MedTrace Logo

Efficacy of Retrograde Fill Vs Spontaneous Fill to Assess Voiding Function

NCT01091844 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 50

Last updated 2010-10-13

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

Purpose: The purpose of this study is to determine if two different methods of performing a postoperative voiding trial are equivalent in evaluating urinary retention after gynecologic surgery.

Participants: The participants in this study will be women who have undergone gynecologic surgery at UNC-Chapel Hill.

Conditions

  • Urinary Retention
  • Surgery

Interventions

PROCEDURE

Voiding Trial

After surgery, each woman will undergo a voiding trial to assess for urinary retention after surgery. This is performed on all patients undergoing surgery involving prolapse or incontinence. There are two methods commonly used to perform a voiding trial: Spontaneous Fill and Retrograde Fill techniques. Both are considered standard of care. The goal of the study is to perform both on each patient to assess their equivalency. There are no experimental interventions taking place.

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    lead OTHER

Principal Investigators

  • Kelly Hankins, MD · University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE
Model
CROSSOVER

Eligibility

Min Age
18 Years
Sex
FEMALE
Healthy Volunteers
No

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-12-31
Primary Completion
2010-04-30
Completion
2010-08-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01091844 on ClinicalTrials.gov