Use of Laryngeal Mask Airway in Pediatric Adenotonsillectomy

NCT01141660 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 131

Last updated 2017-11-13

Study results available
· View outcomes & findings →

Summary

The aim of the current study is to compare the use of laryngeal mask airway (LMA) and endotracheal tube (ETT) in pediatric adenotonsillectomy. The primary objective is to assess the incidence of post-operative laryngospasm between the LMA and ETT. The investigators also sought to compare anesthetic, operative, and recovery times in the LMA and ETT groups. We hypothesized that the LMA would be a safe efficient alternative to the ETT.

Conditions

  • Laryngeal Mask Airway
  • Tonsillectomy

Interventions

DEVICE

Endotracheal Tube

Patients randomized to either Laryngeal Mask Airway or Endotracheal tube prior to undergoing adenotonsillectomy.

DEVICE

Laryngeal mask airway

Randomized to either Laryngeal mask airway or endotracheal tube

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Virginia Commonwealth University

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kelley Dodson, MD · Virginia Commonwealth University

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
PARALLEL

Eligibility

Min Age
2 Years
Max Age
12 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2007-12-31
Primary Completion
2009-08-31
Completion
2009-08-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01141660 on ClinicalTrials.gov