A Comparative Study of Incision Closure Methods for Total Knee Replacement

NCT01088074 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: NA · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 75

Last updated 2012-08-22

No results posted yet for this study

Summary

The aim of the study is to compare incision closure techniques for total knee replacement using a combination of state-of-the-art sutures with tissue adhesives or staples in an effort to identify the best approach with respect to time efficiency, cost, durability, dehiscence, microbial resistance and cosmesis.

The hypothesis is that the combined suture/adhesive approach (sutures for capsule and subcutaneous layers, and tissue adhesive for the final cutaneous layer) or suture/staple approach will be significantly faster and of comparable durability as the conventional exclusive suture approach (sutures used for the capsule, subcutaneous, and cutaneous layers). This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, single site, unblinded (open label) study.

Conditions

  • Total Knee Replacement Closure
  • Wound Closure

Interventions

DEVICE

Histoacryl Tissue Adhesive

DEVICE

Dermabond

DEVICE

Staples

DEVICE

Monocryl 4-0

Sponsors & Collaborators

  • Foundation for Southwest Orthopedic Research

    lead OTHER

Study Design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE
Model
SINGLE_GROUP

Eligibility

Min Age
21 Years
Sex
ALL
Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Timeline & Regulatory

Start
2009-01-31
Primary Completion
2009-08-31
Completion
2009-10-31

Countries

  • United States

Study Locations

More Related Trials

Read the full study record

This page highlights key information. For complete eligibility criteria, study locations, investigator contacts, and the full protocol, visit the original record on ClinicalTrials.gov.

View NCT01088074 on ClinicalTrials.gov