Effect of Veramyst and Olopatadine 0.2% Opthalmic Solution on Allergy Symptoms
NCT01007253 · Status: COMPLETED · Phase: PHASE4 · Type: INTERVENTIONAL · Enrollment: 21
Last updated 2013-07-17
Summary
People who have hayfever or allergic rhinitis often complain about eye symptoms associated with their nasal symptoms. How people with hayfever develop eye symptoms is not clear. The purpose of this study is to better understand the generation of eye symptoms in patients with allergic rhinitis. We have previously shown that placing the substance that subjects are allergic to in their nose causes both nose and eye symptoms. This can be explain by a parasympathetic neurogenic reflex from the nose to the eye. Such a reflex would readily explain the tearing and watery eye symptoms, but does not explain the itch. In this study, we are going to address one possible explanation for the itch; does an axonal neurogenic reflex stimulate mast cells in the eye to release histamine, which then causes the itch? We will do this by placing an antihistamine drop in the eye and challenge the nose with allergen. We will also attempt to demonstrate that mast activation isn't effected by blocking the initiating of the reflex with a nasal steroid, as done in our previous study, and showing that the addition of an antihistamine does not add to the reduction of symptoms.
Conditions
- Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
Interventions
- DRUG
-
PL nasal spray
2 puffs of PL nasal spray (from GlaxoSmithKline) in each nostril once a day for 1 week
- DRUG
-
fluticasone furoate (FF)
2 puffs of FF nasal spray in each nostril once a day for 1 week
- DRUG
-
PL eye drops
1 drop of placebo eye drops (lubricant eye drops with active ingredients 0.3% glycerin) in each eye once a day for 1 week
- DRUG
-
olopatadine (OLO)
1 drop of OLO eye drops in each eye once a day for 1 week
Sponsors & Collaborators
- collaborator INDUSTRY
-
University of Chicago
lead OTHER
Principal Investigators
-
Robert M Naclerio, MD · University of Chicago
Study Design
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Model
- CROSSOVER
Eligibility
- Min Age
- 18 Years
- Max Age
- 45 Years
- Sex
- ALL
- Healthy Volunteers
- Yes
Timeline & Regulatory
- Start
- 2009-11-30
- Primary Completion
- 2010-04-30
- Completion
- 2011-08-31
Countries
- United States
Study Locations
More Related Trials
-
Olopatadine 0.2% for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT00331500 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Olopatadine Eye Drops and Allergy Skin Testing
NCT00775658 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: NA
-
Olopatadine Hydrochloride Ophthalmic Solution Study in Chinese Subjects
NCT02322216 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Intranasal Steroids and Oxymetazoline in Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00584987 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Ocular Allergy Treatment Practical Impact Trial
NCT01808768 ·Status: UNKNOWN ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Claritin® Tablets 24-Hour in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT05265910 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Assessment of Fluticasone Propionate on Ocular Allergy Symptoms
NCT01817790 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the QLT Proprietary Olopatadine-PPDS in Subjects With Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis to Ragweed in an Environmental Exposure Chamber Model.
NCT01287338 ·Status: TERMINATED ·Phase: PHASE2
-
Intranasal Steroids and the Nasal Ocular Response
NCT00473915 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Treatment With 2 Antihistamines Used in Combination With Intranasal Corticosteroid
NCT00845195 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Single-Center Evaluation of the Pattern of Allergic Signs and Symptoms During 4 Weeks in Ragweed Season
NCT00982163 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Study Comparing Two Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Sprays in the Relief of the Signs and Symptoms of Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis
NCT01279057 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Study Comparing the Efficacy of Pataday® Once Daily Relief Extra Strength to Flonase® Allergy Relief in Subjects With Allergic Conjunctivitis
NCT05314621 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Evaluation of the Sensory Attributes of Olopatadine 0.6% and Azelastine 137mcg Nasal Sprays in Patients w/Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00772304 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Effectiveness of Olopatadine HCl Ophthalmic Solution for the Treatment of Allergic Conjunctivitis in Japan
NCT02251613 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
A Comparison of Patients on AVAMYS ® Versus NASONEX (A Trade Mark of Schering Corporation) and FLIXONASE ® on Key Health Outcome Measures
NCT01199757 ·Status: COMPLETED
-
A Clinical Study With Fluticasone Furoate Nasal Spray And Vehicle Placebo For The Treatment Of Perennial (Year-round) Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00682643 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety and Efficacy of Olopatadine 0.6% and Azelastine 137 Mcg in Vasomotor Rhinitis
NCT00979615 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Comparison of Olopatadine 0.6% and Fluticasone Proprionate 50mcg Nasal Sprays in a Two Week Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Trial
NCT00691665 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Mast-Cell Stabilizing Effects of Olopatadine
NCT00389025 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Efficacy & Safety of Loratadine-Betamethasone Oral Solution for Treatment of Severe Perennial Allergic Rhinitis in Children (Study P03428)
NCT00963573 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Alrex® Versus Patanol in the Treatment of Seasonal Allergic Conjunctivitis(SAC)
NCT01435460 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
Safety of PATANASE Nasal Spray in Patients With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis
NCT00789555 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE4
-
Safety Study of Olopatadine Nasal Spray
NCT00578331 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3
-
A Safety and Efficacy Study of Ciclesonide Nasal Aerosol in Subjects 6-11 Years With Perennial Allergic Rhinitis (PAR).
NCT01451541 ·Status: COMPLETED ·Phase: PHASE3