Outcomes of Gastric Band Fills as Found With a Patient Self-reported Questionnaire: The Vomiting, Eating, and Weight Loss (VEW) Questionnaire
NCT01105156 · Status: UNKNOWN · Type: OBSERVATIONAL · Enrollment: 361
Last updated 2010-04-16
Summary
1\. Background / Scientific Rationale
The VEW (Vomiting, Eating, and Weight Loss) Questionnaire has been developed as a method for the assessment of post bariatric surgery patients, as well as a research tool into the eating behaviour of these patients.
Objective VEW Questionnaire Premise If used optimally the VEW score is a valuable tool for patients who have had Laparoscopic Gastric Band Surgery (LAGB). The VEW score will be able to assist clinicians treating patients with a LAGB, specifically the Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band (SAGB), by providing them a tool to enhance patient outcomes. By using the information gained from the VEW questionnaire we can assess many areas of the eating behavior, and adjustment outcomes in patients with Gastric Bands.
Hypotheses:
* The VEW questionnaire aids in the assessment of the need for gastric band adjustment (up or down in volume)
* Comparison of patient factors in those who have had a
1. good outcome (increased weight loss)
2. bad outcomes (vomiting, low weight loss, maladaption), from a gastric band fluid addition
* In patients who have had a bad outcome, which factors are more predictive?
* Fewer Complications associated with Gastric Band Adjustments
* Obstruction
* Need for urgent deflation
* Pain on eating
* Lowering incidence of inappropriate fills
* Lower incidence of maladaption
* Eating behavior can predict long term outcomes
o By comparison of factors in the different quartiles of weight loss (particularly top 25% cf. bottom 25%)
* Maintenance of weight loss after 12 months is best achieved by use of behavior modification via improved food tolerances and better eating behavior than by increasing restriction of the band by further adjustments. 12 months is chosen as an arbitrary time where the majority of expected weight loss (45% of expected 50-55% 0f EWL) has been achieved. It is also a time frame by which patients have learnt to use the band appropriately, and the gastric band has had time to be adjusted into its optimal range.
* The VEW questionnaire can help predict poor outcomes from a SAGB adjustment.
* By analyzing the factors in patients who have returned both acutely (days) or at subsequent visits (weeks) and had fluid removed from their bands. These factors would include pain, vomiting, length of meals, maladaption score, fluid added, etc.
Conditions
- Morbid Obesity
Interventions
- BEHAVIORAL
-
VEW Questionnaire
Patient Self reported questionnaire filled in.
Sponsors & Collaborators
-
Ethicon Endo-Surgery
collaborator INDUSTRY -
North Eastern Weight Loss Surgery
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Patrick M Moore, MBBS FRACS · North Eastern Weight Loss Surgery
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 16 Years
- Max Age
- 70 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- No
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2010-04-30
- Primary Completion
- 2010-04-30
- Completion
- 2010-04-30
Countries
- Australia
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Photographic Food Recognition and Meal Size Estimation Before and After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT04600596 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Comparison Between Gastric Band, Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy, Gastric Bypass Surgeries
NCT02004561 ·Status: ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Morbid Obesity
NCT05611697 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Comparison of Pulmonary Complications Related to Sleeve Gastrectomy and Gastric Banding
NCT01178567 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy: a Cohort Study
NCT03629808 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
LAGB Versus VBG: 7-Year Results
NCT00840736 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Assessment of Nutritional Consequences of Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT01475903 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Resolution of Comorbidities, Safety and Efficacy of Greater Curvature Plication in Obese Patients.
NCT01512940 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Adjustable Gastric Banding With Truncal Vagotomy
NCT00329862 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: NA
-
Simplified Technique for Performing Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass
NCT06782256 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Gastric Procedures for Obesity
NCT01026181 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Ambulatory Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT05106660 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
The Results and Outcomes of the Modified Swedish Adjustable Gastric Band (SAGB-VC)
NCT01084915 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Laparoscopic Banded Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT04354532 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Banded Versus Non-banded Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT01078181 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: NA
-
Ablation Registry (Combined Gastric Mucosal Ablation With Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty for Weight Loss)
NCT06420700 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Versus Sleeve Gastrectomy to Treat Morbid Obesity
NCT00793143 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Gastric Bypass for Private Pay Patients Seeking Obesity Surgery
NCT01063959 ·Status: WITHDRAWN ·Phase: NA
-
A Retrospective Multicenter Comparison of Laparoscopic and Robotic-Assisted Roux-en-Y Gastrectomy
NCT05224791 ·Status: RECRUITING
-
Secondary Bypass Banding for Weight Regain or Weight Loss Failure After Lap. Gastric Bypass
NCT01078194 ·Status: UNKNOWN
-
Laparoscopic Single Incision -Vs- Multiple Incision Gastric Band Surgery
NCT01844960 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass Versus Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT00667706 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effects of Assisted Robotic vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT06425016 ·Status: RECRUITING ·Phase: NA
-
Endoscopic vs. Suction Device Calibration in Sleeve Gastrectomy
NCT03939819 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy vs Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass
NCT05145205 ·Status: COMPLETED