Trial Outcomes & Findings for Study Evaluating Single Dose Of ILV-095 In Psoriasis Subjects (NCT NCT01010542)
NCT ID: NCT01010542
Last Updated: 2024-07-03
Results Overview
PASI score: combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score range:0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease),with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.Body divided into 4 sections(head and neck \[h\],arms \[u\],trunk \[t\],legs \[l\]);each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI score.For each section,percent body surface area(A) of skin involved was estimated:0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100 percent involvement),severity estimated by clinical signs:erythema(E),infiltration(I),scaling(S);5 point scale:0(no involvement) to 4(very marked involvement).Final PASI score = 0.1Ah(Eh + Ih + Sh) + 0.2Au(Eu + Iu + Su) + 0.3At(Et + It + St) + 0.4Al(El + Il + Sl),where head:0.1;upper limbs:0.2;trunk:0.3;lower limbs:0.4. Percentage of participants with at least 50 percent(%) improvement in total PASI score at Week 2 relative to baseline total PASI score was reported and 95% confidence interval was calculated using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
TERMINATED
PHASE1
39 participants
Baseline, Week 2
2024-07-03
Participant Flow
The study was early terminated based on the outcome of interim analysis which was conducted when data from 39 participants was available. At the time of study termination, 30 participants had received 300 milligram (mg) of ILV-095, 8 participants had received placebo, and 1 participant had received 100 mg of ILV-095.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1
|
30
|
8
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1
|
25
|
6
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
5
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
|
0
|
1
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
Withdrawal by Subject
|
0
|
3
|
2
|
Baseline Characteristics
Study Evaluating Single Dose Of ILV-095 In Psoriasis Subjects
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Total
n=39 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
27.00 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.00 • n=99 Participants
|
46.23 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.94 • n=107 Participants
|
44.63 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.90 • n=206 Participants
|
45.41 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.33 • n=157 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
0 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
6 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
9 Participants
n=157 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
1 Participants
n=99 Participants
|
24 Participants
n=107 Participants
|
5 Participants
n=206 Participants
|
30 Participants
n=157 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 2Population: Intent-to-treat (ITT) population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "Number of Participants Analyzed" (N) signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
PASI score: combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score range:0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease),with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis.Body divided into 4 sections(head and neck \[h\],arms \[u\],trunk \[t\],legs \[l\]);each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI score.For each section,percent body surface area(A) of skin involved was estimated:0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100 percent involvement),severity estimated by clinical signs:erythema(E),infiltration(I),scaling(S);5 point scale:0(no involvement) to 4(very marked involvement).Final PASI score = 0.1Ah(Eh + Ih + Sh) + 0.2Au(Eu + Iu + Su) + 0.3At(Et + It + St) + 0.4Al(El + Il + Sl),where head:0.1;upper limbs:0.2;trunk:0.3;lower limbs:0.4. Percentage of participants with at least 50 percent(%) improvement in total PASI score at Week 2 relative to baseline total PASI score was reported and 95% confidence interval was calculated using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in Total Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 2
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
13.8 percentage of participants
Interval 3.9 to 31.7
|
14.3 percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 57.9
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 4Population: ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "N" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
PASI score: combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score range: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease), with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Body divided into 4 sections (head and neck \[h\], arms \[u\],trunk \[t\],legs \[l\]);each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI score. For each section, percent body surface area (A) of skin involved was estimated: 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100 percent involvement),severity estimated by clinical signs: erythema(E),infiltration(I),scaling(S);5 point scale:0(no involvement) to 4(very marked involvement).Final PASI score = 0.1Ah(Eh + Ih + Sh) + 0.2Au(Eu + Iu + Su) + 0.3At(Et + It + St) + 0.4Al(El + Il + Sl),where head:0.1;upper limbs:0.2;trunk:0.3;lower limbs:0.4. Percentage of participants with at least 50% improvement in total PASI score at Week 4 relative to baseline total PASI score was reported and 95% confidence interval was calculated using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=7 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in Total Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 4
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 13.2 to 48.7
|
28.6 percentage of participants
Interval 3.7 to 71.0
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 6Population: ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "N" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
