: Families in PE will return for the same number of visits as the IMI and FCU sessions of the IMI/FCU condition. An interventionist will review a set of educational materials with the parents regarding teen SU use, truancy and risk behaviors and parenting a teenager. A similar set of materials will be reviewed with the adolescent
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
34
|
35
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
30
|
33
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
4
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Family Check-up/Individual MI
Two session motivational intervention to improve parent monitoring and communication with respect to adolescent risk behavior especially substance use plus 2 session Individual Motivational Intervention for the adolescent
Family Check-up/ Individual MI: The 2-session intervention protocol consists of an individual motivational interview plus the Family Check-Up (Dishion \& Kavanagh, 2003), a family based motivational interview. The experimental protocol provides a thorough assessment of both individual and family strengths and weaknesses with respect to substance use prevention and school attendance/performance.
|
Psychoeducation
Two sessions of psychoeducation for parents regarding adolescent risk behaviors especially substance use
Individual and family psychoeducation: Families in PE will return for the same number of visits as the IMI and FCU sessions of the IMI/FCU condition. An interventionist will review a set of educational materials with the parents regarding teen SU use, truancy and risk behaviors and parenting a teenager. A similar set of materials will be reviewed with the adolescent
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
4
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Individual and Family Motivational Interviews for Substance Using Truant Teens
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Family Check-up/Individual MI
n=34 Participants
Two session motivational intervention to improve parent monitoring and communication with respect to adolescent risk behavior especially substance use plus 2 session Individual Motivational Intervention for the adolescent
Family Check-up/ Individual MI: The 2-session intervention protocol consists of an individual motivational interview plus the Family Check-Up (Dishion \& Kavanagh, 2003), a family based motivational interview. The experimental protocol provides a thorough assessment of both individual and family strengths and weaknesses with respect to substance use prevention and school attendance/performance.
|
Psychoeducation
n=35 Participants
Two sessions of psychoeducation for parents regarding adolescent risk behaviors especially substance use
Individual and family psychoeducation: Families in PE will return for the same number of visits as the IMI and FCU sessions of the IMI/FCU condition. An interventionist will review a set of educational materials with the parents regarding teen SU use, truancy and risk behaviors and parenting a teenager. A similar set of materials will be reviewed with the adolescent
|
Total
n=69 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
15.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.4 • n=99 Participants
|
16.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.2 • n=107 Participants
|
15.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.3 • n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
14 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
13 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
20 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
42 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
|
13 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
8 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
21 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
|
21 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
27 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
48 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
|
6 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
10 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
16 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
|
23 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
18 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
41 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
|
5 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
12 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
|
Region of Enrollment
United States
|
34 participants
n=99 Participants
|
35 participants
n=107 Participants
|
69 participants
n=206 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 Month Follow-Up and 6 month follow-upNumber of Days in which a Participant Responded "Yes" to Marijuana use in the Past 90 Days" range = 0 to 90; higher scores indicate more marijuana use
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Family Check-up/Individual MI
n=34 Participants
Two session motivational intervention to improve parent monitoring and communication with respect to adolescent risk behavior especially substance use plus 2 session Individual Motivational Intervention for the adolescent
Family Check-up/ Individual MI: The 2-session intervention protocol consists of an individual motivational interview plus the Family Check-Up (Dishion \& Kavanagh, 2003), a family based motivational interview. The experimental protocol provides a thorough assessment of both individual and family strengths and weaknesses with respect to substance use prevention and school attendance/performance.
|
Psychoeducation
n=35 Participants
Two sessions of psychoeducation for parents regarding adolescent risk behaviors especially substance use
Individual and family psychoeducation: Families in PE will return for the same number of visits as the IMI and FCU sessions of the IMI/FCU condition. An interventionist will review a set of educational materials with the parents regarding teen SU use, truancy and risk behaviors and parenting a teenager. A similar set of materials will be reviewed with the adolescent
|
|---|---|---|
|
Marijuana Use Days in Past 90 Days
Baseline
|
35 days
Standard Deviation 29
|
45 days
Standard Deviation 39
|
|
Marijuana Use Days in Past 90 Days
3-month follow-up
|
27 days
Standard Deviation 35
|
41 days
Standard Deviation 36
|
|
Marijuana Use Days in Past 90 Days
6-month follow-up
|
21 days
Standard Deviation 28
|
41 days
Standard Deviation 35
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 3 and 6 Month Follow-UpIf a Participant Responded "Yes" to Alcohol use in the Past 90 Days" ; yes /no
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Family Check-up/Individual MI
n=34 Participants
Two session motivational intervention to improve parent monitoring and communication with respect to adolescent risk behavior especially substance use plus 2 session Individual Motivational Intervention for the adolescent
Family Check-up/ Individual MI: The 2-session intervention protocol consists of an individual motivational interview plus the Family Check-Up (Dishion \& Kavanagh, 2003), a family based motivational interview. The experimental protocol provides a thorough assessment of both individual and family strengths and weaknesses with respect to substance use prevention and school attendance/performance.
|
Psychoeducation
n=35 Participants
Two sessions of psychoeducation for parents regarding adolescent risk behaviors especially substance use
Individual and family psychoeducation: Families in PE will return for the same number of visits as the IMI and FCU sessions of the IMI/FCU condition. An interventionist will review a set of educational materials with the parents regarding teen SU use, truancy and risk behaviors and parenting a teenager. A similar set of materials will be reviewed with the adolescent
|
|---|---|---|
|
Alcohol Use Days in Past 90 Days
Baseline
|
20 Participants
|
26 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Use Days in Past 90 Days
3-month follow-up
|
8 Participants
|
17 Participants
|
|
Alcohol Use Days in Past 90 Days
6-month follow-up
|
11 Participants
|
18 Participants
|
Adverse Events
Family Check-up/Individual MI
Psychoeducation
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr. Anthony Spirito
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, The Alpert Medical School of Brown University
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place