PASI score: combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score range: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease), with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Body divided into 4 sections (head and neck \[h\], arms \[u\],trunk \[t\],legs \[l\]);each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI score. For each section, percent body surface area (A) of skin involved was estimated: 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100 percent involvement),severity estimated by clinical signs: erythema(E),infiltration(I),scaling(S);5 point scale:0(no involvement) to 4(very marked involvement).Final PASI score = 0.1Ah(Eh + Ih + Sh) + 0.2Au(Eu + Iu + Su) + 0.3At(Et + It + St) + 0.4Al(El + Il + Sl),where head:0.1;upper limbs:0.2;trunk:0.3;lower limbs:0.4. Percentage of participants with at least 50% improvement in total PASI score at Week 6 relative to baseline total PASI score was reported and 95% confidence interval was calculated using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in Total Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 6
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
25.0 percentage of participants
Interval 10.7 to 44.9
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 4.3 to 77.7
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8Population: ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "N" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure.
PASI score: combined assessment of lesion severity and area affected into single score range: 0 (no disease) to 72(maximal disease), with higher scores representing greater severity of psoriasis. Body divided into 4 sections (head and neck \[h\], arms \[u\],trunk \[t\],legs \[l\]);each area scored by itself and scores combined for final PASI score. For each section, percent body surface area (A) of skin involved was estimated: 0 (no involvement) to 6 (90 to 100 percent involvement),severity estimated by clinical signs: erythema(E),infiltration(I),scaling(S);5 point scale:0(no involvement) to 4(very marked involvement).Final PASI score = 0.1Ah(Eh + Ih + Sh) + 0.2Au(Eu + Iu + Su) + 0.3At(Et + It + St) + 0.4Al(El + Il + Sl),where head:0.1;upper limbs:0.2;trunk:0.3;lower limbs:0.4. Percentage of participants with at least 50% improvement in total PASI score at Week 8 relative to baseline total PASI score was reported and 95% confidence interval was calculated using Clopper-Pearson (exact) method.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=27 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=6 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Participants With 50 Percent Improvement From Baseline in Total Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) Score at Week 8
|
0 percentage of participants
Interval 0.0 to 97.5
|
33.3 percentage of participants
Interval 16.5 to 54.0
|
16.7 percentage of participants
Interval 0.4 to 64.1
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (Day -1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8Population: ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
Each lesion was evaluated for 3 components: erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling. Physician rated each component using the following scale: 0= none, 1= mild, 2= moderate, 3= severe and 4= very severe, where higher scores indicated higher lesion severity. TLS was calculated as the sum of the 3 individual components and TLS total score ranged from 0 (no disease) to 12 (maximal disease severity), where higher scores indicated more severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Target Lesion Score (TLS)
Day -1
|
9.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
7.77 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.41
|
8.13 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.83
|
|
Target Lesion Score (TLS)
Week 2
|
8.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
5.93 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.33
|
6.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.26
|
|
Target Lesion Score (TLS)
Week 4
|
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
5.11 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.60
|
4.75 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.87
|
|
Target Lesion Score (TLS)
Week 6
|
6.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
4.64 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.02
|
4.43 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.88
|
|
Target Lesion Score (TLS)
Week 8
|
4.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
4.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 3.05
|
5.29 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.98
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-treatment (Day -1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8Population: ITT population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication and had at least 1 clinical activity measurement (PASI score). Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
PGA of psoriasis was scored on a 5-point scale, reflecting a global consideration of the erythema (E), infiltration (I), and scaling (S) across all psoriatic lesions. The severity rating scores (erythema: 0= no evidence of erythema to 4= dark, deep red; infiltration: 0= no evidence of plaque elevation to 4= marked plaque elevation, hard/sharp borders; scaling: 0= no evidence of scaling to 4= thick, coarse scale predominates) were summed (E + I + S = total) and the average (total score divided by 3) was calculated. The average was rounded to the nearest whole number score to determine the PGA. The 5-point scale for PGA was ranging from: 0= clear; 1= almost clear; 2= mild; 3= moderate; 4= severe, where higher scores indicated more severity.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Psoriasis
Day -1
|
4.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
3.23 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.43
|
3.38 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.52
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Psoriasis
Week 2
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
2.52 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.87
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Psoriasis
Week 8
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
2.37 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 1.01
|
2.71 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.76
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Psoriasis
Week 4
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
2.25 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.97
|
2.63 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.92
|
|
Physician Global Assessment (PGA) Score of Psoriasis
Week 6
|
3.00 units on a scale
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
2.18 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.98
|
2.86 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.69
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 16Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.
Hematology (decrease of greater than or equal to \[\>=\] 5% hematocrit, hemoglobin \>=20 gram per liter \[g/L\]; white blood cell less than \[\<\] 3.0\*10\^9/L; neutrophil \<1.5\*10\^9/L; platelet \<100\*10\^9 /L; eosinophil greater than \[\>\] 0.5\*10\^9/L); coagulation (prothrombin, partial thromboplastin time \>1.5\*upper limit of normal \[ULN\]); chemistry (above ULN or below lower limit of normal \[LLN\] for \[sodium \>5 millimole per liter {mmol/L}; potassium \>0.5 mmol/L; glucose {fasting} \>0.83 mmol/L; glucose {non fasting} \>5.0 mmol/L; phosphorus \>0.162 mmol/L\]; creatinine \>1.36\*ULN; blood urea nitrogen/urea \>1.5\*ULN; creatine kinase \>3\*ULN; change from baseline in \[calcium \>=0.25 mmol/L; magnesium \>=0.21 mmol/L; total protein \>=20 g/L; albumin \>=10 g/L; uric acid \>0.119 mmol/L\]; fasting \[cholesterol \>7.77 mmol/L; triglyceride \>3.39 mmol/L\]); liver test (alanine amino \[A\] transferase \[T\], aspartate AT, total bilirubin \>2\*ULN; alkaline phosphatase \>1.5\*ULN; gamma glutamyl T, lactate dehydrogenase \>3\*ULN).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Laboratory Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance
|
1 participants
|
19 participants
|
6 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 16Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.
Sitting and supine systolic blood pressure (BP): increase of \>=20 millimeter mercury (mm Hg) from baseline value and \>=160 mm Hg; decrease of \>=20 mm Hg from baseline value and less than or equal to (\<=) 90 mm Hg. Diastolic BP: increase of \>=15 mm Hg from baseline value and \>=100 mm Hg; decrease of \>=15 mm Hg from baseline value and \<=50 mm Hg. Heart rate: increase of \>15 beats per minute (bpm) from baseline value and \>=120 bpm; decrease of \>15 bpm from baseline value and \<=45 bpm. Orthostatic (supine to standing): 1) systolic BP: decrease of \>=20 mm Hg from supine value; 2) diastolic BP: decrease of \>=20 mm Hg from supine value; 3) heart rate: increase of \>=30 bpm from supine value. Oral temperature \<35 degree Celsius or \>38.3 degree Celsius. Respiratory rate \<10 breaths per minute; \>25 breaths per minute. Weight \>=7% increase or decrease from baseline value.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Vital Sign Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance
|
0 participants
|
6 participants
|
2 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 16Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.
Criteria for abnormality of potential clinical importance: PR interval: change of \>=20 milliseconds (msec) from baseline value and \>=220 msec; QRS interval: \>=120 msec; corrected QT (QTc) interval (men): \>450 msec and QTc interval (women): \>470 msec.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Electrocardiograms (ECG) Abnormalities of Potential Clinical Importance
|
1 participants
|
24 participants
|
8 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: Pharmacokinetic (PK) parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Cmax) of ILV-095
|
7.39 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
19.25 microgram per milliliter (mcg/mL)
Standard Deviation 8.1558
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Time to Reach Maximum Observed Serum Concentration (Tmax) of ILV-095
|
2.01 days
Full range could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
5.98 days
Interval 1.97 to 9.21
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
t1/2 was the time measured for the serum concentration of ILV-095 to decrease by one half.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=29 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Serum Terminal Half-Life (t1/2) of ILV-095
|
13.0 days
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
15.40 days
Standard Deviation 2.7272
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
AUCinf was calculated as AUClast + (Clast/kel), where AUClast was area under the serum concentration-time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast) and Kel was the terminal phase rate constant calculated by a linear regression of the log-linear concentration-time curve.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero Extrapolated to Infinite Time (AUCinf) of ILV-095
|
5070 microgram*hour per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
13200 microgram*hour per milliliter
Standard Deviation 6828.5
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest.
AUClast was the area under the serum concentration versus time curve from time zero to the time of the last quantifiable concentration (Clast).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Area Under the Serum Concentration-Time Curve From Time Zero to Time of The Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) of ILV-095
|
5040 microgram*hour per milliliter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
12190 microgram*hour per milliliter
Standard Deviation 6803.3
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Clearance was a quantitative measure of the rate at which ILV-095 was removed from the blood (rate at which ILV-095 was metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Clearance (CL/F) of ILV-095
|
0.0197 liter per hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
0.02275 liter per hour (L/hr)
Standard Deviation 0.022558
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Pre-dose, 2, 4, 8, 24, 48, 120, 216, 312, 480, 648, 984, 1320, 1656, 1992, 2328, 2664 hours post-dosePopulation: PK parameter analysis population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of ILV-095 and had at least 1 of the PK parameters of interest. Here, "N" signifies number of participants who were evaluable for this measure.
Apparent volume of distribution was defined as the theoretical volume in which the total amount of ILV-095 was needed to be uniformly distributed to produce the desired serum concentration of ILV-095.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=28 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Apparent Volume of Distribution (Vz/F) of ILV-095
|
8.90 liter
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
11.83 liter
Standard Deviation 10.656
|
—
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, 56,112Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
Serum amyloid-A (SAA) is a low molecular weight acute phase protein. Serum samples were analyzed for SAA concentrations using solid phase sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The limit of detection (LOD) for SAA assay was 0.21 ng/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Serum Amyloid-A Levels
Baseline
|
53753.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
53161.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 86984.7
|
24316.5 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 14098.6
|
|
Serum Amyloid-A Levels
Day 14
|
74142.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
64341.8 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 121231.2
|
27118.9 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 14287.6
|
|
Serum Amyloid-A Levels
Day 56
|
114900.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
45934.9 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 62741.2
|
40405.6 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 55721.3
|
|
Serum Amyloid-A Levels
Day 112
|
62092.0 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
38173.3 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 29227.6
|
25537.1 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL)
Standard Deviation 9639.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, 56,112Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
Interleukin: group of naturally occurring proteins that are particularly important in stimulating immune responses such as inflammation. Plasma samples were analyzed for IL-6 concentrations using high sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The limit of detection for IL-6 assay was 0.00002 ng/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=2 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=60 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=16 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels
Baseline
|
4.7 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
4.8 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 7.6
|
3.6 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels
Day 14
|
6.0 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
5.5 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 6.8
|
3.4 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 2.6
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels
Day 56
|
4.7 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
4.8 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 5.5
|
2.9 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 1.3
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-6 (IL-6) Levels
Day 112
|
5.4 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
4.5 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 4.4
|
2.6 nanogram per liter (ng/L)
Standard Deviation 1.5
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, 56,112Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
Interleukin: group of naturally occurring proteins that are particularly important in stimulating immune responses such as inflammation. Plasma samples were analyzed for IL-22 concentrations using highly sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The lower limit of quantification for IL-22 assay was 0.34 pg/mL.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Plasma Interleukin-22 (IL-22) Levels
Baseline
|
636.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
334.4 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 352.7
|
1150.4 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 1229.3
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-22 (IL-22) Levels
Day 14
|
5688.3 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
1273.9 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 1642.4
|
733.3 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 708.4
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-22 (IL-22) Levels
Day 56
|
7412.3 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
2886.6 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 2260.5
|
552.0 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 377.5
|
|
Plasma Interleukin-22 (IL-22) Levels
Day 112
|
2202.4 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
3471.3 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 2368.0
|
363.1 picogram per milliliter (pg/mL)
Standard Deviation 273.6
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 14, 56,112Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication. Here, "n" signifies those participants who were evaluable for this measure at specified time-points for each arm, respectively.
CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation. Serum samples were analyzed for CRP concentrations using nephelometry.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Baseline
|
11.2 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
7.2 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
4.7 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Day 14
|
9.6 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
9.1 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 10.9
|
5.0 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.9
|
|
Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Day 56
|
13.0 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
6.4 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 6.7
|
4.9 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 2.2
|
|
Serum C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Levels
Day 112
|
12.1 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation NA
Standard deviation could not be estimated as only 1 participant was analyzed.
|
6.1 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 3.2
|
4.6 milligram per liter (mg/L)
Standard Deviation 1.8
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.
The serum samples were analyzed for anti-drug antibodies of ILV-095 by a validated electrochemiluminescence assay and participants with positive anti-drug antibodies were reported in this outcome measure.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Positive Anti-Drug Antibodies of ILV-095
|
0 participants
|
16 participants
|
0 participants
|
OTHER_PRE_SPECIFIED outcome
Timeframe: Baseline up to Week 16Population: Safety population included all randomly assigned participants who took at least 1 dose of study medication.
Injection site reactions included following symptoms: injection site itching, injection site redness, injection-site swelling, injection site pain, injection site ulceration, requirement for plastic surgery associated with an injection.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 Participants
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 Participants
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Injection-Site Reactions
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
0 participants
|
Adverse Events
ILV-095 100 mg
ILV-095 300 mg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Foot Fracture
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
ILV-095 100 mg
n=1 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 100 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
ILV-095 300 mg
n=30 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of ILV-095 300 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
Placebo
n=8 participants at risk
Participants received single dose of placebo matching to ILV-095 subcutaneously on Day 1 and were followed up to Week 16.
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Cardiac Failure
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Dry Eye
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Eye disorders
Mydriasis
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Discomfort
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal Pain
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhoea
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
25.0%
2/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Paraesthesia Oral
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Parotid Gland Inflammation
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Irritability
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Oedema Peripheral
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
General disorders
Temperature Intolerance
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Immune system disorders
Seasonal Allergy
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Fungal Infection
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Furuncle
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Herpes Zoster
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
16.7%
5/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Pharyngitis
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper Respiratory Tract Infection
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Arthropod Sting
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Muscle Strain
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Tooth Fracture
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Alanine Aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Aspartate Aminotransferase increased
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
Blood Pressure Increased
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Investigations
C-Reactive Protein Increased
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
13.3%
4/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Stiffness
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Joint Swelling
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck Pain
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Pain In Extremity
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Psoriatic Arthropathy
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Anxiety
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Impatience
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
6.7%
2/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Tension
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Bronchial Hyperreactivity
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
12.5%
1/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dry Throat
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Dry Skin
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Psoriasis
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Skin Irritation
|
0.00%
0/1
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
3.3%
1/30
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/8
The same event may appear as both an adverse event and a serious adverse event. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one participant and as non-serious in another participant, or one participant may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER